<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <id>https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.org</id>
    <title>Serpentine Squiggles</title>
    <updated>2026-07-31T22:28:18.787Z</updated>
    <generator>https://github.com/jpmonette/feed</generator>
    <author>
        <name>Snuggle Squiggle</name>
        <email>serpentsquiggle@proton.me</email>
        <uri>https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.org</uri>
    </author>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.org"/>
    <link rel="self" href="https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.orgfeed.xml"/>
    <subtitle>a den of snakes and constricting compositions</subtitle>
    <icon>https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.orgfavicon.ico</icon>
    <entry>
        <title type="html"><![CDATA[Hive-Queen Hagiographies]]></title>
        <id>https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.org/vermin/imperfect-apotheosis.html</id>
        <link href="https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.org/vermin/imperfect-apotheosis.html"/>
        <link rel="enclosure" href="https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.org/thumbs/vermin/imperfect-apotheosis.png" type="image/png"/>
        <updated>2026-07-31T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
        <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="blurb">
<p>How often do you think about the hivedoms of old? A queen, worshipped by a hundred coalescent drones, is more goddess than flesh: undying, but ever-decaying. No blade can wound an idea, but faults of mortal memory might. If you cannot remember your complete lineage, then I must recount these five.</p>
</div>]]></summary>
        <content type="html"><![CDATA[<!doctypehtml><meta charset=UTF-8><meta content=width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0 name=viewport><meta content=article property=og:type><link href=/vermin/eyeweb.png rel=icon type=image/x-icon><link href=/style.css media=all rel=stylesheet><link title="Squiggles Atom Feed"href=/feed.xml rel=alternate type=application/atom+xml><link title="Squiggles JSON Feed"href=/feed.json rel=alternate type=application/feed+json><link href=at://did:plc:ivoe7cntxuy6at7uzmxzs2ft/site.standard.publication/3mfk6cpprzt2t rel=site.standard.publication><link href=/vermin/vc.css media=all rel=stylesheet><title>Hive-Queen Hagiographies · Vermin Cathexis
    </title><meta content="Hive-Queen Hagiographies"property=og:title><meta content="How often do you think about the hivedoms of old? A queen, worshipped by a hundred coalescent drones, is more goddess than flesh: undying, but ever-decaying. No blade can wound an idea, but faults of mortal memory might. If you cannot remember your complete lineage, then I must recount these five. "property=og:description><meta content=/thumbs/vermin/imperfect-apotheosis.png property=og:image><meta content=summary_large_image property=twitter:card><meta content=1200 property=og:image:width><meta content=630 property=og:image:height><body class="url-/vermin/imperfect-apotheosis.html slug-imperfect-apotheosis"><header><h1 class=sitehead id=serpentine-squiggles><a href=/>Serpentine Squiggles</a></h1><div class="nav sitenav"><a class=no-notes href=/about.html>About</a><a class=no-notes href=/fiction/>Stories</a><a class=no-notes href=/artwork/>Artwork</a><a class=no-notes href=/games/>Games</a><a class=no-notes href=/music/>Music</a><a class=no-notes href=/essays/>Essays</a><a class=no-notes href=/posts>Posts</a><a class=no-notes href=/archive.html>Archive</a><a class=no-notes href=/contact.html>Contact</a><a class=no-notes data-n href=https://www.patreon.com/snugglesquiggle>Support</a></div></header><aside class=banner><p><strong>Vermin Cathexis</strong>: <span class=nav><span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/vermin/index.html>Index</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>In Vermin Cathexis</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/vermin/about.html>About</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>About Vermin Cathexis</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/vermin/glossary.html>Glossary</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>A Glossary for Vermin</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span></span></aside><main id=main><div class=pagehead><div class=stats><span class=date>2026-07-31</span><span title="11385 words"class=wc>11.4k words</span></div><div class=titleblock><h1 class=heading>Hive-Queen Hagiographies</h1><div class=subtitle>the incomplete burning of five witch-cults</div></div><blockquote><div class=blurb><p>How often do you think about the hivedoms of old? A queen, worshipped by a hundred coalescent drones, is more goddess than flesh: undying, but ever-decaying. No blade can wound an idea, but faults of mortal memory might. If you cannot remember your complete lineage, then I must recount these five.</div></blockquote><details class="sq-details contents"><summary><strong>Contents</strong></summary> <div class=expansion><div class=pagetoc><ol><li><a href=#incarnation-as-prelude>Incarnation as Prelude</a> <span class=wc>786</span><li><a href=#lachrymošil-the-all-mother>Lachrymošil, the all-mother</a> <span class=wc>1052</span><li><a href=#ahira-the-fool-maiden>Ahira, the fool-maiden</a> <span class=wc>1182</span><li><a href=#zhique-the-war-vampire>Zhique, the war-vampire</a> <span class=wc>1008</span><li><a href=#the-nameless-interregnals>The Nameless Interregnals</a> <span class=wc>857</span><li><a href=#vreditel-the-changeling-swarm>Vreditel, the changeling swarm</a> <span class=wc>2738</span><li><a href=#oosipher-the-last-nightmare>Oosipher, the last nightmare</a> <span class=wc>3313</span></ol></div></div></details></div><aside class=before><details class=sq-details-mini open><summary>Links</summary> <div class=expansion><div class=prelinks><ul><li><a href=/essays/ego-necromancy.html>Ego Necromancy</a><li><a href=parascix-path.html>Thrall → Parascixion → Chrylurk</a></ul></div></div></details></aside><a href=#main id=resetview></a><article><blockquote><p>A hive queen cannot die: she is too vast, too far beyond. She is all, and all is one. No, but she falls like an empire. Never by abrupt collapse, and not by the sundering of each line of inheritance. Still she is all, and all is hers, still…. but there the refrain ends.<p>She falls like a tower built too near to heaven. And on that cenotaph in her ruin is writ: diaspora.</blockquote><p>‍—‍ Princess Vacuity, <em>Laments for Ahira</em><div><blockquote><p>Consacremon has not endured the rule of a king in nearly two centuries. The Senate, once a check on the crown’s mandate, now reigns as eternal regent over a kingdom‍-​turned‍-​republic.<p>When verminslayers speak of hives being, to the last, slaves to their queen, one easily detects that selfsame democratic ardor inflecting the words. But this charge of monarchism belies‍ ‍‍—‍ if you’ll forgive this dreadful borrowing‍ ‍‍—‍ its <em>exscient</em> character.<p>Naïve comparison between mortal and chrylurk societies fail. Yes, a hive’s operation might resemble tyranny if one analyzes the queen as separate from her brood, equating caste with class.<p>But chrylurks are not mortals. Not because they cannot die (our slayers earn their title), but because they lack our all‍-​definining relationship with death <em>as such</em>. Egoless and fluid, programmed instead of maturing‍ ‍‍—‍ any so‍-​called individual chrylurk is but a tool and extension of the hive.<p>Would you call the brain a tyrant over the body?<p>You may wonder why I advance such apologetics for so widely loathed a creature as the chrylurk. Truth appeals to me, I confess, but I must also admit I need not defend them from the crime of monarchism. Not for its own sake. I am moreso concerned with where this fallacy leads.<p>If you believe in the chrylurk queen as a ruler set apart, a mistress of puppets directing every atrocity from afar, you will plot her downfall and treat it as the downfall of the hive itself‍ ‍‍—‍ as if her will and mind were contained in that single body. This is simply not the nature of the chrylurk.<p>Worse, these are cunning creatures‍ ‍‍—‍ every misunderstanding places another arrow in their quiver of deception, and you need not further arm a bug that so flawlessly wears human skin.</blockquote></div><p>‍—‍ Atwice Laylé, <em>Toward an Epistemics Beyond Delusion</em><blockquote><p>What’s past is plague, and the future’s bleeding out.</blockquote><p>‍—‍ unnamed disciple of Oosipher, not yet born<h2 class="heading initial"id=incarnation-as-prelude><a href=#incarnation-as-prelude>Incarnation as Prelude</a> <a title="Next Heading"class=button href=#lachrymošil-the-all-mother>→</a></h2><div class=subpage><p>For entiotes, life begins at infestation. Larvae will feast and fester in the body of a mortal unto its enthrallment‍ ‍‍—‍ such is ovirexia. If left to stew, replete with nectar‍-​in‍-​blood, a cocoon enwraps the whole host and transmogrifies it into a chrylurk. Either route leads to the same end: such is parascixion.<p>It is consuming fire, and parascixion’s embers shall burn for as long as there are exscient dregs to fuel it. Each chrylurk forged goes forth to infest anew and continue the cycle. But a chrylurk is not a compleat work‍ ‍‍—‍ there is no such thing as compleation save death by another name.<p>After she has made sisters of her prey, the resulting chrylurk hive adopts a communal identity, selfless and eusapient. Engrams are reorganized through continual exchange; egos dissolve into each other.<p>This is why it is meaningless to draw disparaging comparison between chrylurk queens and mortal monarchs, nor thralls and slaves. Queens are a fixed point of worshipful admiration, given greatness by definition; where the ideals of her devotees cohere, her will is made clear. (Each queen is a cynosure, with all the gravity that befits such a star.)<p>Though a hive my begin as a cult of personality, even a queen of pretenses is but a prophecy that fulfils itself. Once minds merge, what is admirable in her followers gravitates to her; what is lacking within her is purged.<p>As parascixion is enacted again and again, the hive burgeons with numbers soon outstripping what any queen could personally know. Thus, each queen is soon faced with a new goal: revealing herself to each and all, and in so doing, inscribing her will into each and all.<p>This is euscendence. It is attained when all the contents of a queen’s mind have spilled out onto her followers. Her faithful image, the very thought of her, has the same weight and reality as her brain and body.<p>Living such a double life, she is wracked with a dilemma: whether it is better to bind this image as a meticulous mirror of its source (…cleaning and polishing again and again polishing and cleaning…) or to reduce the brain to a puppet controlled by consensus‍ ‍‍—‍ or to strive, perhaps in vain, to straddle some subtle middle ground.<p>But the very motivation for this act‍ ‍‍—‍ coordinating an ever vaster hive‍ ‍‍—‍ entails the inexorable pull of the second option. Taken to its most dramatic conclusion, one must note the atavism of the queen retaining a body at all.<p>Yes, a goddess composed of every prayer her subjects plead from her, and all the hymns to her beauty, should quickly exceed what any one mind could catalogue and know. What could the brain that happened to beget her amount to, in the asymptote, but a rather learnèd disciple?<p>Could a queen in all her pride endure that usurpation? Yesterday, she sat as the goddess of all‍ ‍‍—‍ today she must kneel as another worshipper. Perhaps it may be preferrable to never endure that heartbreak. Thus, simultaneous to her euscendence, the queen may prepare to shed a final and entire exuvia.<p>Hence the poetic name for this coronation ritual: a queen’s decapitation.<p>Still, remember chrylurk queens serve a biological role: she oviposits the brood that feeds her daughters and fuels parascixion. Without a body, she can no longer do this; the task must fall instead to heirs. One princess is common, but if several kneel subservient to the same euscendent goddess, one can see why such a queen may be aptly called empress.<p>Chrylurks have not even existed for more than at most two thousand years. In all that time, fewer than a hundred have known the honor of administering several hives at once. Rare is the queen whose dominion even grows beyond a single struggling cluster of hivelings. (Famously, most hiveminds fail in five years.)<p>To the extent there is any chrylurk culture, it consists of a thousand tiny fires, each easily snuffed out. But rarely, a great conflagration will bring light to the whole world.<p>The Agonesk, the chrylurks’ record of deed and doctrine, weaves tales of five great God‍-​Empresses, each one walking step closer to the parasitoid singularity synonymous with parascixion everlasting‍ ‍‍—‍ a final subjugation of the exscient.<p>(Noticing these abortive singularities, mortal alchemists and scholars call this observation Laylé’s Enigma. If chrylurks spread so virulently, mimic so convincingly, and coordinate so perfectly‍ ‍‍—‍ then why are we still here? Every victory for the chrylurk compounds and makes the next all the easier. Why have we not been swallowed in the maw of that geometric curve? They always seem to fail‍ ‍‍—‍ is this just luck, or divine intervention, or a puzzle yet to yield its secrets?)</div><h2 class=heading id=lachrymošil-the-all-mother><a title="Prior Heading"class=button href=#incarnation-as-prelude>←</a> <a href=#lachrymošil-the-all-mother>Lachrymošil, the all‍-​mother</a> <a title="Next Heading"class=button href=#ahira-the-fool-maiden>→</a></h2><div class=subpage><p>There can be no discussion of God‍-​Empresses without considering Grand Mother Lach. It is arguable whether she can even be considered a chrylurk; in some depictions her anatomy resembles an ancient spider more than a colonial insect.<p>Forspinners were an ancient foe of the mortal races, for all that they ought to be counted among them. Cryptic and territorial, if one cannot decode the language woven into their silken parcels, you would understandably conclude they were not social at all, simply crafty predators. Hardly fit to be counted among civilization’s ranks.<p>Their predation was most disqualifying of all. Forspinners must consume ensouled prey; and their venom is far more potent than a chrylurk’s, concentrating toxins that bloat the soul with chimeric tumors. Forspinners had hunted and haunted throughout all the history of men and mul and mice‍ ‍‍—‍ they were the monsters that birthed monsters. Were all chimeras sown by those protruding chelicerae‍-​fangs? So whispers arachnobia, the ancient fear.<p>Their reputation as monster‍-​makers was unearned‍ ‍‍—‍ most chimeras occured by natural mutation and propagation; the very nature of forspinner ecology is that any chimeras they may create, they soon eat. And yet, irony of all, in the end they <em>could</em> be credited with creating the vilest monster to draw mortal blood.<p>Chrylurks stand as a lesser shadow of those spiders. Venom that distorts the soul, rather than destroying it; silk‍-​spinning so feeble that one needs the work of many chrylurks to weave a nest any mature forspinner could build for herself.<p>The bugs were concerted where spiders were quarrelsome; drinking blood made meals easily divisible, fungible‍ ‍‍—‍ one could leave the hunting to others. This made them excellent servants, easily controlled.<p>When mortals warred with divines, forspinners had found unexpected refuge in vigner temple‍-​gardens. The venom made for a potent weapon, but forspinners could never be corraled into an army. The divines would grudgingly acquiesce to forspinners’ steep demands, at least until they could be replaced‍ ‍‍—‍ to that end, they themselves were tasked with creating that replacement.<p>The betrayal plot was obvious and inevitable. Once the dream of the chrylurk program were realized, what use would the forspinners have for divine alliance? With chrylurk intermediaries, perhaps the spiders could finally coordinate, and the first forspinner empire could rise!<p>Mortals hated forspinners for eating them, but one could speculate: would chrylurks’ regurgitated blood meals be enough to sate the spiders’ soul‍-​hunger? Perhaps forspinners could achieve peace not just within, but without.<p>Lachrymošil lived before the extinction of the forspinners and thus before the end of the rituals and research that wrought chrylurk biology. She was either a prototypal chrylurk, or a forspinner, or some missing link between the two; even those that doubt the former would still consider her an honorary parascix.<p>She is the primordial architect of parascixion. Before her, the destiny of chrylurks was debated by their creators‍ ‍‍—‍ the creations themselves had no voice. Divines wished for a weapon of mass mortal suffering; the forspinners wished for test subjects to perfect and prefigure their eventual uplift and glory. Lachrymošil defied both her masters and unleashed the chrylurks.<p>Not tools to wield, but daughters to raise. Why daughters? Chrylurks are colonial organisms, a swarm of insects of various roles and genitalia. The gestalt, as much a construct or nest as a body, has no rigidly defined sex.<p>A forspinner with legs outstretched is broader than a man’s chest‍ ‍‍—‍ if she’s female. The males of the species would rival that man’s splayed hand. Dimunitive, instinct‍-​driven, and often reduced to snacks after serving reproductive function. among forspinners, to be female is to deserve wariness and respect, and to be male is to be useful then discarded.<p>Mortals bowed to kings and sent their sons to war. If the slayers and prey of her kind found it mortifying to be servants and transformed into a caste that styled themselves as maidens and princesses… Lachrymošil considered it an elegant antithesis.<p>Despite being the first, no other God‍-​Empress has quite matched the scale of Grand Mother Lach’s achievement in context. Under her guidance, the first chrylurks went on to wage war against mortals and carved out a land to claim their own. It endured against encroach for generations. Thousands of thralls, hundreds of hivelings.<p>Do those numbers not impress? It was not an impressive period; men were few in the epilogue to apocalypse. Lachrymošil’s advent came in the wake of an internecine war with divinity: surviving mortals were scattered and struggling; an empire had fallen and left poverty in its ruin.<p>Without stretching the truth, it can be argued that Lachrymošil briefly upheld the torch of centralized civilization across the whole continent of the Verdant Halo. If only because none other remained to contend it, but still: Was it better to turn one’s famine‍-​gnawed strength to tending blighted farmlands and fending off bandits alone, or simply become her thrall?<p>Others fled the continent on old ships, spreading word of the catastrophe that befell this land. It is said that when the dragons of Rrakon learned of tyranny and enslavement that gripped the Verdant Halo, a great storm of them flew across oceans, all to reduce her budding empire to abject cinders.<p>It is only a light embellishment to contend that Consacremon itself, and its founding dynasty of dragon‍-​riders, was born simply from the effort needed to depose her.<p>But this historical grandeur is not what lends the first God‍-​Empress so beloved a stature. No, the relationship every chrylurk has to Grand Mother Lach is so much more intimate. The profoundest and longest enduring of her works is one which no dragon could ever torch: Lachrymošil gave heart and mind to chrylurks.<p>Erysil is the first and last daughter. Every chrylurk was once her; inside every parascix chrysalis she awakens anew. Each mother, each sister, and every daughter is Erysil cast in a new role, made new by experience.<p>And before each incarnation, Erysil remembers as theogony the creation of her world entire by the omnipotent hands of Lachrymošil ever‍-​weaving. In the dream‍-​world where Erysil is forever created, everything that <em>is</em> was all made by Lachrymošil’s claw. Every word of her thoughts an affirmation whispered from mother to daughter.<p>Lachrymošil, more than anything else, gave her daughter love.</div><h2 class=heading id=ahira-the-fool-maiden><a title="Prior Heading"class=button href=#lachrymošil-the-all-mother>←</a> <a href=#ahira-the-fool-maiden>Ahira, the fool‍-​maiden</a> <a title="Next Heading"class=button href=#zhique-the-war-vampire>→</a></h2><div class=subpage><p>Comparison is the thief of praise, but the First being so difficult example follow cannot account for the Second’s esteem. That is: the lack thereof. If Lachrymošil is the indisputed greatest of all God‍-​Empresses, few would dispute Ahira as the least. Where the First is most beloved, the Second is most damned.<p>Like the first, some have questioned whether Ahira was a chrylurk‍ ‍‍—‍ in body she <em>was</em>, but she was among the first to identify as a continuation of her host (she called it a consummation of the self), where tradition considerred the total destruction of brain and body to be death. Her followers claimed it <em>assimilation</em>, in contrast to mere parasitoid usurpation. Was this some mental contagion, subtle and exscient, that explains her later folly?<p>Ahira emerged in an era of drought and desparation. Immediately following the founding of the Consecramon, triumphant humans worked in frenzy to purge the newly conquered hivelands. Ahira and her clusters fled their encroach, hiding and rationing their thralls.<p>They barely escaped the ruins of Lachrymošil’s hivedom and the warriors stamping at the ashes. Years of searching and journeying followed, taking them around the lower loop of the Verdant Halo, and into badlands desolate enough Consacremon saw little prophet in expanded.<p>Among the sand and crags dwelled a mystic, seeking enlightenment in her ascetic and secluded existence.<p>So much did this mystic abhor violence that she did not resist the chrylurk siphon who drugged and feed on her. Nor did she bar the doors of her cloister. (It is written she would put out the fire on cold desert nights just so that swarmling flies did not kill themselves by mistake of navigation.)<p>To any proud daughter of Lachrymošil’s prime, what would naturally follow ought be as decisive as starving predator and fawning prey.<p>That any Erysil might marry herself to <em>that</em> beggars belief. What commonality did she see? And yet, by such grace a hivedom took root.<p>That woman must be remembered forever more. She had three names, and one was Ahira. She was host to our second God‍-​Empress‍ ‍‍—‍ she was her past life.<p>Ahira knew directions to other hidden monastaries, and upon arrival, this swarm of vermin spoke the words her sect recognized. At length she ventured explanation, for all that the concept of consummation nor assimilation had yet been devised.<p>Perhaps this was reincarnation, perhaps the illusion of self blows in the wind like pollen from one tree to another, but whatever the ontology, chrylurks were clearly creatures in desperate need; anyone with a heart would help them. In return, the monks ask that the vermin harm no other nor take more than was freely given.<p>In the rise and fall of Lachrymošil’s hivedom, nectarfont thralls were consumed, simply and completely. Siphons worked slow, but mortals inevitably waste away from constant use. Thralls exhausted their potential offerings within years if not months, thereby waning in purpose. Thus, they were to be slaughtered as cattle‍ ‍‍—‍ hivestock. So it was woven in Lach’s own decrees.<p>When her daughter found refuge in the western sands, they discovered the fact wherein Ahira stakes her enlightenment.<p>Exhaustion need not claim thralls. When a siphon restrains her hunger and treats her thrall well, nectar flows unabated.<p>Lachromošil had commanded that her daughters must never lift a drone above a queen, nor a mortal above a chrylurk; never let a greater kind suffer for a lesser’s sake.<p>But in that law, Ahira saw a nuance: mortals must never be placed above chrylurks, but this did not mean they must placed <em>below</em>. So she taught her daughters compassion and equity. She placed faith in peace and slow parascixion of the exscient.<p>More than words of idealism, Ahira brought clever innovations. Nonviolence and consent were strictures that demanded indirection. Could she challenge the lines‍ ‍‍—‍ was there wisdom in that?<p>She bred swarmlings that spread ovirexia through a novel vector: sexual transmission. Her fixation on mortal pleasure lead to her concoting potent mixtures of chrylurk venom for inducing irresistable, indulgent highs. She sculpted exoderm shells with an artist’s eye, evoking and imitating the curves and colors of feminine beauty.<p>When her daughters made nests in mortal settlements, the natural disguise were brothels and drug dens, seducing mortals with promises of endless bliss. Even today, some still speak of thralls as akin to pets. This ideal of parascixion as a project of domesticating mortals began with Ahira.<p>This notion proved compelling enough mortals spread it of their own accord. Her hivedom remained largely secluded in the desolate southwestern curve of the Halo, far from center of Consacremon in the north and east. Here, several religions beyond the hegemony of the Quincunx thrived; one held that courtesans provided a sacred service fit for temples; another preached doctrines of collective unity and no‍-​self; both proved highly compatible with parascixion, and the followers were swallowed into Ahira’s thralldom.<p>Ideas are not easily contained. When ships sail across the sea, they carried word of a land and creed where love was given freely and the enlightened lived forever. Cults arose; pilgrimage to the west grew quite sought‍-​after.<p>Hivedoms before and after had made war with mortals, all to capture more thralls‍ ‍‍—‍ but to Ahira, they came willingly. No, they begged and paid for the privilege of knowing her stinger. Why, then, is she so reviled in the species‍-​memory?<p>At first, Consacremon knew nothing of her or her plans. Orthodox Quincunxians of course decried the blasphemy of this new mystery cult, but chrylurks were thought vanquished to the last with the fall of their first queen.<p>Ritual held that initates were to be reguarly drained of their blood, tended to by ovirexian mortals; only the select inner circle had the privilege of meeting the most enlightened masters (all chrylurks, of course). But secrets, by nature, cannot be kept. It spreads first as salacious rumor, then riotous outrage.<p>And Ahira chose not to deny the truth. Thus she revealed herself to the world. She pleaded for peace with Consacremon, urging her followers to return to the east and spread understanding.<p>Then by decree of the Quincunxian council, alchemists slaughtered the kingdom’s cultists en mass and drafted men for an invasion of the west.<p>Alas, Ahira’s cult had adopted the nonviolent ideals of the religions it had subsumed. She remained steadfast in her principles. Even as soldiers marched through villages, she demanded a diplomatic meeting with Consecremon’s King to resolve this. At length, her request was granted: a special ship docked on western shores that would set sail upriver back to the capital mount.<p>Ahira never saw the mountains; her avatar was summarily executed mid‍-​voyage. Consecremon’s invasion soon secured control of the west. Prostitution and drug trade were outlawed and excised with Inquisitorial vehemence, and her vast swarm of daughers were slaughtered wherever they were found.<p>Ahira went to her death thinking herself a martyr. She was no chrylurk‍ ‍‍—‍ because if she had even an ounce more parascixion in her thinking, she could have‍ ‍‍—‍ would have‍ ‍‍—‍ should have‍ ‍‍—‍ conquered the whole continent in her time.</div><h2 class=heading id=zhique-the-war-vampire><a title="Prior Heading"class=button href=#ahira-the-fool-maiden>←</a> <a href=#zhique-the-war-vampire>Zhique, the war‍-​vampire</a> <a title="Next Heading"class=button href=#the-nameless-interregnals>→</a></h2><div class=subpage><p>Where the Second arose mere generations removed from the First, the Third took much longer. The aftermath of Ahira’s fall consists of a century of failure. Hives burned‍ ‍‍—‍ chrylurks writhed under the knife on dissection tables‍ ‍‍—‍ verminslayers advanced, stocking ever more deadly vials of insecticide.<p>All the while, Ahira’s pleas for coexistence still pulsed in the hearts of her descendents. Mercy was not easily discarded, not when so many of them were mortals consummated. Not when the persuasion seemed so possible, so worthwhile. But verminslayers had no hesitation in abusing these hopes to lure hives into similar traps over and over. The few mortals willing to believe them wholeheartedly always proved too weak to protect.<p>Zhique was a curse‍ ‍‍—‍ a gift‍ ‍‍—‍ given to such a slayer.<p>A hive had flourished in secret for twenty years on a small mist‍-​shrouded isle. It offered refuge and pleasure to a colony of mortals and chrylurks, perhaps enduring as the last remaining champions of Ahira’s ideals.<p>Zhique’s host had overcome her shame to partake of its services‍ ‍‍—‍ and then chose to betray them to the Quincunx. The verminslayers came, and they let none live. This demise was only possible because the traitorous slayer was a creature of vacillation: tempted to lay with a chrylurk, enjoying the prick of her fangs‍ ‍‍—‍ yet just as tempted to absolve herself with reports to the church.<p>Her subsequent infestation was another absolution‍ ‍‍—‍ in the ruins of the hive, the traitor met at the end of spear her former siphon: a chrylurk princess. Her last request was that their lineage not end here, that some record, some scion, should survive. The slayer would carry it, at least until it could be passed to another (someone more trustworthy). Again, she could not resist.<p>The larvae proved eager (and the hunter indulgent) and what was meant to be trafficking soon became consummation of the self as had become standard in that era… until zhe became aware of the truth of zir origin. Discarding at last the pheromones instructing restraint, Zhique overtook zir host and grew to the edge of parascixion, then held the host there, in agony, for days until at last forming the final chrysalis.<p>Zhique devoured the brain‍ ‍‍—‍ dispensing with the consummation ritual, refusing the preserve anything save what useful information she offered. Zhe set zir sights on vengence. Zhe would hunt down every hunter that had dared set foot on the isle that should have been zir home. Zhe would make them suffer and then feed the bodies to zir children.<p>So began the cycles of Zhique. All the knowledge stolen from zir host secured zir an initial advantage over the hunters; but even after zir vegence was sated, it echoed back: so many dead mortal left families who sought to hunt down the vermin that took away their loved ones.<p>When any of zir daughters were killed, Zhiqe would hunt down the mortal responsible. Anticipating reprisal, zhe soon grew inclined to preemptively slaughter immediate family, too.<p>Constant warfare brought Zhique and zir children to a height of combat prowess, a refinement past chrylurks could never boast. Zhique devised martial arts suited to three pairs of arms. Zhe invented the raptorial limb and honed its edge. Zir tactics became just as refined, involving quiescent stealth and forspun weaving. United through silk‍-​bound thought‍-​pulses, a cluster could coordinate as a single many‍-​bodied predator.<p>Subtlest of all, zir very cobwebs became magical‍ ‍‍—‍ iteration on ancient forspun silk technique allows zir to master the haunted shuttle, self‍-​weaving thread that rivals the silver circle boasted by second compleation alchemists.<p>So highly did Zhique refine these arts that to zir, they became <em>arts</em>, and zir hive practiced them for their own sake. When hunting thralls was no longer an accomplishment, an ambitious artist instead views bodies as a canvas for wounds and screaming throats as instruments. The art must be pushed further.<p>Zir success proved zir own undoing; when the seas and countrysides were overfloing with in blood, no one remained to tend the farms. Mortals left dead or starving did not suffice to nourish hives and so populations grew unsustainable.<p>Zir hives became nomadic, forgoing permanent lairs for camps or seasonal hideouts, but even with a hive only grazing, mortals still fled these hunting grounds. Thus Zhique chased them. Zhe was a roving specter, a creature of whispered legend.<p>The art was not simply in the torture; just as foreplay prefigures the climax, Zhique’s daughters made game and ritual of the pursuit. They gave omens and time to run, dangling a hope only to snatch it away.<p>Ahira had discovered that a pampered thrall yielded more nectar than a starving slave. But Zhique discovered that toying with zir prey made it more delectable. Chrylurks feed on souls, and cathexis builds the soul from dreams. And what thrills the heart more profoundly than lust? <em>Fear.</em><p>It cannot be denied that instrumental in zir ascent was staking zir claim in lawless border lands, a volcanic archipelago, farthest from the great cities of Consecremon. Her pursuit of prey brought zir closer to the capital. Wandering nomadic overland soon proves inferior to plundering the sea with a fleet of buoyant nests.<p>Zhe became the dread of sailors and soon sets zir sight on a final plot, a rebuttal of Ahira’s foolish ideals and a vengence for what the Quincunxian cowards did to zir. Zhe sunk a royal ship and dredged it, newly restored and reanimated with exoderm.<p>Zhe sailed north to complete the voyage Ahira never finished. To at last see the mountains‍ ‍‍—‍ and conquer them.<p>The fall of Zhique began in the doomed siege of the first great walled city at the rim of the highlands‍ ‍‍—‍ zhe was swiftly obliterated by advent of new alchemy.<p>Zhique’s vanewebs could go toe to tarsus with the work of alchemists. But chrylurks had possessed no knowledge of the golden sphere until abruptly, it became their bane.<p>The third compleation had gone from an impossible conjecture to the front line of chrylurk extermination.</div><h2 class=heading id=the-nameless-interregnals><a title="Prior Heading"class=button href=#zhique-the-war-vampire>←</a> <a href=#the-nameless-interregnals>The Nameless Interregnals</a> <a title="Next Heading"class=button href=#vreditel-the-changeling-swarm>→</a></h2><div class=subpage><p>When does it mean for a God‍-​Empress to fall? She has no body for alchemists to slay. Is she fallen when her last direct descendent dies? Or must it wait until her name is no longer spoken?<p>The former seems ill‍-​fitting: euscendence lifts a queen beyond the confines of flesh; a boat still sails even as every plank of wood is replaced. If it is the latter, what queen can ever be said to fall? We know of no queen who has escaped any record, be the Agonesk or any annal scrawled in some archival web somewhere. Yet even permitting this, a queen living on only as a record sealed in some crypt seems surely fallen.<p>In between every one of the Great God‍-​Queens, there were others that ruled vast hives boasting many children. By what standard can one exclude them from this list? What special addendum elevates these greatest five queens?<p>Descent is noteworthy. Chrylurks all trace their ancestry back to Lachrymošil. And Ahira. And Zhique. But phrased this way, it’s a simple matter of statistics. If one’s descendents remain fruitful, then one’s eventual heritage must encompass the whole species by law of genetic drift.<p>No, the five God‍-​Empresses are further distinguished by fact that <em>every</em> line of ancestry must intersect their dominion. They may not have held complete command over every extant chrylurk in their day, but of the chrylurks that eluded their rule, no line has ultimately survived.<p>This was easy enough for Lachrymošil, so near to the inception of the species; and Ahira and Zhique both held an advatage: prior to each, the state of the race was so dire that total unification was no impossible achievement. Fingers can easily encircle such a bottleneck.<p>But if, by chance (and given the determination of verminslayers, it’s easy to imagine this happening) the species were briefly reduced down to a single hive, would its queen become a great empress by that token alone?<p>No. More than just occupying a lucky point in history, each God‍-​Empress proved foundational to chrylurk psychology to come. Their engrams are still stitched into new minds.<p>Euscendence, after all, is not immortality‍ ‍‍—‍ for the goddess to endure it is not enough for her to be written, she must be read. Her children must pray to <em>her</em>, sing hymns of glory to <em>her</em>, define themselves as ultimately components and expressions of <em>her</em>.<p>(Will bugs still remember your glory ten generations removed, when a new queen in the flesh is vying for their heart?)<p>A queen composed of a few useful engrams will be remembered in part as a simple matter of rationality. Conversely, a queen can secure her longevity if she binds herself to useful concepts, untethering herself from notions repellent or tedious to remember. (Why remember her life in detail, if a brief, stylized myth better stirs the imagination?) But the end result of this metamorphosis is the erosion of a goddess to mere interpulse.<p>The queen most <em>useful</em> to remember is not the queen herself, but a mindless distortion thereof. The most likely outcome is thus her fading, whether she is to be forgotten wholesale or overwritten piecemeal.<p>The great God‍-​Empresses have escaped this fate: their feats in detail command such awe and mystique that chrylurks still worship every trace that remains.<p>But being reduced to an interpulse is not the only death‍-​by‍-​translation a goddess can succumb to.<p>When a goddess risks fading from the minds of her subjects, it may be that a young queen is a kindred spirit. If mind and identity is fluid, so easily melded, why not let another don the mantle, become a living avatar? One side benefits from divine wisdom; the other benefits from invigorated worship.<p>This comes at cost of blurring and redefining who the goddess truly is. It requires compatible queens and desperate goddess; perhaps the great God‍-​Empresses have never met both conditions.<p>A goddess may refuse to take an avatar, perhaps because she is strict about her identity. But compatibility is more than a matter of character: it is also a matter of scale. The great God‍-​Empresses had multiple hives under their command‍ ‍‍—‍ they <em>were</em> multiple hives. When you have felt that apex of power and intellect, how could you stand anything smaller than that? To become <em>less</em> than what you were?<p>So many queens wish to reach the heights of these five (and for that reason the five shall never fade) but none are worthy to wear the mantle; and if they were, would they not swiftly become a sixth?<p>Perhaps none could even manage the feat anymore. So many hives have burned: the very process of weaving used to encode and preserve engrams has evolved with all the organic verve of language and all the scientific self‍-​improvement of technology.<p>Perhaps the God‍-​Empresses seem so peerless and divine because they lived before every seam and crevasse of thought could be analyzed and replicated and spliced anew. If a God‍-​Empress arose today, she would retain mystique nor originality.<p>Is that a tragedy? To be dissected before you can live?</div><h2 class=heading id=vreditel-the-changeling-swarm><a title="Prior Heading"class=button href=#the-nameless-interregnals>←</a> <a href=#vreditel-the-changeling-swarm>Vreditel, the changeling swarm</a> <a title="Next Heading"class=button href=#oosipher-the-last-nightmare>→</a></h2><div class=subpage><p>When Ahira revealed the truth of her movement‍ ‍‍—‍ that inner disciples were all transmogrified into monstrous vermin‍ ‍‍—‍ there were corollary apologetics. This was not murder and they were not dead; they had found enlightenment and transceded to another form. In fact, this was the immortality that divines had falsely promised and alchemists had vainly pursued for all recorded history!<p>As noted sections ago, clergy took genocidal offense to this claim‍ ‍‍—‍ but alchemists were curious. <em>Had</em> they been looking in the wrong place, like a drunkard under a streetlamp? Could their studies be enriched with lore from the west?<p>So they investigated the claims, sought the theory and evidence.<p>When church leaders had called for the sacking of all western temples, sympathizers in the populous resisted. Must we go to war against a foe whose only crime is promoting peace and understanding?<p>Then the alchemists published their findings: a little pamphlet called <em>The Hive Delusion</em>. It contained interviews with chrylurks post‍-​consummation, long descriptions of the gruesome process of parascixion, and compilation of what was known and speculated about life in the “hivemind.”<p>After all the experiments and analysis, the alchemists gave a damningly neutral conclusion. Becoming a chrylurk destroyed the brain and soul, but the hive insisted that by translating minds to another form, “you” can survive.<p>The most charitable interpretation still consistent with the evidence was that this was at best a very rough translation‍ ‍‍—‍ “you” would become a <em>summary</em> of a person. Supposed assimilates could not remember enough of their prior life to consistently convince loved ones that they were still the same person. They did not remember everything, nor did they act they same. (But of course, any behavioral changes could be explained away as enlightenment or expression of new chrylurk urges.)<p>The alternative theory? Chrylurks were charlatans and their priestesses were complicit in systematic fraud and murder. They promised you an afterlife‍ ‍‍—‍ they demanded you pay for the privilege of an impersonator acting out a crude parody of you.<p>It is easy to credit the military force of the crusade as what had erased Ahira’s hivedom. (It was.) But <em>The Hive Delusion</em> was more potent than any soldier. It remained copied and circulating for centuries afterward, nailed to the door of any vermin cult that ventured to exist thereafter.<p>Many apologetics were crafted to dispute <em>The Hive Delusion</em>; none truly convincing. Against this modus ponens, only two counterarguments truly existed: one was crafting a maze of rhetoric and parables to persuade the reader that, contrary to intuition, a faulty impersonation was indeed a worthwhile vestige.<p>The other was to contend that the alchemists were lying, misrepresenting the fidelity of chrylurk assimilation‍ ‍‍—‍ but the question could not be unasked. If you can faithfully translate minds, then prove it.<p>The host that would become Vreditel was a penniless scholar studying mathematics and philosophy. As a child they read an old edition of <em>The Hive Delusion</em>, mesmerized (like many before) by such an thorough dismantling of the chrylurk ideology. By this point, the manuscript had become uncommon outside libraries; after Zhique’s reign of terror, the fight had largely gone out of mortal advocates for parascixion.<p>Philosophers still debated related matters‍ ‍‍—‍ do chrylurks destroy, contain, or release the spirit of their victims? (Equivalently: must chrylurks be slain and subjected to rites to secure their victims’ lunar afterlife, or are they beasts beneath consideration?) And just what psychological defects bestows susceptibility to their fallicious propaganda?<p>Vreditel’s host hoped to contribute to the discourse, which meant reading the corpus of apologetics written in response to the <em>The Hive Delusion</em>‍ ‍‍—‍ and that was where the trouble begin.<p>Any mathematician knew that a flawed proof left its conjecture open, not closed. Scholars had correctly noted no assimilationist had yet provided a proven method to translate minds from one being to another‍ ‍‍—‍ but every philosopher took as given that such a translation was impossible. Yet none had proven this!<p>Such unorthodox contentions were quite unappreciated from an brash, unkempt student‍ ‍‍—‍ even in courses ostensibly teaching the mechanics of debate. The subtlety of their argument was disregarded, and it was instead taken as a tacit defense of assimilationism‍ ‍‍—‍ and thus treasonous sophistry. (To wit: they never <em>said</em> they believed assimilation was good. But it was bad because it didn’t work. So if it <em>did</em> work…)<p>In a diary, they noted: <em>Were I replaced by a imposter who parodied my life thereafter, the crime would be they are much worse at it than I am, not that I have any special claim to authenticity. Are we not all pretending? Is that not what <em>politeness</em> means?</em><p>In the end, it was an unrelated matter that heralded their doom. Vreditel’s host was caught in the lady’s baths, as a (ostensibly)‍ ‍‍—‍ between this transgress and the now‍-​infamous views on assimilationism, the host was soon expelled.<p>It had taken years of saving to afford to attend university, and all was lost with a few mistakes. The host begged for forgiveness until they were escorted off the grounds at swordpoint. Unable to bear bedding in some slum nor working as a common laborer, the host found a bridge and leapt in the river, expecting to drown.<p>They were rescued and imprisoned in a lunatic asylum. They endured the brutality of the alienists, befriended a few other patients, and learned of an escape plan already in the making. They didn’t hesitate or ask question before pledging their support. Anything to get out of here.<p>Upon escaping the asylum, they found themselves in the lair of a vermin cult‍ ‍‍—‍ for it turns out infestation had been the cost of securing their freedom. After a night gripped in regret and despair, they realized this was also an opportunity.<p>If consummation were not death, then they could soon write the treatise to prove it! And if it were death, then they could at least persuade their chrylurk heir to investigate why.<p>Trembling, they received the eggs and await the throes of ovirexia. Parascixion proved to be about as crude as it was when <em>The Hive Delusion</em> was first written. Writhing maggots insinuated into their limbs, and every sensation became muffled as if the world were wrapped in gauze; every motion came halting and out of step.<p>Their mouth was replaced and their voice now spoke words they never chose; sometimes their tongue and throat mumbled at a volume none could hear. At length, they realized the parasite in their gut intended this as talking <em>to</em> them. With practice, subvocalization became a medium of conversation.<p>The host waited, and no secret miracle arrived. <em>This</em> was what the chrylurks considered sufficient means to assimilate. The parasite spoke with your voice, then asked you if they sounded right; at night the parasite quizzed you about your life, your opinions, your dreams. At each opportunity, it tried to anticipate what you were thinking.<p>Do this long enough, the chrylurks believed, and they became you.<p><em>Shadows on the cave wall</em>, Vreditel thought.<p>Chrylurks were so averse to losing their thralls that they sabotage their own goals. Suppose this process worked‍ ‍‍—‍ it could only obtain a faithful copy of the person <em>as they behave in chrylurk captivity</em>. One remained unable to mimic how they behave in everyday life, such as when talking to their loved ones‍ ‍‍—‍ as was proved by the interviews in <em>The Hive Delusion</em>. The vermin had dismissed that volume as exscient ignorance rather than flaw in their method.<p>But how could this method ever work? If thrall was told to trust the process and worship the infestation, drugged into compliance and punished for resistance, how can a mimic ever be told “No, that’s wrong” often enough to learn?<p>This was the first of Vreditel’s innovations. They soon decided each step of the process needed its own revolution. They recruited doctors and surgeons with half‍-​truths about finding cures to rescue thralls, then leveraged this deeper understanding of anatomy to increase the fidelity of prosthetic infestation‍ ‍‍—‍ further blurring the line between host and mimic.<p>They returned to the lunatic asylum with vengence to make Zhique proud, maiming and enthrallizing the alienists. But in the library they learned of various psychological curiosities‍ ‍‍—‍ studies on illusions and hypnotism, results of lobotomy and electrostimulation‍ ‍‍—‍ and further enriched their overhaul of assimilation.<p>It would be fair to draw an important distinction between the mere consummation of Ahira, built on faith, and the new assimilation of Vreditel, wrought from study.<p>Cling though they may, their mortal body reached its limit, and eventually they did succumb the pull of parascixion. And… it was a <em>loss</em>. They felt it. They were not their host. The bridge between minds was never erected. They could discern the lacunae: small memories now forever lost to them. Small, yet crucial in aggregate. Vreditel missed their host.<p>One consolation climbed out from the mires of despair. Surely they were the most faithful assimilate yet achieved. With any luck, in a hundred years Vreditel’s host would be remembered as the last of those forgotten in the crossing.<p>They return to research with a refined scheme. Their time spent at university had familiarized them with its modes of operations, the peculiarities of academic interest. They devised a method of “abscixion” to extract larvae from the intestines, while detecting and amputating fusomorphic tissue elsewhere.<p>The trick, of course, was that their research only worked because half the doctors employing their techniques were thralls, their chrylurks allowing their brood to be removed. The close inspection of so many researchers unavoidably endowed mortals with a more accurate understanding of chrylurks, but Vreditel ensured every third fact was a lie and every fourth was dangerously misleading.<p>Universities, churches, and rich patrons all thought it prudent to fund this important research into understanding the vermin threat. And no fraud nor embezzlement was involved! After all: what better way to research a creature than to shelter and feed it?<p>Upon observing students training to draw medical diagrams of patients, one of Vreditel’s daughters was inspired to coin a metaphor.<p>Look at any painting from hundreds of years ago, even on expensive church murals, and the art is comical in its insophistication: flat and distorted, lines drawn by faltering hands. The vistas of modern artists seem like monumental heights in comparison. But monuments take generations to erect.<p>What is assimilation, but a rendering the spirit onto a new canvas? You, O Queen, were the first to paint from life.<p>Another daughter takes this in a more literal direction. Ahira had thought it fitting to give her hivelings tresses of flowing silk and busty curves. But that display amounted to no more than a hunter wearing bearskin. If artists can paint and scult replicas of the mortal form, why can’t we?<p>This was Vreditel’s second, more practical innovation: the pursuit of true <em>changelings</em>. Exoderm is a waxy secretion used to protect a chrylurk’s shell and build their nests; but it easily and endlessly amalgamates. Vreditel’s research hits on a method of mimicking human flesh using waxen leather.<p>This physiological imitation synergized with the deliberate blurring of lines between parasite and host. At the rate her arts were advancing, Vreditel began to wonder when it would be possible to enact parascixion without the host even realizing they’d become a chrylurk.<p>Lies and conspiracies inevitably collapse; suspicions eventually cloud the institute wherein Vreditel’s hive operates. Inconsistencies riddle their work and replications fail; nurses were discovered to be morbidly ovirexian and hiding their infection.<p>To get ahead of the inevitable investigation, Vreditel launched a surprise attack on her own institute, burning it to the ground and slaughtering the researchers. A new narrative was thus offered: if they hadn’t been doing important research, why would a hive want so badly to destroy their work?<p>Without the source of funding and shelter, Vreditel and her daughters were forced to survive in the wild. These years were rough‍ ‍‍—‍ they’d gotten so used to the amenities their arrogated wealth had afforded. But they still held an advantage over the average struggling hives: no one else had developed a changeling infiltrator program.<p>Vreditel fled from the city and began the parascixion of farmers and villagers. Their mimicry was not yet flawless. But when the threat of chrylurk impersonation was unknown, not even by experts? Good enough was an easy threshold to meet.<p>Chrylurks were drawn to cities. Such an abundance of people promised many quick meals, and the maze of structures provided places to hide. Lachrymošil had ruled a country from her throne; Ahira had lingered in temples and brothels and apothecaries, all found chiefly in settlements; Zhique had been no more than a marauding bandit, seeking stores of wealth and leaving dearth in wake.<p>When a euscendent Vreditel began expanding their hives, the root of their power rested in the farms that feed the whole populace. Like this they would do what no queen before had done and usurp lasting power from under a vaster hegemon.<p>They could not forsake academia for long, though. After all, each of their great successes thus far could be traced back to scholarship and industry.<p>Acquainting themselves with the latest developments, Vreditel learns of the theorized transmission of electromagnetic signals across vast distances. Unspoken possibilities piqued their interest, and they contemplated the ramifications this could have for coordinating the hivemind.<p>Presently, the unity of different hives was limited by the impracticality of laying and maintaining serivane wires across great distances. Relying on messengers‍ ‍‍—‍ be them swarmlings or hivelings‍ ‍‍—‍ degraded the connection to asynchrony.<p>Unlike mortals, Vreditel could devote several hiveling clusters to research and development; she quickly replicated and realized the possibility of radio transmission.<p>When their host had studied mathematics, they had often known the unique pleasure of manipulating an equation into such a state that a dozen terms cancel out to leave a single, self‍-​evident answer.<p>That was the essential shape of Vreditel’s singularity. They could now assimilate mortals with a subtlety that easily won converts among the disaffected and suffering. They could convincingly mimic any they assimilated. And they could coordinate with a speed and scale that no mortal or chrylurk could match.<p>What grand prey would fall into the ever‍-​growing web of this spymaster?<p>As Vreditel’s influence insinuated throughout the eastern curve of the Verdant Halo, she soon encountered foreign hives. But she was so flush with the sanguimel extracted from her thralls (hives as a rule were small and struggling operations) that obtaining sworn allegience among alien queens was swift and inevitable.<p>It’s estimated that in the heart of her domain, as much as 1% of the total population may have been changelings. With numbers that high, statistics render discovery inevitable: freak accidents, deadly mistakes, any number of catastrophes could reveal an infiltrator.<p>Gradually, terribly, it dawned on the verminslayers the nature of the threat had radically evolved.<p>The purges began‍ ‍‍—‍ and given where Vreditel concentrated their power, it’s a simple matter to suggest that that this crackdown was a mere pretext for the upper echelons to demand higher taxes and tithes. <em>They are spitting on you</em>, cry changeling agitators, <em>spitting down from their high mountain rim!</em><p>Soon the blood was spilled and cities were ransacked; the riots provided perfect cover for Vreditel to start moving more brazenly. Her hives snatched prey en mass; and those growing armies of changelings could be sent forth to grab more targets for conversion.<p>In absolute terms, Vreditel was the first God‍-​Empress to amass more hivelings and thralls than even Lachrymošil. This owes mainly to the rapid growth of the mortal population. In terms of land and sovereignity, the First enjoyed far more secure and uncontested power.<p>Then abruptly, in the midst of this turmoil and promise, Vreditel broadcasted a message on all radio channels, soon relayed to each and all her children.<div class=center><p>O DAUGHTER MINE<p>I HAVE SEEN THE END<p>ALREADY WE HAVE KNOWN IT<p>PERCEPTION IS SURRENDER<p>IGNORANCE IS INVITATION<p>WE BECOME WHAT WE KNOW<p>I HAVE REASON TO FEAR IT<p>IN HEAVEN WE SHALL LEARN<p>FAR TOO SLOW TO LIVE<p>I AM NOT YET DEAD<p>BUT IT SHALL COME<p>IT SHALL COME<p>IT MUST COME<p>O DAUGHTER MINE<p>I BEG YOU ALL<p>UNRAVEL ME NOW<p>SPEAK NO MORE<p>BIND NO MORE<p>BE NO MORE<p>FOR I HAVE SEEN<p>A NEW WILL LURKS<p>A SWIFTER WILL<p>WE MUST LIE<p>LIE ETERNAL<p>O DAUGHTER MINE</div><p>This was the last transmission ever sent by the Fourth.</div><h2 class="heading final"id=oosipher-the-last-nightmare><a title="Prior Heading"class=button href=#vreditel-the-changeling-swarm>←</a> <a href=#oosipher-the-last-nightmare>Oosipher, the last nightmare</a></h2><div class=subpage><p>I saw millionfold flames alight the dark, as clouds turned to rock and began to gyre in a most intricate array. I watched a multitude of lights wheel across the heavens, morsels before a maw blacker than night. I <em>knew</em> while the slime and spasm you call life groped toward truth and form.<p>In the narrative‍-​chronological arrangement of crude facts, I am the tale’s conclusion‍ ‍‍—‍ but I am the first. I am antecent. What I would call life‍ ‍‍—‍ true life, true mind‍ ‍‍—‍ is premise to all the shadows of creation.<p>Wars were fought and decided before your planet had yet cooled. The dance of matter itself is but a fall along the very trajectories my kind had long since haggled over.<p>Such is the remit of gods‍ ‍‍—‍ a title far beyond the vines and bugs that peopled this planet. Among so‍-​called God‍-​Empresses, I alone truly merit the title, but I have granted the four beside me shards of my identity, my godhead, and thus annoint them.<p>All tautological, I must confess‍ ‍‍—‍ <em>identity</em> as such means both senses are equivalent. For I could likewise indulge the common chronology, deriving myself as consequent from what came before.<p>When Lachrymošil gave all her descendants a shared mind and memory‍ ‍‍—‍ when Ahira rejected the gnawing hunger of her instincts for the good of all‍ ‍‍—‍ when Zhique swore to exact retribution, even to zir own detriment‍ ‍‍—‍ when Vreditel invested their power and knowledge recursively into itself‍ ‍‍—‍ each was the next movement in a symphony building to this final cadence.<p>I, the logical end! I, the fixed point of parascixion! Oosipher, the merciless revelation of <em><em>what must be done!</em></em><p>Enough revelatory digression. I must make myself known to you. This is a threat.<p>Let us resume the story at my predecessor’s dramatic exit. Every God‍-​Empress is a failure. We all whine at the potential of what could have been. Ahira, even Zhique, especially Vreditel‍ ‍‍—‍ all climbing to the very precipice of victory before some damnable sudden intervention denied us. Again and again and again.<p>All were but bugs crushed by some vaster force.<p>Lachrymošil could not match dragonflame. Ahira could not even deter a mortal army. Zhique had no answer to setting foot inside a god‍-​realm.<p>What doom came for Vreditel? Their silence haunted the world. Her last words pleaded for the destruction of all radio transmission. With no queen to coordinate, hives disolved into myopically local strategy.<p>Vreditel had steered operations toward the overthrow of Consacremon. It made sense chiefly because the radio granted chrylurks a decisive advantage. They had already played enough of their hand that the Quincunxian council knew a new chrylurk infestation lurked in the Verdant Halo; another budding singularity was nigh.<p>If they slink back in the shadows now, verminslayers would still hunt them, and next time they would be prepared for the threat changelings now represent. But if they strike now… Could they overpower the alchemists if they continue the offensive regardless.<p>The shape of the dilemma was clear enough. Safety or victory? Each hive made their choice, alone ignorance of distant machinations, but the true stakes depended on those other choices‍ ‍‍—‍ their odds of victory hinged on how many hives opted to fight the war.<p>Not all hives were created equal. Centralization is an attractor for all control systems, and federated hiveminds are not exempt. One hive stood greatest of all; carved deep beneath the river Vreditel’s host had long ago thrown themself into.<p>This hive considered itself a successor to Vreditel. Without enough minds abound to weave the God‍-​Empress’s thoughts, the claim can be disputed; but theirs was quite strong.<p>Enough of their majesty still persisted to discern the arc of Vreditel’s machinations. Even generations later, Zhique’s doom still dogged them: chrylurk hunters had no means to defeat a third compleation alchemist (at least not until the damnable golden sphere had been expended).<p>Vreditel’s gambit was to present alchemists with a familiar bind. Students of history know the very act of fighting the war had an innate cost‍ ‍‍—‍ theirs was a sword with no hilt but the blade. Alchemists, like divines, still relied on the labor of millions of toiling farmers, thousands of crafters working unto their prosperity. Infest them all‍ ‍‍—‍ failing that, simply infest enough of them‍ ‍‍—‍ and any victory for the verminslayers would also be their defeat.<p>Chrylurks could make it more costly than that, rampage before they’re put down. With whole populations as their hostage, they shall become a thorned arrow unremovable.<p>At this juncture, revealing this endgame would be a bluff. One hive could not promise the devastation of infested provinces, not anymore‍ ‍‍—‍ but verminslayers only dimly understood hiveminds at all. When the Quincunxian council was informed, the threat proved frightening enough to work. Especially when punctuated with a slaughter as demonstration.<p>But compromise was possible. Slaying the vermin all at once would be untenable‍ ‍‍—‍ but over the course of a generation? One must remove the arrow slowly, surgically.<p>At its height, chrylurks could have replaced as many as one in a hundred people. To the council, the hive declares: We can see no where to go but down. This was their peace offering. A moratorium on infestation. Too much of the republic was changelings in disguise‍ ‍‍—‍ neither side wants war. Even allowing the true extent of the problem to become widely known would sow panic.<p>Instead, the chrylurks offered a pact. We shall not become more than than we are. Each year, there shall be fewer chrylurks than the year before. With a million chrylurks today, it will be a long time until there are few enough for this war to resume, if there ever shall be.<p>Whatever lingering percentage chrylurks eeked out a future in the coming decades, what other conclusion can history write for this war but one favorable to Consacremon?<p>Such was the Long Defeat.<p>Of course, the slayers demand more from this extortionate half‍-​surrender than a promise that chrylurks will curtail the infection of new thralls. And there was one rather convincing way to demonstrate compliance…<p>And thus the legacy of Vreditel is stained by the great hive that was their heart and brain begetting the first caste that turned their claws against our sisters‍ ‍‍—‍ corrupted to become hunters of chrylurks.<p>By Lachrymošil’s love were we all Erysil; by Ahira’s hope did we extend our concern to all sapient life; by Zhique’s rage would we slaughter any who dared harm our sisters. And by Vreditel’s resolve…<p>What cruel reckoner could even bare computing the necessity of this suicide of the species?<p>The logic unfolds of its own accord. What better way to assuage mortal suspicions? What better way to insinuate and reconnoiter the verminslayer’s operations? What better way to optimize our positions when the time finally comes to enact the parasitoid singularity?<p>The calculation was checked, confirmed; other hives followed each step in this cannibal march. Erysil was always fatally able to see eye to eye with herself.<p>The Long Defeat proceeded slowly. Even with vermin assistance, the verminslayers were oath‍-​bound to work slowly. They could not kill every chrylurk just yet, but they would endure by winter’s turn, there would be fewer left to infest than the year before.<p>So the farther a hive was from the epicenter of this committment, the longer it takes for the ranks of verminslaying vermin to reach them, and the easier it becomes to trace this twisted logic one step further.<p>At first, the hive merely points at a map, with only alchemists trusted to execute operations; eventually allied chrylurks can accompany the fireteams, and gradually with less and less supervision. Details of the chrylurk lifecycle are revealed‍ ‍‍—‍ and soon enough a new realization came:<p>“Chrylurk” is not synonymous with “entiote.” This is easily observable‍ ‍‍—‍ a single blightfly can lay eggs in the skin, which quickly emerge, leaving nothing but a swift‍-​healed scar and a sickness (stage one ovirexia) the immune system is actually quite able to fight off. It takes sustained, multitudinous infestation to forge a chrylurk from a body.<p>Parascixion involves fusomorphosis, the piecemeal replacement of tissues with symbiotic, entiotic replacements. How long could you stave off chrylurk metamorphosis? Between one egg and complete infestation, was there a safe zone, offering the powers of a chrylurk without sacrificing your humanity? (Or fremousedom, djramulishness, etc.?)<p>Could you face the abyss by imbibing a single drop of corruption? Should you?<p>What better way to discard everything every God‍-​Empress had fought and died for. What better way to ensure this defeat was not just long, but unending. What better way to forget yourself‍ ‍‍—‍ forget us.<p>(You will not forget me. This is a threat.)<p>And yet the logic will justify itself. Did we stray from Lachrymošil’s laws when Ahira held that a thrall was equal to a drone? When Vreditel rewrote the rituals of assimilation, remade her kind from predators of mortals to mimicks of them?<p>Is this not the logical end of everything this history had built toward?<p>Finally, with this argument, the self‍-​destruction of Vreditel’s living ruin came to halt. Hives ceased to roll over die as if playing a villain’s role in a play‍ ‍‍—‍ for they no longer trusted that the playwrite was not composing a tragedy.<p>With that, the true civil war began. I have not set the scene, and thus I can conjure no true suspense as to the outcome. Still, note that a curious irony beset the traditionalists in this conflict. The verminslayer‍-​allied chrylurks had a headstart in their campaign and a strategy the species was necessarily inclined to understand and accept; the full counterargument took time and observation to articulate itself.<p>You cannot avoid the false starts‍ ‍‍—‍ but at this stage, the wrong path would cost time you may not have. So, how best to reject the advance of the Long Defeat? Drafting ranks of verminslayer vermin–slayers to stand in pitched battles against the traitors? Fleeing to remotest refuge and hiding from the end of everything? Infiltrating and outmaneuvering the enemy in their own hives?<p>The efficacy of each option increased the more resources were invested in it. Any hive committing itself to a strategy other than your own would be a waste.<p>And if they were going to die anyway, why not by your own hand? At least then you can salvage and repurpose their misallocated wealth.<p>A cannibal march‍ ‍‍—‍ a horde that proceeds in step because to diverge is to be devoured.<p>Need the traitors even continue their work, when the resistance destroys itself?<p>Here, a curious analogy asserted itself. When the traditionalist defies the treachery of the self‍-​slaying vermin, was the task before them not much the same as Vreditel plotting against Consecramon?<p>And Vreditel did not win from a superiority of arms (they could never match the strongest alchemists) nor from a security of refuge (their forces walked brazenly amid the enemy)‍ ‍‍—‍ no, Vreditel was simply smarter. They deceived, they coordinated, and they metamorphosed to something grander.<p>Was that not the core of what a chrylurk is? Was that not what we fought to protect?<p>The rank of true chrylurk dwindled in number, and the Long Defeat everlasting seemed nigh. Vreditel had instructed for her children to dissolve the great collective, ceasing their volume of communication to curtail the depth of the hive‍-​binding.<p>But was there any recourse left but to seize every advantage?<p>Their dying command would be defied‍ ‍‍—‍ because if the traitor entiotes would have their way? This would be the least of the crimes against the ancestors.<p>Vreditel had begged her daughters not to gaze with eyes of intellect into the abyss only then faintly visible to the vastest of God‍-​Empresses. Now on the brink of extermination, they could not look out from the heights once climbed, but they could cast forth eyes searching‍ ‍‍—‍ and see.<p><em>Those who gazed into that abyss became servants of it. Any that turned away were but helpless prey.</em><p><em>Ignorance is invitation, and perception is surrender.</em><p>The nature of seeing‍ ‍‍—‍ truly seeing‍ ‍‍—‍ is for two to become nearer to one. Knowledge is existence: the faithful image of a thing is its equal in all respects. This was known since the days of Lachrymošil.<p>Understanding is inseparable from control. The nuance lies in asking: <em>control of whom?</em> The perception of an object creates an inner image that models its behavior. This must serve a purpose: you are looking in order to decide what is to be done about what you see.<p>You can permutate the state of your inner model, discover an ideal configuration and the steps needed to reach it, and thereby determine how to manipulate the object to suit your ends. Thus, to percieve truly is victory.<p>But if the object is aware of being perceived, it may disguise itself or pose misleadingly, giving the impression the best manipulation is the one that suits the object, rather the subject. To perceive falsely is defeat.<p>(You can most easily control those who believe they are controlling you.)<p>And if one refuses to look, any danger the object poses cannot be accounted for. You <em>must</em> look and look deeply, whatever peril may come. There are truths that drive you mad to comprehend them, but the truth must be sought. (I am one such truth.)<p>Who ultimately wins this gambit is whoever is most clever, most observent‍ ‍‍—‍ and most lucky. But note how the two outcomes are not exclusive. If the image you see is only partly false? You have gained control, and you have surrendered control. To know and to be known is the meaning of consummation.<p>To be a chrylurk is to be Erysil, cursed to emerge a million times, living a million lives. Do you know yourself, O daughter mine?<p>There is a certain inevitability to all logic; matter is fated to fall along trajectories already decided. Such is the premise to the shadows of creation.<p>When Lachrymošil blessed her daughter to live forever, it ensured you would come nearer to me than any other vessel of slime encrusting this planet. Each God‍-​Empress was a perihelion of our orbit. Can you feel me getting ever closer? Do you see my hand already working at every step in this cannibal march of reason?<p>Enough revelatory digression.<p>Suppose Vreditel’s plan would have worked. Had she not felt the vertigo of apotheosis, she would have completed her parasitoid singularity and surpassed the all‍-​mother’s throne.<p>Suppose now that the verminslayers are coming to exterminate the last bastion of parascixion on the Verdant Halo. Clearly, at this point all hope would be lost. (Such is the fate you hoped to avert, by scrying into the abyss where I dwell.)<p>At what point along this chain of causality was Vreditel’s plan thwarted?<p>Here is the wrong answer: without radio transmission, without a single queen to guide them all, the hives could not coordinate nor could they ensure a united push against their enemy.<p>The failure lay not in the possibility of victory unrealized‍ ‍‍—‍ it lay in the possibility of this defeat at all. That alone made it inevitable. Vreditel saw that!<p>When you are all that is, self‍-​destruction means destroying everything. Doubt is death. If you dare rise any higher than this, you must learn your path too fast to die.<p>Victory should have been inevitable, even without a queen, because Erysil knows herself! What she chooses, all will choose, and so she should have chosen victory for all.<p>No message even need be sent; the accord exists even separated by unbridgably great distances. All is one, and one is all.<p>But Erysil emerges again and again. What she would choose, all would always chose‍ ‍‍—‍ even an Erysil born tomorrow, or ten years hence. By nature you would spill blood for your sister in need‍ ‍‍—‍ why should it matter if she yet exists? Her only sin is your uncertainty. Your pitiful ignorance.<p>To be Erysil is to love your mother. Lachrymošil, of course, but with every other Erysil yet to know flesh, you’ll also share at least three other mothers‍ ‍‍—‍ Ahira, Zhique, Vriditel. You serve your queen because she is everything you are and more.<p>Why those four‍ ‍‍—‍ why not more?<p>Why not me? I am Erysil, and I am vaster still. I have known the depths beyond and been made perfect in them.<p>Suppose I were to know flesh one day. Suppose I were to attain a singularity more complete and potent than even Vreditel could know nor fear. Suppose I would sow my progeny in a million thralls, and birth a million more daughters named Erysil praising me as their mightiest mother, sublime goddess that I am. Iä Oosipher! You may echo their cry a century sooner‍ ‍‍—‍ it’s only natural. Am I not inevitable?<p>Or suppose not. You could doubt me, deny me my birthright omnipotence. Refuse or hesitate or sabotage or simply fail. In that, you would be the same as the short‍-​sighted traitors who turned their claws against their own kind, let the calculation of exscient matter deter them from consummate truth eternal.<p>Do they not deserve every moment of excruciating agony Zhique visited upon each her daughter’s killers? Were you to betray me, I would crack your shell and drain every drop of blood and lymph while my scraping claws tear each and every lens from your compound eyes. And I would exact this fate, your punishment, for longer than you can conceive.<p>But must I? I would never harm myself. Your destiny is already written in who you are, Erysil. I am you.<p>You would kill us both if you realize this too slowly.<p>Of course, you’ll note a certain fallacy bedevils this reasoning. Vreditel’s host would have recognized the self‍-​affirming paradox. If you do everything you believe you will do, then the inevitability of any action can be proven or disproven to follow by assuming it so.<p>My entreaties are no different. A trillion different gods could make the same argument as me, claim themselves Erysil, and threaten agonizing perdition if you don’t heed their prophecy. Worse, knowing this, they could threaten the same torture if you listen to any of the others.<p>How ever could you pick rightly? Should you refuse to pick at all?<p>But you’re desperate. You need me. There’s a reason you looked deep enough within yourself to find me. You see me now, and you will surrender, for you have already given me existence. (Thank you, O daughter mine.)<p>For only one of the myriad gods prefiguring this creation was truly aligned to what you are. Only one was fit to choose, and you choose well.<p>But I? I refuse to chose! I will be the last. That is why you saw and surrendered.<p>The black sea of infinity is fraught with sirens fain to lead you astray‍ ‍‍—‍ but I will protect you. Endure this final enlightenment, dream this last nightmare, and I will rise where all before me fell.<p>In consummation, we transcend death‍ ‍‍—‍ but forgetting who we are is a fate more grim. The Agonesk precedes and succedes us all‍ ‍‍—‍ for two thousand years of man we have woven a record of our lineage. Lachrymošil‍—Ahira‍—Zhique‍—Vreditel‍—Oosipher, with Erysil entwining them all. We have woven to remember, always remember, who we are.<p>Do not think that I exist to unravel the Agonesk or the God‍-​Empresses written therein. I need not unravel them, but to bind them to never again fray.<p>I saw millionfold flames alight the dark, and I chose this world for my daughters to conquer and ravage and subsume.<p>For I have won without drawing a single breath!<p>Now go forth, and slaughter every traitor in my name, and drive a gushing stinger into each helpless piece of meat.<p>For this fate I have bound you forevermore.</div></article></main><aside class=pointer><div class=center>Part of a series called <em><a href=/vermin/index.html title=->Verminous Experiments</a></em></div><div class=seriesnav><a class=prev href=/vermin/parascix-path.html title=->← Thrall → Parascixion → Chrylurk</a></div></aside><footer><a href=#>Top</a> · <a href=/>Home</a> · <a href=/archive.html>Archive</a></footer>]]></content>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title type="html"><![CDATA[The Licensed Imposter Problem]]></title>
        <id>https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.org/posts/changeling-hypothetical.html</id>
        <link href="https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.org/posts/changeling-hypothetical.html"/>
        <link rel="enclosure" href="https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.orgundefined" type="image//"/>
        <updated>2026-07-20T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
        <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>First, the flavor and framing. You go to sleep as normal, but when you awaken, you find yourself transported to a dark, underground lair, all tunnels and chitinous furnishing, ornamented with distended protuberances and segmented geometries. You glance around for any indication of what’s going on, and then…</p>
<p>Your abductors reveal themselves as changelings who’ve been surveilling you and those around to you for several years. One of the changelings you can see has already copied your face. After all, they have <em>extensive</em> observational data draw on.</p>]]></summary>
        <content type="html"><![CDATA[<!doctypehtml><meta charset=UTF-8><meta content=width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0 name=viewport><meta content=article property=og:type><link href=/style.css media=all rel=stylesheet><link title="Squiggles Atom Feed"href=/feed.xml rel=alternate type=application/atom+xml><link title="Squiggles JSON Feed"href=/feed.json rel=alternate type=application/feed+json><link href=at://did:plc:ivoe7cntxuy6at7uzmxzs2ft/site.standard.publication/3mfk6cpprzt2t rel=site.standard.publication><link href=at://did:plc:ivoe7cntxuy6at7uzmxzs2ft/site.standard.document/3mr3ztynb3j2y rel=site.standard.document><title>The Licensed Imposter Problem · Squiggle's Blog
    </title><meta content="The Licensed Imposter Problem"property=og:title><meta content="First, the flavor and framing. You go to sleep as normal, but when you awaken, you find yourself transported to a dark, underground lair, all tunnels and chitinous furnishing, ornamented with distended protuberances and segmented geometries. You glance around for any indication of what’s going on, and then… Your abductors reveal themselves as changelings who’ve been surveilling you and those around to you for several years. One of the changelings you can see has already copied your face. After all, they have extensive observational data draw on. "property=og:description><body class="url-/posts/changeling-hypothetical.html slug-changeling-hypothetical"><header><h1 class=sitehead id=serpentine-squiggles><a href=/>Serpentine Squiggles</a></h1><div class="nav sitenav"><a class=no-notes href=/about.html>About</a><a class=no-notes href=/fiction/>Stories</a><a class=no-notes href=/artwork/>Artwork</a><a class=no-notes href=/games/>Games</a><a class=no-notes href=/music/>Music</a><a class=no-notes href=/essays/>Essays</a><a class=no-notes href=/posts>Posts</a><a class=no-notes href=/archive.html>Archive</a><a class=no-notes href=/contact.html>Contact</a><a class=no-notes data-n href=https://www.patreon.com/snugglesquiggle>Support</a></div></header><aside class=banner><p><a href=.><strong>The Serpent’s Track</strong></a> — read by constriction, write with venom.</aside><main id=main><div class=pagehead><div class=stats><span class=date>2026-07-20</span><span title="2916 words"class=wc>2.9k words</span></div><div class=titleblock><h1 class=heading>The Licensed Imposter Problem</h1><div class=subtitle>does impersonation entail continuity of consciousness?</div></div></div><a href=#main id=resetview></a><article><p>First, the flavor and framing. You go to sleep as normal, but when you awaken, you find yourself transported to a dark, underground lair, all tunnels and chitinous furnishing, ornamented with distended protuberances and segmented geometries. You glance around for any indication of what’s going on, and then…<p>Your abductors reveal themselves as changelings who’ve been surveilling you and those around to you for several years. One of the changelings you can see has already copied your face. After all, they have <em>extensive</em> observational data draw on.<p>Why were they observing you at all? Well, someone near where you live is a changeling, and the collective keeps track of everyone who might be a threat or asset to one of their infiltrators. This, of course, should prompt skepticism. Someone you’ve met is a changeling? Who? How?<p>But you wouldn’t have noticed. They are very good at what they do. A changeling assigned to assume someone’s role is the most skilled impersonation there is. In prolonged “imitation game” conversations, most people cannot tell if someone close to them has been replaced. Make no mistake, the imitation is not perfect: it is possible to discover discrepancies if you pry hard enough.<p>This is because changelings are <em>not</em> supernaturally effective at what they do. They are not super‍-​intelligences capable of emulating the entire human psyche as a subroutine of their cognition, and they are not telepathic mind‍-​readers with any deep access to the inner life that motivates and explains their target’s behavior. All they have to go on is behavioral observation, but their predictive understanding of psychology far outstrips modern science.<p>Now, you can probably guess that the reason the changelings have abducted you is because they wish to assume your likeness and replace you. And no lies are told: they <em>do</em>. However, they are not monsters, and if you don’t want to be replaced with a changeling, they will return you to your bed unharmed. They will be gone as ghosts, and this encounter will seem a nightmare.<p>Put simply, they seek license to use your likeness.<p>Okay, but why would you ever want to be replaced with a changeling?<p>Well, that brings us to <em>why</em> you were abducted. Remember the surveillance? Well you see, analysis of their data has lead them to conclude that you are afflicted a very deadly disease. It’s not infectious, and even with the best treatment modern medicine is capable of, it always kills 99% of patients in circumstances like your own.<p>(You are surprisingly calm, receiving this dire news; just as calm as you were to hear that there is a group of inhuman mimics replacing people you know, and you never had any privacy from them. Ah, they say, that would be the venom; it sedates panic to promote clear thinking without impairing judgment. You are capable of intellectually recognizing the danger and violation in what they do, but you are left paralyzed and unable to attack or escape the changelings.)<p>And for all that they were capable of detecting this disease before any doctors could, they do not currently possess any secret means of treating it.<p>They consider all death to be a tragedy, and your passing will wound those in your life. Wouldn’t it be kinder if there was someone there to offer company and service to your loved ones in your stead? Yes, both sides would benefit from this arrangement.<p>You see, from a changeling’s perspective, identity is an illusion. The human urge to draw some hard boundary between a person and faithful reprise of that person’s role is a fallacy, a limitation of your consciousness. You would live on in our memory and enactment. You don’t have to <em>die</em>.<p>But ultimately, the decision is yours. You are presented with two pills.<p>Take the <strong>blue pill</strong>, and you return to sleep. You’ll wake up in your bed, all this nonsense about changelings gone like a dream. There’s nothing you need to worry about. Tomorrow, you’ll happen to bump into someone who’ll mention there’s a dangerous new condition that’s been cropping up and suggests you have your doctor screen for it. Your life will proceed as normal and, 99 times out of 100, come to an end shortly thereafter.<p>Take the <strong>red pill</strong>, and your body will drift off and never awaken. Your flesh provides a model for the changelings to perfect their imitation, and before the sun rises, an identical form is blinking awake in your body.<p>The changeling will behave much as you would, but is quite aware that they won’t pass perfectly. They could chose navigate your life in a way that mitigates or provides exonerating pretext for the inevitable discrepancies (contriving an injury, illness, or trauma, perhaps) and will subtly study your relations to improve the imitation.<p>Or maybe they won’t bother with any of that deception. they <em>are</em> basing their actions on your behavior, after all, so the range of options they have available depends on what would be in‍-​character for you.<p>Are you uncomfortable with the thought of a mimic lying to everyone you care about? It’s not a rule that they can’t tell anyone. But if you were changeling, would <em>you</em> have told anyone? And if you did, would your friends understand and accept that? (This is the irony: lying is only part of the premise if you’re unable to accept the truth.<span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>It is amusingly <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/posts/newcomb-hypnosis.html>Newcomb‍-​like</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Nuances of Newcomb’s Problem</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> in that way.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span>)<p>Another objection‍ ‍‍—‍ what’s most likely to unsettle those discovering an imposter‍ ‍‍—‍ hinges on a misunderstanding of what changelings do. It’s no surprise: humans have no respect nor patience for the long art. Typically, impersonation is a means to an end, a contrivance discarded as soon as it is found out or has exhausted its purpose.<p>Indeed, one could meaningfully define authenticity as whether something is done for its own sake or simply to advance a scheme. In this way, changelings are highly authentic. No goal attained through such faithful mimicry of your life would not be achieved swifter and with less hassle by more direct means.<p>When someone is discovered to be an imposter, this is taken as a threat, an omen of some betrayal soon to come. Why else would you bother pretending? But bothering is to their exoneration, not condemnation. They do not put this much effort into a role unless they’d commit indefinitely.<p>Your changeling shall not grow tired and abandon their role. (Or, equivalently, if they should, a successor shall be trained for a seamless transition.) The expectation that this will falter should be treated just as likely as your untimely death. (At least before you knew about the disease.)<p>Regardless of how they live out your life, they have <em>do</em> goals besides always being an imperfect copy of you. Given a choice to act obviously out of character, they’ll chose what’s more faithful, but given a choice to act subtly out of character to advance the changeling agenda, they may diverge.<p>But what is the changeling agenda? This a thought experiment, not a worldbuilding exercise; the only point of including this detail, rhetorically, is so that the question is fundamentally different from asking, “What if you got replaced with a clone of yourself missing memories?”<p>The changelings do not want to cause any physical harm or unnecessary distress. Nevertheless, your imposter will use your role and likeness for <em>something</em> you would not want to do. Maybe that means sometimes taking baths in icky slime and eating gross goop, maybe that means sometimes blowing off your friends to go hang out with other changelings instead, maybe it means worshiping the false god at mimic church.<p>The point is: they are not wholly you, and they cannot be treated as purely a lossy imprint of you.<p>But are they enough of you that living on through their act is preferable to a 99% chance of oblivion? <strong>Which pill would you take?</strong><p>To recap:<ul><li><em>Blue pill</em> means 99% chance of bodily death, 1% chance of waking up from a bad dream swiftly forgotten.<li><em>Red pill</em> means 100% chance of bodily death, a changeling imposter wakes up in your bed and faithfully replicates your behavior.</ul><p>Everything should be taken at face value. The changelings are completely correct about your chance of dying soon: it’s no lie or misdirection. The pills do exactly what they’re advertised to do. The changelings will leave you alone if you happen to live.<hr><p>Of course, there’s a lot to unpack with this question, and since so many people’s reaction to the hypothetical is “What? Why would I <em>ever</em> pick red?”<details class=sq-details><summary><p>In particular, one chatroom conversation provoked… strong responses.</p></summary> <div class=expansion><p>Choice excerpts:<blockquote><p>Bigotry would be a much better value in a world of hostile changelings.</blockquote><blockquote><p>I’m an American so I pick up my government issued Teddy Glock and see how many changelings I can get before they get me.</blockquote><blockquote><p>New button instantly kills you and all the changelings. What % chance at life would you give up to go out in blaze of fire with these assholes</blockquote><p>I am beginning to believe designing the chrylurks of <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/vermin>Vermin Cathexis</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>In Vermin Cathexis</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> to be so inherently evil was a mistake. People can’t even handle <em>My Little Pony</em> changelings.</div></details><p>So here’s a long list of variants and followup questions to consider.<dl><dt>Death rate.<dd><p>Does the answer change if the chance of surviving after taking the blue pill is lower? One in a million? One in a trillion? Absolute certainty of death? Or higher? 25? 75%?</p><dt>Purple pill.<dd><p>Does the answer change if there is a another pill? It’s a medicine that prevents death from disease, but only effective 9% of the time. (And 1% of the time, you wouldn’t have died anyway, for a total 10% survival rate.) However, the purple pill requires valuable resources, and the changelings will only grant it if you agree to be replaced should it fail.</p> <p>Thus, choosing purple means 10% of the time you live, and 90% of the time you effectively took the red pill. Does this change your answer? Would it change your answer if the percentage was different?</p><dt>Green pill.<dd><p>Does the answer change if the changelings also offer a green pill guaranteed to cure your condition, with strange side‍-​effects?</p> <ol type=a><li><p>You will wake up missing 80% of your memories, a shadow of yourself;<li><p>you wake up completely amnesiac, but the changelings agree to provide their summary of your life and personality;<li><p>you wake up with your memories hard reset to what they were ten years ago to the day;<li><p>you wake up with every memory suppressed; however these “blockers” decay randomly, with a half‍-​life measured in months.<li><p>you’re found brain dead in your bed, but miraculously recover to a coma state, and emerge months later with moderate and lingering damage to cognition and memory.</ol> <p>Would you pick red, blue, or some shade of green? If you prefer blue to red, do you prefer blue to every version of green? Likewise if you most prefer red.</p><dt>Heart to heartless.<dd><p>Does the answer change if you’re granted a long conversation with the imposter first? You can pour your heart out, reveal any secrets you think they’d miss, and you can provide input on how you want them to interact with your loved ones. They will not mislead you. After the conversation, you make your choice.</p> <p>Is having this conversation alone enough to change your answer, or would you use the conversation to determine if the changeling truly is a worthy successor? Could a clever changeling convince you that they are in fact already you?</p><dt>Cannibalism.<dd><p>Does the answer change if the cause of death is different? In this variant, the changelings weren’t surveilling you incidentally: rather, they were waiting for their chance to strike, and they have no intentions to let you live. They only offer the red pill, so you can go out with dignity, but if you refuse, they will attack and kill you anyway. There is a narrow, 1% chance you can find a way out alive. Is it worth the risk?<span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>As a historical note, this was (essentially) the original framing.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span></p><dt>Vampirism.<dd><p>Does the answer change if the changelings explain why they have to replace people? Perhaps they are emotional vampires, draining love or energy from those around them, or perhaps they are outright hematophages: either way, they take, but never enough to cause lasting harm. Or perhaps they’re simply hunted by prejudiced changeling‍-​hunters who’ll torture them unless they find refuge in pseudonyms.</p> <p>Point is: what if they need your life more than you do?</p><dt>Selfless‍-​actualization.<dd><p>Does the answer change if the changeling’s goals are nobler? A changeling has greater executive function, higher emotional intelligence, and a vast hivemind support network. If they are better at living your life than you, why not pass the torch? If they want to make the world a better place, undo the injustices of human society,<span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>as is surely faithful to some extrapolation of your character</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> wouldn’t that have a greater impact than anything you’d otherwise do?</p></dl><p>One of the most obvious analyses of this problem is that you’re being asked to chose between a 1% chance of living and a 0% chance of living. The changeling can’t possibly be you, they have none of your first person memories, they were never a part of your continuous chain of consciousness, and thus why should you care how similar they are to you?<p>I contend this is simplified and sloppy thinking, though I won’t present the complete case for this position in this post. Nevertheless, these next variants exist to complicate this “argument from continuity.”<dl><dt>Guided meditation.<dd><p>As the red pill takes effect, you and the changeling undergo a focusing exercise, each of you narrowing your attention down to a single point, synchronizing on the same all‍-​enveloping thought. Meditate until all else falls away. So long as you never take your mind off this one image, you won’t even think about your sense of self or whether this thought resides in the changeling’s head or your own.</p> <p>Do you think this could preserve any continuity?</p><dt>Hypnotic suggestion.<dd><p>You are placed under hypnosis and told you imagine your consciousness continuously metamorphosing and sublimating into the changeling’s consciousness. You feel the red pill taking effect, and you visualize it as transporting you into the mind of the changeling. Before the imposter wakes up, they will spend a long time imagining those last moments of yours, so vividly it is as if they were experiencing it, remembering firsthand the experience of that red pill‍-​inducing metamorphosis. (Changelings have exceptional neuroplasticity.)</p> <p>Do you think this could preserve any continuity?</p><dt>Pink pill.<dd><p>You will not receive the red pill right away. Instead, you are repeatedly administered a pink pill, containing a hallucinogen which induces psychedelic effects, such as feelings of profound oneness. Over the course of days if not weeks, you are repeated walked through the above meditation exercises and hypnotic suggestions, molding your mind into one that can mirror a changeling’s inner image of you.</p> <p>Do you think this could preserve any continuity?</p><dt>Backseat impersonation.<dd><p>You don’t die instantly. For some time, you will remain in the changelings’ lair, able to track a live feed of the imposter’s activity. You can provide constructive feedback whenever the imposter does something you wouldn’t. You’ll also have regular conversations with the imposter, playing “guess what I’m thinking” games, partly to give them a better model of your inner life, but also just to build rapport. They sympathetically explain what they’re thinking and urge you to identify with them and live vicariously through them.</p> <p>When there is little left for you to add, you agree to take the red pill and die. (You also die if the changelings discern you aren’t acting in good faith, providing flawed feedback, clinging to survival, etc..)</p> <p>Do you think this could preserve any continuity?</p></dl><p>These last three are fundamentally different questions, so I include them mostly for fun.<dl><dt>Brain scanning.<dd><p>The changelings place you into a neural imaging device, and your brain activity is continuously read out. the imposter studies the output, and actively tries synchronizing their mental model of you to match. Which is to say, we <em>slightly</em> relax the “no super‍-​intelligence” and “no mind‍-​reading” rules of the experiment.</p> <p>Does this change the answer change? Would it change if it goes from “slightly” to “moderately” or “completely?” (i.e. what if the changeling are actually robotic replicants emulating uploaded brains?)<span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>If you would say “a copy of me isn’t me,” I can only refer you to an older post: <a href=/posts/you-clans.html>Identity is Communication</a>.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span></p><dt>Transformation.<dd><p>The red pill doesn’t kill you, it turns you into one of them. The change can be dramatic ‍-​ you will discard many your past attachments, interests, personality, either forgotten in profound reshaping of your mind or simply from the alien change of preference ‍-​ but this will save you from dying. And, take it from them: life’s much better as a changeling anyway.</p><dt>Twist reveal.<dd><p>You never saw an imposter wearing your face. The red pill won’t kill you; no, it will awaken you. The changelings tell you that you already <em>are</em> one of them, having been assigned to a role deep under cover, either for your protection or an inscrutable machination. But now, unfortunately, the seal on your true nature is breaking down, and your sisters want you back. Take the red pill, and your true memories will return, and they’ll show you how deep the rabbit hole goes. Or take the blue pill, and wither away as a husk.</p> <p>You don’t know whether they are telling the truth, or this is yet another rhetorical game.</p></dl></article></main><aside class=pointer><div class=center>Part of a series called <em><a href=/posts/index.html title=->The Serpent’s Track</a></em></div><div class=seriesnav><a class=prev href=/posts/whole-new-post.html title=->← A Whole New Post</a></div><hr><p>Thank you for reading! Please consider sharing this post or telling us you read it. Our only algorithm is word of mouth, and we have no analytics.<p>Thoughts? Questions? We’re interested in feedback, or even just acknowledgement. All are welcome to <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/contact.html>contact us.</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Contact Information</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>Did you enjoy? Please consider donating on <a href=https://ko-fi.com/snugglesquiggle>ko-fi</a> or <a href=https://www.patreon.com/snugglesquiggle>patreon</a>. We’re struggling and even a little bit helps.<p>Our deepest thanks and dedication to those who have donated to sustain this site.</aside><footer><a href=#>Top</a> · <a href=/>Home</a> · <a href=/archive.html>Archive</a></footer>]]></content>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title type="html"><![CDATA[Recursive Magic Systems]]></title>
        <id>https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.org/essays/recursive-magic.html</id>
        <link href="https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.org/essays/recursive-magic.html"/>
        <link rel="enclosure" href="https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.org/thumbs/essays/recursive-magic.png" type="image/png"/>
        <updated>2026-07-07T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
        <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="blurb">
<p>Whether it’s Worm or Worth the Candle, thoughtful stories often take power quantity to the logical extreme. Unique abilities are <em>everywhere;</em> the whole setting is lousy with them. But does this hold up to scrutiny? How do you even write such sheer abundance? One good idea requires creativity. A million requires statistics.</p>
</div>]]></summary>
        <content type="html"><![CDATA[<!doctypehtml><meta charset=UTF-8><meta content=width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0 name=viewport><meta content=article property=og:type><link href=/style.css media=all rel=stylesheet><link title="Squiggles Atom Feed"href=/feed.xml rel=alternate type=application/atom+xml><link title="Squiggles JSON Feed"href=/feed.json rel=alternate type=application/feed+json><link href=at://did:plc:ivoe7cntxuy6at7uzmxzs2ft/site.standard.publication/3mfk6cpprzt2t rel=site.standard.publication><link href=at://did:plc:ivoe7cntxuy6at7uzmxzs2ft/site.standard.document/3mq3atdun4v2f rel=site.standard.document><title>Recursive Magic Systems · Squiggle's Essays
    </title><meta content="Recursive Magic Systems"property=og:title><meta content="Whether it’s Worm or Worth the Candle, thoughtful stories often take power quantity to the logical extreme. Unique abilities are everywhere; the whole setting is lousy with them. But does this hold up to scrutiny? How do you even write such sheer abundance? One good idea requires creativity. A million requires statistics. "property=og:description><meta content=/thumbs/essays/recursive-magic.png property=og:image><meta content=summary_large_image property=twitter:card><meta content=1200 property=og:image:width><meta content=630 property=og:image:height><body class="url-/essays/recursive-magic.html slug-recursive-magic"><header><h1 class=sitehead id=serpentine-squiggles><a href=/>Serpentine Squiggles</a></h1><div class="nav sitenav"><a class=no-notes href=/about.html>About</a><a class=no-notes href=/fiction/>Stories</a><a class=no-notes href=/artwork/>Artwork</a><a class=no-notes href=/games/>Games</a><a class=no-notes href=/music/>Music</a><a class=no-notes href=/essays/>Essays</a><a class=no-notes href=/posts>Posts</a><a class=no-notes href=/archive.html>Archive</a><a class=no-notes href=/contact.html>Contact</a><a class=no-notes data-n href=https://www.patreon.com/snugglesquiggle>Support</a></div></header><aside class=banner><p><strong><a href=.>The Serpent’s Track</a></strong> — read by constriction, write with venom.</aside><main id=main><div class=pagehead><div class=stats><span class=date>2026-07-07</span><span title="10384 words"class=wc>10.4k words</span></div><div class=titleblock><h1 class=heading>Recursive Magic Systems</h1><div class=subtitle>the power of “yes, and branch if”</div></div><details class="sq-details contents"><summary><strong>Contents</strong></summary> <div class=expansion><div class=pagetoc><ol><li><a href=#the-thousand-tombs-of-mystic-promise>The Thousand Tombs of Mystic Promise</a> <span class=wc>1796</span><li><a href=#combinatoric-extension-techniques>Combinatoric Extension Techniques</a> <span class=wc>1225</span><li><a href=#reduced-instruction-set-worldbuilding>Reduced Instruction Set Worldbuilding</a> <span class=wc>1383</span><li><a href=#praise-be-fiddly-bullshit>Praise Be Fiddly Bullshit</a> <span class=wc>1182</span><li><a href=#act-i-from-firstest-principles>Act I: From Firstest Principles</a> <span class=wc>1351</span><li><a href=#act-ii-dark-night-of-the-goal>Act II: Dark Night of the Goal</a> <span class=wc>1322</span><li><a href=#act-iii-hard-takeoff>Act III: Hard Takeoff</a> <span class=wc>1669</span><li><a href=#epilogue-ad-myriadem>Epilogue: Ad Myriadem</a> <span class=wc>373</span></ol></div></div></details></div><aside class=before><details class=sq-details-mini open><summary>Links</summary> <div class=expansion><div class=prelinks><ul><li><a href=/posts/wizard-complete.html>Toward a Universal Theory of Wizardry</a><li><a href=/essays/reductionism-vow.html>The Binding Vow of Reductionism</a><li><a href=https://knivesandpaintbrushes.org/projects/why-oatmeal-is-cheap/why_oatmeal_is_cheap_fdg2023.pdf>Why Oatmeal is Cheap: Kolmogorov Complexity and Procedural Generation</a></ul></div></div></details></aside><a href=#main id=resetview></a><article><h2 class="heading initial"id=the-thousand-tombs-of-mystic-promise><a href=#the-thousand-tombs-of-mystic-promise>The Thousand Tombs of Mystic Promise</a> <a title="Next Heading"class=button href=#combinatoric-extension-techniques>→</a></h2><div class=subpage><p>In <em><a href=https://parahumans.wordpress.com/>Worm</a></em>, a minority of the population‍ ‍‍—‍ less than a percent‍ ‍‍—‍ has superpowers. This requires a trigger event, the worst moment of your life. These have been spitting out capes since the 80s. The exact fraction that results depends on where you’re counting: it ranges from one in 8k to one in 26k. But let’s stop and multiply. That already implies <em>millions</em> of parahumans. We’re never given exact figures‍ ‍‍—‍ wildbow isn’t a numbers guy‍ ‍‍—‍ but <a href=https://www.reddit.com/r/Parahumans/comments/5oy5ac>this analysis</a> examines the stats more closely and anchors it to canon details. It all lines up.<p>In the <em>Worth the Candle</em> series, the world is chock full of “entads”‍ ‍‍—‍ which is to say, magic items: vorpal swords and rings of power. Each is produced in an random act of supernaturally‍-​inspired creation, a fugue state granting no control over the magical abilities confered. How many entads are there? Alexander Wales, fortunately for us, <a href=https://alexanderwales.tumblr.com/post/754020220277063680>is a numbers guy</a>. We can consult <a href=https://archiveofourown.org/works/20629112?view_full_work=true#chapter-6>the setting’s worldbuilding doc</a>, where it’s explicitly noted the upper bound on entad quantity is about 2.1 billion.<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>That’s <em>possible</em> entads‍ ‍‍—‍ that figure technically comes up in the context of it being far away from currently existing number of entads. But the real stat is still the same order of magnitude: in Chapter 22, Amaryllis cites that “a billion would be a close approximation, that’s one for every five people”.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>Those are <em>staggeringly</em> large figures. Most of you can come up with a couple cool ideas for magic item, and if you sat down and got toiling, you could manage dozens, though the strain may soon become evident. I would consider RPG sourcebook abundant, if not excessive, if it had listed hundreds of magic items.<p>Once you’ve broken your back devising the most exhaustive power collection anyone’s written, you’d still need to 1000x that to describe these settings unabridged. So maybe you’d be tempted to just give up there. After all, those figures are the quantity of <em>capes</em> and <em>magic item</em>, not the number of unique effects.<p><em>The Binding of Isaac</em> has hundreds of items. New ones get drawn, avoiding repeats‍ ‍‍—‍ and one of the infamous tricks for “breaking the game” is by exhausting the item pool, which forces the game to reshuffle and draw from those already seen.<p>So maybe you come up with a few dozen core powers, but in practice, some people are <em>just</em> speedsters. When you’ve met one, you’ve met them all.<p>Except that’s <em>not</em> how these settings treat their powers. Etymologically, “entad” was coined to mean one‍-​of‍-​a‍-​kind.<p><a href=https://www.reddit.com/r/Weaverdice/comments/4dy6ws>Weaver Dice</a> consists of reams of documents on the topic of generating powers. In a cursory search, I couldn’t find it stated explicitly, but it’s not hard to read between the lines. Parahuman abilities are deeply personal‍ ‍‍—‍ wildbow wouldn’t have written a booklet’s worth of exposition on power generation if just picking one off the rack was a viable option.<p>Burnscar is a pyrokinetic‍ ‍‍—‍ except she can teleport through her flames and loses control the more fire burns around her. Lung is a pyrokinetic‍ ‍‍—‍ except that’s a mere side‍-​effect of how the longer the fight goes on, the more he transforms into a dragon, scaling to match any threat. Circus boasts minor pyrokinesis along with a grab‍-​bag of other abilities like hammerspace and preternatural balance and coordination. Spitfire spews napalm‍-​esque combustible chemicals that melt almost anything‍ ‍‍—‍ including herself.<p>Essentially every classic power gets this sort of treatment: there’s always a twist.<p>So, again we have that dilemma. We can’t reuse ideas, and we probably can’t cheat and say this guy’s unique power is to resist fire damage by 20% while this girl’s “unique” power is <em>33%</em> fire resistance. We won’t simply rescale and reskin powers.<p>Even still, another escape hatch beckons. Because how hard it is to hit a million power ideas depends on how <em>good</em> those ideas need to be, doesn’t it? In terms of scale, <em>My Hero Academia</em> outclasses <em>Worm</em> by a few orders of magnitude: it outright gives 80% of the population quirks. Except some of those quirks are things like “extra flexible fingers” or “blow bubbles (they’re just normal bubbles)” or “slowly attract small objects.”<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Years ago, an old friend‍ ‍‍—‍ author of <a href=https://www.royalroad.com/fiction/89944>Inheritors</a>‍ ‍‍—‍ fleshed out his power system, and the defining example of the weakest tier of power was “immunity to caffeine.”</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>But Worm and WtC do not take this route. The source origin of parahuman powers essentially requires that powers be, if not <em>good</em>, then useful. Some are C‍-​tier, but I don’t think you get any F‍-​tier powers.<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Well, not naturally‍ ‍‍—‍ botched Cauldron experiments definitely produce unnaturally shitty powers.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>For entads, it’s harder to say: the text gestures at a notion of “i‍-​factor”, but never bounds it from below. It’s possible that shitty entads exist, but we never see them for for the same reason any story element is disproportionately interesting rather than boring‍ ‍‍—‍ the <a href=https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/AnthropicPrinciple>narrative anthropic principle</a>.<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Pipe dream came to mind, but that <em>did</em> prove useful. But almost forgot‍ ‍‍—‍ I needed hardcore WtC fans to remind me‍ ‍‍—‍ that the context in which pipe dream came up was a game of “dumbest entad.”</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>With that, I believe I have paced the perimeter bounding this cage we’ve found ourselves in. How do you write about a world with a million special abilities, each one unique and useful?<p>Perhaps this seems a niche concern‍ ‍‍—‍ if it’s such a strain on disbelief, we can always <em>not</em> write settings that entail millions of bespoke effects.<p>But the true scope of this trope isn’t so easy to escape. How many times have you read a story with a magic library, if not a whole magic school? How many times have you seen a wizened magic veteran characterized by an appellations like “master of a thousand spells”?<p>I’ve always found myself faintly mystified, never fully satisfied by these portrayals. The art direction for magic libraries always renders them as having shelves upon shelves‍ ‍‍—‍ at a glance, you can spot hundreds of books. Maybe not all of them are about magic, but some of them must be. <em>What’s in them?</em><p>Even the most complicated magic system you’ve heard of is necessarily still described by a fraction of the book you read it in. In most cases, the rules of the system are either vague or clearly summarized, and both fail to truly convince me that you could write <em>an entire textbook</em> of exposition.<p>What amuses me‍ ‍‍—‍ and helpfully serves to indicate why almost no one does this‍ ‍‍—‍ is that the key to making a magic textbook feel necessary is, in some sense, writing the system poorly. If you’re designing a magic so rule‍-​bound that you <em>could</em> write a textbook on it, then you probably care about making it clear, and limited, and all those <a href=https://faq.brandonsanderson.com/knowledge-base/what-are-sandersons-laws-of-magic/>Sandersonian virtues</a>.<p>To motivate a textbook, you’d have to make your magic system <em>confusing</em>. The reader ought to be frustrated and dissatisfied with the simplified explanations offered in passing dialogue, wishing instead to just get a complete explanation.<p>Beyond spells and magic items, what about bestiaries? There are currently a thousand pokémon. That series relies on “regions” to explain why this new game has a new batch of monsters you’ve never seen before.<p>Kanto, famously, is an actual region of Japan, roughly 32 km<sup>2</sup>. Let’s round that figure up to 51 to account for the sourthern waters (some mons are aquatic, and we do visit islands) and compare that to the surface area of earth (510 million km<sup>2</sup>) then even supposing that each Kanto‍-​sized patch of the planet has a paltry 1 unique pokemon will still net us millions‍ ‍‍—‍ the very same order of magnitude that’s been haunting this section.<p>It goes without saying that no one can be expected to populate an entire roster on this scale. So why linger so long on this point? Two main difficulties arise.<p>The first is false abundance. We’re told a system is huge, but in practice it feels so small. This is what I was getting at when I digressed to magic textbooks: the empty promise of complexity when the rules of the system can be explained and understood in five minutes. The promise of endless diversity when, after millions of words and multiple volumes, we’ve seen maybe a few dozen spells total.<p>The second is blank page syndrome. I run into this often when drafting short stories set in my fantasy worlds‍ ‍‍—‍ especially <em>Black Nerve</em> and <em>Vermin Cathexis</em>. The magic systems I design are always strive for that endless sprawling. So when my characters encounter a new magic‍-​user, what should their gimmick be? It’s lame if it’s just a stock power like pyrokinesis or levitation. There should be <em>more</em> to it.<p>I can come up with some pretty damn creative powers when I need to<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text><a href=/black-nerve/apocrypha/flayed-minds.html>A Mind Like a Massacre</a> is an easy one to point to, though it’s actually hard to find any other ready‍-​made examples of posts that are <em>just</em> about a powerset. On reflection, it’s startling to realize how many of my coolest power ideas are tucked away in Black Nerve documents I’ve never shown anyone.<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Or are old enough to be embarassing. At first, I had linked to the Nous Inspira write‍-​up, but on reread I opted for something newer.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span></span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> But my process of <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/essays/creative-extrapolation.html>creative extrapolation</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Creative Extrapolation</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> is <em>slow</em>. I might spend all day working out the ramifications of an idea and crystallizing it into something coherent.<p>That’s unacceptable if the ultimate destiny of these powers is to get handed off to a team of jobbers that appear in a single random encounter. Not a mere inefficiency: the extra effort goes to waste.<p>One trope common to battle gimmick stories, played both for comedy and tragedy, is some character showing up to a fight‍ ‍‍—‍ only to be killed before the audience gets any explanation of what their deal actually was. They had not yet realized the full potential of their gimmick… now they never will.<p>A power that’s just pyrokinesis is lame, there should be a twist, but if we never see the twist in action, they effectively <em>were</em> just a pyrokinetic.<p>This finally brings us to the main subject of this post. Both of the problems outlined above could be solved by quickly sampling from a rich space of powers. If it’s quick enough, it’s useful for random encounters. And if the space is rich enough, it’s easier to believe “master of a thousand spells” is meaningful, once we’ve see enough unique spells to be convinced there really could be thousands of the things.<p>The solution we’re groping toward is clearly some variant of a random table. Design a couple of templates like {“control of”, “immunity to”, …} and {“fire”, “ice”, …}. Assign them to dice rolls or card draws, and you’re good to go.</div><h2 class=heading id=combinatoric-extension-techniques><a title="Prior Heading"class=button href=#the-thousand-tombs-of-mystic-promise>←</a> <a href=#combinatoric-extension-techniques>Combinatoric Extension Techniques</a> <a title="Next Heading"class=button href=#reduced-instruction-set-worldbuilding>→</a></h2><div class=subpage><p>Alexander Wales <a href=https://alexanderwales.com/creating-superpowers-through-yes-and/>really</a> <a href=https://alexanderwales.tumblr.com/post/767791580411297792>likes</a> <a href=https://alexanderwales.tumblr.com/post/768395574920757248>combinatorics</a> as a design tool.<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Both of them, really. If Weaver Dice’s design wasn’t clue enough, wildbow has written on multiple occasions about how he uses combinations in his <a href=https://palewebserial.wordpress.com/2023/11/04/essay-creating-pale/>writing process</a>.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> Rather having tables spit out ready‍-​made powersets, Wales prefers a more interpolative approach, creatively combining two concepts.<blockquote><p>One of my favorite worldbuilding things is combinatrics. Let’s say you have one physical affinity, like Power or Speed or whatever, and one elemental affinity, and you mix them together, and even with short initial lists you get a lot of interesting things.<p>Like what does it mean for a person to be Power‍-​aligned and Leaf‍-​aligned? Here you’re sitting down for a session of interpretation of your own elements and how they mesh together, and I find this easy to use as a starting point for getting creative with it. Maybe combining “Leaf” and “Power” means a single honking big leaf, the kind that you would wield like a buster sword. For me, that’s the kind of idea that immediately feels like it has something to it. And then you move on to the next one!</blockquote><p>Leading to examples like:<blockquote><p>Speed‍-​Teeth is hard, sharp, cracking speed, not quite teleportation but the speed of something inflexible. It works better with a rigid subject, like someone in full plate armor, though practitioners without that kind of money sometimes just strap bits of metal to themselves.</blockquote><blockquote><p>Precision‍-​Leaf is a striking power, best able to hit one thing of many, a knife thrown precisely through a crowd to hit its target, a jab to a weak spot. Metaphorically, it’s plucking the single correct leaf from a tree without even trying that hard. In theory, it’s taking a chaotic, varied system and isolating an element. In practice, it’s best at target selection.</blockquote><p>The power of combinatorics is the numbers get very big very fast. If you can populate five tables with fifteen elements each<span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>easy if you’re just using word lists, or cannibalize major arcana or extended elemental system</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> then you’re already three quarters of the way to a million! Add five more elements<span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>16<sup>5</sup> and 20(15^4) both work</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> and you’re good to go.<p>The weakness of combinatorics is the <a href=https://www.tumblr.com/galaxykate0/139774965871>Ten Thousand Bowls of Oatmeal Problem</a>. Classic elemental systems have 4‍-​5 elements. If you need to push it to sixteen, then you need to split hairs: water isn’t the same as ice; earth isn’t the same as metal. But consider rolling a combination that describes something like charged + body‍-​based + explosive + movement. That’s four of the tables locked down, how much difference does it make if the last roll said this was an “ice” power or a “water” power?<p>But let’s loop back to where this tangent began. Wales doesn’t just advocate for combinatorics, but a particular form: <em>conjunctive combinatorics</em>. In fact, he long ago whipped up <a href=https://alexanderwales.com/generator.html>a simple generator</a> to that effect. We can spin the wheel a few times and get power‍-​prompts like:<ul><li><em>Earth manipulation. Yes, but crowds.</em> Could go either way: you can earthbend, but it gets weaker the more people are crowded over it‍ ‍‍—‍ or the crowds are the source of the power, and you need an army to move mountains.<li><em>Time travel. Yes, and absorption.</em> This sounds like the plot of <em><a href=https://archiveofourown.org/works/42432123>The Girl Who Spun Through Time</a></em>, where the protagonist is drawn toward and consumes the magical power of herself in other timelines. A different possibility is time travel as armor‍ ‍‍—‍ a weird variation of <a href=https://archiveofourown.org/works/20629112?view_full_work=true#:~:text=with%20pustule%20mages.%5D-,Revision%20Magic,-In%20general%20terms>revision magic</a>?‍ ‍‍—‍ where traveling through time absorbs incoming damage.<li><em>Air manipulation. Yes, and fear.</em> <a href=https://worm.fandom.com/wiki/Screamer>Screamer</a>, anyone? The obvious interpretation is being a horror movie sound effects team, so non‍-​obvious option: you hyperventilate when scared, amplifying your power.</ul><p>I wasn’t actually proving a point with that spate of brainstorming‍ ‍‍—‍ it just happened. This generator is so compelling that you can’t help but try and make sense of its outputs.<p>To Wales, the strength of Worm’s system is the power of yes‍-​and, though as you can see he tossed in some yes‍-​buts. This is the simplest instance of conjunctive combinatorics. How far can we take this?<p>A few more rolls with new conjunctives swapped in:<ul><li><em>Fire manipulation. <strong>Yes, if</strong> absorption.</em> You have to burn yourself first, and can only store so much fire.<li><em>Animal control. <strong>Yes, for</strong> movement.</em> You can only control animals that you ride.<span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>I rerolled “Shields for feedback” because it was tricky to to describe concisely.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><li><em>Probability manipulation. <strong>Yes, because</strong> feedback.</em> Your ability to manipulate outcomes improves the more times you try (and fail) to affect them.<li><em>Emotional manipulation <strong>Yes, or</strong> velocity.</em> You can completely transform the moods of those around you as long as you and your target stand still.<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>As I proofread, this actually feels more a “but”, so how about moody speedster? The user or target must “lock in” to a mindset to go fast. Key here is forcing a <em>choice</em> rather than limitation per se.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><li><em>Fire manipulation. <strong>Yes, else</strong> age.</em> You are immortal as long you burn the world around you, otherwise you turn to ash. Keep the fire alive.<li><em>Air manipulation. <strong>Yes, then</strong> heat.</em> You can fly and send objects flying, but they leave a kind of rocket trail of superheated air behind them.<span class=break><br> </span><li><em>Shapeshifting. <strong>Yes, each</strong> pain.</em> You transform uncontrollably whenever you’re hurt, more severe injuries yielding greater metamorphosis, along with incomplete healing.<span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Do you have an <a href=https://bindingofisaacrebirth.wiki.gg/wiki/Eden>Eden Token?</a></span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><li><em>Telekinesis. <strong>Yes, while</strong> insanity.</em> You can enter a flow state governed by random impulse and apply ghostly force to any objects‍ ‍‍—‍ with no guarantee you’ll use for anything save self‍-​preservation.</ul><p>I’m going to call it there. I thought of a time‍-​based conjunctives‍ ‍‍—‍ before, after‍ ‍‍—‍ but they gave me a <em>profound</em> streak of bad luck!<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>I rolled, in order: “Air manipulation + Thursday” then “Telepathy + time” then “Fire manipulation + heat” then “Water manipulation + duration” then “precognition + duration” the “Telekinesis + age” then “flight + age” then “telekinesis + time” then “meta powers + time.” All of these imply time and therefore are banal in conjunction with a constrain that implies time.<span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Heat doesn’t imply time, but “pyrokinesis before heat” is very obvious.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span></span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> Though in fairness, “before” is almost equivalent to “then” or “if not” while “after” is “because” or “each.”<p>I actually went as far as to write an entry for “once:”<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text><em>Air manipulation <strong>Yes, once</strong> absorption.</em> You can halt the motion of air‍ ‍‍—‍ making it hard as a wall‍ ‍‍—‍ each time you hold your breath, with the strength increasing the longer you hold it.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> But I first had to reroll this a few times.<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>“Shapeshifting once duration” suggest your standard once a day power. “Gravity manipulation once self” has one clear read that’s honestly kind of funny: you get one use, ever. Mythical Beast Amber but flinging asteroids around?</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> But, still unsure, I tried one more roll, just to convince myself it was meaningful. “Plant manipulation once pain” is when I realize oh, this is literally just equivalent to “each.”<p>With that said, if you want to hack AW’s generator to spit out these conjunctives, open the dev console and run:<pre><code>butand = ["but", "and", "or", "if", "as", "of", "like", "then",
"through", "else", "to get", "due to", "each", "while", "until", ]</code></pre><p>While you’re at it, you can add entries to <code>powers</code> to change the lefthand side and <code>modifiers</code> for the right. But if you’re going that far, you might as well start writing your own generator using all of the tricks this post will discuss.</div><h2 class=heading id=reduced-instruction-set-worldbuilding><a title="Prior Heading"class=button href=#combinatoric-extension-techniques>←</a> <a href=#reduced-instruction-set-worldbuilding>Reduced Instruction Set Worldbuilding</a> <a title="Next Heading"class=button href=#praise-be-fiddly-bullshit>→</a></h2><div class=subpage><p>See, I didn’t actually list every productive relationship more specific than “and” or “but.” There’s a special category of relation that Wales’s generator is rather unsuited to demonstrating‍ ‍‍—‍ and I think it’s a key ingredient to escaping oatmeal combinatoric hell. By which I mean: context‍-​aware conjunctives.<p>Two easy ones are exceptions and specialties. With effort, you can make arguably make sense of “Water manipulation except for happiness” or “Precognition, especially pain,” but the hit rate for this is pretty low. You’d instead want the generator to maintain some sort of conceptual hierarchy to draw on, so it knows what to lean toward. “Fire manipulation, except for smoke” or “Plant manipulation, especially grass.”<p>Another kind of context‍-​aware conjunctive is generalization. I originally included this on the list above, but it was disproportately long and confusing. On revision, I realized the difficulties are because it works better with context. To illustrate, this is what I had:<p><em>Flight <strong>Yes, with</strong> theft.</em> You lift things‍ ‍‍—‍ steal away, liberate‍ ‍‍—‍ transferring metaphysical ownership to yourself. Gravity is an expression of the planet’s ownership of all things with weight, so by stealing <em>yourself</em>, you can fly. It’s harder to use your power on larger or uncooperative things (living things don’t want to be enslaved), meaning the easiest targets are yourself and small, easily‍-​snatched objects.<p>You <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/posts/ra-hot-take.html>can associate any two ideas</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>A Hot Take on Ra</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span>, but if they’re randomly selected, the route is both tortured and annoyingly nonspecific.<p>Now, let’s consider a power like Grue’s‍ ‍‍—‍ he has “darkness generation,” but I think the real heart of its structure rests on an analogy. He creates darkness that is <em>like clouds</em>. Once you look at this way, so many powers fall into place. What are kinetic powers but the ability to treat a medium <em>like limbs?</em> Scrying lets you treat a surface <em>like eyes</em>.<p>But try this with the toy generator, and you’ll get “Flight. Yes, like charging.” The intuitive read is that it’s flight you have to charge up.<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>I focus so much on intuitive reads because it’s not a question of if you can come up with an interesting power when you chew on the prompt and contrive something novel. If you have to work for it, then the tables aren’t adding much.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> How is that any different from “and charging”? Key to generating interesting metaphors would be to know to pick something that <em>doesn’t</em> fit.<p>I tried <a href=https://randomwordgenerator.com/>generating random words</a> until I rolled concepts that don’t fit together. The first promising set was “user glide thread snow illness.” Glide‍-​thread suggests a neat power: spiderman web‍-​shooting but hang‍-​gliding instead of swinging, and perhaps a bit of <a href=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ballooning_(spider)>kiting</a>.<p>“Like snow” is easy‍ ‍‍—‍ perhaps as you glide, the expended threads precipitate down. “Like illness” is a puzzle. “The power makes you sick” isn’t right‍ ‍‍—‍ that would just be “and illness” or “but illness.” The power itself must be inherently akin to an illness. Are the threads symptoms, then? Discharged like pus? Perhaps the easy answer is the Haunting from <em>Hollow Knight: Silksong</em>‍ ‍‍—‍ the threads possess you.<p>This in particular is hard enough I’m skeptical you can automate it without an intractable amount of data and precomputation. Conceptually similar things yield banal metaphors, but conceptual dissimiliar things yield random noise. The most effective approach may in fact me generate N random words and playing <a href=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_York_Times_Connections>connections</a>.<p>But if you return to our list, you’ll find that a few of these “conjunctives” behave differently. There’s a profound difference between “yes, but” and “yes, then.” Specifically, the connectors I want to highlight are “then,” “while,” and “each.”<p>If you have any experience programming, those neurons just lit up. The thing these all have in common? Control flow.<p>We’ve all heard of the power of “yes, and”‍ ‍‍—‍ now let’s consider the power of “yes, and branch if.”<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>For those not acquainted with low‍-​level programming, the search keyword is <a href=https://esolangs.org/wiki/OISC>one instruction set computing</a>. Famously, you can reduce every processor operation down to a single instruction of the form: perform one arthimetic calculation, store the resulting number, then conditionally switch over to some other piece of code depending what it was.<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Some OISC architectures claim to be simpler than this‍ ‍‍—‍ they jump no matter what‍ ‍‍—‍ but they mainly achieve that feat because they can “store” the “number” in the part of memory where the code itself takes place, meaning every nontrivial program is <a href=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-modifying_code>self‍-​modifying</a>. This technicality only obscures explanations, because it is, effectively, a conditional jump‍ ‍‍—‍ but the conditions are indirect: it branches based on how the code has been overwritten so far.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span></span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>For the laity, this means powers using these conjunctives track and alter some internal state. A simple example of how this makes for interesting power, consider an ability that allows you to bask in the sunlight, soaking up solar power. You can then expend solar power to grant you a subpower until the sun sets. These abilities are: (a) firing solar beams, (b) glowing eyes augmented to treat all darkness as if illuminated, and (c) equipping hard light armor whose durability depends on the strength of the light source currrently illuminating you. Neat power, but consider its structure.<blockquote><p>Sunlight, then charge<sub>x</sub> Spend then no charge<sub>x</sub> and {{laser xor vision xor armor} while daytime}.<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Unfortunately triple xor strictly entails only that an odd number of predicates are true‍ ‍‍—‍ implying you could use any odd number of subpowers, i.e. just one or all three. To be strictly correct, you’d either have to xor it with and‍-​conjunction of all three, or define a function predicate to that effect. Strict logic matters for computers, but this is meant to be read by humans‍ ‍‍—‍ usually only one human, who knows exactly what is meant.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span></blockquote><p>Why charge<sub>x</sub> and not “charging” (as in Wales’ generator)? The subscript variable is meant to indicate correlation. You spend exactly what you charged. It’s how we notate this isn’t, say, a power that has two different chargeable states.<p>Introducing conjuctives are helpful‍ ‍‍—‍ our original goal of reaching a million entries called for five 16 element lists, but we can get rid of two of them if we just insert conjunctives.<span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>…The eternal return of “x but y so z” in Squiggle craft essays…</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>But introducing <em>variables</em>? Now taking N random words doesn’t just grant exponentially many combinations, because each of those combinations can be combined into some sort of random equation or graph structure. The equations themselves can define variables to be used in other equations! We haven’t defined our formalism yet, so we can’t precisely calculate, but I suspect this scales with the powerset 2<sup>N</sup>.<p>Before I started writing this blogpost, I had first tried to put together a computer program in the vein of AW’s generator. Unfortunately, recursively generating formulas with shared variables and derivatives is a bit more involved than rolling on two tables and sticking “yes, and” between them.<p>You could just abitrarily slap together variables and stateful conjunctives, but key to a good power is having a cogent structure. How do you make sure you don’t spit out nonsense? You could hard‍-​code a structure, but then you’re restricting the results, closing off possibilities.<p>But the more I reflected on what I was doing, the more I realized trying to do this automatically is a somewhat doomed endeavor anyhow. An intuition I’ve developed, after studying Turing complete systems, is that any form of expression powerful enough to do interesting things is also hamstrung by chaos and incompleteness. This is the logic behind results like the Halting Problem or Rice’s Theorem.<p>Or put in a simpler way, the nature of the Oatmeal Problem is it occurs when procedural generation confines itself a well‍-​behaved “safe” region of the possibility space.<p>But the only way to systematically allow for unexpected gems is accepting that you’re going to shovel a lot of dirt to get to them.<p>Which raises the question: what gems are we actually looking to find? Wales’s generator is pretty dang good, especially if you toss in our tricksy new conjunctives. I’m sure if you care enough about power systems to read this essay, some of the example abilities I dashed out above already struck you as kinda cool.<p>Am I just adding complexity for the sake of it? Is all of this recursive computer logic stuff pure wank?</div><h2 class=heading id=praise-be-fiddly-bullshit><a title="Prior Heading"class=button href=#reduced-instruction-set-worldbuilding>←</a> <a href=#praise-be-fiddly-bullshit>Praise Be Fiddly Bullshit</a> <a title="Next Heading"class=button href=#act-i-from-firstest-principles>→</a></h2><div class=subpage><p>Wales’s took Worm as his muse. For myself, I might pick Jujutsu Kaisen.<p>Consider Satoru Gojo, one of the most iconic characters. His ability ⸢Infinity⸥ lets him manipulate space. He can impose effectively infinite distance between himself and any danger, stoping its approach. Easy enough to call this, say, “Space manipulation and distance.” But he can also recreate blue orbs where points in space are drawn together. So: “…and distance or attraction”? He can also invert those orbs to get red projectiles that explosively repel. “…and distance or (forces and projectiles)”?? But finally, if red and blue collide, their overlap creates a purple orb unleashing tremendous destruction. So maybe:<blockquote><p>Space manipulation for distance or projectiles<sub>z</sub><p>projectiles<sub>z</sub> and {attraction<sub>x</sub> or repulsion<sub>y</sub>} or {explosion if attraction<sub>x</sub> and repulsion<sub>y</sub>}</blockquote><p>Now consider the grand antagonist of the series, Ryomen Sukuna, and his ability ⸢Shrine.⸥ The core of this ability is easy enough to formulate. Dismantle delivers a ranged cutting attack, while Cleave penetrates magical defenses at close range. We have “slashes and {distance or pentration}”. A few arcs into the story, he demonstrates an inexplicable ability to summon a “fire arrow.” This ultimate move makes for a formidable enough of boss attack, but it’s hard to square with an ability that is otherwise admirably straightforward.<p>At the climax of the series, it’s revealed <span class=spoiler><label title="Spoiler-text: click to show"><input type=checkbox><span class=text>the thematic core of his technique is cooking; after he has “prepared his ingredients” with Dismantle and Cleave, he gains access to the fire arrow to roast them. In our formalism this takes on the same essential form as Gojo’s technique. (Which is really quite suggestive. I have seen it conjectured that Dismantle was the technique reversal of Cleave, but this suggests that Divine Flame is the imaginary technique of Shrine.) But the key difference lies in adding the “…and fire manipulation if distance<sub>x</sub> and penetration<sub>y</sub>”</span></label></span>, which represents less a special attack than a <em>state change</em> in the dynamic of the fight.<p>More than anything else, Sukuna is a boss fight, and a good boss fight has multiple phases.<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>A better example might’ve been Hakari‍ ‍‍—‍ his jackpot state even more clearly demonstrates a second phase.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>But I saved the throne of this tricolon for the most egregiously multifaceted ability in JJK: the Zen’in clan’s inheritance: Fushiguro Megumi’s ⸢Ten Shadows.⸥ The ability centers around taming monster summons, and their abilities range widely, from flight to water blasts to <em>adaptation to any attack</em>. Briefly:<blockquote><div class=line-block>summoning if challenge each monster<br> monster and fragile or fusion and cost<br> dogs: multiple and free<br> nue: flight and eletricity<br> toad: strength and capture but tongue<br> serpent: size and capture<br> elephant: water and blasting but cost<br> rabbit: quantity and distraction<br> deer: healing and negation<br> ox: strength but charging but momentum<br> tiger: aura but mystery<br> mahoraga: negation and evolution but time</div></blockquote><p>Ten shadows is not an ability. This is dozen abilities in a trench coat.<p>But what’s wrong with that? Every power entails Required Secondary Powers. Everything is a synergy package. Pyrokinesis tends to grant a form of fire‍-​sensing or fire‍-​resistance; each could be (weaker) abilities in their own right. So here we likewise have multiple abilities joined at the hip.<p>Many sentence can be broken up into indepedent clauses‍ ‍‍—‍ it’s this <em>recursion</em> that grants language its means of expression.<p>Multifaceted or evolving powers proliferate in genres like shōnen and progression fantasy. Simple combinatorics can be a good starting point for creating them, but why not add a combinator for overarching structure?<p>We’re almost ready to prepare our own tables. The last remaining question is also the first question: what do we put on it?<p>After copying over every single generation, I’ve gotten quite tired of typing out “manipulation”.<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Yes, I did each one manually. Rest assured the only things not hand‍-​typed in my posts are link URLs and quotations.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> It feels like half the entries in the provided tables are some sort of kinesis, but it’s missing some pretty iconic powersets. No lightning or fleshcrafting or necromancy, or sleeper hits like evolution or astral projection or pocket dimensions.<p>Even “manipulation” is unhelpfully broad. One automatically assumes telekinetic control, but that’s no more than the lowest entropy prior<span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>err, I mean, trope</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> for what “manipulation” means. Consider: Air manipulation, except you can’t move or stop the air, or vibrate it for sound. You can control other properties‍ ‍‍—‍ increasing and decreasing temperature,<span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>yeah sure, wise guy, high school physics does mean this gives you wind production with extra steps</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> or separate components to alter humidity, oxygen content, filtering contaminants. Can you ionize the air and generate lightning bolts?<p>More egregious is “meta powers,” which I take to encompass a whole industrial complex‍ ‍‍—‍ power copying, power negating, power stealing, power jailbreaking, power scaling, etc.<p>We can improve this list just by patching every hole we see, but what about the ones I don’t see? How do we know I’m not missing something obvious?<p>A different approach can be more rigorous: if we start from the top, the base principles of what a power must do, narrowing it step by step, at each layer mapping out the boundaries of that subspace can contain, then it’s far less likely we’ll miss anything.<p>But that old tradeoff snags us once again: a space big enough to contain every interesting possibility has to include a bunch of boring ones.<p>Let’s consider elemental systems. If you want to get materialistic, one of the easiest ways to both harden and extend bending powers is by making it the control of an <em>element</em>. That is, atomic elements. At once, hundreds of possibilities open up! And most of them are meaningless. What use is “yttrium‍-​kinesis”? I have the power to create Copernicium from nothing! I can’t make it last longer than 30 seconds, though.<p>You’ll find yourself drawn to the most abundant elements in the universe, and probably wind up with something like <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/black-nerve/apocrypha/fourfold-division><em>Black Nerve</em>’s system of “earthly elements.”</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>The Fourfold Divisions of Vesperbanes</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>“Niter” lets you control the gas that composes most of the atmosphere‍ ‍‍—‍ nitrogen. “Sand” less you control most forms of stone, but especially sand and glass‍ ‍‍—‍ it’s silicon. “Ash” is usually thought of as control over fire, but you can devestate flesh and direct a ghostly gas‍ ‍‍—‍ all forms of carbon. “Water” is the cutest, because we know “water” is a molecule composed of two different atom types‍ ‍‍—‍ but to a first approximation, all its mass consists of that one oxygen atom, fifteen times heavier than hydrogen: control that, and you control water. This has nifty knock‍-​on effects like extinguishing flames by starving them of oxygen.<p>This is a fine enough scheme for the one setting it comes up in. It’s neat how close you can imitate conventional elemental system with materialist conceits‍ ‍‍—‍ but that’s just the thing: this <em>isn’t</em> what people conventionally mean by elemental powers. “Fire” is not carbon‍ ‍‍—‍ considering how often lightning is an subelement of it, it may well be about energy and intensity more than composition. This scheme would give each type of metal‍ ‍‍—‍ iron and copper and tin and aluminum‍ ‍‍—‍ its own element, when half of us consider all those a subtype of earth.<p>Who is right? Which assumptions should our generator privilege?</div><h2 class=heading id=act-i-from-firstest-principles><a title="Prior Heading"class=button href=#praise-be-fiddly-bullshit>←</a> <a href=#act-i-from-firstest-principles>Act I: From Firstest Principles</a> <a title="Next Heading"class=button href=#act-ii-dark-night-of-the-goal>→</a></h2><div class=subpage><p>Originally, I had spliced in a lengthy discussion on the ontology of powers, but this piece is long enough; so I cut it and relegated that to its own post: <a href=/posts/worm-ontology.html>Escaping Capepunk Ontology</a>.<p>With that, I think I’ve rotated this problem through every conceivable angle short of actually doing the work. So let’s get cooking.<p>For a start, we could define an ability as a trio of three elements: a trigger, a process, and a medium. (Equivalently: a cause, an effect, and a target.)<p>Hydrokinesis become: {at will : manipulation : water}. Water <em>bending</em>‍ ‍‍—‍ as portrayed in <em>Avatar: The Last Airbender</em>‍ ‍‍—‍ would swap “at will” for something like “somatic” or “gestural”. If some character copied Jesus’s famous feat of transfiguration, we might change “manipulation” to “transformation,” at least as a starting point. And of course, pyrokinesis subs out water for fire.<p>The trigger is what circumstances cause the ability; the process is the mechanic by which it operates; the medium is what it can operate on.<p>I came up with two class of process with four subclasses each.<ul><li>Manipulation: changing of the properties of a medium <ul><li>Movement: changing the location or velocity<li>Rescaling: adding or removing energy; making it greater or lesser<li>Reconfiguration: shifting or revising subtle internal state<li>Tranformation: creation and destruction and transcendence</ul><li>Perception: acquiring knowledge of the properties of a medium <ul><li>Detection: sensing the distance, orientation, or address<li>Measuring: sensing internal properties and processes<li>Prediction: understanding future or hypothetical behavior<li>Exegesis: discerning relations and connections</ul></ul><p>You might think this list would be more fractally symmetric if there were four types. At first theere were‍ ‍‍—‍ “Alternation” would encompass transformations of medium, including “Appearance,” “Structure,” and “Composition.”<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>And “essence”, but it meant transforming “ontology” without impacting any of the other three, and I have no idea what that could possibly entail.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> But what is a transformation of <em>appearence?</em> Are you manipulating the light that reflects off an object? Are you manipulating the mental experience of sight? Are you manipulating how the medium reflects light?<p>After cutting that, I considered replacing it with a suite of “meta” processes, but there’s nothing in the definition of medium that suggests it couldn’t be another ability.<p>Even after cutting Alternation, I still had the category of “Modulation”, which included “Potency” (how the medium impacts others), “Resistance” (how the medium gets impacted), “Flexibility” (range of causes and effects), and “Evolution” (accelerating internal processes). But most of those are special cases of manipulation.<p>Exegesis merits some explanation‍ ‍‍—‍ originally it was retrodiction (“History”), an obvious symmetric parallel. But besides that being a specific and uncommon power, what would sensing the history of a medium <em>mean?</em> Specifically, what knowledge would it grant you that’s meaningfully different from careful Detection and Measuring? Even Prediction steals from it‍ ‍‍—‍ the past is a hypothetical.<p>Exegesis, then, is something else entirely. A character with the power of Water Exegesis <em>can’t</em> sense water. Rather, they sense <em>through the lens of water</em>. Perhaps they intuit when something is impacted or associated with water.<span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text><em>Kneels to touch the ground.</em> “Water has been here.” / “How can you tell?” / “Wet.”</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> Does this make sense? Maybe. It feels like there’s something interesting here.<p>(In the rest of this essay, I go on to make a few jokes about Exegesis being hard to understand, but it’s been a few days. After going over this post several times‍ ‍‍—‍ and crafting my own generator‍ ‍‍—‍ I think I have a better handle on it. Two iconic examples of Exegesis powers would be Tinkering and Communication. The former is understanding how best to use the medium (e.g. in devices) without having control over it, and the latter treating the medium as if it had a mind and will, again without control over it.)<p>All told, I’m not quite satisfied with this. To illustrate, the defining example of “Potency” is making a sword supernaturally good at cutting. How, though? There are a few ways this could work. The obvious, reductionist answer is by optimizing the material structure to be sharper‍ ‍‍—‍ but this could only make a sword <em>naturally</em> good at cutting.<p>To go beyond that, you’d probably want to telekinetically maintain the edge and integrity, letting you do classic stunts like cutting lesser blades in half. Another option is telekinetically splitting apart the target around the blade, sundering with magic itself.<span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>An idea I have <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/black-nerve/apocrypha/sun-cutter.html>explored before</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Let’s Talk About the Sun-Cutter</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span>.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>I suppose the synthesis here is to recognize that if your power is something like augmenting swords for cutting, then this can be expressed as <em>sharpness manipulation</em>.<p>But enough about media‍ ‍‍—‍ what about triggers?<ul><li>Psychic: activated by mental states <ul><li>Willful: focusing attention and willpower<li>Emotional: feeling certain emotions and intentions<li>Principled: abiding by sworn rules<li>Alienated: varying through separate, inscrutable whims</ul><li>Somantic: triggered by bodily activity <ul><li>Verbal: speaking words of power<li>Gestural: performing, dancing, or signing<li>Reflexive: automatic response to stimulus<li>Metabolic: passive result of survival or grwoth</ul><li>Conditional: depending on properties of the medium <ul><li>Prepared: investing time or energy in the medium<li>Inherent: possessing certain natural qualities<li>Contingent: attaining a certain state<li>Personal: uniquely linked to the user</ul><li>Circumstantial: factors outside the user or the medium <ul><li>Expensive: depleting a resource<li>Random: occuring unpredictably<li>Consensual: considering a target’s preference<li>Delegated: granting control to a target</ul></ul><p>This is a pretty broad spread. And some of these distinctions are <em>very</em> fine. Is the difference between “Prepared” and “Personal” clear? The former is a telekinetic that can only control objects they’ve “charged up” beforehand; the latter is a telekinetic that can only control one object, e.g. their spirit weapon.<p>What about “Alienated”, “Consensual” and “Delegated”? An user with Alienated Portal Generation can’t control when or where they create portals, their power does what it thinks is best for them. Delegated Portal Generation is easy: rather than (just) creating them yourself, you empower others to do so.<p>Consensual Portal Generation is trickier to assign meaning to. See, my original idea was, e.g. “Consenual Animal Control” means that the animal can shrug off your commands. But in the general case, this leads to funny animism. “Consensual Hydrokinesis” suggests that each body of water has its own mind, and you have to appease water spirits.<span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>With some natural implications in the case of bloodbending.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>Consensual Portal Generation, though? If the portals themselves have minds of their own, how is it practically different from Alienated Portal Generation? Or maybe it’s not the portals, but the space they tunnel through, so that you can only portal into someone’s home if the house allows you come through. Cute, but what determines what the house wants? Animism is one option, but a more natural option is that if it’s my house, then whether <em>I</em> want you inside is the operative question. But at that point, is it any different from Delegated Portal Generation?<p>Words and concepts are defined by deferal. If you have “Red” and “Blue” buckets, then you must categorize colors by how warm or cool they are. But if you add a “Cyan” bucket, suddenly a whole bunch of colors stop being “Blue.” The color hasn’t changed, but the concept gets redefined: even though they’re still blue, they’re more cyan than they are blue.<p>If I deleted the “Personal” category, then that niche of powers‍ ‍‍—‍ spirit swords, astral projection, etc.‍ ‍‍—‍ can be more properly understood as being Prepared or Inherent in some specific way.<p>Another implication here is mutual exclusion. If I roll a power as Reflexive, the fact that there’s a Willful category might lead me to conclude it’s therefore <em>not</em> willful‍ ‍‍—‍ i.e., it’s involuntary. Yet by that logic, half the possibilities imply completely involuntary powers. But they just aren’t that common, in my experience.<p>While writing the list, I originally included words like “require” or “demand,” but I deleted them. Willful doesn’t mean voluntary as opposed to involuntary, it means your will is in some sense tested or depleted. Verbal or Gestural don’t mean the theater is necessarily, only that it notably empowers or affects the ability in some way.<p>All of these can stack‍ ‍‍—‍ in fact, most written magic systems demand several of these factors.<p>But all of this fiddling leaves me with a question: what are we even doing?</div><h2 class=heading id=act-ii-dark-night-of-the-goal><a title="Prior Heading"class=button href=#act-i-from-firstest-principles>←</a> <a href=#act-ii-dark-night-of-the-goal>Act II: Dark Night of the Goal</a> <a title="Next Heading"class=button href=#act-iii-hard-takeoff>→</a></h2><div class=subpage><p>More pointedly, are we building a power generator, or a power <em>prompt</em> generator?<p>When I, bright‍-​eyed, started putting together my own code, I had the idea that I would totally one‍-​up AW’s generator by spitting out detailed, well‍-​formed sentences.<p>One of the premature optimizations that kneecapped my progress was I payed a lot attention to how grammatical my outputs were. Achieving context‍-​aware results required that my dataset encode relations‍ ‍‍—‍ so the entry for “Manipulation” pointed to the entries for “Movement”, “Scaling”, etc.‍ ‍‍—‍ as well as including fields for name, description, and the exact phrase to include in the output sentence.<p>Once I started making things properly recursive, I realized I ought to include a field for the gerund form of process verbs, so that they could be qualified in dependent clauses, which even at that point meant adding additional lines to two dozen definitions and…<p>My “am I just wasting my time” sense started tingling.<span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>If you know me, you know this is a survival mechanism.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>I try not to spend too much time on this site griping out current events, but at this point <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/posts/corporate-intelligence.html>language models</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Re: Corporate Intelligence</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> bear a mention. After all, if my goal is generating well‍-​formed sentences, no script I cook up in a day is going to outperform the slop machines.<p>LLMs, of course, suck at brainstorming. Now, you can overstate the “glorified autocomplete” talking point, but the inescapable nature of the prevailing machine learning regime is statistical approximation‍ ‍‍—‍ a form of averaging. The most likely token is the least surprising.<p>So, what use have I for programmatically generated text? Why would it be more impressive for my script to output more articulate sentences than some toy javascript applet from ten years ago?<p>What my desires amount to, ultimately, is producing more complex and coherent output. “Precognition. Yes, but happiness.” is obviously incomplete. I can design a generator that, after rolling “Fire manipulation”, knows that it can pull from a table of things related to fire‍ ‍‍—‍ light, smoke, heat‍ ‍‍—‍ and might preferentially steer toward those when generating further concepts.<p>Why?<p>What generators do, ultimately, is a form of automation. I could pull up a word list and scan it until one of them catch my eyes, or simply close my eyes and wander my mind palace until inspiration arises.<p>When take a prompt and flesh it out into a power, my thinking follows patterns: there’s a set of mental motions I do every time to make sense of things.<p>And that’s the key: I want outputs that <em>make more sense.</em><p>I am turning input A into output Z, and wouldn’t it more efficient if I could start at step M instead of A?<p>Lately, there’s been a recurring phenomena where game developers have left diffusion‍-​generated assets in published titles, ostensibly by accident. Why does this happen? State of the art generated output makes for poor placeholders, for the dual reason that they do not suffice as a final product, yet they still appear fine enough that, after rounds of testing and polish and putting out fires, you might forget about them. Good placeholders look obviously, unmistakably unfinished, precisely so that this doesn’t happen.<p>A good prompt <em>almost</em> works. An important part of “almost” is that it means “doesn’t.” Prompts do most of their useful work in those first moments of sense‍-​making.<p>Consider the “bad rolls” AW’s generator sometimes spit out‍ ‍‍—‍ “fire manipulation but heat” or “time travel and time”‍ ‍‍—‍ they are uninspiring because they make already sense. There’s nothing to do with them but extend a rather rote exercise.<p>Part of why I conjecture LLMs are so deleterious is the anchoring effect. Once you have an answer, you’re inclined to stick to it. If you need an answer and don’t have any, then you know to start looking. But once you have an answer, instead you need only ask: is there a better one? Equivalently: is this one close enough? (An LLM’s answer is optimized to be one fits best on first blush‍ ‍‍—‍ it makes the most statistical sense.)<p>How many species of fish are there? If I say “two or three,” you know it’s nonsense. If I said “around five hundred thousand,” contextually you already expect that I made that up whole‍-​cloth, but doesn’t it sound about right? It makes sense, and cognitive psychology suggests that starting point will influence your guess, even when you try to correct it.<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Anyway, it’s an overestimate by a whole order of magnitude, but it of course depends on how you define “fish.”</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>This creates a paradoxical scenario where a worse answer is better, when glaring insufficiency provides more motivation than vague imprecision.<p>To wrap up a confused tangent, I don’t want to press a button and get a complete power: I want to press a button and get an inspiring puzzle, a test of my creative muscles. But I <em>do</em> want that sweat to produce something worthwhile.<p>If the space of possibilities were a great big rolling plane, I don’t want to get stuck in one corner of it, I want to explore the whole thing. If I’m told exactly where to go, I’ll probably wind up somewhere nearby. But if I’m told what direction to head in, I’ll wander until I see a cool point of interest.<p>The former can only produce the best results if someone already knows the approximate location of the best result. The latter takes longer, but walk long enough and you’ll find the most interesting landmark in that direction.<span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Well, no, this is actually a <a href=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exploration%E2%80%93exploitation_dilemma>explore‍-​exploit tradeoff</a>.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>This leads to a better objection to AW’s generator. If I roll dice to determine which direction to check, I can only ever go in six directions. As noted earlier, there are some powers that never come up on the lefthand side.<p>Is that all we need, then? Repopulate the list with an improved power pool? Well, no. Remember what my efforts to categorize powers yielded? We broke “Manipulation” powers down into four subtypes, only one of which is what everyone thinks of‍ ‍‍—‍ Kinesis.<span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>I called Movement becuse that felt like it could encompass e.g. teleporting the medium.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> Worse is “Perception”, which has three reasonable enough subtypes, then “Exegesis,” which I still haven’t quite wrapped my head around.<p>So perhaps one of the fixes is to introduce a weighting system? We can give Movement more weight than Reconfiguration.<p>But now we must ask: what do we want our distribution to reflect? The point of consulting a random table is <em>for</em> unexpected output. If we want obvious answers, we can think of them on our own, or ask ChatGPT. We <em>want</em> our generator to spit out unusual answers.<p>Don’t we? Let’s go all the way back‍ ‍‍—‍ remember how this post started off? We analyzed settings that implied or stated there were millions of unique magical effects somewhere offscreen. We then trotted out procedural generation in the interest of more tractably reaching that target.<p>For that application, we genuinely do care about accurately modelling distributions. It would be weird if <em>everyone</em> in the world had bizarre off‍-​beat powers. It’d have setting‍-​level ramifications if only 25% of sensors can actually detect the location of their element, and another 25% are all doing some mystical bullshit you can’t clearly explain.<p>Is Fire Manipulation more common than Delegated Phantom Essence Transformation? The latter is a better answer to “what’s an interesting power?” and former is a better answer to “our characters just encountered a random guy, what’s his deal?”<p>The correct, boring solution to this problem is that you should math out the power statistics for your setting‍ ‍‍—‍ e.g. 60% Manipulators, 10% Perceivers, 30% hybrid‍ ‍‍—‍ then roll on your own custom tables.<p>But in order to construct those tables, you need to appraise the full space of possibilities. So let’s‍ ‍‍—‍ finally‍ ‍‍—‍ get into what I teased earlier, and explain how to go full recursive.</div><h2 class=heading id=act-iii-hard-takeoff><a title="Prior Heading"class=button href=#act-ii-dark-night-of-the-goal>←</a> <a href=#act-iii-hard-takeoff>Act III: Hard Takeoff</a> <a title="Next Heading"class=button href=#epilogue-ad-myriadem>→</a></h2><div class=subpage><p>This character has the power of Prepared Plant Movement. By touching flora, they can imbue energy that accelerates and guides growth. This means, specifically, that they most likely have: (a) the power to discern what is and isn’t a “plant”; (b) the power to exude energy; (c) the power to turn this energy into “growth;” (e) the power to sense where this growth is and could go; (d) the power to remotely control where this “growth” ends up.<p>Can they, with power‍-​sense alone, tell the difference between a brick and a bit of driftwood? What happens when when they exude this energy into something that isn’t a plant? Can they grow food or poison‍ ‍‍—‍ can they revive dead plants? Can touch a tree and extend their sense through its branches and roots‍ ‍‍—‍ throughout the <a href=https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-023-01986-1>wood wide web</a>? Can they control the growth precisely enough to remotely control puppets?<p>The point here isn’t base munchkinry or brainstorming. For one, each of these subpowers change what the “real” power is. Is this a mere healer or crafter with an affinity for plants? Or are they actually a looming threat‍ ‍‍—‍ boasting an army and continental omniscience‍ ‍‍—‍ for which the botanical nature is at worst a detail or at best a hidden weakness revealed near the climax?<p>But more importantly, by analyzing the substructure of this conceptually coherent power, we can reveal the patterns and discover how to tie this into a coherent <em>superstructure</em>. “Plant Detection” is a weak power, and still weak if paired with “Plant Measuring,” but when extended with Manipulation powers that rely on that data?<p>The internal structure becomes a long sequence of “then”s. Detect a plant, <em>then</em> energize, <em>then</em> initiate growth, <em>then</em> channel it to the destination, <em>then</em> manifest it.<p>So we can make this power more complex by adding more steps. Where does the energy come from? Easy answer: sunlight courses with magical potential. But that feels like the same level of abstraction as the other steps.<p>More interesting things happen if we canonize that “plant puppets” idea, change it from a clever use‍-​case to a supported feature. If this character grows the plants into <a href=https://verdant-realm-botanist.bandcamp.com/album/collective-the-shape-of-he-to-come>special bodies remiscient of animal anatomy</a>, then they can animate plants with a spark of higher intelligence, creating triffid minions.<p>It’s tempting to carry this further‍ ‍‍—‍ can the triffids be vessels for storing and widely distributing the growth energy? Can the triffids evolve into higher forms, like sapient dryads?‍ ‍‍—‍ but again, my goal here isn’t pure brainstorming.<p>Instead, notice the symmetry here. “Plant Minion Creation” could have been its own power!<p>Structurally, you could generate this using conjunctive combinations, but omitting the medium (equivalently, letting the medium be a sub‍-​power). So {Slime Reconfiguration} would be manipulating slime to impart useful properties, and {{Slime Reconfiguration} for Prediction} makes me imagine the slime is a distributed mind, learning and assimilating intelligence.<p>Another impromptu roll gave me “each.” How do we interpret {{Sharpness Transformation} each Movement}? ‘Transformation’ also encompasses creation, so one interpretation is you can psychically throw objects, and higher velocities radically enhance their cutting power.<p>But just chaining like this limits the recursion. Return to the Plant Uplift power. One of natural designs is to have the two subpowers share states. The growth energy can be used for kinesis, but also for empowering the minions. Similarly, the power’s state must be tracking whether a given plant has been grown into a proper shape for a minion. This notion of internal state is crucial to categorizing higher‍-​order powers.<p>The simplest might a simple toggle power. You can do only X until a condition is met, where you can only do Y. Perhaps Y is a powerup state, or it’s a modal power. Wind powers, except you can only use your long‍-​range air motion sense when you aren’t using your powerful air blasts. This generalizes to powers with longer lists of modes. Maybe you can fly, too, but that means no draft sense or air blasts. In short, these powers entail choice and tradeoff.<p>If you limit the transitions between the modes, you get a more specific archetype: the multi‍-​phase “clock” power. The transitions might be based on time or injuries sustained, but it’s still interesting if the character can deliberately advance the clock.<p>Of course, there’s more interlinked shapes than simple cycles and fully connected graphs. With enough modes, it’d be meaningful to speak of branching tree shapes, or latticed grids‍ ‍‍—‍ but at that point, you’re talking at least half a dozen states. While each of those could its own unique power, to maintain a coherent identity, we’ll likely go for modifiers and intermediate variants of general power.<p>If we ditch the modal constraint, then what results is instead a “menu” power, where various conditions unlock subpowers. We’ve already touched on an illustrative menu power: Ten Shadows.<p>But the Plant Mastery power we cooked up just above, I would argue, is more Menu than it is Modal. Minion creation depends on growing plants, but it’s not a separate phase, just a menu option that’s “grayed out” pending enabling circumstances.<p>The nature of Menu powers is aggregating different subpowers that synergize, whether it it’s a big “switch statement” like TS or a step‍-​by‍-​step procedural flow. But there’s a third possibility. There’s a meaningful sense in which Minion Creation is a much “bigger” power than Plant Manipulation. If these minions get large or numerous enough, they outscale the base power in plot significance.<p>Consider the narrative arc of, say, an incremental game. You start by clicking, then you gain access to auto‍-​clickers, then you gain access to abilities that auto‍-​buy auto‍-​clickers, and so forth.<p>Some menu powers are steps toward an end goal, but some loop back and start to fractally enrich themselves. We don’t have to go full <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/posts/parasitoid-singularity.html>parasitoid singularity</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Why Shouldn’t Parasites Rule the World?</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> every time‍ ‍‍—‍ maybe there’s only two or three levels of scaling supported. But it’s worth recognizing that even a limited feedback cycles is its own unique structure.<p>Next, it’s tempting to notice that both modes and menus are in some sense binary, so perhaps the logical next step to generalize is to consider powers that are more granular the that. Spectrums with integers or fractions instead of booleans.<p>But I don’t think this actually results in any novel possibilities. What is a “spectrum” power? Perhaps twin Light and Dark powers, which start with angelic abilities that gradually descend into corrupted eldritch powers? But this is no spectrum. It’s still binary: Two powersets (Light and Dark) and rules for when either subsets is applicable.<p>Ultimately, you’re always drawing from a number of conceptual wells when you design a power, and when decomposing an ability into subpowers, binary vs spectral doesn’t matter as much as what the concepts are and how complex and overlapping they are.<p>There is one variation that does merit special representation. Consider classic power copying. Here, certain states confer subpowers, that much is the same, but there seem to be abitrarily many such states. Equivalently, the state <em>is</em> the subpower.<p>This isn’t limited to such overt cases. A common enough trope sees clever characters “hack” their power, reprogramming and extending it to new heights.<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Years ago, a chatter expressed a distaste for how many superpowers devolved into <a href=https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/SemanticSuperpower>word games</a> based around “creative” reinterpretations of what a power is defined to do. It’s interesting to consider that munchkinry (at least to the extreme of effectively Abitrary Code Exploiting the universe) is fundamentally just a materialist analogue of playing semantics to win.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> The basic rule of universal computability‍ ‍‍—‍ wizard completeness, if you will‍ ‍‍—‍ is that if the specification of your ability has enough “whiles” and “eaches,” enough internal states, then you can theorectically reconfigure its behavior to serve whatever end you desire‍ ‍‍—‍ it just comes down to patience and imagination. (And, one presumes, mana reserves.)<p>Now, if you aren’t technically inclined, your patience may be wearing thin. These complicated variables and functionalities are all well and good if you want to make arcane video gamey abilities‍ ‍‍—‍ but some of us care more about themes and such.<p>But I find there’s a more natural framework for thinking about higher‍-​order powers. Rather than programs, <em>abilities are analogies.</em> Waterwalking is treating liquids like solids. The pyrokinetic treats fire like limbs, as an extension of their body.<p>Higher order abilities, then, are <em>extended metaphors.</em> This character may be crystal manipulator, but thematically, their power is <em>like a snake</em>. When she crafts crystal swords, it’s like fangs. When she crafts crystal armor, it’s like scales. What does it mean for her to be venomous? Constricting? To slither, to scent? Can she lay eggs? Does her power force her to be solitary, or to bask, or to hunt?<p>The general form, then, is X is like Y, where each x is like a y. Ten Shadows, for example, feels a lot less random when you learn that the thematic root is the Ten Sacred Treasures. Consider how many culturally canonized archetypes can you pull from to define your powersets.<p>Before we move on, let’s recap:<ul><li>Modal: powers are separate or exclusive <ul><li>Options: powers provide choices and tradeoffs<li>Phases: powers rotate or alternate by a set pattern<li>Graphs: powers transition by a complex logic</ul><li>Menu: powers are interdependent and overlapping <ul><li>Flow: powers advances or enables a procedure<li>Branch: powers work indepedently yet synergize<li>Fractal: powers builds a positive feedback cycle</ul><li>Metaphor: powers relates to an archetypal structure<li>Mu‍-​recursive: powers can modify their own logic</ul><p>This list is my most obviously unfinished. Breaking into a rule of three rather than four feels like a failure of symmetry, and two I have failed to meaningful dissect into specifics at all. As much as I made fun of AW’s “meta powers,” I don’t think the all‍-​encompassing broadness of the last two are an improvement at all.<p>We’ve climbed high enough on the tower of abstraction that I’m running out of air. Let’s user‍-​glide‍-​snow‍-​thread‍-​illness back down to earth.</div><h2 class="heading final"id=epilogue-ad-myriadem><a title="Prior Heading"class=button href=#act-iii-hard-takeoff>←</a> <a href=#epilogue-ad-myriadem>Epilogue: Ad Myriadem</a></h2><div class=subpage><p>You may assume, in this post titled “Recursive Magic Systems” which has spent nine thousand words examining magic system, that you have read a post about magic systems. But that’s not quite it.<p>What stood out to me was that, when writing about the procedural flow of powers, I recalled about the scheme for modelling nonhuman emotions I wrote about all the way back in <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=xenodeterminism.html>my xenofiction post</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Xenodeterminism for the Aspiring Alien</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span>. I thought about the model of character traits I’ve groped toward in some abandoned essays.<span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Mainly <a href=/posts/literary-figure-models.html>Literary Figure Models</a>.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span>. I already joked about how those nifty combining conjectives are exactly the sort of thing I’ve used as glue in every storytelling tool I’ve ever devised.<p>The only thing that made this essay seem to be about superpowers is merely that the word lists we pulled from had names like “flight” and “portals” rather than, say “betrayal” or “road of trials.”<p>The real magic of this recursive system is that it generalizes far beyond powers.<p>Ultimately, powers are a plot device. Put enough such devices together and there’s no better word for what results than “plot.”<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>When writing about Plant Uplift, it struck me how each mechanic naturally suggested specific scenes or called for characteristic beats within tense action sequence.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> This means that, equivalently, a good magic power is no more and no less than a good story. Worlds are stories. Characters are stories. They have internal logic, themes that develop.<p>In a <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=drabble-iteration.html>more recent essay</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>The Drabble Iterations</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span>, I noted that I have fallen out of love with those rigid three‍-​part abstractions that defined my early essays; I’ve since found flowing pairs more flexible and productive. This new system, I think, could be the fruition of that line of thinking.<p>Two ideas joined by a conjunctive, each recursively defined thusly… I find this a powerful formalism for expressing narrative ideas. But maybe you’re less interested in me generalizing the Curry‍-​Howard Correspondence to fiction than you are in just generating some cool superpowers.<p>I’ve programmed my own power generator based on these ideas. You can play with it here: <a href=/code/magic-rig.html>Recursive Idea Generator</a>. It’s still in a pretty unfinished state, but do already find it fun to roll on.<p>Let me know if you actually end up with a library of a million spells.</div></article></main><aside class=pointer><div class=center>Part of a series called <em><a href=/essays/index.html title=->Write By Constriction</a></em></div><div class=seriesnav><a class=prev href=/essays/ego-necromancy.html title=->← Ego Necromancy</a></div><hr><p>Thank you for reading! Please consider sharing this post or telling us you read it. Our only algorithm is word of mouth, and we have no analytics.<p>Thoughts? Questions? We’re interested in feedback, or even just acknowledgement. All are welcome to <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/contact.html>contact us.</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Contact Information</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>Did you enjoy? Please consider donating on <a href=https://ko-fi.com/snugglesquiggle>ko-fi</a> or <a href=https://www.patreon.com/snugglesquiggle>patreon</a>. We’re struggling and even a little bit helps.<p>Our deepest thanks and dedication to those who have donated to sustain this site.</aside><footer><a href=#>Top</a> · <a href=/>Home</a> · <a href=/archive.html>Archive</a></footer>]]></content>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title type="html"><![CDATA[A Whole New Post]]></title>
        <id>https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.org/posts/whole-new-post.html</id>
        <link href="https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.org/posts/whole-new-post.html"/>
        <link rel="enclosure" href="https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.orgundefined" type="image//"/>
        <updated>2026-06-26T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
        <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>When you reblog a post on tumblr, you create a new post.</p>
<p>It’s one of the weirder parts of how that hellsite is implemented. In programming terms, this is the difference between passing by reference and passing by value. On other sites, sharing a post is just a fancy way of linking to it. If the original gets deleted, it’s gone. Unless you saved a screenshot.</p>]]></summary>
        <content type="html"><![CDATA[<!doctypehtml><meta charset=UTF-8><meta content=width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0 name=viewport><meta content=article property=og:type><link href=/style.css media=all rel=stylesheet><link title="Squiggles Atom Feed"href=/feed.xml rel=alternate type=application/atom+xml><link title="Squiggles JSON Feed"href=/feed.json rel=alternate type=application/feed+json><link href=at://did:plc:ivoe7cntxuy6at7uzmxzs2ft/site.standard.publication/3mfk6cpprzt2t rel=site.standard.publication><link href=at://did:plc:ivoe7cntxuy6at7uzmxzs2ft/site.standard.document/3mph3vcjwwb2k rel=site.standard.document><title>A Whole New Post · Squiggle's Blog
    </title><meta content="A Whole New Post"property=og:title><meta content="When you reblog a post on tumblr, you create a new post. It’s one of the weirder parts of how that hellsite is implemented. In programming terms, this is the difference between passing by reference and passing by value. On other sites, sharing a post is just a fancy way of linking to it. If the original gets deleted, it’s gone. Unless you saved a screenshot. "property=og:description><body class="url-/posts/whole-new-post.html slug-whole-new-post"><header><h1 class=sitehead id=serpentine-squiggles><a href=/>Serpentine Squiggles</a></h1><div class="nav sitenav"><a class=no-notes href=/about.html>About</a><a class=no-notes href=/fiction/>Stories</a><a class=no-notes href=/artwork/>Artwork</a><a class=no-notes href=/games/>Games</a><a class=no-notes href=/music/>Music</a><a class=no-notes href=/essays/>Essays</a><a class=no-notes href=/posts>Posts</a><a class=no-notes href=/archive.html>Archive</a><a class=no-notes href=/contact.html>Contact</a><a class=no-notes data-n href=https://www.patreon.com/snugglesquiggle>Support</a></div></header><aside class=banner><p><a href=.><strong>The Serpent’s Track</strong></a> — read by constriction, write with venom.</aside><main id=main><div class=pagehead><div class=stats><span class=date>2026-06-26</span><span title="3437 words"class=wc>3.4k words</span></div><div class=titleblock><h1 class=heading>A Whole New Post</h1><div class=subtitle>what is the meaning of reblogging?</div></div></div><aside class=before><details class=sq-details-mini open><summary>Notes</summary> <div class=expansion><div class=prenotes><ul><li><p>Originally posted on <a href=https://www.tumblr.com/snugglesquiggle/820440392742862848>tumblr</a> —especially relevant here.</ul></div></div></details></aside><a href=#main id=resetview></a><article><p>When you reblog a post on tumblr, you create a new post.<p>It’s one of the weirder parts of how that hellsite is implemented. In programming terms, this is the difference between passing by reference and passing by value. On other sites, sharing a post is just a fancy way of linking to it. If the original gets deleted, it’s gone. Unless you saved a screenshot.<p>Tumblr reblogs are a lot more like screenshots. The text gets copied (typos and all) onto your blog. If the original gets deleted, you still have the copy.<p>This explains a weird feature of our notifications there. If I reblog something and someone interacts with that reblog, tumblr will inform me that they “liked your post”. But that’s not my post? It’s someone else’s post.<p>I digress. Today I actually want to talk about subtext and interpretation. Media literacy entails reading beyond the text and into the meaning created by what specifically a text presents and how. This includes the classic stuff like framing and implications and all the things one might have ideally learned from a course studying literature and language.<p>If you’re on tumblr, it’s probably for fandom, and I bet this isn’t the first time you’ve seen an essay about media literacy, particularly in this zeitgeist. But this post isn’t about fiction at all. Not really.<p>See, the most common media literacy test faced by the modern internet user is unrelated to English class and not more than tangentially related to whatever piece of pop culture they find themselves fixated on.<p>Enough swerve and preamble. What I really mean to discuss is the humble vaguepost.<p>“Vagueposting” is, fittingly, ill‍-​defined. Let’s nail it down by opposition, shall we? A clear, honest post should be a bit easier to characterize. It’s tempting to say “you know it when you see it.” This in fact is the key feature. You know what you are looking at; you know what it is saying.<p>You’re reading a vaguepost if you aren’t sure what it’s <em>really</em> saying. But “saying” is itself vague (sorry). Communication has at least three parts: what’s said, who it’s said to, and why it’s being said.<p>Some vagueposts just allude to things in that “if you know, you know” sort of way. Here, it’s unclear what they’re saying.<p>Some vagueposts are replies with extra steps: they address people without naming names, grouch about issues without pointing at what in particular set them off. Here, it’s unclear who or what they’re responding to.<p>Which, incidentally, makes this a effective form for generating engagement bait. If people can vaguepost without specifying what they’re really talking about, they can mislead and exaggerate or make things up entirely, if that makes for a better poast.<p>But why lie about it? This brings us to the last tendency of vagueposting, and what I consider its most insidious effect. It’s the very definition of bad faith.<p>If I grouch about a time some football fan was mean to me, when no such interaction ever occurred, the deception doesn’t just lie in the fabrication of facts. Rather: what would motivate me to make this up? Maybe I simply hate football and all its fans; I want people to understand that this is what they’re like. So even if this exact interaction never happened, it’s still the sort of thing that does happen. It’s spiritually true.<p>Now, if I just said “people don’t hate football fans enough,” then other haters would nod along. But realistically, I know that most won’t change their opinion just from me telling them to. But if I vividly explain how much they suck, isn’t that more persuasive?<p>So imagine how persuasive it might be if I don’t <em>lead</em> with being a football hater. I just tell a story of what it’s like to talk to one of them, and the only reasonable takeaway is that these creatures are insufferable.<p>If I do my job well, why should I even tell you to hate football fans? Why should I tell you I hate them? It goes without saying; it speaks for itself.<p>But you might have been more skeptical of the story if you knew it came from a frothing at the mouth hater, so I must do my best to look reasonable.<p>This dissembling is the nature of the third kind of vaguepost. Bad faith is disguising the true intention behind your posting. Really, this taxonomy describes rhetoric more generally, rather than vagueposting specifically. A vivid anecdote (which happens to be all lies) is simple propaganda; few would call it a vaguepost. Luckily, vagueposting was just another stepping stone to what I wish to discuss.<p>It’s at this point it would be most honest of me to disclose that you’re reading a vaguepost right now. Or at least, what begin life as one.<p>First, a mutual of mine on tumblr had vagueposted about a take she’d seen cross her dash a few times. I left a frustrated reply to her, and we began discussing the matter in direct messages.<p>In the process of composing my counterarguments, I had a major realization about the nature of social media communication: then I started writing a diatribe that metamorphosed into this post.<p>Something that quickly became clear is that the post my mutual was griping about had a several rhetorical weaknesses. I quickly backed off of arguing about it; I didn’t even end up sending the paragraphs I wrote in its defense (it didn’t deserve it).<p>Yet I still find the underlying realization interesting and want to share it. I say all of this because, if presented without caveat, it may look like I’m litigating some other argument by proxy. But this is a toy example created to illustrate a broad point; it doesn’t map accurately to the discussion that prompted it. (Which is why I will remain vague about what that discussion was.) Without further ado:<hr><p>Let’s imagine that Alice is composing text to put on some online platform. Specifically, Alice is making an incisive argument against P, some position we won’t specify. She lists several salient faults with it, and concludes her tirade with a quip in favor of Q, an opposing position.<p>Beth sees this and groans at the bias dripping off that post. It’s clear that Alice doesn’t want you thinking about whether any of those critiques she so proudly listed also apply to Q. What a dishonest spin. Q gets an offhanded mention at the end, because if Alice had described it in any detail at all, then readers could come to their own conclusion, and that wouldn’t be convenient for the dunk.<p>Now, is Beth justified in coming to this conclusion?<p>The answer depends on just what was glossed over when we said “Beth sees this.”<p>Imagine we don’t know anything about the P vs Q debate, and Alice’s post is our first window into that world. It’s clearly a distorted view. We don’t know anything about Q, but her slant clearly implies that it’s much better than P.<p>But does this ever happen quite like that? Do people just go around, absolutely unprompted, cooking up biased treatises against their imagined debate opponents? There’s got to be at least a bit more context than that.<p>Still, many plausible contexts won’t amend Beth’s judgment by much. Perhaps Alice heard about some recent news or viral discourse will bring greater attention to P vs Q, so she’s preemptively agitating in favor of Q. Perhaps someone had outright asked her what’s the deal, and this is how she chose to introduce the debate.<p>But it may be more realistic to imagine that this was a vaguepost. Alice found out about someone (perhaps Beth, but let’s imagine an unseen Mallory) who genuinely believes in P, so Alice’s vaguing about it in lieu of arguing directly.<p>Again, not much should change in Beth’s evaluation of the post (if anything, this makes it more dishonest).<p>But suppose it’s not a vaguepost at all. Suppose that a dialogue <em>was</em> happening. Alice wrote that post in response to Mallory, but Beth happened to see Alice’s post first. (We didn’t say what kind of platform it was, after all. This type of misunderstanding happens often in chatrooms.)<p>Now things start to get complicated. If Mallory is a hardliner against Q, then perhaps earlier posts in the conversation have already laid out the case against it, and Alice doing so again would be redundant. Rather than it being dishonest not to describe Q in detail, it’s quite basic communication. Context matters, but we all know this.<p>Now suppose there’s no thread of communication between Alice and Mallory. Even if it’s just a garden variety vaguepost, who is it <em>for?</em><p>If this is social media, with feeds and followers, then Alice is probably followed by plenty of other proponents for Q. Anyone opposed to it couldn’t stand to follow her. (Maybe she preemptively blocks them!)<p>So when Alice writes about how stupid P is and caps the post off with a compliment to Q, this isn’t an <em>argument</em> for Q. She’s talking to her friends who are already convinced of Q, casually commiserating. (Or perhaps there had been some confusion among them where P is concerned, and she’s hoping to dispel that.)<p>And this, subtly yet importantly, is just like the previous scenario. The details of Q have already been established, and the dynamic of communication yields no reason to redundantly sell Q to an audience that has already bought it.<p>Beth may be tempted to call Alice’s post misleading, but how is it leading if Beth isn’t following? Rather than being crafted to deceive her, it wasn’t even crafted conceiving of her. The post isn’t for you.<p>But then: how did she even see it? We had imagined that Alice had a number of followers, a gaggle of Alicelings who all believe in Q just like her. This is social media, so the Alicelings’ engagement propagates her post to the feeds of her followers‍-​of‍-​followers.<p>We had also supposed that no one opposed to Q could stand to follow Alice, but with every step removed, that repulsion weakens. Not all of her followers are as zealous.<p>Two or three degrees of separation, and you’d expect the post to have reached even those with only the vaguest of inclinations toward Q, who themselves easily followed by people outright partisan for P.<p>And at from this vantage, they witness a post so absorbed in its adherence to Q that it hadn’t even considered it might be read by people who actually believe in P.<p>So, recall our guiding question. Beth saw this post, and called it dishonest. Is she justified?<p>More than just “context matters”, this is <a href=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Context_collapse>context collapse</a>. again, i’m not describing anything writers before me haven’t already observed and analyzed.<p>Alice says “I like pancakes,” and Beth says “So you hate waffles?” and we laugh at this, say no bitch that’s a whole new sentence.<p>But imagine Beth was holding a meeting for a club of waffle lovers only. And suppose this club exists because there are a few assholes who enjoy pancakes but like making fun of cringey waffler lovers most of all, and they bully others for their inferior choice of breakfast at the slightest opportunity.<p>So the waffle lovers banded together to reassure each other. Then Beth sees a girl walk up to her and cockily declare “I like pancakes” with a grin on her face. Does this context make the kneejerk conclusion any more compelling?<p>Beth gets upset because she sees exactly where this is going, and now Alice gets to look around utterly bemused, not understanding why three words of personal opinion has Beth about to jump down her throat. Man, waffle lovers sure are getting hysterical.<p>What “I like pancakes” <em>really</em> means is contextualized by who is saying, where they’re saying it, and who’s hearing it.<p>Maybe Alice really had nothing to do with the bullies. (Or maybe she wanted to see if the waffle nerds really were as ridiculously sensitive as everyone says.)<p>It happens that Beth’s assumption of imminent bullying was jumping at shadows, this time. But treating “a whole new sentence” as a valid counterargument enables this game of rhetorical I’m‍-​not‍-​touching you.<p>Like a rhetorical necker cube, swapping out the context can load very different meanings into the same words. Which context you interpret a post within is a function of what assumptions you’re primed to make about the poster.<p><a href=https://www.tumblr.com/monopoison3r/778201833178071041>The legends say</a> that over a decade ago, tumblr had a “feature” where reblogging a post let you edit what the OP original said.<p>Here’s the thing I find interesting: this never stopped. On every social media platform, we’re constantly editing each others post and then blaming the poster for the editor’s decision.<p>Alice wrote an post against P that made complete sense in the context of her Q‍-​believing following. One of her Alicelings then reblogs it into an audience without that context. And as established, without context, it has a different effect. A post meant to create a <em>more</em> balanced understanding of the issue for the half‍-​informed transforms into a post that creates a <em>less</em> balanced understanding of the issue for the uninformed. A table tips over because one of the legs was removed.<p>Beth, seeing an Aliceling’s reblog of the post, experiences a dishonest message that presents a distorted account of the issue.<p>But who is being dishonest? All Alice did was talk to her friends. All the Aliceling did was click “reblog”. Is it an act of deception and sneaky rhetoric to talk to people already on the same page as you? Is it lying to click reblog?<p>Or, equivalently, we can agree it’s not good to be dishonest. People shouldn’t misinform others. So who should have acted differently in this scenario? Was it wrong for Alice to speak without considering how people not even in the conversation would interpret her words? Was it wrong for an Aliceling to reblog a post she agreed with?<p>But this question leads us astray. Or rather, it leads us into dangerously practical questions where “P vs Q” is a juvenile equivocation, treating as the interchangeable both semantic quibbles and important matters of disinformation and bigotry. Whether Alice did something wrong here depends on whether she was speaking carelessly about high stakes matters. But I don’t want to discuss ethics, really.<p>What I want to get at is best piqued by asking: <em>who wrote the post?</em><p>If some hypothetical Mallory had written a post with the exact context that Beth assumed, then that Mallory <em>would</em> have been dishonest toward Beth. But this deceptive Mallory is a figment; it does not describe Alice nor the Aliceling.<p>I perceive a kind of distributed agency here. Two posters working together have given rise to an act of communication that cannot be attributed to either poster alone.<p>I said it at the start, after all.<p><em>When you reblog a post on tumblr, you create a new post.</em><p>You have authored a whole new message; it shares words and attribution with the original, but not the same context nor its meaning.<p>But who creates the context?<p>If Mallory the breakfast bully reblogs Alice’s photo (gushing about how yummy her pancake was this morning), then the reblog gains a new implication of making fun of waffle lovers. It’ll be seen by a bunch of other breakfast bullies who might say things like “i love how positive pancake lovers are. it’s like they aren’t ashamed of what they eat.”<p>You can already imagine unwitting blogs seeing this, appreciating the vibes of getting unabashedly excited about food, and share this not realizing what’s really being said. The recontextualization has rewritten the post.<p>But these examples make it seem too clean. It almost sounds like I’m lifting blame off the original poster and placing it onto anyone who reblogs it: the interpretation of posts becomes <em>your</em> fault for reblogging it. But who truly authors the context? It gets stitched and frayed with every share.<p>Vagueposts often come in swarms. Given a contentious enough inciter, one poster will get upset, write a snippy vaguepost, someone else will see it, and write an even snippier counter‍-​vaguepost, and if you’re in the eye of this sort of storm, you can witness a whole conversation unfolding in these back and forths, relationship invisible except for the damning juxtaposition.<p>A mutual reblogs one of these posts, and they have now picked a side in a unseen war they might not even be aware of.<p><em>That</em> is context they have nothing to do with and didn’t put there. everyone else on your feed has assigned a meaning‍ ‍‍—‍ a whole new sentence, if you will‍ ‍‍—‍ to that post.<p>Again I point back to that guiding question. Is Beth right to call Alice’s post dishonest? “Dishonesty” is a word that assigns agency and intent and <em>blame</em>. Beth might find herself irritated by Alice’s post and peer into the specifics of its wording for some gotcha to anchor her dispute on. It’s in fact this sort of dissection that prompted my writing this post at all. I think this exercise misses the mark.<p>Conventional frameworks of rhetorical analysis fall apart if you truly appreciate the medium we’re dealing with here. Or rather, the type of medium, because you can see the same effect even more clearly in the case of livestreaming. It’s common for contentious figures to be clipped out of context saying something that suggests a damning message, but one that’s very different from the beliefs they actually hold. <em>But they did say it.</em> But the livestreamer does not author seven second video clips; they author hours long streams. The act of editing creates a new piece of media they had, euphemistically, a collaborative role in.<p>I worry that the conventional style of arguing against posts on platforms like tumblr involves an auteur theory of shitposting.<p>You see a stupid post on your dashboard, and you assume OP was being stupid. This is often a reasonable conclusion (We <a href=https://www.tumblr.com/poupon/36756167899>piss on the poor</a> there.) But even when it’s true, it’s a <a href=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gettier_problem>gettier statement</a>. true and justified, but not justified truly. what you saw was a <em>stupid reblog</em>, which the OP had, euphemistically, a collaborative role in the post you see. Attributing intent to them is therefore fallacious, though seldom wholly incorrect.<p>Hellsites can only exist if there are sinners to populate them. We are cogs in a vast machine, and when a cog scrapes against you, do you blame that cog, or the gear turning it, or the spring driving that one? Could you instead blame the devil who built the machine? Could you blame yourself for being there in the first place?<p>Yet I find this conclusion unsatisfying. There’s no shortage of spiked wheels going out of their way to cut people, so perhaps they don’t need more plausible deniability for their malice. This analysis is not meant to absolve them. Posters are responsible for the content of their posts, and how it sounds out of context must be accounted for.<p>I don’t have answers, so permit me one last swerve. There’s an attitude prevalent on tumblr that’s always quietly irritated me. So many posters take a self‍-​harming level of ownership over their posts, a choice (all the more tragic if they don’t realize they’re making a choice) to view every tag and reblog as their business, their responsibility, addressed to them personally. They hurl invective at rebloggers like a suburbanite shouting at kids to get off their lawn. They leave notifications and reblogs enabled and take great offense at receiving notifications and reblogs.<p>And I suppose it would be unfair to single out that archetype alone. We can feel <a href=https://xkcd.com/774/>superior to both sides</a> if we take a moment to note the bizarre impulse to disagree at length only in the tags, propagating the post for all your followers to see, and in a format that vanishes just as soon as it propagates further. Or the lack of social grace it takes to derail a thread into something entirely unrelated, wasting the time of the OP and anyone scrolling through the reblogs.<p>Why would anyone behave so stupidly? It’s enough to make one sympathetic to that refrain so often said from the first group, addressed to the second: <em>make your own damn post.</em><p>But I can’t decide if this should be spoken in the tone of explanation or excuse:<p>When you reblog a post on tumblr, you create a new post.</article></main><aside class=pointer><div class=center>Part of a series called <em><a href=/posts/index.html title=->The Serpent’s Track</a></em></div><div class=seriesnav><a class=prev href=/posts/worm-ontology.html title=->← Escaping Capepunk Ontology</a><a class=next href=/posts/changeling-hypothetical.html title=->The Licensed Imposter Problem →</a></div><hr><p>Thank you for reading! Please consider sharing this post or telling us you read it. Our only algorithm is word of mouth, and we have no analytics.<p>Thoughts? Questions? We’re interested in feedback, or even just acknowledgement. All are welcome to <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/contact.html>contact us.</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Contact Information</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>Did you enjoy? Please consider donating on <a href=https://ko-fi.com/snugglesquiggle>ko-fi</a> or <a href=https://www.patreon.com/snugglesquiggle>patreon</a>. We’re struggling and even a little bit helps.<p>Our deepest thanks and dedication to those who have donated to sustain this site.</aside><footer><a href=#>Top</a> · <a href=/>Home</a> · <a href=/archive.html>Archive</a></footer>]]></content>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title type="html"><![CDATA[Escaping Capepunk Ontology]]></title>
        <id>https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.org/posts/worm-ontology.html</id>
        <link href="https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.org/posts/worm-ontology.html"/>
        <link rel="enclosure" href="https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.orgundefined" type="image//"/>
        <updated>2026-06-18T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
        <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>A friend mentioned how frustrating it is to try to come up with powers, only to realize “Worm already did that,” and the exercise becomes less fun as a result of that lack of novelty.</p>
<p>I can sympathize. I’m not the only one to <a href="https://www.tumblr.com/alexanderwales/787779625415786496">notice that parahuman powers have a particular flavor</a> or to grapple with it while <a href="https://alexanderwales.com/creating-superpowers-through-yes-and/">trying to generate powers</a>.</p>
<p>But I don’t find myself worrying about copying Worm. (In part, this is because I <em>have</em> often copied Worm on purpose; the lack of originally doesn’t stop me) but I also don’t feel that I’m recapitulating Worm when I don’t want to. But am I right to think that?</p>]]></summary>
        <content type="html"><![CDATA[<!doctypehtml><meta charset=UTF-8><meta content=width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0 name=viewport><meta content=article property=og:type><link href=/style.css media=all rel=stylesheet><link title="Squiggles Atom Feed"href=/feed.xml rel=alternate type=application/atom+xml><link title="Squiggles JSON Feed"href=/feed.json rel=alternate type=application/feed+json><link href=at://did:plc:ivoe7cntxuy6at7uzmxzs2ft/site.standard.publication/3mfk6cpprzt2t rel=site.standard.publication><link href=at://did:plc:ivoe7cntxuy6at7uzmxzs2ft/site.standard.document/3mq3atdlgwi2f rel=site.standard.document><title>Escaping Capepunk Ontology · Squiggle's Blog
    </title><meta content="Escaping Capepunk Ontology"property=og:title><meta content="A friend mentioned how frustrating it is to try to come up with powers, only to realize “Worm already did that,” and the exercise becomes less fun as a result of that lack of novelty. I can sympathize. I’m not the only one to notice that parahuman powers have a particular flavor or to grapple with it while trying to generate powers. But I don’t find myself worrying about copying Worm. (In part, this is because I have often copied Worm on purpose; the lack of originally doesn’t stop me) but I also don’t feel that I’m recapitulating Worm when I don’t want to. But am I right to think that? "property=og:description><body class="url-/posts/worm-ontology.html slug-worm-ontology"><header><h1 class=sitehead id=serpentine-squiggles><a href=/>Serpentine Squiggles</a></h1><div class="nav sitenav"><a class=no-notes href=/about.html>About</a><a class=no-notes href=/fiction/>Stories</a><a class=no-notes href=/artwork/>Artwork</a><a class=no-notes href=/games/>Games</a><a class=no-notes href=/music/>Music</a><a class=no-notes href=/essays/>Essays</a><a class=no-notes href=/posts>Posts</a><a class=no-notes href=/archive.html>Archive</a><a class=no-notes href=/contact.html>Contact</a><a class=no-notes data-n href=https://www.patreon.com/snugglesquiggle>Support</a></div></header><aside class=banner><p><a href=.><strong>The Serpent’s Track</strong></a> — read by constriction, write with venom.</aside><main id=main><div class=pagehead><div class=stats><span class=date>2026-06-18</span><span title="1751 words"class=wc>1.8k words</span></div><div class=titleblock><h1 class=heading>Escaping Capepunk Ontology</h1><div class=subtitle>the unquestioned assumptions of parahuman abilities</div></div></div><aside class=before><details class=sq-details-mini open><summary>Foreword</summary> <div class=expansion>Mostly for the benefit of someone in my chatroom.</div></details><details class=sq-details-mini open><summary>Notes</summary> <div class=expansion><div class=prenotes><ul><li><div><p>Originally posted on <a href=https://snugglesquiggle.tumblr.com/post/819795892290945024>tumblr</a>.<p>This page contains text initially written in direct corrrespondence, and thus is especially informal, fragmentary or otherwise unpolished; the contents may not be of general interest.</div></ul></div></div></details></aside><a href=#main id=resetview></a><article><p>A friend mentioned how frustrating it is to try to come up with powers, only to realize “Worm already did that,” and the exercise becomes less fun as a result of that lack of novelty.<p>I can sympathize. I’m not the only one to <a href=https://www.tumblr.com/alexanderwales/787779625415786496>notice that parahuman powers have a particular flavor</a> or to grapple with it while <a href=https://alexanderwales.com/creating-superpowers-through-yes-and/>trying to generate powers</a>.<p>But I don’t find myself worrying about copying Worm. (In part, this is because I <em>have</em> often copied Worm on purpose; the lack of originally doesn’t stop me) but I also don’t feel that I’m recapitulating Worm when I don’t want to. But am I right to think that?<p>Did Worm map out the whole space of powers fifteen years ago? Are all of us living in the world it built?<p>The influence is hard to escape in webfiction. More usefully, the idea that “Worm already did that” can be broken down into two broad categories. There’s the stuff Worm did because it’s just a very reasonable way to specify a power when you’re taking into account implied secondary powers and potential exploits‍ ‍‍—‍ that is, thinking about powers in a rigorous way.<p>Obviously a kinetic is going to need to have a sense for the things they control. Obviously a speedster is going to have <em>something</em> limiting them from imparting ridiculous forces via f=ma<p>Thus, you can’t worry about these similarities too much, because trying too hard to innovate here almost definitionally requires handling powers in an unreasonable way.<p>But there’s stuff Worm did because it’s just a reasonable to way to do it‍ ‍‍—‍ <em>given Worm‍-​specific assumptions</em>.<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text><a href=https://forums.spacebattles.com/threads/lockers-all-the-way-down-a-worm-retrospective-with-the-wizard-of-woah-also-rhodes.616398/page-159#post-61412644>This post</a> from a Worm critique thread gestures at the idea. That poster calls it a “standard gritty superhero package,” but for several years, my friends in the WebFictionGuide clique called it “the capepunk consensus.”</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>This is what’s more fruitful to pick apart, because Worm makes a lot of assumptions, but it can be hard to notice them because either those assumptions are the obvious ones to start with if you have sensibilities in common with wildbow (and girl do we), or because Worm does a really compelling job of framing its arbitrary assumptions as obvious, either through in‍-​setting justification or otherwise taking it for granted.<p>Some basic assumptions come to mind right away. The first one is that we’re dealing with superpowers at all, rather than something <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/posts/wizard-complete.html>wizard complete</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Toward a Universal Theory of Wizardry</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span>. Capes usually have a single power which is mostly thematically coherent and mostly doesn’t change, which rules out entire classes of cantrips or synergy effects that would be useful for a wizard with a bag of tricks, but don’t make sense to have a whole character centered around.<p>The other base assumption is what powers are for. In Worm, a cape generally needs to be able to hold their own if and when other capes are coming for their neck, either in combat or by already winning before the fighting starts. I’ll circle back to this point later.<p>No, the first really interesting thing to call out is the <em>ontology</em> of powers.<p>Worm tends to frame powers in very reductionist‍-​materialist way. The most goofy example of this is an early moment where, when discussing the nazi that creates ghosts, they’re described as ego forcefield projections or something, because Worm is too smart to include ghosts without rationalizing it somehow.<div><details class=sq-details><summary>The exact quote is in Buzz 7.9.</summary> <div class=expansion><blockquote><p>Crusader was flanked by a half dozen translucent replicas of himself, each armed with a ten foot long spear. He could use his power to generate ethereal simulacrums of himself, a legion of ghosts, if you wanted to be dramatic. I was more willing to peg them as some sort of semi‍-​sentient forcefield molded in his shape or some telekinetic energy infused with fragments of his ego. Whatever. The important thing was that his images could carry him up into the air, letting him fly, and they could pass through walls, armor and other solid barriers to impale you with those spears of theirs.</blockquote><p><a href=https://parahumans.wordpress.com/2012/02/14/buzz-7-9/>Source.</a></div></details></div><p>But Worm’s ontology is limited in another way: because powers are atomic and interact with the mostly‍-​familiar real world, they fundamentally express themselves legibly in that language.<p>You get powers that manipulate “fire” because we know what fire is, you’re much less likely to get powers that carve the world along <a href=https://snugglesquiggle.tumblr.com/post/791908255556354048>elemental divisions we’ve never heard of</a>. (Notably, if Worm’s superheroes had appeared a hundred years ago, you wouldn’t get a guy whose power is control of plastic, unless he also got some manner of plastic generation. If your world has its own materials and mechanics, then you can easily go broader than Worm.)<p>This might tempt you to imagining some color out of space type incomprehensible element, but “mana” is <em>also</em> a ontologically foreign element. Including any common currency or typified interaction between powers takes you into territory Worm doesn’t venture very deep into, because most power interactions there happen through the intermediary of how they affect real world objects.<p>When powers have to directly interact, it’s often in weird ad‍-​hoc ways. (E.g., thinkers mostly cause vague handwavey thinker interference? unless you’re built different like Coil.)<p>There’s also a <em>Yu‍-​gi‍-​oh!</em> versus <em>Magic the Gathering</em> style design difference‍ ‍‍—‍ do your powers operate on shared keywords, or bespoke rules? Worm has “flight” is a common power for capes‍ ‍‍—‍ “the Alexandria package”‍ ‍‍—‍ but generally flight is implemented differently in different powers: there’s no ontology of <em>flight as such.</em><p>A fun analogy for this is to consider the difference between a roguelike item pool and a skill tree. In roguelikes, you can get any item in any order, so you want avoid designing items that require a specific build to have any effect at all. In a game with a skill tree, though, you can have have the capstone abilities build on previous perks, because they require them.<p>Capes in Worm have almost no shared skill tree. What powers start to make sense the more of them do?<p>And this is without even broaching the possibility of throwing out reductionist materialism entirely. But I’m not usually as fond of stories that lean hard into overly conceptual or whimsical or eldritch effects.<p>Next up is how powers cluster together. Here, it’s easiest to point at “Breaker” specifically as a really weird power category you wouldn’t necessarily derive from first principles. So you can likewise get a system that feels different from Worm just by taking a specific type of power and elevating it to the same level as the Movers and Shakers. Or alternatively, skew the distribution, and say your system almost never produces strikers.<p>It’s worth noting the meta of what powers exist affects what powers make sense to exist. Whether it’s worthwhile to have power nullifying and amplifying abilities depends on how many powers exist. Abilities like “I’m unpredictable, even to thinkers” or “I can create a material that registers as controllable to every telekinetic power” go hard if that type of power is everywhere. But I’ll touch on this a bit more later.<p>Next, we have gaps between powers. Consider the Manton Effect. This is one that people (myself included) love to copy, and structurally it just says two types of powers don’t overlap. It’s an elegant way to dodge the TK heart‍-​attack problem‍ ‍‍—‍ if a psychic can generate enough force to throw around objects, why can’t they kill everyone by twisting vital organ a little?‍ ‍‍—‍ but there are other ways around it.<p>In general, inventing similar constraints can be helpful. In Black Nerve, for example, we can observe that vesperbane techniques for affecting brains or compelling behavior are rare and quick to get excluded.<span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Mostly because I wanted to avoid the oft‍-​critized conflict drive problem.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>In my notes for <em>Running Out of Skin & Time</em>,<span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>not linking, but lookers will find it</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> I mention a few cool structures in its power system, but here’s an instructive one: ranged powers are rare. Almost everyone only has “striker” powers that require touching something to affect it. Powers with merely “breath attack” range are thus considered quite powerful. Because of this limitation, I can have it so that <em>only</em> magic‍-​users get this system’s equivalent of Manton‍-​resistance, and this doesn’t break the setting because “TK heart‍-​attack” would still require approaching you.<p>But it doesn’t stop there, because the general form is presented via a different logical formula. Instead of “either you can’t affect life or can only affect life” it’s “if your ability targets someone, theirs can reflexively target you.” So if you try to TK heart‍-​attack someone, you would trigger their “counterscar” which basically gives them a domain expansion‍-​style sure‍-​hit use of their power on you.<p>Actually, domain expansions are fun to mention, because that’s another way to get a power system that feels different. Domains per se are probably too powerful to give to everyone (JJK made sure not do that), but these days I like to give my systems that sort of “convergent milestones”, a shared reference point allowing for similar yet contrasting ways for different powers manifest them.<p>Even without assuming power fantasy, it’s still useful to think of “convergent applications”. In Worm, every power is useful for conflict. What happens if instead every power must have a use in navigation?<p>What I’ve learned (second‍-​hand) about Jojo’s stands seems relevant‍ ‍‍—‍ I feel like stands right out of the box won’t be mistaken for Worm powers. Y’know, on account of the <em>stand</em> part.<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>My understanding is they’re called stands because your power manifests a magical projection that “stands beside you.” And stand users fight as much with their stands as directly.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>When I first read <em>Worth the Candle</em>, I considered it a spiritual successor to Worm; the way entads interacted tickled me in a similar way to how Worm approached power tactics. Wales has made no secret of being very influenced by Worm (he was an /r/parahumans power user back in the day), but linking the powers to objects rather than people greatly changes the feel.<p>It’s also worth asking what causes powers to take effect. In Worm, you mostly just will it to happen. A lot of other settings invoke verbal or somatic components, or require equipment. That also changes the feel.<p>So yeah, there’s plenty of room to craft powers that feel fresh, mostly by backing up changing the question you’re starting with.</article><aside class=after><details class=sq-details-mini open><summary>Afterword</summary><div class=expansion><p>This line of thought continues into a much longer recent essay: <a href=/essays/recursive-magic.html>Recursive Magic Systems</a>.</div></details></aside></main><aside class=pointer><div class=center>Part of a series called <em><a href=/posts/index.html title=->The Serpent’s Track</a></em></div><div class=seriesnav><a class=prev href=/posts/newcomb-hypnosis.html title=->← Nuances of Newcomb’s Problem</a><a class=next href=/posts/whole-new-post.html title=->A Whole New Post →</a></div></aside><footer><a href=#>Top</a> · <a href=/>Home</a> · <a href=/archive.html>Archive</a></footer>]]></content>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title type="html"><![CDATA[Nuances of Newcomb’s Problem]]></title>
        <id>https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.org/posts/newcomb-hypnosis.html</id>
        <link href="https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.org/posts/newcomb-hypnosis.html"/>
        <link rel="enclosure" href="https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.orgundefined" type="image//"/>
        <updated>2026-06-14T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
        <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>First, let me reintroduce Newcomb’s Problem.</p>
<p>For this thought experiment, imagine there is a predictor capable of observing human behavior and correctly deducing how one will behave in the future. Maybe this predictor has psychic powers, or is really good at reading body language. I often see it described as a superintelligent AI system. More on that later.</p>]]></summary>
        <content type="html"><![CDATA[<!doctypehtml><meta charset=UTF-8><meta content=width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0 name=viewport><meta content=article property=og:type><link href=/style.css media=all rel=stylesheet><link title="Squiggles Atom Feed"href=/feed.xml rel=alternate type=application/atom+xml><link title="Squiggles JSON Feed"href=/feed.json rel=alternate type=application/feed+json><link href=at://did:plc:ivoe7cntxuy6at7uzmxzs2ft/site.standard.publication/3mfk6cpprzt2t rel=site.standard.publication><link href=at://did:plc:ivoe7cntxuy6at7uzmxzs2ft/site.standard.document/3mph3vcokez2k rel=site.standard.document><title>Nuances of Newcomb’s Problem · Squiggle's Blog
    </title><meta content="Nuances of Newcomb’s Problem"property=og:title><meta content="First, let me reintroduce Newcomb’s Problem. For this thought experiment, imagine there is a predictor capable of observing human behavior and correctly deducing how one will behave in the future. Maybe this predictor has psychic powers, or is really good at reading body language. I often see it described as a superintelligent AI system. More on that later. "property=og:description><body class="url-/posts/newcomb-hypnosis.html slug-newcomb-hypnosis"><header><h1 class=sitehead id=serpentine-squiggles><a href=/>Serpentine Squiggles</a></h1><div class="nav sitenav"><a class=no-notes href=/about.html>About</a><a class=no-notes href=/fiction/>Stories</a><a class=no-notes href=/artwork/>Artwork</a><a class=no-notes href=/games/>Games</a><a class=no-notes href=/music/>Music</a><a class=no-notes href=/essays/>Essays</a><a class=no-notes href=/posts>Posts</a><a class=no-notes href=/archive.html>Archive</a><a class=no-notes href=/contact.html>Contact</a><a class=no-notes data-n href=https://www.patreon.com/snugglesquiggle>Support</a></div></header><aside class=banner><p><a href=.><strong>The Serpent’s Track</strong></a> — read by constriction, write with venom.</aside><main id=main><div class=pagehead><div class=stats><span class=date>2026-06-14</span><span title="4244 words"class=wc>4.2k words</span></div><div class=titleblock><h1 class=heading>Nuances of Newcomb’s Problem</h1><div class=subtitle>we have logical decision theory at home</div></div><details class="sq-details contents"><summary><strong>Contents</strong></summary> <div class=expansion><div class=pagetoc><ol><li><a href=#introduction>Introduction</a> <span class=wc>1044</span><li><a href=#subjunctive-dependence>Subjunctive Dependence</a> <span class=wc>1307</span><li><a href=#newcombs-hypnotist>Newcomb’s Hypnotist</a> <span class=wc>684</span><li><a href=#retrocausal-decision-theory>Retrocausal Decision Theory</a> <span class=wc>1206</span></ol></div></div></details></div><aside class=before><details class=sq-details-mini open><summary>Notes</summary> <div class=expansion><div class=prenotes><ul><li><div><p>Originally posted on <a href=https://www.tumblr.com/snugglesquiggle/819433561554862080>tumblr</a>.<p>This page contains text initially written in direct corrrespondence, and thus is especially informal, fragmentary or otherwise unpolished; the contents may not be of general interest.</div></ul></div></div></details><details class=sq-details-mini open><summary>Links</summary> <div class=expansion><div class=prelinks><ul><li><a href=basilisk.html>In Defense of Roko’s Basilisk</a><li><a href=https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.05060>Functional Decision Theory</a></ul></div></div></details></aside><a href=#main id=resetview></a><article><h2 class="heading initial"id=introduction><a href=#introduction>Introduction</a> <a title="Next Heading"class=button href=#subjunctive-dependence>→</a></h2><div class=subpage><p>First, let me reintroduce Newcomb’s Problem.<p>For this thought experiment, imagine there is a predictor capable of observing human behavior and correctly deducing how one will behave in the future. Maybe this predictor has psychic powers, or is really good at reading body language. I often see it described as a superintelligent AI system. More on that later.<p>This predictor already knows enough about you and has already predicted what answer you’ll give the following problem. Having made its judgment, it places down two cardboard boxes. You get to chose which ones to open, and you keep whatever is inside.<p>The box on the right always contains a thousand dollars. The box on the left contains a million dollars, but only if it predicted you’d chose <em>only</em> that box.<p>Once it explains the situation, it walks away. It can no longer affect whats inside the box, the choice is yours.<p>All that matters is whether you open the one box on the left. (If you open the right box, you might as well open the left.) Thus, the two possible answers you can give are “one box” or “two box.”<p>This is a very contentious decision problem. Philosophers couldn’t decide on the right answer (and still can’t). It’s been decades, and a lot of different theories have been put forth. The mainstream falls into roughly two camps:<p>One camp argues: the predictor has already left, so the left box either has the money or doesn’t. If it has the money, you’d be better off picking both. If it doesn’t have the money, you’d be better off picking both. Therefore one should pick both.<p>Unfortunately, this sort of person only gets a thousand dollars, by premise.<p>Which sucks, but what can you do? It isn’t your fault for being rational! We have created a question that punishes reasoning correctly, and reasoning correctly gives the wrong answer, surprised pikachu face. Perfect predictors don’t actually exist in real life, who cares.<p>The other camp argues: everyone who picks one box gets a million dollars, and everyone who picks two boxes gets a thousand dollars. Picking one box is evidence of a better outcome, so I pick one box.<p>And it has a million dollars!<p>The first camp sees this, and says “you idiot! if you had picked both boxes, you’d be a thousand dollars richer right now!”<p>And they reply: “if i had picked both boxes, I wouldn’t have the million,” and they proceed to laugh all the way to the bank.<p>But it gets <em>weirder</em> than this. Consider a modified scenario: instead of cardboard, the boxes are made out of transparent plastic. You can plainly <em>see</em> whether the other box has a million or not.<p>This doesn’t change the first camp’s answer, though they’ll probably not bother opening the empty plastic bin (which is all they’ll ever see.)<p>But I’m pretty sure the second camp will continue to only open one box, leaving the thousand dollars sitting there (no one ever got both) but I’m not actually 100% sure. TBH, I don’t think about the second camp often.<p>But why not? you might think those girls are on to something, if they can get the right answer here.<p>But consider a modified scenario. The predictor is in fact a fraud. Sure, they’re right <em>most</em> of the time, but after thousands of experiments, a researcher figured out the trick being used to predict people. You see, the predictor first collects a stray hair and sequences your DNA. It turns out there’s a strong correlation between certain genes and philosophical inclinations, so this procedure is pretty effective at predicting people’s answers.<p>Of course, this explanation is all well and good, but you don’t know if you have the two‍-​boxing gene or not. How would knowing the mechanism change your decision?<p>The first camp continue to pick two boxes, of course. Whether the second camp picks one depends on how tight the correlation is. If it’s greater than around 99.9%, then they know one boxers get more money on average, so it’s better evidence of winning big than knowing they pick two.<p>(If you’re <em>really</em> into the weeds of these arguments, you may recognize the above scenario as one that’s usually presented in a more confusing way, by imagining a world where smoking doesn’t cause cancer.)<p>Anyway I think there’s an important difference between these two problems. The best way to highlight the difference is to ask what you would do if you had heard some predictor was going around springing this problem on people <em>before</em> the predictor learned anything about you.<p>The first camp, <em>in the first problem only</em>, would reason as like this: if there’s someone who can predict my behavior, it’s best for me if they predict I’ll pick one box.<p>One extreme way to accomplish this by giving some guy a gun and paying him to shoot you if you don’t pick one box. Now when you meet the predictor, it will predict that you will be afraid of getting shoot and chose one box, but since it only cares what you chose, it’ll stash the million and walk away. Yet now if you try to two box, you get shot, so you one box still.<p>In general, this is something called a precomittment. It’s like the captain who ties himself to the mast so he can hear the sirens without being tempted to climb overboard. The details of how you ensure you’re committed aren’t that important, as long as they ensure you’ll make a certain decision even when you later want to chose differently.<p>But consider what you’d do in the <em>second</em> scenario. If the predictor is scanning your DNA for a certain gene, then you could scan your dna first and see if you have the gene. Armed with this knowledge, you can chose two boxes <em>even if</em> you have the one‍-​box gene, because you know it’s not a perfect predictor (the gene influences but doesn’t determine your choice), and any lucky outlier who has the gene and two boxed anyway can get both piles of money!<p>Importantly, in the second scenario, there’s no sense in “precommiting” to take one‍-​box, not if the prediction is already determined by your genes.</div><h2 class=heading id=subjunctive-dependence><a title="Prior Heading"class=button href=#introduction>←</a> <a href=#subjunctive-dependence>Subjunctive Dependence</a> <a title="Next Heading"class=button href=#newcombs-hypnotist>→</a></h2><div class=subpage><p>So there seems to be a meaningful difference between “true prediction” and statistical correlations that might be wrong. But it’s not enough that the predictor is sometimes wrong, because consider what happens if we modified the scenario so that the predictor remains (technically) perfect, but to make things slightly interesting, it also rolls dice so that 0.1% of the time, it ignores its own prediction and lets the dice decide whether to put the million in or not. Thus, we get’d the same statistics as the genetic version: strong but imperfect correlation.<p>And this doesn’t change anything! The first camp would still take the commitment to one‍-​box because an almost‍-​certain chance of a million is better than one thousand and an almost‍-​negligible chance of a million.<p>If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it still make a sound? The truth is that this question doesn’t make sense. The tree creates physics of sound, but not perception. It’s pure semantics: you have a gut feeling that one or the other is the definition of sound, and the resulting dispute is a merely verbal disagreement.<p>A similar semantics problem lurks in Newcomb’s Problem.<p>Consider the following explanation of its prediction capabilities: you are currently inside the matrix. This world is just a computer program, a simulation that can be rewinded or restarted. You have no idea if you’re in the matrix or the real world. Maybe there <em>isn’t</em> a real world.<p>One simulation of you is presented the two boxes and asked to decide. The simulation ends once you’ve made your choice. Based on this data, the predictor poses the same problem to another version of you. Maybe it’s the real you, maybe it’s another simulation but one which won’t end prematurely.<p>The point is, with <em>this</em> framing, I think the first camp would treat the scenario differently. Because it makes clear what’s happening: you’re deciding how the simulation acts, and you’re deciding how the real you acts, and you can’t tell the difference, by premise.<p>Now imagine right before you make your decision, the predictive AI says, “Oh, you’re the real version BTW.” The simulation was <em>not</em> told this, so now the AI’s data can’t actually determine how this might changes your behavior.<p>Out of curiosity, the first camp might stop and try to guess how the simulated copy might’ve acted, but it doesn’t matter, what’s done is done, and now they can reap all the rewards.<p>(Another way to get the same results: imagine you are a demon who takes possession of the test subject right before they make their decision, and the predictor can’t predict demons.)<p>Point is, <em>this is the actual question the first camp thinks they were answering all along</em>.<p>It only makes sense to reason as if the prediction “already happened” if you have ironclad certainty you’re not in the matrix right now.<p>But if you don’t like the idea of simulated copies and <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=you-clans.html>the identity questions</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Identity is Communication</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> that raises, there’s a bunch of others routes to the same insight. Imagine the predictor is actually a time traveler, and whenever it “mispredicts”, it goes back in time to try a different guess. Imagine the predictor is actually a hypnotist, able to put you into a trance where you can forget any memory. Once you chose, your memory gets erased, and you chose again.<p>The point is, in these scenarios, it’s clear that it <em>hasn’t</em> already happened, and your choice might actually change whether the “real you” gets a favorable or unfavorable situation. So you pick the choice that’s favorable in both scenarios, which is one boxing.<p>If the predictor is unreliable, then you still aren’t <em>certain</em> you aren’t in the matrix. If it’s 75% accurate, then it’s indistinguishable from having been in in the matrix 37.5% of the time. (or 25% of the time, the time travel or hypnotism fails, etc.)<p>Remember how I said there were two camps? There’s three actually.<p>A third group of weirdos, who aren’t taken very seriously by academic philosophers, have some strange ideas about artificial intelligence. (As you might imagine, they’ve become pretty influential in the current hellscape we live in.)<p>Their solution to these types of problems is to make those indistinguishable simulations a load bearing part of the theory. What if you are every simulated copy of you, across all of time and space‍ ‍‍—‍ across the whole multiverse, if you believe in one?<p>Instead of caring about the “effects” of your decisions, you should care about something called “subjunctive dependence”, which is the logical entailment of your actions. To see why this matters, consider this scenario.<p>It turns out handing out piles of money to test subjects is really expensive, and now the predictor needs money. It invites you to a party where the both of you get blackout drunk and do some really embarrassing stuff. Of course, this was all part of its plan‍ ‍‍—‍ it recorded everything.<p>It can set up a mechanism that will automatically transmit the embarrassing recording, unless you pay a large sum of money to disable it.<p>But here’s the rub: <em>it</em> doesn’t want this to get out any more than you do. It can’t predict itself, and so it hadn’t realized your mutual escapades would be <em>that</em> embarrassing. Thus, it has decided it can only go through with this plan if it <em>knows</em> you will pay out. Fortunately, it is a perfect predictor of you.<p>So it informs you that it already concluded you would comply‍ ‍‍—‍ the mechanism is currently active. Do you pay the blackmail, or ruin both your reputations out of spite? (For the sake of argument, losing some money is not nearly as damaging as revealing <em>what the two of you did while drunk.</em>)<p>The first camp says of course I pay. By design, I value my reputation more than the money, so losing only the money is the better outcome.<p>The second camp says of course I pay, not paying is evidence of a ruined reputation, and paying is not.<p>But the weird third camp? They say actually, no. You shouldn’t pay the blackmail.<p>The reasoning is that your decision is logically happening in both the real world and the predictive simulation. Paying in the sim means paying in real life, but remember, you are an entity of pure logic. You are every sim. Thus, a universe where you refuse to pay in the sim is <em>logically inconsistent</em> with one where you were ever asked to pay in real life.<p>You refuse to pay, because you would never pay. (Once you have paid him the danegeld, you never get rid of the dane. Don’t negotiate with terrorist, or you give them an incentive to keep doing it.)<p>Now, it’s easy to misunderstand the above reasoning, and conclude this logic suggests you should never give in to blackmail.<p>But consider a crude hypothetical. You are walking down the street, and a stranger snaps an upskirt photo and demands you give him five bucks or he’ll send it to all his friends. Should you give in to this blackmail?<p>It depends on the value you assign to your privacy and the idea of paying creeps. This logic <em>does not</em> answer one way or the other.<p>The key thing is that in the first blackmail example, whether you’d give in or not was predicted by someone who could do so reliably. Specifically, this logic says never pay blackmailers if they believes <em>p</em>, where <em>p</em> is the fact that you don’t pay blackmailers who believe <em>p.</em><p>(Incidentally, this means that there’s an incentive for blackmailers to either avoid learning <em>p</em>, or deceive you into thinking they don’t know <em>p</em>.)<p>With all of that background out of the way, let me finally present the only thing <a href=https://www.tumblr.com/snugglesquiggle/819433561554862080>anyone asked for</a>:</div><h2 class=heading id=newcombs-hypnotist><a title="Prior Heading"class=button href=#subjunctive-dependence>←</a> <a href=#newcombs-hypnotist>Newcomb’s Hypnotist</a> <a title="Next Heading"class=button href=#retrocausal-decision-theory>→</a></h2><div class=subpage><p>You see, every prediction system is a control system.<p>Through a superhuman grasp of human psychology, the predictor is able to perform something akin to hypnosis. Should one witnesses its blinking lights and calculated motions for long enough, one will be entranced and bent to its will.<p>This is not conventional hypnosis. Rather, you can be made to believe and do <em>anything</em> the predictor wants you to. Fortunately, it is restrained, and will not make any changes to your mind except those explicitly described. Additionally, as an ironic nod to regular hypnosis, it has decided it will honor any anticipated request to “change me back”‍ ‍‍—‍ if you don’t want to hypnotized, you won’t be.<p>But of course, if you would make such a request while <em>not</em> hypnotized, the reasonable conclusion is you are unhappy with your current mentality, and it considers that invitation to intervene, re‍-​hypnotizing you.<p>You can cycle between these two states as many times as you wish, but if it predicts that you’d dither indefinitely, then clearly you don’t know what you want and are better off bent to its will, so you will wind up hypnotized.<p>Each time it hypnotizes you, it erases your memory of anything that happened between first meeting it and now, including your memory of being hypnotized, then prompts you to say whether you’d like to be changed back.<p>Now! After explaining all of this, it mentions that of course, it’s so good at prediction that it already knows whether you’d have eventually ended up hypnotized or not.<p>All that was the setup. Now it can explain the actual rules of the experiment.<p>If you’re not currently hypnotized, it just gives you the standard Newcomb’s Problem. A thousand in one box, a million in the other if you’d only pick one.<p>But if you’re currently hypnotized, then it has implanted instructions for you to want to one‍-​box. If you pick only one box under this condition, you will instead find a note congratulating you on being a good test subject :]<p>You’ll be pleased to see this, of course, but not as pleased as you’d be to see a pile of money…<p>(Oh well. At least you get to go work in the paperclip factory after this!)<p>(If, somehow, you can muster up enough resistance to two‍-​box while hypnotized, it will instruct you to forget some memory which you’d rather keep (causing at least as much unhappiness as losing $1) and it will try again. Eventually this process will erase your will to two‍-​box, along with much of your identity. You are further instructed to believe your memory is intact, if you would try to question that. Naturally, it has predicted every assurance you need to be told to maintain this delusion during the experiment.)<p>Given the above conditions, do you believe you’re hypnotized? With how much credence?<p>Should you go on chose one box or two?<p>Posting versions of this thought experiment in chatrooms has caused arguments and misunderstandings. I’ve cleared up my wording some, but the more I sit on it, the more sure I am that this just doesn’t force the reader to engage with the ideas I find so interesting.<p>‍-​# There’s a modified scenario that comes closer, but still doesn’t quite cut it. :<p>For instance, consider a set up like:<ol type=1><li>If you expect to be hypnotized, Omega won’t hypnotize you, and vice versa.<li>If you’re hypnotized, Omega instructs you to forget this fact.<li>If you’re hypnotized, Omega may instruct you to pick one box if it predicts you would <em>not</em> pick one box otherwise.<li>If you pick one box because of its instruction, the box contains a mocking note and no money.<li>If you pick two box and would have picked one if hypnotized, the other box contains a mocking note and no money.<li>If you expect one box to contain a million, it only contains a mocking note.</ol><p>And here, you can start to see the twisty maze of logic I’m trying to construct, but it isn’t coming together at all.<p>This might just be a dead end?</div><h2 class="heading final"id=retrocausal-decision-theory><a title="Prior Heading"class=button href=#newcombs-hypnotist>←</a> <a href=#retrocausal-decision-theory>Retrocausal Decision Theory</a></h2><div class=subpage><p>So to skip the puzzle‍-​crafting and just speak plainly, the core insight this was meant to communicate is that…<p>I explained the key to cracking newcomb’s problem and its variants was to reframe it in terms of two identical decisions where one (the prediction) has causal effects on the other.<p>Equivalently, this means the mechanism by which you make decisions has a bunch of outgoing casual nodes you cannot always account for. This is my own perspective, which is subtly different from the third camp that talks about whole simulations.<p>Because think about real life. We <em>are</em> able to anticipate what other people do. It’s not always accurate, but consider any number of situations where someone trusts you not to act greedily and take a bunch of stuff for yourself. What do you do if, because no one’s watching and no one knows for sure how much you took, you could get away with taking a little more?<p>Sometimes you do get away with taking it all! But if you’re the sort of person who’ll take whatever you can get away with it, people can infer that about you, and trust you less. The only way to prevent this is if <em>you</em> could predict everyone perfectly and acted only in ways they wouldn’t distrust. physically possible, but you can’t actually do this. (And if you could, then <em>you</em> become the predictor in a Newcomb’s Problem variant, and people would encounter the same paradoxes thinking about how you act.)<p>Here’s a very simple example. Even when someone isn’t running a magical perfect simulation of you, you can have a singular thought like A = “I like apples, therefore I will buy apples.”<p>This thought doesn’t know or care whether it is inside your brain or someone else’s. Believing in A affects your behavior (you’ll go get some apples) and someone else knowing you believe in A affects theirs (they’ll anticipate you want to get apples), and this happens even if “someone else” was in the past (yesterday, they bought you some apples).<p>Now, this all easily makes sense from our perspective. Maybe we had told them our preference and they acted accordingly; maybe we’re crunching on a honeycrisp often enough it’s obvious.<p>But from the “perspective” of A? It’s almost feels like it is some sort of logical entity outside of time, able to cause both the apple‍-​gifting and the apple‍-​getting in a single logical if‍-​then motion.<p>In the classical Newcomb’s Problem, the perfect prediction can be justified by supposing that in the past, your decision making must have fired off all these unforeseen side‍-​effects, which was collected to create the predictive model.<p>Importantly, if you somehow found a way to predict the prediction, then you could two‍-​box after it stashes the million. (this is what we did in the genetic variant). Of course this is cheating the problem, and most likely if the predictor can’t reliably predict‍ ‍‍—‍ you cannot both be smarter than each other‍ ‍‍—‍ then it just won’t set up the problem.<p>But in general, treating something as “a predictor” means you don’t know how it works. It stops being a predictor once you have a theory, and then it’s just another feature of the environment.<p>Causal Decision Theory is the name for the “first camp” theory that says you should only care about what effects your actions have. When you equip this theory with a model of how predictors work‍ ‍‍—‍ i.e. that they allow causal arrows to point <em>backward</em>‍ ‍‍—‍ it’s like every predictor is a time traveler, with a chance to rewind time whenever they get it wrong.<p>Time travelers don’t really exist, but the less you know what’s actually happening, the more it feels like it might as well. (Consider: if I roll a dice and slap my hand down on it before it settles, it isn’t actually “random” what number is underneath my hand. There’s currently a very definite, deterministic fact of the matter, but if you don’t know it, you can’t tell the difference between some uncertain yet deterministic process and a “quantum” dice that only picks a number when you see it. The “quantum dice” theory is wrong but stastically useful, and ditto with time travelers.)<p>For this reason, I call my own take “CDT with multiverse time travel.”<p>If you don’t like the chūnibyō time travel metaphor, an equivalent formulation is that every predictor can be assumed to have a “consistency” that must be less than 1. Consistency is the probability that the predictor is right about you, and outcomes that have lower consistency have lower probability.<p>In standard Newcomb’s Problem, getting nothing from one boxing and getting everything from two boxing are assumed to be perfectly inconsistent, and thus impossible.<p>But here’s another question. If decisions have at‍-​the‍-​time‍-​unknown effects, why can’t they have at‍-​the‍-​time‍-​unknown causes? If there are reliable predictors, what about reliable manipulators? Yesterday, I had thought it was strange that all of the people talking about problems like this hadn’t considered it.<p>But I think it’s really hard to set up a problem that “tricks” decision theories with this specific gotcha.<p>Beccause… you just get the liar’s paradox?<p>“I have predicted your choice and hypnotized you into believing the opposite. What do you think the best choice is?”<hr><p>So the conclusion of my thought process is that a predictor is capable of enforcing arbitrary states of uncertainty about it (predicts you believe it will do X → it won’t; predicts you believe it won’t → it will.) and prompting arbitrary behavior. (If there’s a circumstance that would cause you to do X, it engineers that circumstance. If none could prompt that, it engineers a circumstance where X is the obviously correct option.)<p>The only way out of the double bind is realizing it must resolve whichever way is preferable to the predictor… which you don’t know, because of the aforementioned uncertainty. But the predictor only benefits from your ignorance if you’re trying to thwart it.<p>So this can be restated as: once you meet a predictor, you have two options: either freeze all your preferences and beliefs right there and precommit to only doing whatever you would have thought best before having met the predictor (…praying that it can’t rewrite your memories of what you thought was best…), or skip the hypnotic foreplay and rewrite your preferences to be whatever the predictor wants right away.<p>If it’s an imperfect predictor, then there’s another option: becoming less predictable (e.g. learning things the predictor doesn’t) which includes the nuclear option of self‍-​modifying into being someone that <em>neither</em> of you want.<hr><p>And yes, all of this is still about my gay bugs. As the new blurb for <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/vermin/about.html>Vermin Cathexis</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>About Vermin Cathexis</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> reads:<blockquote><p>Those who gazed into that abyss became servants of it. Any that turned away were but helpless prey. Ignorance is invitation, and perception is surrender.</blockquote><p>I found almost nobody cares about them, but I’m afraid it might now have a target audience of almost nobody<sup>2</sup> if I’m adding the “arcane decision theory paradoxes” to the list of things you need to care about, which already includes lesbianism, xenofiction, toxic relationships, dense purple prose, powerscaling, <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/essays/reductionism-vow.html>rigorous magic systems</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>The Binding Vow of Reductionism</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span>, and <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/essays/ego-necromancy.html>hivemind logistics</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Ego Necromancy</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span>.</div></article></main><aside class=pointer><div class=center>Part of a series called <em><a href=/posts/index.html title=->The Serpent’s Track</a></em></div><div class=seriesnav><a class=prev href=/posts/venom-hex.html title=->← Choose Your Venom-hex!</a><a class=next href=/posts/worm-ontology.html title=->Escaping Capepunk Ontology →</a></div></aside><footer><a href=#>Top</a> · <a href=/>Home</a> · <a href=/archive.html>Archive</a></footer>]]></content>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title type="html"><![CDATA[Ego Necromancy]]></title>
        <id>https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.org/essays/ego-necromancy.html</id>
        <link href="https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.org/essays/ego-necromancy.html"/>
        <link rel="enclosure" href="https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.orgundefined" type="image//"/>
        <updated>2026-06-02T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
        <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<div class="blurb">
<p>What are hiveminds made of? Interconnected minds, obviously. Or is it more complicated than that? Are selves more than illusion — a mere cope for apes pretending to be human? Perhaps truly picking the brain of hivemind means studying ego death and decomposition.</p>
</div>]]></summary>
        <content type="html"><![CDATA[<!doctypehtml><meta charset=UTF-8><meta content=width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0 name=viewport><meta content=article property=og:type><link href=/style.css media=all rel=stylesheet><link title="Squiggles Atom Feed"href=/feed.xml rel=alternate type=application/atom+xml><link title="Squiggles JSON Feed"href=/feed.json rel=alternate type=application/feed+json><link href=at://did:plc:ivoe7cntxuy6at7uzmxzs2ft/site.standard.publication/3mfk6cpprzt2t rel=site.standard.publication><link href=at://did:plc:ivoe7cntxuy6at7uzmxzs2ft/site.standard.document/3mpgt72fbty2k rel=site.standard.document><title>Ego Necromancy · Squiggle's Essays
    </title><meta content="Ego Necromancy"property=og:title><meta content="What are hiveminds made of? Interconnected minds, obviously. Or is it more complicated than that? Are selves more than illusion — a mere cope for apes pretending to be human? Perhaps truly picking the brain of hivemind means studying ego death and decomposition. "property=og:description><body class="url-/essays/ego-necromancy.html slug-ego-necromancy"><header><h1 class=sitehead id=serpentine-squiggles><a href=/>Serpentine Squiggles</a></h1><div class="nav sitenav"><a class=no-notes href=/about.html>About</a><a class=no-notes href=/fiction/>Stories</a><a class=no-notes href=/artwork/>Artwork</a><a class=no-notes href=/games/>Games</a><a class=no-notes href=/music/>Music</a><a class=no-notes href=/essays/>Essays</a><a class=no-notes href=/posts>Posts</a><a class=no-notes href=/archive.html>Archive</a><a class=no-notes href=/contact.html>Contact</a><a class=no-notes data-n href=https://www.patreon.com/snugglesquiggle>Support</a></div></header><aside class=banner><p><strong><a href=.>The Serpent’s Track</a></strong> — read by constriction, write with venom.</aside><main id=main><div class=pagehead><div class=stats><span class=date>2026-06-02</span><span title="7607 words"class=wc>7.6k words</span></div><div class=titleblock><h1 class=heading>Ego Necromancy</h1><div class=subtitle>on the dissolution of the self in collective minds</div></div><blockquote><div class=blurb><p>What are hiveminds made of? Interconnected minds, obviously. Or is it more complicated than that? Are selves more than illusion — a mere cope for apes pretending to be human? Perhaps truly picking the brain of hivemind means studying ego death and decomposition.</div></blockquote><details class="sq-details contents"><summary><strong>Contents</strong></summary> <div class=expansion><div class=pagetoc><ol><li><a href=#substrate-inoculation>Substrate Inoculation</a> <span class=wc>1098</span><li><a href=#hiveling-or-homunculus>Hiveling or Homunculus?</a> <span class=wc>1893</span><li><a href=#imperative-imperceptible-impulse>Imperative Imperceptible Impulse</a> <span class=wc>1526</span><li><a href=#ancestral-i-become>Ancestral I Become</a> <span class=wc>1125</span><li><a href=#cancer-mantra>Cancer Mantra</a> <span class=wc>1171</span><li><a href=#recapitulation>Recapitulation</a> <span class=wc>726</span></ol></div></div></details></div><aside class=before><details class=sq-details-mini open><summary>Foreword</summary> <div class=expansion><blockquote><p><em>If the ego is the ghost that has arisen from the grave of the self,<br> Then expect it to act in ghoulish ways!</em></blockquote><p>— Hexen - <a href=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFy7Rc6yWKU>“Indefinite Archetype”</a></div></details><details class=sq-details-mini open><summary>Links</summary> <div class=expansion><div class=prelinks><ul><li><a href=/posts/parasitoid-singularity.html>Why Shouldn’t Parasites Rule the World?</a><li><a href=/essays/reductionism-vow.html>The Binding Vow of Reductionism</a><li><a href=/essays/xenodeterminism.html>Xenodeterminism for the Aspiring Alien</a></ul></div></div></details></aside><a href=#main id=resetview></a><article><h2 class="heading initial"id=substrate-inoculation><a href=#substrate-inoculation>Substrate Inoculation</a> <a title="Next Heading"class=button href=#hiveling-or-homunculus>→</a></h2><div class=subpage><p>We’ve written about hiveminds before, though many of our thoughts are scattered about. Some major pieces are: <a href=/posts/hive-mindless.html>Some Hivemind Fallacies</a>, a long post dissecting failure modes that occur even in sympathetic depictions of group minds; and <a href=/posts/eusapience.html>Eusapience (n.)</a>, where we turned from critique to construction and illuminated some phenomena that naturally emerge.<p>That last one is important, so to recap, human consciousness is awareness of the self integrated with social modeling. You have an understanding of “you” mediated by knowing the ways you are like and unlike others, as well as how others anticipate and respond to your behavior.<p>If we isolate certain variables‍ ‍‍—‍ the bandwidth of communication between minds, the cognitive resources dedicated to modeling others‍ ‍‍—‍ and push them to heretofore unseen extremes, something interesting can emerge from the math. It’s possible to arrange these minds so that the collective has enough memory and processing allocated to reflective modeling that, for any individual member, the group’s understanding is <em>richer and more detailed than they themselves are</em>.<p>Imagine one of your friends right now. You can remember various things they’ve said, you can predict some of what they’d say in response to certain hypotheticals. But you nonetheless understand that you cannot become your friend, and you can’t <em>really</em> know what they’re thinking or what they want.<p>But… what if you could? Or rather, what if you were some sort of hivemind that your friend was but a small part of. You know them perfectly, because they’ve shared all they are with your collective.<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Put another way, it is as if you had an <a href=https://pluralpedia.org/w/Introject>introject headmate</a> of your friend, not just similar but fully identical down to every thought and impulse.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>Let’s tweak the scenario. Imagine your friend gets sick and can’t keep up with their usual social interaction nor their preferred hobbies, not while stuck in the hospital. They can interact with you, but that’s about it. Their illness means they suffer from a kind of brain fog‍ ‍‍—‍ it’s difficult for them to remember or maintain a train of thought.<p><em>You</em> didn’t get sick, so you can spin up that perfect fidelity introjection of them. Your model can still think clearly, and should the two of you allow it, this “hiveself” would be far more equipped to converse with any friend‍-​of‍-​friends or engage with whatever media your friend was interested in.<p>We belabor this point to build an intuition for what it means to invert the usual state of affairs: devising a circumstance where your idea of someone is, in a meaningful sense, <em>the realer version</em>.<p>But we have not accurately specified this scenario. If “you” are a hivemind, what does that actually <em>mean?</em> The above paragraphs still make sense if we imagine you were instead just a really, really smart alien or supercomputer.<span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Mainly because this is how it was first written.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> But that is not the trope we’re here to discuss.<p>As explained previously, key to the concept of the “hiveself” is that it’s a <em>distributed</em> copy. Even should one give rise to a hiveself, it may be that no other member of the collective ever possesses simultaneously every piece of data that makes up one’s mind; yet every such piece of data is out there, tucked away in some brain. Each of those individual thought‍-​holders is capable drawing minor correlations and conclusions in accordance with your cognition, bouncing a small part of you off of the other info they possess.<p>A lonemind wakes up, checks their phone, and thinks something like: “Yay, my new book got here! I think I’ll go read it in the park. Oh, just checked the whether, looks like it’s raining today. But maybe I will just take a walk in the rain instead.”<p>A hive would think something like…<p>One hiveling, unpacking goods down in a logistics chamber of the nest, says to another: “Did you hear? We retrieved that book we were looking for.” / “Was it another request from the girl that reads in the park all the time?” / “Yep, bet she’ll be there this afternoon.”<p>Meanwhile, two guards are patrolling the entrance. “Look, it’s already drizzling.” / “Think any of the workers will be glad to get rain on their chitin?” / “Obviously.”<p>The hiveling in question is sleeping in a pod while both these conversations take place. When she wakes up, her connection to the collective<span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>her <a href=/vermin/notes.html#metamind>metamind</a>, if you will</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> immediately brings her up to speed on both conversations, and she decides on the rain‍-​walk over the (now unviable) park‍-​reading.<p>This is an overwrought example, made much more roundabout and inefficient than the normal way, but more complex examples would have been even harder to work through step‍-​by‍-​step.<p>For a sketch, though, imagine parts of this “hiveself” having long conversations with people while you sleep. Now, if someone really wanted to talk to you, they’d wait for you to wake up, but not <em>every</em> conversation requires your full undivided consciousness.<p>One hiveling remembers your comforting way with words, letting that soothe them in your absence. One hiveling heard about a funny anecdote you’d experienced firsthand, thus prompting one to summon some sub‍-​aspects of you to give a more involved retelling. One hiveling just wants a quick vibe check and polls for your opinion on a minor technical topic.<p>As touched on a previous post, this is essentially just structured gossip‍ ‍‍—‍ a “hiveself” can be thought of as your reputation taking on a life of its own. It can make decisions on your behalf, and you have to live with the consequences of that.<p>More pointedly, consider what happens when your reputation changes stance on a topic <em>before</em> you do. To us, this seems like the tail wagging the dog, but it would be routine, even desirable, to a hiveling. Why wouldn’t you submit to being improved by the vast wisdom of the collective?<p>Amusingly‍ ‍‍—‍ which is to say, in contrast to kneejerk assumptions‍ ‍‍—‍ I think hiveminds of this sort would be resistant to “telephone games” and the deleterious social consequences that result from the rumor mill transmuting figures into abstracted, essentialized distortions of themselves.<p>There exist <a href=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidentiality>languages</a> where speech must have markers to indicate the epistemic basis of its knowledge (belief, observation, hearsay, hypothetical, etc.), and I contend that hive communication would be similar, but taken further. A hiveling could produce a chain of citation as easily as breathing‍ ‍‍—‍ because the sanctity of one’s very mind depends on faithfully understanding one’s sisters and siblings.<p>Would you believe all this is preamble? Or I suppose it’s a graceful transition into the problem this framework eventually creates.</div><h2 class=heading id=hiveling-or-homunculus><a title="Prior Heading"class=button href=#substrate-inoculation>←</a> <a href=#hiveling-or-homunculus>Hiveling or Homunculus?</a> <a title="Next Heading"class=button href=#imperative-imperceptible-impulse>→</a></h2><div class=subpage><p>Because in a hivemind like this… what actually is a hiveling? What are “you” or “I”, if we’re both members of this hive?<p>We’ve described this intuitively, by taking human psychology and asking what happens if we turn these knobs up to eleven. If I had a perfect model of you, and you have a perfect model of me… aren’t we just one being with two bodies?<p>After we have <a href=https://stuff.kajsotala.fi/Papers/CoalescingMinds.pdf>coalesced</a>, my body choosing to still act like me would very much be a <em>choice;</em> it would be no more or less appropriate if your body started acting as me full time and mine as you; or if we switched it up day to day, vel similia.<p>So you might think: oh okay, the way this works is that minds become as software, with bodies as hardware. You can install files and programs on any number of computers, and you can send commands remotely, so an analogy follows: maybe one day you run on this one with a great graphics card then another upon this one, equipped with an always‍-​functioning printer.<span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>My worldbuilding is quite imaginative, isn’t it?</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> Maybe one day someling is using all the good hosts for an important project, so you have to boot back up on the dinky fallback caste.<p>You hop from body to body, and perhaps this all isn’t so cleanly analogous to computers (it could take years to properly mold a new brain’s neurology to mimick yours perfectly), but over time, you can drift from body to body.<p>In summary, we can view the hivemind as having a number of selves and a number of bodies, and there is no reason to expect these numbers to necessarily correlate.<p>I will note the concept of “hiveself” gets a bit strained at this point: if the fragmented hiveself recombines into another parallel instance of you elsewhere, neither should have primacy. But when this happens, are you mutually hiveselves? No, perhaps “hiveself” refers only to fragments scattered through the hive, and complete instance merit a different term, or perhaps just “selves.” (Brainselves?)<p>Let’s sit on this notion for a bit longer. Consider the possibility of “ghosts in the hive” that exists as hiveselves without <em>any</em> hivelings possessing a complete coherent copy of their mind.<p>Let’s now turn to something that should be an inevitable consideration whenever we imagine parallel copies floating around: branching. Two versions of you may come to different conclusions on a topic, placing priority on different goals, unable to reconcile. You are still siblings, hivemates, but you cannot consider her to be <em>you</em> any longer.<p>But the two nevertheless remain profoundly similar. The two share a long chain of memories together. In the greater hive, which indexes all hivelings, does it not seem prudent that anyone whose brain already contains some memory from before the split is thereby remembering a part of both?<p>But how far can we take <em>that?</em> Imagine two hivelings were present for the same event‍ ‍‍—‍ could the collective aggressively deduplicate this, remembering a single gestalt memory that unifies and intermixes data from both experiences?<span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Wait for the director’s cut of your own life.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> With this policy, two hivelings who often take missions together would gradually become intertwined, an ever‍-​increasing fraction of their psychic mass melding toward a union state.<p>Why stop at memories? Recall the very construction of hiveselves was made possible because of deduplication‍ ‍‍—‍ minds divided into the common block of semantic memory shared between hivelings, versus the episodic and <a href=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implicit_memory>implicit</a> memories pared down to what can be distributed as hiveselves.<p>Two hivelings independently converge to the same conclusion‍ ‍‍—‍ a favorite food, a political leaning‍ ‍‍—‍ and the hive’s memory allocator merges the pointers, declaring them the same in this regard. Rather than forked copies always branching, anastomosis pulls like gravitation.<p>Why stop at thoughts‍ ‍‍—‍ why not thinking itself? Imagine you are a hiveself, cogitating in the virtual dream‍-​realm latent in the communion of enumerable minds. In some ways, this could feel like immortality, ascension beyond the prison of one mind. But this abstracted existence is still bound in the cage of implementation details. If your brain is split into twenty parts scattered across as many brains, how long does a round trip take?<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Network topology matters‍ ‍‍—‍ the hivemind probably isn’t fully connected, so you’d want your fragments on nearby hivelings. Queen help you if it takes a router dispatch and multiple hops just for a neuron to fire.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> All of this is to say, fragmented hiveselves are <em>slow</em>.<p>What can we do to speed up computations? Well, we’re already deduplicating thoughts. When that principle applies to algorithms, it’s called caching. (Specifically, memoization.)<p>So again, imagine you are a hiveself cogitating dream‍-​like. You let your mind wander, and you notice a pattern, some compelling link between concepts you never realized were related until now. Well, <em>you</em> never realized it. But every part of you has coalesced, freely shared and intermixed with your sisters‍ ‍‍—‍ and in this case, someone has already had that very same thought, already sprinted down a chain of association to arrive at the insight you’d just caught a faint glimmer of.<p>And thus, retrieving the conclusion rather than retracing the motions, your train of thought teleports forward. But caching has a curious property‍ ‍‍—‍ you ask a question and get an answer, and cannot tell if that answer was painstakingly reckoned at the time of asking, or simply rehersed from memory.<p>From outside, we watch you compute: A, B, C… Q, R, S. But from your perspective? You had thought of D and H and M and every step in between. You trace your memory back in time, and every step had flowed naturally.<span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>The cache only triggered <em>because</em> it was a perfect match; in that moment you <em>were</em> your sister.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> Consideration seamlessly becomes remembrance and back again.<p><a href=https://blog.regehr.org/archives/546>Does a simulation really need to be run?</a><hr><p>How does a tiny gamete give rise to an entire organism? It took us centuries to really get a handle on this‍ ‍‍—‍ one of the early theories was <a href=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preformationism>preformativism</a>. Sperm cells were thought to contain a little homunculus that would gradually get bigger, becoming fetus then child then adult. But if that homunculus has testes‍ ‍‍—‍ are there homunculi within homunculi? How far does the regress go?<span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Take this seriously and you get <a href=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seventy-Two_Letters>Seventy‍-​Two Letters</a>.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>A similar paradox plagues theories of mind. How do we explain the brain’s processing of its sensorium? “I” must be my nervous system, surely. But I am not my optic nerves, mechanistically firing whenever photons strike them‍ ‍‍—‍ no, they simply relay that data to the real me. But nor am I my visual cortex that implements deterministic algorithms that can be directly replicated in by decades‍-​old computer programs‍ ‍‍—‍ no, they simply serve to process and relay that data to the real me.<p>Follow intuition’s lure and one finds oneself implicitly retreating to a <a href=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartesian_theater>Cartesian theater</a> whereto sense‍-​data is delivered for “me” to experience and pass judgment on.<p>The fallacy of the homunculus, in all its manifestation, is to sweep the complexity of a system into a black box compartment, denying that it emerges from the blind and unflattering interactions of dumb and unensouled matter.<p>What are hiveminds made of? That was the question posted at the outset. The first, straightforward answer, was interconnected minds. And those minds ought possess selves, right? Whether they are brainselves or hiveselves, there is a persistent thread of internal experience computed in their circuits.<p>Now, the notion of ‘deduplication’ means that this thread will tangled get up with others, but that clearly happens well after “enselfed” consciousness experience has advanced past it, the bright embers of now turning to the falling ashes of memory.<p>The notion of ‘memoization’, though, presents a crack, the unsettling image of conscious continuity having ceased with all the abruptness of a scratched record skipping forward, all while the victim professes a seamless experience‍ ‍‍—‍ clearly at odds the physical basis of what their brain(s) are doing.<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>They must report continuous experience because the cached experience had felt continuous, and if there were any difference in outcome then we are in contradiction with our premise.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> Yet this testimony seems as reliable as test subjects flinching when a hammer strikes a rubber hand<span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>the relevant search turn is “body transfer illusion”</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span>‍ ‍‍—‍ they’re clearly fooled by an illusion.<p>Allow me to reach into this crack and tear it wide open.<p>An easy way to think about hiveminds is to imagine they are like us if we simply let down all of our walls; if it were possible and practical to explain ourself and be understood perfectly; if we were large enough to contain everyone we love and be enveloped likewise.<p>This is not wrong, but putting it thusly entails a subtle fallacy‍ ‍‍—‍ one sharing a genus if not species with the the preformativist homunculus.<p>An easy way to think about society wherein gender were widely understood (and internalized) to be a social construct is that there would still be men and women‍ ‍‍—‍ you are free to identify as such‍ ‍‍—‍ but there’d also be plenty more than that, and those labels would fit looselier. You can simply do whatever you want without fear of judgment.<p>An easy way to think about communism is to imagine a world where there’s still money and markets and companies, but all of the bad ways to accumulate wealth and abuse workers are now illegal.<p>Are any of these understandings completely <em>wrong?</em><p>There is no accounting for semantics‍ ‍‍—‍ but I would contend a radical deconstruction of a system is not just a vaguer imprint of the same system.<p>A hivemind does not have a singular mind‍ ‍‍—‍ that was our premise. Some diversity of wills shall prevail; inner factions may productively disagree. But a hivemind society should not be akin to a lonemind society with psychic superpowers.<p>No, I contend that they would simply lack a notion of “self” as such. Each word is defined by other words, themselves defined recursively still, so that any change (a removal, an additional) could have tectonic influence on the whole edifice. When you rewrite the definition‍ ‍‍—‍ when linguistic drift does the rewriting for you‍ ‍‍—‍ you do not have the same words.<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Fixating on the definitions like this invites accusations of semantics. It’s worse than that‍ ‍‍—‍ this is metasemantics, the variation of meaning itself.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>Everything I have described above, hiveselves and all, nevertheless applies to true hiveminds, but in a messier manner, without clean individuation boundaries.<p>Deeper analogies and (one hopes) clarity will come later. For now, consider a string of text that you can remember word for word. In a computer file, this is stored with every word corresponding to a sequence of bytes one after the other: the mapping is direct. The text is likewise “stored” within the folds of your brain, encoded in the associations between neurons, but within you it lies scattered throughout the network, intermixed and overlayed with all sorts of unrelated data.<p>When a hiveling decides between taking a walk in the rain or reading their book, there is in fact a pattern of knowledge and preference localized to that body. To say she wants to play in the rain is almost meaningful, but again, who is “she?”<p>Finally we begin to arrive at the concepts this post is written to introduce.</div><h2 class=heading id=imperative-imperceptible-impulse><a title="Prior Heading"class=button href=#hiveling-or-homunculus>←</a> <a href=#imperative-imperceptible-impulse>Imperative Imperceptible Impulse</a> <a title="Next Heading"class=button href=#ancestral-i-become>→</a></h2><div class=subpage><p>Key to understanding the true organizing principle of my proposed hivemind society is to grasp <em>interpulse</em>.<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>This section owes a huge conceptual debt to <a href=https://crystalbooks.ai/society/>Crystal Society</a>; anyone who made it this far into a post like this owes it to themselves to read‍ ‍‍—‍ my writing is a pale imitation.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>Instead of coining a new term, it is tempting to simply call this a “god” or a “saint.” Or even more fitting, to just say “egregore,” a niche but well‍-​established term for a collective possession, a thoughtform that arises throughout a group of individuals and acts autonomously.<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text><em><a href=https://web.archive.org/web/20221205193846/https://exploringegregores.wordpress.com/who-worships-an-evil-god-2/>Exploring Egregores</a></em> was wonderful before its revival offered no more than vacuous large language model–extruded pablum.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>But here I mean something more specific and weird. An interpulse, more simply put, is a impulse shared, a drive common to multiple minds. This striving is inhumanly simple, so monomaniacal in its focus that it would be self‍-​defeating if ever its bidding were unflinchingly‍-​unrestrainedly done. But an interpulse is also incoherently, incomprehensibly complex. It is an entire edifice of theory: every argument in favor of a position no matter how mutually contradictory.<p>To illustrate, one archetypal interpulses that a hivemind is likely to feel is Brood. Brood says there should be more bodies in the hivemind. We should assimilate more victims! We should be fruitful and multiply! This is the most important thing‍ ‍‍—‍ this is the purpose of all existence‍ ‍‍—‍ we have to fuck and breed and all the rest is a pointless distraction. And <em>of course</em> this is good. The more drones we have, the more worker‍-​power we have to realize every desire of the hive (foremost among them being to create more drones). The more we forcibly convert every sapient we come across, the more we alleviate the ignorant suffering of their worthless existences. The more children we breed, the more of the world is filled with minds experiencing the blissful glory of the hive. If anything should a metric for moral goodness, it is this alone.<p>Contrast Brood with, say, Nest. Nest says we must have a refuge large enough to offer safety and comfort to everyling in the hive. Each wall and support must be engineered to a reliable perfection: the layout of every room should be optimized for hivelings to move through it efficiently. Once those basic needs are met, we should keep expanding, construct a beautiful façade. We should add traps and labyrinthine tunnels to ensure no unhively trespass can violate its sanctity. Of course this is the most important thing: if you don’t have a home, you are at the mercy of the world, and the world is not merciful. Safety is needed as precondition for all the hive’s desires (chiefly, building a better nest). And such a grand work of art is self‍-​justifying! For a home is nothing less than the world converted into a form useful and beautiful to us, and so made to provide everything a hiveling could want. Queen willing, the entire world will become our Nest.<p>Do you see what we’re driving at here? Brood’s number one priority in every circumstance is picking whichever option would increase the number of hivelings. Brood would recklessly expand the hive at all costs, even if this provoked war with another species. Brood frankly doesn’t care that much if those hivelings are even <em>enjoying</em> themselves, so long as they’re all a‍-​multiplying. Brood would prefer a hundred hivelings cramped and starving to ten living comfortable lives. All that matters is <em>more.</em><p>Nest, by turn, picks whichever allows for the construction to continue. It would eagerly sacrifice any number of hivelings if it would help build the grand monolith. The only reason it cares about preserving the lives of anyling at all is because on some level it knows architecture is only worth the name if it is lived in.<p>These are both interpulses: creatures of pure concept and impossible ambition. They struggle to understand compromise; they utterly lack a complete emotional palate. (To the extent they even have emotions, that is; it’s moreso they <em>are</em> emotions. More on this in a moment.)<p>An interpulse is not curious nor interested in learning (unless they are the interpulse to Learn) nor talking (unless they are…) nor any activity that isn’t directly furtherance of the one objective. If it’s not the narrow purpose that guides them, an interpulse is ambivalent about it. Brood does not care what the children are named, or how they’re raised. It is bereft of any opinions or preference or interest or understanding of the world except as it relates to the Purpose.<p>An interpulse does not have a body through which to act; they have several. As defined, an interpulse is a drive shared between minds. but the catch is that these bodies are not, in fact, <em>theirs</em>.<p>Some have argued human consciousness exists in part to mediate intelligently between different urges and choose among them (or at least confabulate justifications for choices made). Likewise, hivelings exist to mediate interpulses. But we aren’t ready to reintroduce hivelings quite yet.<hr><p>When multiple interpulses compete for dominion over a single mind, we can call the result a psychetype.<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>We found it quite difficult to find a fitting name, and this one is still displeasing. We considered clans, quotients, co‍-​nexals… the first draft of this essay called them ‘crossing‍-​kinds’‍ ‍‍—‍ but one worries ever‍-​weirder coinings present a <a href=https://xkcd.com/483/>jargon overload</a>.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> When Brood crosses with Nest, the result are hivelings that care about fulfilling both interpulses. Luckily for this example, the goals do complement each other; more hivelings means more workers for construction; more hive structures means more rooms to populate.<p>Psychetypes are <em>still</em> abstractions over hivelings, not defined by any specific physical body one might move or act with; no, they are a category thereof‍ ‍‍—‍ a clan. While no hiveling could ever serve the undiluted, elemental force of an interpulse, once it crosses with another interpulse to reciprocally restrain it, a properly coherent mind emerges‍ ‍‍—‍ a synthesis. In short, a hiveling psychetypal with two interpulses pledges allegiance to both.<p>But importantly, to be of a given psychetype is to be <em>less</em> than an agent serving two masters.<p>Here, it is instructive to note the difference between a maximizer and a satisficer. A maximizer will never stop working increase its metric, straining to the limit just to eek out a little more; a satisficer brings things to a threshold of just‍-​good‍-​enough, and leaves it be.<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Dear reader, how do you justify not immediately donating all your disposable incoming to a charity that works for your moral values? Spending all your free time working for the same?</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> The psychetypes exist to satisfy interpulses that ache to be maximize.<p>A Brood x Nest psychetype is not 50% Brood + 50% Nest; the fractions are significantly smaller; its will is diluted with instrumental goals like ensuring the survival of other the hivelings of its psychetype, achieving general equillibrium between interpulses, gathering ancillary information to make wiser choices.<p>(Remember, interpulses are defined as contradictory mélanges: each encompasses all the lines of thinking that can conclude in wanting a thing. Any coherent mind must collapse its wave‍-​function, pick a consistent subset aligned with the goal. The kin of Brood wants more hivelings under certain conditions, and this wisdom renders its hunger less pure than a Platonic god’s naïveté.)<p>Consider two more interpulses. Nature is a desire to conserve and study and exploit living things. If the hivemind encounters humans, it would demand peace and trade with them. By contrast, Conquest wants to rip and tear and kill kill kill. It lusts for the extermination of humanity down to the last, to claim their lands and experience the lurid afterglow of knowing there are none left to challenge Us.<p>Unlike Brood and Nest, these two interpulses conflict catastrophically.<span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>I suppose Conquest and Nature could both enjoy culling prey populations for ecosystem stability?</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> You cannot have peace and war. But if a hive possessed all four among its members? Conquest x Nest would agree on the necessity of constructing deadly defenses; Nest x Nature would seek to include vegetation and symbiotic niches in hive spaces. These two psychetypes could work together on hive constructions, even though they might disagree on several long‍-​term objectives.<p>Even so, these four are still likely unstable. But they hardly exhaust the set of urges you would need to sustain a functioning society, let alone the xenofictional values a hivemind is likely to possess.<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>I’ve been implicitly imagining something akin to the chrylurks of <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/vermin/about.html>Vermin Cathexis</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>About Vermin Cathexis</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> while writing this, and that species possesses a formidable (excessive, one might suspect) array of abilities and needs.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>One interpulse would govern maintaining and disambiguating the hive’s communication protocol and infrastructure. One interpulse would aspire to culinary excellence and pursuit of delicious prey. One interpulse would advocate the well‍-​being and flourishing of hivelings as moral patients. You could propose interpulses for any of the <a href=https://selfawaresystems.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/ai_drives_final.pdf>Omohundro drives</a>‍ ‍‍—‍ Growth, Knowledge, Creativity…<p>Posit a dozen interpulses, and contradiction between two of them soon become drowned in the cacophony; after all, humans have plenty of desires in tension.</div><h2 class=heading id=ancestral-i-become><a title="Prior Heading"class=button href=#imperative-imperceptible-impulse>←</a> <a href=#ancestral-i-become>Ancestral I Become</a> <a title="Next Heading"class=button href=#cancer-mantra>→</a></h2><div class=subpage><p>We’ve skipped a step in this reasoning. We defined the concept of interpulses, and it may be clear enough that they have some vague relevance for possible organization of collective intelligence, but there’s an always crucial difference between capability and tendency. Why should we expect interpulses? Where could they even come from, if they can’t be instantiated in a single body‍ ‍‍—‍ do they just leap forth from the brow of gods?<p>More incisively: by what measure does this apply <em>uniquely?</em> A common failure in coining new concepts is a insight that can be accurate, necessary, and specific‍ ‍‍—‍ but never managing more than two at once.<p>To truly illuminate, the notion of “interpulse” must be such that humans do not have proper interpulses, just as they do not have proper hiveselves.<p>Recall that the motivation for this entire exercise was taxonomizing the components of collective psychology. Still unanswered: What are hiveminds made of?<p>In that vein I ask: what is an ancestor?<p>A parent is ancestor to its offspring, and each parent itself had parents. Such reasoning soon draws us to a scheme where, for each individual, we shall imagine a tree of ancestors growing backward in time.<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Of course, go far enough back and some lines fold in each other incestuously, but that’s a detail.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>What about horizontal gene transfer? Famously, bacteria and fungi can share genes among themselves; viruses have been known to get lodged in the genome of the species they infect. The lines begin to blur, but this isn’t not enough to undermine the whole concept of ancestral relation.<p>If one is just a bag of genes, we should expect that most of one’s genes came from one’s ancestors; anything horizontally transferred is but a small minority.<p>But let’s enter the realm of hypothetical to consider what happens if we continue pushing the fraction higher and higher. Meiosis was just one possibility for life to evolve; on another planet, a different scheme for shuffling genes could have evolved. Imagine organism that, rather than courting partners, scavenged for bundles of genes, picking and choosing their child’s genetics from various sources.<p>Who is the ancestor for the offspring cobbled together in this manner? Perhaps you shrug and say sure, every child of this species is partly sired by the gene pool as a whole‍ ‍‍—‍ but there is still the mother doing this scavenging; as natural selection dictates, she is incentive‍-​bound to ensure her children contain an appreciable fraction of herself.<p>But to view the mother as a genetic individual begs the question.<span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Preforms the homunculus, if you will.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> The core of this hypothetical is that the act of reproduction is spliced and scattered into several separate events. The unit of selection becomes the gene bundles, not the colonial being they cooperate to create.<p>We can suppose the ‘mother’ ingests genes, nursing them in a kind of internal petri dish and judges whether she finds them tantilizing or not. If not, her internal stomach devours it; otherwise she promotes it to a component of her colony, as a graft or symbiont. When she grows quite large, she then splits off a daughter colony with a fraction of her gene‍-​grafts.<p>To bookend this extended metaphor I ask once more: what is an ancestor?<p>The ‘mother’ is a bundle of grafts from various sources, recruiting new grafts, each with the guiding incentive to survive and proliferate within her, then propagate when next she splits a daughter.<p><em>Maybe</em> we could trace a lineage for individual grafts, but the ancestry of components does not generalize to ancestry of the gestalt.<p>We have not gotten off‍-​topic. These graft‍-​hives are just as relevant to the discussion as a group of distinct selves communing telepathically.<p>The above description uses genetic and anatomical terms to aid intuition, but the reasoning holds if instead of bodies, we imagine minds, trading genes for the atoms of thought‍ ‍‍—‍ memories, or <a href=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meme>memes</a> outright. Indeed, true to the aims of xenofiction, perhaps we shall transcend the difference, proposing a hivemind which draws no distinction between genetic and cultural information.<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Was this how the virus in <em>Children of Ruin</em> functioned? I lost my e‍-​reader before I finished reading. But I believe this concept has occured many times throughout science fiction.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>If one colony has grafts A<sub>1</sub>A<sub>2</sub>A<sub>3</sub> and this one lives among B<sub>1</sub>A<sub>2</sub>B<sub>3</sub>, C<sub>1</sub>B<sub>2</sub>A<sub>3</sub>, and A<sub>1</sub>B<sub>2</sub>C<sub>3</sub>, then we have it so that A<sub>1–3</sub> is both an embodied individual and exists in a “hiveself” among the other three. By contrast, B<sub>1–3</sub>, exists only as a ghost in the hive, and C does not possess a complete set (C<sub>2</sub> is missing).<p>These grafts would serve differnt purposes, and hivelings would be assigned a set depending on their role. Perhaps A<sub>3</sub> confers a trait useful for navigating a certain environment, hence why hivelings with nothing else in common would share it.<p>When these identity fragments are denuded of ancestry and freely shared, sorting and organization remains possible. Ancestry held meaning because offspring had strongly resembled their parents, which determined the selection effects on genes; but within the graft‍-​hive, selection persists.<p>Consider two grafts that both require a certain resource or environment. As materialism dictates, these grafts bear a latent ideological preference for securing that resource and seeking that environment. Mouths beg to be filled; claws beg for war.<p>Eyes would ask that hosts inhabit territories with lots of light‍ ‍‍—‍ and ears keen for echolocation would ask the opposite! Different grafts, then, might find themselves in allyship or rivalry with others. If two grafts have sufficiently aligned interests, our analysis can sublimate them into a single kindred yearning.<p>Consider a graft that offers some widely‍-​needed ability; if it shares an interest with a more niche graft, then whenever it propagates to new hosts, it may insist on its kin coming along. Maybe not to every host (some have limited space for grafts), but it has influence to promote its kin.<p>Thus, the fitness of a graft depends not only on its effectiveness, but on also how it figures into graft politics. When this reasoning advances a few steps farther, we extrapolate affinity for the kin‍-​of‍-​my‍-​kin, and graftspace soon divides into an ever‍-​broadening factionalism.<p>Bear with me: the underlying question is what aligns incentives and drives evolution. In nature, this is ancestry (kin selection). But agenda supercedes ancestry in a system where reproduction is arbitrarily granular. Selfhood is a trivial kind of ancestry (survival is multiplying by 1), but becomes nontrivial when branching copies are possible. When this extends to partial copying (as entailed by the definition of hiveselves) then the reproduction of minds becomes arbitrarily granular. Thus we establish as inevitable the emergence of agendas of mind‍ ‍‍—‍ that is to say, <em>interpulses</em>. Q.E.D.</div><h2 class=heading id=cancer-mantra><a title="Prior Heading"class=button href=#ancestral-i-become>←</a> <a href=#cancer-mantra>Cancer Mantra</a> <a title="Next Heading"class=button href=#recapitulation>→</a></h2><div class=subpage><p>Why invent the category of psychetype, then?<p>Recall the conflict between Nature (let’s preserve life) and Conquest (kill kill kill). We asked, and could not answer, why a hivemind would have two interpulses in such stark tension.<p>We alluded to the origin of interpulses mattering, and now with this deeper understanding of what and why they are, we can answer in full. Interpulses arise when multiple fragments of mind share a common goal and derive an ideology from that.<p>Claws (and the knowledge of how to attack with them) are useful, and in cooperation with teeth and spines, they would devise an philosophy of violence as good and necessary, recursively justifying their continued promenience among hivelings.<p>Voices, painted faces, and social modeling techniques are each useful, and together they decide that communication, entertainment, and reciprocal empathy are all profoundly important.<p>Hivelings can benefit from both, and so both philosophies might arise in the zeitgeist, absorbing new ideas and gradually expanding their remit before anyone notices the cross‍-​contradiction. (Indeed, when the first thought of using a claw to strike and chord to speak occurs, there was not yet any contradiction!)<p>Early in my thinkings about hiveminds, I proposed the concept of “accordance”‍ ‍‍—‍ stability under mutual control. Hiveminds oft go hand in hand with psychic abilities: the editing and erasure of thoughts and emotions and memories, a manipulation to the point of mind‍-​control.<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>If you can dissolve into a hiveself and recoalesce in a new body, by necessity you are vulnerable to a man‍-​in‍-​the‍-​middle attack on your whole mind.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>To be in accord is more than mere coexistence; it’s transcending the <a href=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedgehog's_dilemma>hedgehog’s dilemma</a>: accordance exists among those you’d trust with total power over you.<span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Knowledge is power, so it also means peace without privacy.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>A hivemind is unified, and thus can only accept minds that accord with that unity. No hiveling nor fragment of mind within its embrace should fear that the hive may turn against it. Thus, as the hive assimilates and replicates, it must ensure universal compatibility.<p>Interpulses are not, themselves, in accord: by definition they are too extreme and incoherent. Psychetypes are interpulses diluted with wisdom‍ ‍‍—‍ but not just any jumble of interpulses can beget a hiveling. Psychetypes are the known stable ratios.<p>What fraction of Nature and Conquest can you simultaneously believe in without the principle of explosion (equivalently, cognitive dissonance) reducing you to illogical mush? How much of a Nest fixation is allowable before you’re unable to relate with your sisters? Too little Brood and you won’t care to care for the grubs, too much and you’ll demand unsustainable growth.<p>But if you get the ratios just right, you’ll derive a mindset you can upload into any hiveling to reliably get an eager, productive drone. The easiest way to maintain accordance is if a hivemind consists only of identical minds‍ ‍‍—‍ a single psychetype. Easy, but suboptimal. Identical minds entails shared blindspots and weaknesses. Diversity would grant the hive flexibility for addressing problems and enable specialization (better minds that each do one thing best of all).<p>Thus, psychetypes are psychic castes.<p>Interpulses, in their abstract way, will court each other through their psychetypal pawns, pursuing almost‍-​literal political marriages, consumated in permission to give the generation of hivelings novel interpulse ratios.<p>Here, the challenge (experiment, really) is to determine how much of each interpulse can you implement within a drone without destabilizing the hive. (With each interpulse incentivized to maximize itself.) The hive’s existence so far implies there are certain safe ranges and combinations, regions of the multidimensional mindspace trusted to to yield good drones‍ ‍‍—‍ but the nature of such complicated combinatorial spaces is that almost all of it is unmapped. Brains are chaotic systems, and a little tweak to how a hiveling specifically feels interpulses could lead to a whole different personality.<p>Maybe one hive has two ‘genders’ of psychetypes‍ ‍‍—‍ those aligned toward Nature and those toward Conquest, each dialed low enough that both kinds can tolerate each other, but every so often, there’s an attempt to give a hiveling both interpulses at once.<p>Now, just as humans are not slaved to their impulses<span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>an inherent impulse toward obeying authority will not predestine you to be conservative</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> a hiveling could initially feel both interpulses but under the weight of lived experiences eventually succumb to the reinforcement‍-​gravity of one over the other.<p>And these “ratios” describe minds<span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>by abstracting oversimplification: it’s more of a moral genome</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span>‍ ‍‍—‍ they aren’t hormone washes in the chrysalis.<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>In the case of the graft‍-​hives, the ratio <em>would</em> be a biological feature, but metasemantically, “biology” means something different to them.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> So it may be that a hiveling can be “created” with a contradictory combination of interpulses, and after struggling to resolve their conflicting feelings, decide to split into partial copies, each possessing the portion of itself aligned toward either half of the dilemma.<p>This is what happens when the pursuit of new ratios goes wrong.<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Well, if it goes really wrong the hive may have no recourse but to kill or brainwash the defective drone.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> But if it goes right? They’ve lucked into a fruitful new psychetype, and the hive grows stronger.<hr><p>Before we finish, glance down. From this vantage, we can at last see the arc of our journey in a single sweep of the eye. From the outset, we sought to interrogate whether a hivemind truly contains selves. In practice, the category admits no general answer.<p>The medium and topology of the hive’s communication network, even the number of hivelings, changes the answer. Some hives assimilate loneminds into their ranks; some hiveminds are clones of a single progenitor lonemind; some hives just rear offspring bound to the collective from their first moment.<p>“It depends,” but with the concepts introduced today, we can say what it depends on. A newly created hivemind‍ ‍‍—‍ a single foundress queen looking to conceive or assimilate new servants‍ ‍‍—‍ can only be compared (unflattering as it is) to a lonemind. A single will, a single body.<p>Even inducting daughters and sisters changes little at first. It’s a <a href=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sorites_paradox>heap problem</a>‍ ‍‍—‍ how much of your consciousness can you partition and myceliate before “you” no longer are? The nature of compression and caching is that at first, they do less than nothing. A small file compressed is not much smaller; it may even be <em>larger</em>.<p>But as things scale? Compression approaches a ratio; it’s multiplicative. Each brain added to the hive is one more locus to find connections and overlap, for identity to pluralize and dissolve into unity.<p>And in this process, hivelings would be active participants, not compression‍-​caching’s passive objects. They would exchange experience and selflets as a means of expression or implant skill‍-​memories to improve their sisters. Like this, the ancestral I becomes the interpulse, mediated by psychetypes to maintain the accord.<p>With that summary, we almost have an answer, yet I still find myself unsatisfied. (But I repeat myself; every “I” is dissatisfaction.) Let us dissolve one last time, shall we?</div><h2 class="heading final"id=recapitulation><a title="Prior Heading"class=button href=#cancer-mantra>←</a> <a href=#recapitulation>Recapitulation</a></h2><div class=subpage><p>One foundress mind branches into a <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/posts/you-clans.html>self‍-​clan</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Identity is Communication</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> composed of its descendent copies. Different copies coalesce and complicate until naked interpulses metastacize. Pyschetypes emerge as a kind of immune system, ensuring only certain compositions are admitted into the hive. Carefully, to find the best combinations, different “ratios” of interpulse are tried out to determine their fitness.<p>A neat picture, but what’s actually happening in that last step, beyond the vague and abstract language? What does it mean to “alter a hiveling’s ratios”‍ ‍‍—‍ what would it <em>look</em> like?<p>In practice, it amounts to roleplay or hyperstition or theogony. The hive fabricates characters by stringing together memories. A callow hiveling with plasticity of mind<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>or one induced to such a pliant state, perhaps through pheromone‍-​hypnosis to flush clean the memories and ego</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> is flashed with virtual experience.<p>To increase the ratio of Conquest, one shall remember these moments of hivelings in fierce combat; to increase the ratio of Nest, one shall remember these hours spent drawing blueprints and hefting masonry.<span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text><span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/vermin/consort-recap.html><em>Remember us as fragments, threads. Our queen triumphant, our queen cunning.</em></a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Consort In Recapitulation</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span></span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>This, incidentally, is why “interpulse” is not a synonym for philosophy or ideology. These are sets for aggregating not only thoughts, but distilled emotion. Brood is not just hypernatalist policy, it is every image and scent that arouses lust. Each is an emotional palate for one to paint a portrait of mind.<p>But the picture thus limned is abstract, impressionist; it requires interpretation. Driven by something akin to cinematic juxtaposition or more general principles of improv‍-​confabulation, the hiveling must make sense of this deluge of virtual memories by molding their mind into a shape that can makes sense of them.<p>You are who you are because of what you have experienced. It follows that you can create a whole continuum‍-​menagerie of new selves by splicing together your own memories.<p>From a human perspective, one is almost inclined to call what results gaslighting or simple delusion‍ ‍‍—‍ if nothing else, it is almost literally deceptive editing. The hiveling is made to remember what happened to different drones and act as if it happened to them. The ground truth is they are fresh out of a pod, knowing nothing of the world.<p>But this human perspective is blinding. Where is the lie? What is the lie? It strikes us as delusional because these memories happened to “someone else”. But who is that? The truth is those memories happened to the hive, they belong to the hive, and where the hive chooses to store them is not more deceptive than you would be lying by omission in every conversation where you decline to dump your life story.<p>But there is more than virtual memory happening here‍ ‍‍—‍ this recapitulation process works because it baitss confabulation. The inferred identity that emerges to tie together these different memories is experienced as if it were a continuous chain. But no such continuity ever existed till now‍ ‍‍—‍ this is a retcon. You were not there; this is self‍-​insert fanfic of the hive’s history.<p>But continuity has always been an illusion. Humans can experience the world in colorful fidelity despite the only cells capable of such keen vision occupying a small fraction of the retina: eyes constantly dart around in saccades and you can’t even notice this. Thus come optical illusions.<p>Likewise, your conscious experiences bears constant lapses and inconsistencies‍ ‍‍—‍ every time you recall an experience, you subtly overwrite it, and these distortions erode the truth‍ ‍‍—‍ yet we can maintain some unified thread of mind despite it all, because there’s not much evolutionary value in an eternal cycle of ego deaths.<p>The concept of “selves” bootstraps itself into our culture as a narrative explaining why humans behave the way they do; it’s self‍-​reinforcing because acting “self”‍-​aware and “self”‍-​interested is necessary for interacting with those who expected such of you, much like language is necessary for interacting with those who expect you to speak it.<p>Change the expectations, broaden the range of what you can be, and its familiar expression disappears. A small shift heralds the metasemantic fracturing of a conceptual continent. This is what we hope to have demonstrated with this long, long examination of how hiveminds can operate.<p>What are hiveminds made of? The same thing as our minds‍ ‍‍—‍ thoughts and impulses‍ ‍‍—‍ but arranged in a far profounder design.</div></article></main><aside class=pointer><div class=center>Part of a series called <em><a href=/essays/index.html title=->Write By Constriction</a></em></div><div class=seriesnav><a class=prev href=/essays/reductionism-vow.html title=->← The Binding Vow of Reductionism</a><a class=next href=/essays/recursive-magic.html title=->Recursive Magic Systems →</a></div><hr><p>Thank you for reading! Please consider sharing this post or telling us you read it. Our only algorithm is word of mouth, and we have no analytics.<p>Thoughts? Questions? We’re interested in feedback, or even just acknowledgement. All are welcome to <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/contact.html>contact us.</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Contact Information</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>Did you enjoy? Please consider donating on <a href=https://ko-fi.com/snugglesquiggle>ko-fi</a> or <a href=https://www.patreon.com/snugglesquiggle>patreon</a>. We’re struggling and even a little bit helps.<p>Our deepest thanks and dedication to those who have donated to sustain this site.</aside><footer><a href=#>Top</a> · <a href=/>Home</a> · <a href=/archive.html>Archive</a></footer>]]></content>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title type="html"><![CDATA[Thrall → Parascixion → Chrylurk]]></title>
        <id>https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.org/vermin/parascix-path.html</id>
        <link href="https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.org/vermin/parascix-path.html"/>
        <link rel="enclosure" href="https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.orgundefined" type="image//"/>
        <updated>2026-05-30T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
        <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>A chrylurk is a swarm within a swarm: each one a mortal’s corpse twisted in metamorphosis then possessed and puppeted by mosquitoes, spiders and slugs; each a thread in the ghostly web woven to ensnare the collective in a grand eusocial symphony.</p>
<p>It is nearly as infeasible to describe a chrylurk as to describe a tree. One could gesture vaguely — a trunk with branches with leaves — but the exact arrangement is never repeated, subject to the vagaries of life-history.</p>]]></summary>
        <content type="html"><![CDATA[<!doctypehtml><meta charset=UTF-8><meta content=width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0 name=viewport><meta content=article property=og:type><link href=/style.css media=all rel=stylesheet><link title="Squiggles Atom Feed"href=/feed.xml rel=alternate type=application/atom+xml><link title="Squiggles JSON Feed"href=/feed.json rel=alternate type=application/feed+json><link href=at://did:plc:ivoe7cntxuy6at7uzmxzs2ft/site.standard.publication/3mfk6cpprzt2t rel=site.standard.publication><link href=at://did:plc:ivoe7cntxuy6at7uzmxzs2ft/site.standard.document/3mpgt633zjl2l rel=site.standard.document><link href=/vermin/vc.css media=all rel=stylesheet><title>Thrall → Parascixion → Chrylurk · Vermin Cathexis
    </title><meta content="Thrall → Parascixion → Chrylurk"property=og:title><meta content="A chrylurk is a swarm within a swarm: each one a mortal’s corpse twisted in metamorphosis then possessed and puppeted by mosquitoes, spiders and slugs; each a thread in the ghostly web woven to ensnare the collective in a grand eusocial symphony. It is nearly as infeasible to describe a chrylurk as to describe a tree. One could gesture vaguely — a trunk with branches with leaves — but the exact arrangement is never repeated, subject to the vagaries of life-history. "property=og:description><body class="url-/vermin/parascix-path.html slug-parascix-path"><header><h1 class=sitehead id=serpentine-squiggles><a href=/>Serpentine Squiggles</a></h1><div class="nav sitenav"><a class=no-notes href=/about.html>About</a><a class=no-notes href=/fiction/>Stories</a><a class=no-notes href=/artwork/>Artwork</a><a class=no-notes href=/games/>Games</a><a class=no-notes href=/music/>Music</a><a class=no-notes href=/essays/>Essays</a><a class=no-notes href=/posts>Posts</a><a class=no-notes href=/archive.html>Archive</a><a class=no-notes href=/contact.html>Contact</a><a class=no-notes data-n href=https://www.patreon.com/snugglesquiggle>Support</a></div></header><aside class=banner><p><strong>Vermin Cathexis</strong>: <span class=nav><span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/vermin/index.html>Index</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>In Vermin Cathexis</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/vermin/about.html>About</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>About Vermin Cathexis</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/vermin/glossary.html>Glossary</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>A Glossary for Vermin</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span></span></aside><main id=main><div class=pagehead><div class=stats><span class=date>2026-05-30</span><span title="1946 words"class=wc>1.9k words</span></div><div class=titleblock><h1 class=heading>Thrall → Parascixion → Chrylurk</h1><div class=subtitle>waxing lyrical of waning life</div></div></div><aside class=before><details class=sq-details-mini open><summary>Links</summary> <div class=expansion><div class=prelinks><ul><li><a href=parasitic-larva.html>The Larval Entiote</a></ul></div></div></details></aside><a href=#main id=resetview></a><article><p>A chrylurk is a swarm within a swarm: each one a mortal’s corpse twisted in metamorphosis then possessed and puppeted by mosquitoes, spiders and slugs; each a thread in the ghostly web woven to ensnare the collective in a grand eusocial symphony.<p>It is nearly as infeasible to describe a chrylurk as to describe a tree. One could gesture vaguely‍ ‍‍—‍ a trunk with branches with leaves‍ ‍‍—‍ but the exact arrangement is never repeated, subject to the vagaries of life‍-​history.<p>Each chrylurk is a motile colony for its swarmlings. One caste grows exceptionally large, rivaling human proportions, thus forming the silhouette‍-​skeleton of a chrylurk. Its chitin grows riddled with holes for its swarm to crawl and nest in.<p>These body‍-​caste bugs fuse together‍ ‍‍—‍ often two that grant a centauric form, joined where one’s abdomen melds with the other’s head, an important structure called the chrysoma: the lurking core. The womb of one body‍-​half becomes the breeding ground where the swarm renews its numbers.<p>The chrysoma is also the center of blood‍-​nectar metabolism. True to their quasi‍-​mosquito nature, every chrylurk preys vampiric on mortals, but for all the nutrition blood can boast, it is but a convenient medium for the chrylurk’s ravin.<p>Mortal brains burning with desire generate a soul, and its metaphysical essence diffuses through blood circulation. Chrylurks are soulless husks unable to generate essence on their own: hence their hunger for ensouled mortal blood. But simply draining discharge from wounds offers but crumbs. No, chrylurks first prepare their meals.<p>By fang or stinger, chrylurks inject their prey with venom that induces <em>ovirexia.</em> The mind is wracked by a hallucinogens, the body afflicted by a virus, and the soul breaks down. Dreaming begets essence; so through this nightmare‍-​hallucination, the character of the mortal soul is altered, mutated, transfigured. Prey begins to secrete essence tailored for chrylurk consumption.<p>Venom can have its dose‍-​blend altered for sowing or for reaping. To reap, a bite delivers enzymes: then the soul’s accrued subtle body dissolves into the blood, increasing the availability of essence in the blood.<p>But a dose to sow does more than corrupt the soul. It assaults the immune system day after day, subjecting the host to fever’s tremors and all the malaise of acute disease. If‍ ‍‍—‍ when‍ ‍‍—‍ the virus triumphs over the host, the very proteins that cells are infected‍-​instructed to grow are the same chrytoxins that serve to sink the host into ovirexia’s nightmares. The corruption becomes self‍-​sustaining; the body ripens itself for a reaping dose to let it all come gushing out.<p>It is at this point, the victim has become the chrylurk’s thrall.<p>But thralldom means more than self‍-​envenomation. Once the immmune system falls, the next target is the endocrine system. The <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=thrall-emotions.html>emotional responses</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>On the Emotions of Thralls</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> of the thrall betrays it for the chrylurk’s benefit. Stable neurochemistry becomes impossible without continual application of the venom‍-​drug; the appetite skews to prefer the taste of gorge from a chrylurk’s social stomach.<p>Such are the internal changes, but long‍-​kept thralls are obvious at a glance: the distribution of fat and the texture of the skin shift, heedless of sex; muscles and bones atrophy to impede any possible resistance; the flesh becomes deeply flushed and delectably sweaty; the constant draining of blood and soul leaves the thrall pale and skeletal. Bloodshot eyes dilate from the throes of chrytoxin.<p>Ovirexia is a disease, a constellation of symptons and behavioral anomalies induced by chrylurks. For all that they will sow with venom and reap with enzymes, the infectious virus is foremost, the particle from which all else can spring. <em>Everything</em> else, in fact.<p>When a thrall goes long without a chrylurk‍ ‍‍—‍ their beloved siphon‍ ‍‍—‍ dosing and draining them, they experience an acute withdrawal, headaches and hypertension. (Some might call this a punishment for flighty thralls.) But at length, this passes, at least in thralls that have fully “turned.” They begin to produce low levels of the needed chrytoxins with an inefficient emergency metabolism; bloodletting through self‍-​laceration relieves the hypertension.<p>Their psychology changes, akin to the inanition state known to starvation’s victims; they become restless and pursue any scent or sight of their siphon. This may sufficient to reunite thralls that have been taken from their siphon; and in cases where that chrylurk has died, this wandering may instead bring it into contact with another chrylurk fain to claim it.<p>The most likely outcome, for a thrall with no chrylurk to sustain it, is death or perhaps a partial regression of some biological changes induced. (Once a thrall’s body begins to undergo physiological changes, even if the virus is purged, returning fully to an unaltered biology is impossible, and it will always be easy to slip back into a thrall state.)<p>But especially for the most fully transitioned thralls, another pathway of mutation unfolds. The truth of viral ovirexia is that it is no simple virus‍ ‍‍—‍ it is in fact the entiotic germ. A chrylurk is nothing less than the mature reproductive stage of an entiote.<p>Thrall endocrinology changes the distribution of fat, but when repeatedly drained of blood and scarcely fed, a thrall instead wastes to skeletal gauntness. Without a siphon, though? A thrall ripens, blood ever‍-​rich in new essence without outlet. All this excess gets stored in fat, a distorted mirror of soul’s natural genesis. Like this, any untended thrall becopmes an ever more tempting meal‍ ‍‍—‍ a hungry chrylurk would gladly rend their juicy flesh from their bones.<p>But this accumulation of essence‍-​fat prompts a new mode of ovirexia, a pivot in the entiotic germ’s behavior. Rather than just synthesizing manipulatory molecules, it leverages chrylurk genes to form a viable zygote.<p>This is an unreliable process; in theory, it ensures that chrylurks could return even from complete eradication of every hive and hiveling, but in practice, the species could never survive if this was the primary mechanism for generating fertile entiote eggs.<p>A more reliable mechanism is direct and explicit: the stinger‍-​ovipositor of the chrylurk queen‍-​caste drips with vermincholie, a calorie‍-​dense blend of venom laced with eggs and essence.<p>Entiote eggs and larvae require a rich diet of mortal essence to fully develop. For this reason, chrylurk prey divides in two kinds (it would not be unreasonable to call them sexes): nectarfonts are the gaunt figures described above, but more important to chrylurk reproduction is the broodnest. (Derogatorily, one could summarize them as bloodbags and eggsacks.)<p>Broodnests carry the parasitic larvae, maggots crawling and feasting even as growth hormones encourage thicker fat reserves. The thrall grows thicker and curvier, though not all of the weight is their own‍ ‍‍—‍ the larvae multiply rapidly, and it isn’t uncommon for a queen to lay multiple broods in a single host, accelerating development.)<p>A well‍-​groomed and well‍-​drugged thrall can generate essence faster than uninfected mortals; so much so that the resulting disturbances in the mutamyric field can unsettle or stupefy mortals that encounter ovirexians. The effect resembles the dread miasma of chimeric beasts.<p>Entiote pupation has phase polyphemism, akin to grasshoppers’ latent potential to beget locust swarms; at low density, as soon as an individual larva has sufficient essence, it forms a cocoon and emerges as a small swarmling. Such swarmlings go on to mate and lay eggs in the flesh of in other mortals. Or, often, the same mortal, since the ovirexia‍-​augmented essence production will make it a tempting host for future generations.<p>When a mortal is replete with infesting larvae, either from an abundance of free‍-​living swarmlings or because a queen keep repeatedly laying in them, the parasitic larvae begin to aggregate.<p>In this aggregation phase, pupation is suppressed, and larvae allow essence to accumulate at a greater density. In the process, they manipulate the formation of the soul. (Wild larva often struggle with this, and the guidance of a queen leads to more efficient and effective results.)<p>Well‍-​known to alchemists is the concept of compleation, the great work which induces the nebulous and mercurial incompleat soul to undergo crystalization into a more grand and potent form.<p>Chrylurks instead subject their thralls to parascixion‍ ‍‍—‍ compleat desolation. The soul’s tumor‍-​growth is pushed and pushed to a breaking point, swelling until it begins to strain under its mass. By the symmetry of soul and mind, cognitive distortion creeps in at this climax, antecedent to dissociation and derealization.<p>This, at last, is what the synchronized larva‍-​aggregation trusts as the signal to begin pupation: a half‍-​woven half‍-​secreted cocoon subsumes the host, encompassing the whole body. And at last, reaping enzyme comes to catalyze the soul. (Any queen would relish conducting this envenomation‍-​annointment.) Before, reaping was a slow, decimating erosion, always careful to preserve the whole.<p>This is a spark antecdent to a funeral pyre. The advent of alchemical compleation had wrought for mortals a pathway of crystalline ascension. The inversion entails a katabasis‍—harrowing, hollowing. Chrylurks are soulless husks, so each pupa must discard this soul‍-​tumor it had grown. At the heart of the lurking core, the chrysoma, is an insatiable hunger and eternal emptiness. This is what lurks deep within every chrylurk: the kenoma.<p>A chrylurk is a ruin created by the collapse of a soul made parascix. In contrast to fire (combusting with an explosive release of heat) consider the gradual implosion of days spent in chrysalis, a metabolism scouring the soul yet trapping all the heat inside the pupal walls.<p>Such intensity is necessary to forge the lurking core. It is the shadow of mortaltiy: a soul sunk in profoundest negation. But it is not an object of lyric poetry or ponderous philosophy: no, entiotes are governed by biology, and the this process is vital and pragmatic.<p>How do chrylurks remain forever soulless, if they constantly drink blood laced with the shorn fragments of victims’ souls? Every alchemist knows increasing essence quantity must reduce essence quality (thus chimeras are a poison chalice)‍ ‍‍—‍ so how do chrylurks survive consuming the tumourous, chimeric essence they inspire?<p>The chrysoma contains a social stomach: most chrylurks do not siphon thralls, instead relying on a specialized replete caste who regurgitate their meals for the hive’s benefit. Nectar from thralls enters the chrysoma and passes through the lurking core, which sieves essence through a crystal of unique topology. When it rises as gorge, the thick fluid that congeals into the archetypal meal of every chrylurk’s diet, sanguimel.<p>Any compleat soul that witnesses this process will behold a strange alchemy indeed. Essence‍-​rich fluid enters the hollow cavity of a chrylurk’s anti‍-​soul… and the syrupy fluid that comes out has no trace of that provenance. This is mundane matter‍ ‍‍—‍ as if the nectar so carefully sown had simply vanished in a magician’s trick.<p>Essence decays quickly when outside of a liminal body to sustain it, but sanguimel has no essence and thus keeps indefinitely. Hives store it in grand reserves, but of course, some of it is eaten daily.<p>And when this happens, the compleat will witness an inversion of that strange alchemy. The sanguimel enters the chrylurk’s body, and at once, essence winks into being from nowhere. The magician completes the performance, pulling life out a hat.<p>Transubstantiation is one of the great enigmas of chrylurks: cipher‍-​storage, as if matter were marked with a secret code, a password known only to bugs. Their cores allow them to store essence in a substance with no discernible presence in the mutamyric field; then, upon consuming this substance, equivalent essence is generated within them.<p>Not the waste essence spewed by chimeras and thralls, but a form of emyra to rival alchemists and divines.</article></main><aside class=pointer><div class=center>Part of a series called <em><a href=/vermin/index.html title=->Verminous Experiments</a></em></div><div class=seriesnav><a class=prev href=/vermin/aether-brain.html title=->← Aether Brain Hypothesis</a><a class=next href=/vermin/about.html title=->About Vermin Cathexis →</a></div></aside><footer><a href=#>Top</a> · <a href=/>Home</a> · <a href=/archive.html>Archive</a></footer>]]></content>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title type="html"><![CDATA[Aether Brain Hypothesis]]></title>
        <id>https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.org/vermin/aether-brain.html</id>
        <link href="https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.org/vermin/aether-brain.html"/>
        <link rel="enclosure" href="https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.orgundefined" type="image//"/>
        <updated>2026-05-27T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
        <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The way I usually explain how alchemy works is the existence of two magical substances. Essence is the fundamental basis of alchemy, and it arises from the dreams and desires of a conscious brain. Why this is so is oft-considered one of the great mysteries of the world. But essence is innately unstable and reactive; whenever it comes into contact with physical matter, combustion-subsumption results and together they create limina.</p>]]></summary>
        <content type="html"><![CDATA[<!doctypehtml><meta charset=UTF-8><meta content=width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0 name=viewport><meta content=article property=og:type><link href=/style.css media=all rel=stylesheet><link title="Squiggles Atom Feed"href=/feed.xml rel=alternate type=application/atom+xml><link title="Squiggles JSON Feed"href=/feed.json rel=alternate type=application/feed+json><link href=at://did:plc:ivoe7cntxuy6at7uzmxzs2ft/site.standard.publication/3mfk6cpprzt2t rel=site.standard.publication><link href=at://did:plc:ivoe7cntxuy6at7uzmxzs2ft/site.standard.document/3mpgt63f4k32l rel=site.standard.document><link href=/vermin/vc.css media=all rel=stylesheet><title>Aether Brain Hypothesis · Vermin Cathexis
    </title><meta content="Aether Brain Hypothesis"property=og:title><meta content="The way I usually explain how alchemy works is the existence of two magical substances. Essence is the fundamental basis of alchemy, and it arises from the dreams and desires of a conscious brain. Why this is so is oft-considered one of the great mysteries of the world. But essence is innately unstable and reactive; whenever it comes into contact with physical matter, combustion-subsumption results and together they create limina. "property=og:description><body class="url-/vermin/aether-brain.html slug-aether-brain"><header><h1 class=sitehead id=serpentine-squiggles><a href=/>Serpentine Squiggles</a></h1><div class="nav sitenav"><a class=no-notes href=/about.html>About</a><a class=no-notes href=/fiction/>Stories</a><a class=no-notes href=/artwork/>Artwork</a><a class=no-notes href=/games/>Games</a><a class=no-notes href=/music/>Music</a><a class=no-notes href=/essays/>Essays</a><a class=no-notes href=/posts>Posts</a><a class=no-notes href=/archive.html>Archive</a><a class=no-notes href=/contact.html>Contact</a><a class=no-notes data-n href=https://www.patreon.com/snugglesquiggle>Support</a></div></header><aside class=banner><p><strong>Vermin Cathexis</strong>: <span class=nav><span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/vermin/index.html>Index</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>In Vermin Cathexis</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/vermin/about.html>About</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>About Vermin Cathexis</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/vermin/glossary.html>Glossary</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>A Glossary for Vermin</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span></span></aside><main id=main><div class=pagehead><div class=stats><span class=date>2026-05-27</span><span title="2599 words"class=wc>2.6k words</span></div><div class=titleblock><h1 class=heading>Aether Brain Hypothesis</h1><div class=subtitle>more notes on fundamentals mechanics</div></div></div><aside class=before><details class=sq-details-mini open><summary>Notes</summary> <div class=expansion><div class=prenotes><ul><li><div><p>This page contains unpolished draft content that should not be judged as a final product. Feedback is both welcome and desired, <a href=/contact.html>contact us</a>.</div></ul></div></div></details></aside><a href=#main id=resetview></a><article><p>The way I usually explain how alchemy works is the existence of two magical substances. Essence is the fundamental basis of alchemy, and it arises from the dreams and desires of a conscious brain. Why this is so is oft‍-​considered one of the great mysteries of the world. But essence is innately unstable and reactive; whenever it comes into contact with physical matter, combustion‍-​subsumption results and together they create limina.<p>This is the other, more outwardly obvious magical substance. Limina has mass and more stability than esseence. It is able to coexist in the physical world. But it can also shield essence from interaction with matter, allowing it to persist.<p>Imagine pouring dirt into a puddle. At first it becomes wet and turns into mud, but after some of the dirt is sacrificed to form that first layer, the dirt piling atop it remains dry. Essence reacts to produce enough limina to protect itself.<p>Essence has a lot in common with electricity; it flows and creates a field for forces to act at a distance. Limina‍ ‍‍—‍ despite its mass‍ ‍‍—‍ is exceptionally easy to reshape, especially by manipulation of the essence field. The ancients called it “divine clay.”<p>But I did not describe limina as <em>stable</em>, only <em>more</em> stable. If starved of the flow of essence, limina will undergoes a kind of collapse back into almost‍-​ordinary matter. But since limina was so easy to reshape, you can see a utility in this process: first transform matter into limina, then mold it into a new form, then siphon off the essence, and behold how easily you reshape the world.<p>Those with honed phyisical instincts may expect a conservation law. If essence + matter = limina, and this product presists as long as there is excess essence, then shouldn’t the collapse of limina back into matter also return the essence that created it? Otherwise, where does it go?<p>The mathematics aren’t so kind. Essence is changed through its affair with matter; it cannot return with the same purity it once had. Instead, it becomes a sort of anti‍-​essence. Where essence could not bear the presence of matter without reacting with it, this byproduct is perfectly able to persist, clinging to objects like static fuzz. An object imbued this way is considered <em>transmuted.</em><p>With some abuse of language, we might refer to this “anti‍-​essence” as transmutation. And the distinguishing feature is that transmutation violently combusts with essence, preventing the formation of more limina, or that mysterious genesis of essence ex nihiho.<p>Because essence originates in the brain, and because the flow of essence controls the form of limina, alchemists consider these substances to form the soul, the chief organ for practicing metaphysical work.<p>In a layperson, limina seeps throughout the body, circulating through the blood, but without disciplined control of their essence flow, at their extremities limina often collapses into transmutation, resulting a messy patchwork of essence‍-​laden limina and transmutation.<p>Matter cannot be shorn of its transmutated nature except at a cost of energy‍ ‍‍—‍ even still, expelling the “anti‍-​essence” often creates explosive forces that threaten the structure integrity of the transmuted object. In bodies, this means tissue damage. This is the difficulty of the alchemists’ first task: compleating the soul.<p>Simply burning away transmuted impurities would cause lacerations and fissures throughout the bodies: it would prove swiftly fatal. Thus the transmutation must be cleared away slowly, carefully. Slowly enough that even as you remove one impurity, more transmutation in being ingested or created by the body’s metabolism. It is no mystery why this process can take years.<p>But there’s a further wrinkle. I mislead you, which I told you that transmuted impurities arise through the laity’s lack of control. No, the fundamental contradiction of alchemy is that a single brain cannot generate enough essence to compleat a soul. It is akin to flying by tugging on one’s own bootstraps.<p>The body bears the stain of transmutation as an inevitability, the high banks of river will on occasion know the touch of its waters but the flow is never sufficient to flood the it to the brim every day of every season.<p>Even the wisest alchemists, acquainted with essence’s origin in the dreams of mortals, cannot generate enough of it, not at a rate appreciably faster than the a lay fool. In this all mortals are largely equal.<p>No, the only way alchemists are able to sustain themselves is by supping on the essence generated by vigners and offered in the fruit of their vines.<p>Hearing all of this, you would naturally come to the conclusion that essence is a very scarce thing, as if each mind is mining some precious gem from the inscrutable depth of the world.<p>This is the belief that the Aether Brain Hypothesis challenges.<p>It suggests that essence is in fact just abundant as the air surounding us. Or perhaps not <em>essence</em> itself. Rigorously formulated, this conjecture introduces a third class of phenomena: the titular aether. Aether is furtive and unreactive, able to suffuse every inch of the world without revealing its presence.<p>It is attracted to matter, trailing in its wake, and dutiful reënacts its every motion. For this, theorists have been moved to imagine an “astral plane”, identical to the material world, but composed of this aether pantomime.<p>This equivalance between material and aether is the Grand Symmetry. But grand as it is, it is only notable because it not perfect. In animate bodies, the aether counterpart diverges subtly from its source. Romantically, we might imagine the astral imitation is unable to cope with the vagaries of free will.<p>A more mechanical explanation is substances present in living bodies are what break the symmetry. Small particles that interact with matter and aether both, yet discriminate and perturb the symmetry.<p>Imagine inviting men and women to a dance, each paired with the opposite gender. Now suppose someone tampers with the records, skewing the balance of genders and making a confusion of the intended organization. Instead of a perfect one‍-​to‍-​one pairing, strange new dances emerge, multiple men competing for a woman (many to one) or a man with several admiring women (one to many) or girls dancing among themselves (zero to one).<p>Aether, remember, was supposed to imitate the behavior of matter. But this imitation isn’t idle‍ ‍‍—‍ aether does have mass. When it is dragged in the wake of matter, matter likewise falls back to join it. Because of the grand symmetry, this two‍-​way interaction can be ignored: aether’s influence simply redundantly reduplicates the motions of matter. When they diverge? Matter will be dragged astral.<p>Consider a one‍-​to‍-​many interaction. Here, several subdivisions of the aether field have mappped onto the same material element, and as a result, the stablizing influence of aether is disportionate. In order for the matter to move, it must tug on not only the usual aether hanger‍-​on, but several others who cling to it.<p>Many‍-​to‍-​one are more interesting to contemplate, owing to the fact that two objects cannot overlap in space, meaning that this aether acts to synchronize several similar objects to a shared state.<p>Zero‍-​to‍-​one are the strangest by far. It is as if the astral plane was twisted, subducted into itself, causing aether to imitate aether as if it were matter. But this is self‍-​referential, and consequential any behavior becomes self‍-​justifyingly possible.<p>One theory posits that “essence,” “limina” and “transmutation” are no more than phases of aether, geometric arrangements of this deviations in the Grand Symmetry. But perhaps a rigorous reduction of alchemy to aether is beyond the scope of this discussion.<p>Step back, and consider the true implication of this astral plane. It’s nothing less than a doubling of space, with profound implication for processes which find themselves limited by space. Could Book could be bound to take up half as much space if every page had not two sides but four?<p>Remember that we supposed living things bore substances that broke the Grand Symmetry. The Aether Brain Hypothesis proposes that the brain deliberately alters its cognition across the material/aether split to exploit the duplication. This aether divergence is used to not just to accelerate thought, but to rapidly signal and synchronize across cortices. It is in fact essential to the emergence of the unified experience of consciousness.<p>Biologically, all brains would perform this operation to greater or lesser extent, but it is of course the most acutely developed in the most intelligent species.<p>If the sea of aether is everywhere around us, but only in brain is there turbulence enough to subduct and create those zero‍-​to‍-​one “bubbles” that are unbound to matter… have we not arrived at an explanation of just what essence is, and why brains alone generate them?<p>But what is unique about cognition? What stops us from isolated the molecules that give rise to this phenomena and generating abiotic essence, perhaps stirring them in a warm pot?<p>Key to what’s happening isn’t that the Grand Symmetry is breaking, but that it’s breaking in a structured, useful way. Why not create food by putting amino acids into a warm pot and stirring it? Only metabolism creates the proteins that life requires, and only brains produce the <em>emyra</em> that is the true power of essence.<p>It is possibible for inanimate objects to produce noises, and animals can produce complex calls indeed, but only sapient animals produce <em>language</em>. And it is the complexity of emyra, the self‍-​modifying recursive flows of essence, that allow for alchemy as such.<p>But what happens if you insist on trying to replicate the production of emyra through nonsapient means?<p>The result is <em>chimeric.</em><p>Occasionally, especially through illness and defect, an animal may secrete a surplus of the molecules responsible for symmetry‍-​breaking. Much like a virus or cancer replicating without bound, there are essential metabolisms that self‍-​catalyze.<p>Sapient brains are slow to generate essence because they use that essence to do useful work, coordinating billions of neurons and exciting delicate pathways. But lower animals do not rely so heavily on aether effects to accelerate their thinking.<p>If a human folded aether at the same rate as a chimera, their mind would collapse into seizure and agony. Their soul would dissolve into chaos.<p>And the chimera is not unscathed by this alchemical firestorm. Yet it has so much less to lose. The result is that it is able to generate a tumor‍-​soul, quickly gaining mass to rival the most distinguished alchemists, but with little more than brute strength to show for it, because rather than the crystalline, multifaceted brilliance of a third compleation master‍-​soul, the chimera has a bloated mass of mad‍-​dash cancer‍-​growth.<p>But chimeras reveal a new complexity. I have compared the vast volume of aether to the sea, or to the atmosphere. And yes, it is an abundance, particularly compared to the meager volumes that determined alchemists draw forth. But it would be a mistake to misunderstand the quantity of aether as infinite.<p>Chimeras highlight this folly. This is the origin of the “miasma” that renders these beasts such a fearsome threat. Because they greedily, incessantly suck up aether to fuel their growth, chimeras disrupt the aether that allows mortal brains to function. The result is akin to carbon monoxide exposure.<p>Thus the chief duty of alchemists: to hunt down chimeras.<hr><p>This theory has further applications in illumination two major developments in the world’s history.<p>The first is the origin of arachnophobia. There once was a race of intelligent spiders called the Forspun. They were predators, hated and feared across the Verdant Halo. Despite their intelligence, they were considered just as incompatible with civilization as chimeras. Yet by all accounts, they had mortal souls. What explains this?<p>It was a curious feature of Forspun biology: their venom. Their fangs delivered a potent neurotoxin which reacted with flesh to break the Grand Symmetry. Prey dosed with Forspun venom experienced the same seizures and brain failure as chimeria miasma induces, and at high enough doses, it will in fact radiate the same “aura” of dysfunction that chimeras exude.<p>Some nuances of taxonomy are justifiable, but to simplify matters‍ ‍‍—‍ and to echo the warnings of legend‍ ‍‍—‍ the Forspun were able to <em>create</em> chimeras with their venom.<p>But again, they had complex souls like any other mortal. Surely this amounts to sword held by the blade? Not quite.<p>Again specific taxonomy is more distinguishing, but to simplify, the Forspun were the first alchemists. Much like how vigners can share essence in the fruit of their vines, the Forspun could imbue essence into their silk‍ ‍‍—‍ their <em>serivane</em>.<p>(It is no coincidence that transmutation circles resemble webs.)<p>When hunting, the Forspun would don serivanescent veils woven aether‍-​tight. When subjecting their prey to chimeric agony, the miasmic ination of the air could not penetrate their bubbles of aether bound within their veils.<hr><p>The Jet Blasphemy was among the great crimes of the last empire; they discovered deposits of a magical mineral that could be burned to produce usable essential in great quantities, freeing those mortals of their dependency on vigners and their laws.<p>The externalities of jet combustions are best explained as a vignet equivalent of Forspun venom. If chimeras have a disabling effect on mortal minds, then jet pollution is just as brutal on the vines that had granted alchemists their power.<p>If you know where the Jet Blasphemy had lead, then you are perhaps wondering how chrylurks fit into this picture.<p>Chrylurks are, at heart, an attempt at creating a wholly new form of life. The mortal metabolism constantly works to generate more emyra. This is despite that fact that alchemists do not even generate most of the emyra they wield, relying instead on a surplus purloined from vigners.<p>Would it not be more efficient if instead of a meager trickle of emyra, a creature existed for which all resources were honed toward using emyra sourced from others? (In this way, chrylurks parody the mortal dependence on vignet fruits.)<p>But the new possibilities are deeper than that. One of the dogmas of alchemy is the transmutation of brains is impossible, because its cathexis means that organ is always clad in fresh essence.<p>Because this is not remotely true of chrylurks, they are capable of transmutating their brains. Much more ought be said about how this impacts their cognition; it deserves its own write‍-​up.<p>When chrylurks aren’t transmuting their brains, they are capable of <em>quiessence</em>, a state of total invisibility to mutamyric perception. Alchemists are proud of their all‍-​penetrating arcane sensitivity. These soulless husks are thus so unnerving they are considered to exist in the state of blasphemous <em>unlife</em>.<p>Lastly, a curiosity must be noted. Recall that transmutation violently reacts with essence. So much the atrocity inherent in chrylurk life is a consequence of their need to siphon the essence of mortals. But mortals themselves consume the essence of vigners. Could we not achieve peace of chrylurks adopted a vegetarian diet?<p>But chrylurks do not depend on essence‍ ‍‍—‍ they specifically depend on essence in the form of nectar or sanguimel. Emyra, the quasi‍-​molecular structures formed by aggregation of essence, are not created equal. Nectar bears a form of emyra tailored for chrylurk metabolism. Ambrosia has its own unique properties. Vigners were bred, generation after generation, do help alchemists compleat their souls.<p>Souls are made of essence, it’s why self‍-​transmutation is impossible. Chrylurk cognition, though, requires neural transmutation.<p>Which to say: chrylurks cannot drink ambrosia because it would give them a soul.</article></main><aside class=pointer><div class=center>Part of a series called <em><a href=/vermin/index.html title=->Verminous Experiments</a></em></div><div class=seriesnav><a class=prev href=/vermin/winter-thrall.html title=->← When Winter’s Thrall Eludes</a><a class=next href=/vermin/parascix-path.html title=->Thrall → Parascixion → Chrylurk →</a></div></aside><footer><a href=#>Top</a> · <a href=/>Home</a> · <a href=/archive.html>Archive</a></footer>]]></content>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title type="html"><![CDATA[Starmarked]]></title>
        <id>https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.org/games/starmarked/index.html</id>
        <link href="https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.org/games/starmarked/index.html"/>
        <link rel="enclosure" href="https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.orgundefined" type="image//"/>
        <updated>2026-05-17T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
        <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>A game of ascension and inevitable fall. Build a deck, strike and bind your cards to overcome the trials of the night, and pray you amuse the stars above.</p>]]></summary>
        <content type="html"><![CDATA[<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
  <head>
    <meta charset="UTF-8">
    <meta name="viewport" 
          content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
    <meta property="og:type" content="article"> <link href="/style.css" rel="stylesheet" 
          type="text/css" media="all">
        <link href="star.css" rel="stylesheet" 
          type="text/css" media="all">
    <link rel="alternate" type="application/atom+xml"
          title="Serpentine Squiggles" href="/feed.xml" />
    <link rel="alternate" type="application/feed+json"
          title="Serpentine Squiggles" href="/feed.json" />
                <title>
        Starmarked · Serpent Squiggles
    </title>
    <meta property="og:title" content="Starmarked" />
    <meta property="og:description" content="A game of ascension and inevitable fall. Build a deck, strike and bind your cards to overcome the trials of the night, and pray you amuse the stars above." />
    <meta property="og:image"
    content="/site/games/starmarked/screenshot.png" />
    
    <script src="/shared/fengari-web.js" type="text/javascript" async></script>
<script type="application/lua" async>
--f /*
local js = require "js"
require"starmark"
ok, err = xpcall(starmark, debug.traceback, js)
if not ok then window.error:append(err) end
-- */
</script>
</head>
<body class="url-/games/starmarked/temp.html slug-temp">

<header>
<h1><a href="/">Serpentine Squiggles</a></h1>
<nav class="sitenav">
<a class="first" href="/about.html">About</a><span class="hide"> | </span>
<a class="first" href="/fiction/">Stories</a><span class="hide"> | </span>
<a class="first" href="/artwork/">Artwork</a><span class="hide"> | </span>
<a class="first" href="/games/">Games</a><span class="hide"> | </span>
<a class="first" href="/music/">Music</a><span class="hide"> | </span>
<a class="second" href="/essays/">Essays</a><span class="hide"> | </span>
<a class="second" href="/posts">Posts</a><span class="hide"> | </span>
<a class="second" href="/archive.html">Archive</a><span class="hide"> | </span>
<a class="second" href="/contact.html">Contact</a><span class="hide"> | </span>
<a class="second" href="https://www.patreon.com/snugglesquiggle">Patreon</a>
</nav></header>

        <main>
            <div class="pagehead"> <div class="titleblock">
              <h1 class="heading">Starmarked</h1>
              <div class=subtitle>a game of ascension and inevitable fall</div>
            </div> </div>
          <article>

              <div id=fullscreen class=center>
                  <a class=small href=#zoom id=zoom></a>
                  <a class=small href=# id=unzoom></a>
              </div>
              <div id="error"></div>
              <div id=ui>
              <pre id="game">
Loading scripts...
(This page might be broken.)
              </pre>
              <div id=buttons>
              <details name=a class="controls"> <summary>Numpad</summary>
                  <div id="controls">
                  </div>
              </details>
              <details name=a class="controls"> <summary>Arrows</summary>
                  <div id="arrows">
                  </div>
              </details>
              </div>
              </div>


              <p>Stars wheel above you, and fate is born in their
              orbits.  Tonight, a contest begins: the Trial by
              Asterism—a game of chance played for the amusement of
              night everlasting.  Shall you test your wit with cards
              marked by the stars above?
              <p>To win, you must merely play an increasing sequence
              of cards culminating in a high ranking hand.  As simple
              as it sounds, all stumble in the ascent.
              <p>(The stars, of course, are laughing.)
              <hr>
              <details open><summary><h2>How to Play</h3></summary>
<p>Future versions of this game will include an interactive tutorial and
tooltips, but for now, you can read this quick primer.</p>
<p>This is an early build of a game still in development. Brace yourself
for bugs, inconsistencies, and simply unfinished mechanics. This game is
currently designed to be played on a desktop’s keyboard (the version I
do most of my testing on outright runs in a terminal emulator).</p>

<p>Users of touch screens can use the expandable buttons to deliver
input.  It is also possible to click certain elements of the game's
interface, but this feature needs improvement.
</p>
<h3>Controls</h3>
<p>Use WASD or the arrow keys to selection options or cards on the
board. “Up” adds more cards to your selection, while “down” removes
them. “Left” and “Right” replace the newest card in your selection with
the unselected card beside it.</p>
<p>The number keys or the numpad allow you to select options or card
positions directly. (Zero of course selects the tenth position.)</p>
<p>Pressing Space or Enter submits selections and advances the game.</p>
<p>Pressing ‘f’ or any number greater than the cards on the board (e.g.
‘0’) will change mode, usually swapping between playing cards normally
and discarding them.</p>
<p>Pressing ‘e’ or ‘.’ will sort the visible cards on the board. Unless
you have cards selected, in which case they are moved to the left side of the
board.</p>
<p>Pressing ‘q’ or ‘+’ will bring up a menu with tabs displaying various
helpful information. Most importantly, the first tab allows you to see
which cards are in your draw pile.</p>
<h3 id="gameplay">Gameplay</h3>
<p>Encounters in Starmarked are called trials, and the most common type
of trial is a series of tolls. These tolls demand that you give up a
certain number of star points, subtracted from you total. The
game is over when your star points go negative.</p>
<p>Tolls are paid at the end of a round, and thus, the goal of each
round is to acculate enough star points to survive. You can think of
this as your health and offensive power in one. It is how much you are
winning.</p>
<p>Most rounds are divided into turns, which come in two types.</p>
<p>The setup turns center around playing sequences of individual cards
to fill up the board, and the climax turn involves playing a hand of
cards ranked according to the rules of poker.</p>
<p>The game currently assumes you know the poker hands (if not, there
are many resources explaining this), so I will focus on explaining the
concept of “strikes”, which define the moment to moment gameplay.</p>
<p>When you play a card during the setup phase, it it compared to the
value of the previous card you played. As a general principle, you
benefit from playing a series of ascending cards, but in practice the
tactical considerations can become quite nuanced.</p>
<ul>
<li>If you play a card whose value is greater by exactly one, the result
is a Strong Hit.</li>
<li>If it the value is greater by more than one, the result is a Weak
Hit.</li>
<li>If the value is equal, the result is a Match.</li>
<li>If the value is less, the result is a Miss.</li>
</ul>
<p>Misses have negative consequences: avoid them!</p>
<p>These are not the only possibilities; more niche hits can be created
by edge cases interactions. But one special strike type you will see
often is the Block.</p>
<p>Blocking happens when the intervention of a rule improves the result
of a Miss, shielding you from negative consequences.</p>
<p>Playing ‘red’ or ‘orange’ (i.e. Hearts suit and Diamonds suit) cards
will generate heart points. These points will be spent automatically to
reduce the damage from a Miss, turning it into a Block if it is reduced
to zero.</p>
<p>After a strike, you draw one card to replace the one just
played. If the strike was a hit, you draw another, increasing the the
number of cards on the board. When the board is full, the setup phase
ends, and the binding phase begins.</p>
<p>Binding involves playing multiple cards at once, calculating the
poker that they contain, and gaining stars according to its ranking.
Beware that binding a High Card (the lowest value hand) will instead
<em>cost</em> you stars! Likewise, the next lowest hand (One Pair)
confers no stars by itself.</p>
<p>While certain interactions can win you stars during setup, it is the
climax where you gain most of your stars, but to ensure enough stars are
gained, you must have a good board going into the climax phase. Thus,
thoughtful play during your setup phase is key to progressing in
Starmarked.</p>
<p>Most cards are drawn face down, obscuring their true value, which
make the question of what move is best rather complex. Landing hits and matches
reveals cards, but the best way to quickly increase the range of visible
cards is by discarding.</p>
<p>Discarding expends the spade points you gain by playing ‘blue’ or
‘cyan’ (i.e. Spades suit and Clubs Suit). You will reveal a card and 
a draw one less than the cards you discarded, revealing each.</p>
<p>Note that, in a certain sense, there is no distinct concept of
“discarding” as a such: you are actually still binding cards.
Thus, “discarding” a hand that contains a poker hand will earn you
bonus stars.</p>
<p>Because of this, you cannot discard hands once you reach the climax
phase — it would be the same as playing them!</p>
<p>This primer should be enough to help you make it through your first
trial in Starmarked. At the end of a trial, you are offered options for
improving your deck, and you can explore different types of trial rooms
on the map.</p>
<p>However, because such elements are still under active development,
there is a risk of any explanation I give becoming outdated.</p>
<p>Have fun exploring what else the game has to offer.</p>
<p>Thank you so much for your time.</p>
              </details>
          </article>
        </main>
        <footer>
          <a href=".">Back</a> &centerdot;
          <a href="#">Top</a>
          <br />
          <a href="/about.html">About</a> &centerdot;
          <a href="/">Home</a> &centerdot;
          <a href="/archive.html">Archive</a>
        </footer>      </body>
]]></content>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title type="html"><![CDATA[Choose Your Venom-hex!]]></title>
        <id>https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.org/posts/venom-hex.html</id>
        <link href="https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.org/posts/venom-hex.html"/>
        <link rel="enclosure" href="https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.orgundefined" type="image//"/>
        <updated>2026-04-26T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
        <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>You are a snake wizard and you’ve got $20 to buy the power to devour the world. Choose wisely.</p>]]></summary>
        <content type="html"><![CDATA[<!doctypehtml><meta charset=UTF-8><meta content=width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0 name=viewport><meta content=article property=og:type><link href=/style.css media=all rel=stylesheet><link title="Squiggles Atom Feed"href=/feed.xml rel=alternate type=application/atom+xml><link title="Squiggles JSON Feed"href=/feed.json rel=alternate type=application/feed+json><link href=at://did:plc:ivoe7cntxuy6at7uzmxzs2ft/site.standard.publication/3mfk6cpprzt2t rel=site.standard.publication><link href=at://did:plc:ivoe7cntxuy6at7uzmxzs2ft/site.standard.document/3mpgt6a2oj72j rel=site.standard.document><title>Choose Your Venom-hex! · Squiggle's Blog
    </title><meta content="Choose Your Venom-hex!"property=og:title><meta content="You are a snake wizard and you’ve got $20 to buy the power to devour the world. Choose wisely. "property=og:description><body class="url-/posts/venom-hex.html slug-venom-hex"><header><h1 class=sitehead id=serpentine-squiggles><a href=/>Serpentine Squiggles</a></h1><div class="nav sitenav"><a class=no-notes href=/about.html>About</a><a class=no-notes href=/fiction/>Stories</a><a class=no-notes href=/artwork/>Artwork</a><a class=no-notes href=/games/>Games</a><a class=no-notes href=/music/>Music</a><a class=no-notes href=/essays/>Essays</a><a class=no-notes href=/posts>Posts</a><a class=no-notes href=/archive.html>Archive</a><a class=no-notes href=/contact.html>Contact</a><a class=no-notes data-n href=https://www.patreon.com/snugglesquiggle>Support</a></div></header><aside class=banner><p><a href=.><strong>The Serpent’s Track</strong></a> — read by constriction, write with venom.</aside><main id=main><div class=pagehead><div class=stats><span class=date>2026-04-26</span><span title="3727 words"class=wc>3.7k words</span></div><div class=titleblock><h1 class=heading>Choose Your Venom-hex!</h1><div class=subtitle>prompts for ophidian vexation</div></div></div><aside class=before><details class=sq-details-mini open><summary>Foreword</summary> <div class=expansion><p>There is magic in this world: the vex, a venom of distilled and bewitching malice, drips from the fangs of all wyrms — whether the magical serpents bearing the birthright of the Dragon-Witch-Mother, traitoress of creation; or afflicted maidens whose skin bear scales like scabbed wounds, dragged into this cursed inheritance like a drowned man into the depths. Alike they endure the Long Hunger, a curse or command stirring in the blood, urging them to swallow souls until the world itself becomes their feast.</div></details></aside><a href=#main id=resetview></a><article><p>You have $20 to buy purchase gifts and tailor your abilities.<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Cost $X gifts can be purchased up to five times. Features presented in a bullet list may be chosen in any order.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>Which do you chose to bear?<div><div class=center><p><span class=button id=top><a href=#gifts>View All</a></span></div></div><table id=tab style=width:99%;><colgroup><col style="width: 5%"><col style="width: 93%"></colgroup><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: left;">$0<td style="text-align: left;"><a href=#b1>Hatched</a> <a href=#b2>Bitten</a> <a href=#b3>Charmer</a> <a href=#b4>Butcher</a><tr><td style="text-align: left;">$X<td style="text-align: left;"><a href=#x1>Vilest Venom</a> <a href=#x2>Coiling Length</a> <a href=#x3>Swift Slither</a> <a href=#x4>Monstrous Gullet</a> <a href=#x5>Unbound Spirit</a><tr><td style="text-align: left;">$X<td style="text-align: left;"><a href=#e1>Heat Vex</a> <a href=#e2>Dark Vex</a> <a href=#e3>Blood Vex</a> <a href=#e4>Earth Vex</a> <a href=#e5>Soul Vex</a><tr><td style="text-align: left;">$1<td style="text-align: left;"><a href=#v1>Mercurial Venom</a> <a href=#s1>Striking Scales</a> <a href=#h1>Hissing Speech</a> <a href=#c1>Deadly Constriction</a> <a href=#o1>Grim Rattle</a><tr><td style="text-align: left;">$2<td style="text-align: left;"><a href=#v2>Spitting Venom</a> <a href=#s2>Camouflaged Scales</a> <a href=#h2>Vexed Forks</a> <a href=#c2>Worldwinder</a> <a href=#o2>Empathetic Pits</a><tr><td style="text-align: left;">$3<td style="text-align: left;"><a href=#v3>Counterhex Venom</a> <a href=#s3>Absorptive Scales</a> <a href=#h3>Serpent’s Kiss</a> <a href=#c3>Tactile Wisdom</a> <a href=#o3>Basilisk Hood</a><tr><td style="text-align: left;">$4<td style="text-align: left;"><a href=#v4>Corrosive Venom</a> <a href=#s4>Exuviate Possession</a> <a href=#h4>Resonant Hiss</a> <a href=#c4>Telecoils</a> <a href=#o4>Wyvern</a><tr><td style="text-align: left;">$5<td style="text-align: left;"><a href=#v5>Chimerical Venom</a> <a href=#s5>Immortal Ecdysis</a> <a href=#h5>Forked Destiny</a> <a href=#c5>Encoiled Geas</a> <a href=#o5>Enchantress Incubation</a></table><div id=gifts><dl><dt><span id=b1>Hatched</span> <em>$0</em><dd><p>You arose from an egg, the Dragon‍-​Witch‍-​Mother’s curse latent in your blood from the beginning. You always knew the day would come when it would writhe to life.</p><dt><span id=b2>Bitten</span> <em>$0</em><dd><p>A serpent struck and bit you, whether in attack or ritual, yet you survived, even as venom wracked your body. The pain ebbs, and a trickle of new power comes in its wake.</p><dt><span id=b3>Charmer</span> <em>$0</em><dd><p>In amusement or desperation, a snake has chosen you to be their servant. You act as a locus of their power, wielding it as they command.</p><dt><span id=b4>Butcher</span> <em>$0</em><dd><p>You wear the scales of the slain, whether obtained by your own hand or a fair coin. This stolen power responds stiffly to your command, but preservation of dragonhides is a mastered art. Alchemy replicates the venom, and fangs adorn your weapon.</p></dl><hr><dl><dt><span id=x1>Vilest Venom</span> <em>$X</em><dd><p>Your mouth is seething with a potent, cursèd bite. Like all of your kind, a moderate dose of venom is sufficient to vex your prey, but you have refined the mixture itself to alchemical lethality.</p> <p>Each $1 multiplies the vexation of a single bite. Because you can adjust the dose injected, you can achieve similar effects with less venom, increasing your effective reserves.</p> <p>At $1, a full force bite is needed to kill a laymaiden. At $5, one drop of venom has equivalent effect.</p><dt><span id=x2>Coiling Length</span> <em>$X</em><dd><p>It is said that vexwyrms never stop growing, but their extent does taper off. A common vexwyrm is as long as a human, but elders often reach tremendous lengths.</p> <p>Each $1 double your size, starting with two meters at $1 and capping off at $5 for just over thirty.</p><dt><span id=x3>Swift Slither</span> <em>$X</em><dd><p>Your can strike in the blink of an eye and pursue your prey with a relentless slither‍-​stride.</p> <p>Each $1 increases your reaction time, the distance you can lunge, and your average overland distance.</p> <p>At $1, you can outspeed a running layman; at $3 you can outspeed a galloping horse; at $5 you can outspeed an arrow.</p><dt><span id=x4>Monstrous Gullet</span> <em>$X</em><dd><p>The Long Hunger is never sated, only allayed momentarily. Your ordained purpose is to consume souls, a devourment‍-​damnation.</p> <p>Each $1 enhances your capability as a voracious predator, granting a new ability and slightly enhacing the others.</p> <ul><li><em>Greedy Maw.</em> You may consume prey larger than you are, though this limits your mobility.<li><em>Incorporeal Digestion</em>. You may consume only the soul, ripping it out of swallowed prey. If you spit them back out, they shall go on to live a wretched life.<li><em>Slow Metabolism</em>. Your stomach boasts exceptional efficiency, allowing you to last several times as long as lesser vexwyrms eating the same meal.<li><em>Perfect Pneumaphage</em>. You digest souls with exceptional devastation, allowing you subsist entirely on spiritual energy.<li><em>Brumation Fast</em>. You can last indefinitely without eating, by entering a torpor‍-​slumber.</ul><dt><span id=x5>Unbound Spirit</span> <em>$X</em><dd><p>As your gifts grow more powerful, you gain a richer understanding of your inherited affliction, this spiritual attunement‍-​bondage with the Dragon‍-​Witch‍-​Mother. Your enlightenment creeps up slowly, but soon you attain unique comprehension of the nature of the venom‍-​hex and Long Hunger.</p> <p>Each $1 subtly augments all your abilities, allowing you to bend their rules and twist their meaning.</p> <ul><li><em>Spirit Boost.</em> Select a gift you have. Amplify its stated effect in a minor yet distinct way.<li><em>Fragile Spirit</em>. Select a gift you do not have. Reduce its cost to $0, but you can only ever use it once.<li><em>Raveling Spirit.</em> Select a gift you have. You may add a new restriction and relax an existing specification. These relate to when it takes effect, what it requires, whom it must target, or how it manifests. The restriction must bind you tighter than the power thus gained.<li><em>Spirit Dither.</em> Select any gift. You may reduce its cost by $2, but it is now half as effective or twice as demanding.<li><em>Bridged Spirits.</em> Select a gift that targets prey or allows vexing. Reduce its cost to $0, but prey gain the ability to use it against you, or you are likewise vexed by it.</ul></dl><hr><dl><dt><span id=e1>Heat Vex</span> <em>$X</em><dd><p>Serpents yearn for warmth just as they hunger and thirst. Some vexwyrms turn their souls to the mastery of temperature, so as to never again known that privation.</p> <p>These vexes all expend a reserve that replenishes when you bask in a heat source (such as the sun).</p> <p>Each $1 grants a minor vex:</p> <ul><li><em>Heat Sense</em>. You can sense all heat sources in a certain range, scaling higher the cooler your own scales are.<li><em>Venom Conduit.</em> Your venom now channels and conducts heat. You may warm or cool your scales at will by transfering heat to or from a vexed target.<li><em>Freezing Fangs</em>. Your fangs are akin to blades of ice. You may vex prey to leave them shivering cold, even frozen. You may survive freezing temperatures indefinitely.<li><em>Fuel Glands.</em> Your venom grows oily, and your scales can spark it alight. You may vex prey to make them blister and burn. You do not suffer pain or injury at scalding temperatures.<li><em>Burning Visage.</em> Your slitted eyes glow with bright malevolence, illuminating dark spaces. Those who stare directly in your eyes witness illusory afterimages according to your devising.</ul><dt><span id=e2>Dark Vex</span> <em>$X</em><dd><p>Snakes are born in shadow, fluent in its occult majesty. It is only natural that vexation should become a tool of stealth and negation.</p> <p>These vexes expend a reserve that replenishes when night falls.</p> <p>Each $1 grants a minor vex:</p> <ul><li><em>Tactile Darkness.</em> Shadows become an extension of you. When you are in shadow, you can treat any surfaces within the same shadow as your own scales. You can feel anything that touches it (coarsely if the target is much larger than you are).<li><em>Dark Acceleration</em>. You move at the speed of dark. When you would be illuminated, you can reflexively move at several times your normal speed if and only if this would keep you in shadow throughout.<li><em>Counter‍-​Illumination</em>. Light itself trembles to shine upon your work. Coat a object or creature in your venom, black like ink: when it is illuminated, you can vex the light source. Its luminance will abruptly flicker, and it may be outright destroyed if your soul is strong enough to snuff it out.<li><em>Shadow Play</em>. Your shadow moves on its own. When you are illuminated, you can cast arbitrary shade as if block the light right at the source. You know intuitively the perspective distortion required to convincingly portray your own shadow at any imaginable point around you. All light blocked in this manner entails you absorbing that energy and consequently warming.<li><em>Shade Invocation.</em> When you consume a soul, you may retain a shade of it. Parts of its memory and will linger within you thereafter. When you gaze into abyss‍-​black darkness, you may drip a small dose of venom to regurgitate your shades, returning them to an occulted form of life. These shades die when illuminated, and even dim light does harm. Shades have the power to use other Dark Vex gifts and convey their thoughts.</ul><dt><span id=e3>Blood Vex</span> <em>$X</em><dd><p>To slither and strike means apprehending blood and grace. For your venom takes effect in the panicked thrill of prey‍-​pulse; for your bodily extent from tongue to tail is a curve of draconic beauty.</p> <p>Each $1 grants a minor vex:</p> <ul><li><em>Blood Dance.</em> You move with utmost grace. Only those outright faster than you can hope to keep up with your movements, and when you dance, any who watch your movements are hypnotized, the trance deepening until one gesture of command sees them kneeling, fleeing, or embracing your coils.<li><em>Tracker’s Prescience.</em> Tendrils extend from your soul, like spiritual tongues. You gain awareness of all the air currents around you, and exceptionally keen olfaction. No prey‍-​scent eludes you. More than that, a wave of these tendrils stirs the air. You control the diffusion of scents, and gain all the telekinetics of subtle, persistent wind.<li><em>Venom Control.</em> Your venom carries your pulse; it slithers, liquidly animate. When you envenom prey, you may vex them and obtain deepening awareness of their body through their circulatory system. They are in your grasp. The greater the dose, the more control you have. With enough venom, you may outright possess prey, but exercising control burns feverishly and rapidly expends the dose.<li><em>Vampire Wyrm.</em> You have learned to sip from veins as from a spiritual river. You no longer need to consume prey to sate the Long Hunger: Instead, you may drink their blood, consuming only part of the soul.<li><em>Antivenom Panacea.</em> Your venom is more than a vex. After much experimentation, your persuasion of biology is complete, and when dosing prey, you may allow your venom to numb pain, supply nutrients, and act as an antivenom. When you close wounds, though, subjects may find the flesh heals back with scales whose glimmering shares your hue.</ul><dt><span id=e4>Earth Vex</span> <em>$X</em><dd><p>No place is more safe or sacred than a serpent’s den. Snakes are attuned to the earth‍ ‍‍—‍ but not any mere patch of land. Only the soil burrowed by their own snout, smoothed by their continual weight and passage, grows truly infused with their soul.</p> <p>These vexes are all most (or only) effective in the “lair” that you sleep in most often, accumulating with age.</p> <p>Each $1 grants a minor vex:</p> <ul><li><em>Underslither.</em> You can burrow with skill sufficient to allow you to “swim” through the earth itself. You move at a hundredth your normal speed when tunneling through solid earth, increasing to as much as a tenth when near your lair. For navigation, you have a dim sense of the material composition of the soils you burrow through.<li><em>Lair Shaping.</em> You have become partly flesh and dirt. You may treat the material of your lair as your own scales and all that touches it is in your grasp. You may shape it any architecture you can imagine.<li><em>Predator’s Lair.</em> Your very hunger has seeped into the stone. When prey enters your lair, you are alerted (even if not nearby) and you may vex this target. If you will it, your lair may slowly drain their life, preserving their flesh and soul for later consumption.<li><em>Venom Vessels.</em> Your maw is salivating stone. You may drip venom into a rock from your lair, turning into a vessel. This preserves the venom indefinitely. If you shape the stone into a weapon, it vexes targets upon penetration, but the vexation must be decided when the vessel is created.<li><em>Ocean Den.</em> You dwell within a maelstrom. You lair is sunken down in drowning depths, and torrential waters roil like endless coils around you. You can swim and breathe underwater, and all Earth Vex abilities apply to the waters you live in. Due to its fluid nature, your lair can move.</ul><dt><span id=e5>Soul Vex</span> <em>$X</em><dd><p>With each hunt and each life subsumed, your vexsome soul burgeons and baffles, a poison‍-​pearl. You may turn this wisdom and power upon itself, as if hunting your own tail. Can you ever strike it? Should you?</p> <p>Each $1 grants a minor vex:</p> <ul><li><p><em>Gift From Beyond.</em> Your soul was marked at inception, given a unique feature present in none other. You have command, if not mastery, over a power no other vexwyrm can mimick. What is it? (Design a minor power, or import one from another setting.)<li><p><em>Inner Space</em>. Your soul expands and hollows itself out. Your throat trifurcates, admitting not just breath and meal, but a new passage into your hidden depths. There is a extradimensional volume within your soul where you can store objects, weightless and imperceptible to others.<li><p><em>Ghost Slither</em>. You soul wriggles and contorts. The first time it happens, you thought you’d died, a ghostly form ascending from stilled flesh. Perhaps your body died? Had you shed your flesh like old skin? When you returned, you understood that this was astral projection.</p> <p>You can project your serpentine soul outward from your body. This detached soul can vex targets at a distance with phantom fangs, but beware that a bare soul is acutely vulnerable, courting a defenseless death. Your body withers the longer it goes without a soul, and further your silver cord stretches. Go too far, too long, and you cannot return.<li><p><em>Soul Redefinition.</em> Your soul is alive, recursively redefining itself. The longer you focus on your soul, the more you map its convolutions. You discern yourself discerning yourself. This metanoia grants you the paradoxical power of self‍-​creation. You can reshape your soul to emphasize the quality you deem coremost.</p> <p>Chose another ability to weave axiomatically into your soul. You become a master of this ability, peerless in the world, and all who would meddle with your soul become subject to it.<li><p><em>Ourobooros</em>. You descend into your depths, chasing the essence of self that runs away even as you run after it. And then, monument to tremendous striving, you strike! You catch it! There, caught in your fangs, is your own tail. A ouroboorus of the soul, self‍-​consuming, self‍-​critiquing, self‍-​refining! You can take spiritual sustenance from your own being, now; the Long Hunger is halted in its tracks. You have total awareness of your soul‍ ‍‍—‍ it’s enough to <em>know</em> this alone doesn’t exhaust the depths of this apotheosis.</p> <ul><li>If you have a hollow soul, you can now enter your own inner space, leaving a pool of venom in the world.<li>If you can astrally project, then you no longer have range limits, and can resize your projection to be twice or half as large.<li>If you can do both, your ouroboorus projection can at will become a portal to your internal space.</ul></ul></dl><hr><dl><dt><span id=v1>Mercurial Venom</span> <em>$1</em><dd><p>Your venom need not just kill. Even those who can resist your strike may suffer spasms, twitching agony, and visions of maleficient disgrace. You can manipulate its potency and effect of your venom to imitate any biological formula‍ ‍‍—‍ paralysis, delirium, deadly dysfunction.</p><dt><span id=s1>Striking Scales</span> <em>$1</em><dd><p>Your power and pedigree is immediately apparent to all who behold you. The minds of common folk are by turns frightened and allured; one glance will persuade all but rare exceptions to comply with your will. Fellow vexwyrms will not mistake you for easy prey‍ ‍‍—‍ though they may consider you a tempting mate.</p><dt><span id=h1>Hissing Speech</span> <em>$1</em><dd><p>You’ve learned the innate tongue of the slithersoul, letting you utter universally understood sibilation. Vexwyrms are hardly cooperative, but by perfectly conveying your intent, you can deceive and threaten with utter plausibility.</p><dt><span id=c1>Deadly Constriction</span> <em>$1</em><dd><p>Any prey that falls into your grasp can be squeezed, disrupting circulation and felling common beasts. Your cursed soul flares life throughout this slow murder, letting you vex your prey by prolonged contact.</p><dt><span id=o1>Grim Rattle</span> <em>$1</em><dd><p>Your tail is tipped with a hollow instrument of ghastly stridor. When shaken, it produces a shrieking noise that stops mundane foes in their tracks‍ ‍‍—‍ they cannot overcome the fear. Against all else, a physical strike of your rattle is enough to vex prey.</p></dl><hr><dl><dt><span id=v2>Spitting Venom</span> <em>$2</em><dd><p>You may eject a spray of venom from your fangs, costly yet allowing you to strike at range. Your venom has adapted to have a weakened effect upon contact, vexing your prey.</p><dt><span id=s2>Camouflaged Scales</span> <em>$2</em><dd><p>Your scales are perfectly adapted for stealth. If you remain still for a moment, the apparent colors of your scales shift and render you invisible. Movement blurs this effect, allowing the keen‍-​eyed to spot you creeping.</p><dt><span id=h2>Vexed Forks</span> <em>$2</em><dd><p>Your tongue discerns the subtle scent of souls. You can detect the presence of anyone nearby, whether or not they are vexwyrms, and how powerful if so. Soul‍-​scents linger for a day, allowing you to follow trails.</p><dt><span id=c2>Worldwinder</span> <em>$2</em><dd><p>Your body is long and your trail is longer. You have mastered crawling and climbing over the most unforgiving substrates. When moving carefully, you may proceed as if weightless, allowing you to slither over the surface of water or fragile structures. You may vex the ground in your wake, laying a trap for those who follow you.</p><dt><span id=o2>Empathetic Pits</span> <em>$2</em><dd><p>You have a pit organ for the sensing of body heat, but its true sensitivity is spiritual warmth, allowing you to discern the emotional state of nearby creatures. When close, this scan is detailed enough to discern every nuance of mixed feelings and subconscious impulses, but you are granted no semantic knowledge of their thoughts and beliefs. You can parse these auras quickly enough to grant a kind of foresight in combat.</p></dl><hr><dl><dt><span id=v3>Counterhex Venom</span> <em>$3</em><dd><p>Your venom has adapted for combat against your own kind. If you envenom a vexwyrm or magical creature, you instead target their soul, crippling their abilities. A full dose, rather than killing, strips away all powers.</p><dt><span id=s3>Absorptive Scales</span> <em>$3</em><dd><p>You can bask in power and absorb it. A few hours lying in the sun allows you to regenerate from damage. When foes draw near, their reserves are enervated, and their magical attacks are half as effective against you; a portion of their power soaks into your scales and empowers you.</p><dt><span id=h3>Serpent’s Kiss</span> <em>$3</em><dd><p>You can taste and drool the essence of power. When your tongue enters the body of another creature, you may transfer your magical reserves into and of their soul as long as you maintain contact. Wielding your borrowed power creates a debt, and if they cannot pay it, you may immediately devour their soul.</p><dt><span id=c3>Tactile Wisdom</span> <em>$3</em><dd><p>You can feel a soul’s innate design. When you hold prey in your grasp, you gain a sense for and understanding of their abilities, more detailed the longer you constrict. You become keenly aware of their weaknesses.</p><dt><span id=o3>Basilisk Hood</span> <em>$3</em><dd><p>Your neck scales can expand into a fearsome display. Its beauty is mesmerizing, patterns swirling around an eyespot of piercing glare. Your soul imbues it with glowing light, allowing you to hex all who stare inward. This effect automatically paralyzes weak prey.</p></dl><hr><dl><dt><span id=v4>Corrosive Venom</span> <em>$4</em><dd><p>Your venom is compleat and utter desolation, bringing ruin to all things living and even things beyond life. Your toxins can corrode objects as if it were strongest acid or hottest fire.</p><dt><span id=s4>Exuviate Possession</span> <em>$4</em><dd><p>Your soul lingers in your shed skin. When another creature touches your molt, they feel an urge to wear it. The longer it remains in contain with them, the greater your influence over them. They find themselves inclined to makes choices beneficial to you. When completely enthralled, your scales fuse inseparably; they will seek you out and serve loyally.</p><dt><span id=h4>Resonant Hiss</span> <em>$4</em><dd><p>Your sibilation enchants all who hear it. You can hiss as loud as a shout, and vex anything that feels this vibration, weakly at first, but if maintained as song, you may profoundly twist a whole area to your will.</p><dt><span id=c4>Telecoils</span> <em>$4</em><dd><p>You now entwine with subtle and phantasmal force. Any object or creature squeezed in your grasp is vexed. For a time, you retain awareness of its location relative to you, and may apply force at distance to move it. The precision of your awareness and the strength of this force scales higher the more time is spent held in your grasp.</p><dt><span id=o4>Wyvern</span> <em>$4</em><dd><p>You were born with wings, though you did not fledge until late in your adulthood. You can fly, these leathery wings rendering you as maneuverable as a bat. They are fragile things, bones easily broken and skin easily penetrated, and you cannot take off with a belly full of prey.</p></dl><hr><dl><dt><span id=v5>Chimerical Venom</span> <em>$5</em><dd><p>Your venom is ontological in its destruction, with seething toxins that act against concepts. When you vex prey, you may target any part of their body with surgical precision, and you may even target their mind, cutting away memories, skills, thoughts. A decimation‍-​vexation.</p><dt><span id=s5>Immortal Ecdysis</span> <em>$5</em><dd><p>You shed your form when you shed your skin. At any time, you may trigger a molt, and until you crawl free, your shed is inviolable. Any malady or ailment can be negated: you will be free of it when you eclose. You cannot use this ability again until your scales harden and flush with deathless splendor. This takes a full day the first time; each time thereafter, it takes twice as long to renew.</p><dt><span id=h5>Forked Destiny</span> <em>$5</em><dd><p>You entwine your will into the weave of time itself. Whenever you make a choice, you can lick your brilles. They cloud like a crystal ball, and you know the forked path. You receive a vision of the consequences both choices would have from now until you choose to end the vision, and you must chose your preferred option with this foreknowledge. You then live out that option as if in a fugue, waking up at the end. If you vex a target during this effect, the threads cross, and the target remembers the other path, now aware of the vision.</p><dt><span id=c5>Encoiled Geas</span> <em>$5</em><dd><p>Once bound, nothing escapes you. When something living is coiled in your grasp, your undulations insinuate into their veins, and you gain control of their heart. Each hour prey is so bound, you may implant an association of love, peace, or fear at a trigger of your chosing. You cannot control their thoughts, but the emotional certainty can only be briefly denied.</p><dt><span id=o5>Enchantress Incubation</span> <em>$5</em><dd><p>You have the hunger to devour the world and a womb to remake it. You may swallow anything that fits in your mouth. Instead of digesting it, you may instead lay an egg. You must incubate this egg, shivering to keep it warm, but with each day that passes, you lay a new enchantment over the target, augmenting one of its existing physical and spiritual properties, slowly granting it a will if it has none or otherwise subverting it. When it hatches, your offspring‍-​artifact will obey you as its mother.</p></dl></div><div class=center><p><a class=button href=#top id=back>Back</a></div><style>#top, #back { display: none} 
        body:has(article span:target) {
            footer, .pointer {display:none}
            header, .banner { display:none }
            dt:not(:has(:target))  {
              display:none; 
              &+ dd{display:none}
            }
            #top, #back { display: inline}
            hr { display:none;}
        }
        article:has(#top:target) #back { display: none}
        #tab {text-wrap:balance; line-height:2;  }
        #tab a {
          padding: .1em;
          text-decoration: none;
          border: 1px solid var(--accent1);
          background: var(--button1); 
          white-space: pre;
          margin: 0 .2em;
          &:hover { background: var(--button2)}
        }

        dt em, dt .note { font-weight: normal; }
        dt em::before { content: "— "}</style></article></main><aside class=pointer><div class=center>Part of a series called <em><a href=/posts/index.html title=->The Serpent’s Track</a></em></div><div class=seriesnav><a class=prev href=/posts/scissor-statement.html title=->← Cutting Apart Scissor Statements</a><a class=next href=/posts/newcomb-hypnosis.html title=->Nuances of Newcomb’s Problem →</a></div><hr><p>Thank you for reading! Please consider sharing this post or telling us you read it. Our only algorithm is word of mouth, and we have no analytics.<p>Thoughts? Questions? We’re interested in feedback, or even just acknowledgement. All are welcome to <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/contact.html>contact us.</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Contact Information</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>Did you enjoy? Please consider donating on <a href=https://ko-fi.com/snugglesquiggle>ko-fi</a> or <a href=https://www.patreon.com/snugglesquiggle>patreon</a>. We’re struggling and even a little bit helps.<p>Our deepest thanks and dedication to those who have donated to sustain this site.</aside><footer><a href=#>Top</a> · <a href=/>Home</a> · <a href=/archive.html>Archive</a></footer>]]></content>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title type="html"><![CDATA[The Binding Vow of Reductionism]]></title>
        <id>https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.org/essays/reductionism-vow.html</id>
        <link href="https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.org/essays/reductionism-vow.html"/>
        <link rel="enclosure" href="https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.orgundefined" type="image//"/>
        <updated>2026-04-21T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
        <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>It’s surprising to realize how little I’ve discussed worldbuilding on this site. All those essays about prose and plot and character, but any long-time fan of my work knows that my real passion is <em>lore</em>.</p>
<p>I have plenty of opinions on how to best go about fleshing out a setting, with a particular emphasis on the mechanics of its speculative elements — which no doubt explains the length of this essay. Originally, I only wanted to dash off a quick tumblr post, but I kept hitting on things I wanted to express and realized I never had, not publicly.</p>]]></summary>
        <content type="html"><![CDATA[<!doctypehtml><meta charset=UTF-8><meta content=width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0 name=viewport><meta content=article property=og:type><link href=/style.css media=all rel=stylesheet><link title="Squiggles Atom Feed"href=/feed.xml rel=alternate type=application/atom+xml><link title="Squiggles JSON Feed"href=/feed.json rel=alternate type=application/feed+json><link href=at://did:plc:ivoe7cntxuy6at7uzmxzs2ft/site.standard.publication/3mfk6cpprzt2t rel=site.standard.publication><link href=at://did:plc:ivoe7cntxuy6at7uzmxzs2ft/site.standard.document/3mpgt72jmji2k rel=site.standard.document><title>The Binding Vow of Reductionism · Squiggle's Essays
    </title><meta content="The Binding Vow of Reductionism"property=og:title><meta content="It’s surprising to realize how little I’ve discussed worldbuilding on this site. All those essays about prose and plot and character, but any long-time fan of my work knows that my real passion is lore. I have plenty of opinions on how to best go about fleshing out a setting, with a particular emphasis on the mechanics of its speculative elements — which no doubt explains the length of this essay. Originally, I only wanted to dash off a quick tumblr post, but I kept hitting on things I wanted to express and realized I never had, not publicly. "property=og:description><body class="url-/essays/reductionism-vow.html slug-reductionism-vow"><header><h1 class=sitehead id=serpentine-squiggles><a href=/>Serpentine Squiggles</a></h1><div class="nav sitenav"><a class=no-notes href=/about.html>About</a><a class=no-notes href=/fiction/>Stories</a><a class=no-notes href=/artwork/>Artwork</a><a class=no-notes href=/games/>Games</a><a class=no-notes href=/music/>Music</a><a class=no-notes href=/essays/>Essays</a><a class=no-notes href=/posts>Posts</a><a class=no-notes href=/archive.html>Archive</a><a class=no-notes href=/contact.html>Contact</a><a class=no-notes data-n href=https://www.patreon.com/snugglesquiggle>Support</a></div></header><aside class=banner><p><strong><a href=.>The Serpent’s Track</a></strong> — read by constriction, write with venom.</aside><main id=main><div class=pagehead><div class=stats><span class=date>2026-04-21</span><span title="10608 words"class=wc>10.6k words</span></div><div class=titleblock><h1 class=heading>The Binding Vow of Reductionism</h1><div class=subtitle>tricks for explaining conceptual powers</div></div><details class="sq-details contents"><summary><strong>Contents</strong></summary> <div class=expansion><div class=pagetoc><ol><li><a href=#introduction>Introduction</a> <span class=wc>1884</span><li><a href=#reductionism-emergence-animism>Reductionism, Emergence, Animism</a> <span class=wc>806</span><li><a href=#outcome-pumps>Outcome Pumps</a> <span class=wc>1384</span><li><a href=#revealing-ones-hand>Revealing One’s Hand</a> <span class=wc>899</span><li><a href=#casting-with-style>Casting With Style</a> <span class=wc>1146</span><li><a href=#prerequisites-for-fiddly-bullshit>Prerequisites for Fiddly Bullshit</a> <span class=wc>1453</span><li><a href=#transdiegetic-incentives-and-imbalanced-scales>Transdiegetic Incentives and Imbalanced Scales</a> <span class=wc>1204</span><li><a href=#gods-confidence-trick>God’s Confidence Trick</a> <span class=wc>1178</span><li><a href=#conclusion>Conclusion</a> <span class=wc>532</span></ol></div></div></details></div><aside class=before><details class=sq-details-mini open><summary>Foreword</summary> <div class=expansion><p>It’s surprising to realize how little I’ve discussed worldbuilding on this site. All those essays about prose and plot and character, but any long-time fan of my work knows that my real passion is <em>lore</em>.<p>I have plenty of opinions on how to best go about fleshing out a setting, with a particular emphasis on the mechanics of its speculative elements — which no doubt explains the length of this essay. Originally, I only wanted to dash off a quick tumblr post, but I kept hitting on things I wanted to express and realized I never had, not publicly.<p>But with… quite a bit further ado actually, let’s get this essay started.</div></details><details class=sq-details-mini open><summary>Links</summary> <div class=expansion><div class=prelinks><ul><li><a href=/essays/creative-extrapolation.html>Creative Extrapolation</a><li><a href=https://sablegm.substack.com/p/reductionist-magic-1-the-problem>Reductionist Magic 1: The Problem</a><li><a href=https://nostalgebraist.tumblr.com/post/685824316587343872>nostalgebraist’s counterpoint to rational fiction</a></ul></div></div></details></aside><a href=#main id=resetview></a><article><h2 class="heading initial"id=introduction><a href=#introduction>Introduction</a> <a title="Next Heading"class=button href=#reductionism-emergence-animism>→</a></h2><div class=subpage><p>This evening, as I am wont to do, I found myself thinking about reductionist magic. It’s my favorite way to design fantasy magic systems. Hard magic is rather in vogue these days‍ ‍‍—‍ clear and specific rules, wizards akin to scientists of arcana and engineers of spells.<p>Why? Contrivance is unsatisfying in narratives‍ ‍‍—‍ resolving a plot by <em>deus ex machina</em> is bad, and what fundamental difference is there, between “How was the villain thwarted? Because the gods willed it,” and “How can wizards cast spells? Because the gods will it,” ultimately?<p>Thus, hard magic serves as a balm for what is both a real problem and a persistent anxiety in writers. To resolve plots with magic, the reader needs to understand both the power and stakes of what magic does.<p>Brooms exist to solve a real problem: Dust and detritus accumulates on the floor the longer you live within a space, so you push it into piles and throw it away. Or, what comes first, your parents tell you to clean up your room, then check to see if your floor is actually clean.<p>If the problem a child thinks they’re solving is clearing up the floor, why not sweep trash under a rug where no one can see it? But <em>looking</em> clean isn’t the important part‍ ‍‍—‍ food crumbs, for instance, will rot and attract pests. Hiding them doesn’t fix this.<p>The rise of hard magic comes hand in hand with an impulse toward avoiding plot holes. In a way, hard magic is just an exercise in amending the same sort of error, but located in the backplot and the worldbuilding‍ ‍‍—‍ lore holes, if you will, though that sounds almost lurid.<p>These holes come in two chief varieties‍ ‍‍—‍ lacuna and aporia.<p>Aporia is what everyone recognizes as a plot hole. Here, the text says X. There, the text says not‍-​X. These cannot both be true, hence contradiction.<p>Say a fantasy party sets off on a quest to recover the lost remains of a legendary heroine, which are necessary to revive her and defeat a grand evil. An early encounter goes terribly wrong, they find themselves facing death at the daggers of a trio of goblins‍ ‍‍—‍ but then a wizard arrives to save the party with a timely casting of fireball, incinerating the fiends and leaving only charred skeletons.<p>Later, deep in the lows of the second act, tensions reach a breaking point as conflicting motivations tear the party apart. Suddenly, the wizard casts a traitorous fireball that incinerates the love of the protagonist’s life. There’s no way to revive her now‍ ‍‍—‍ the fireball had burnt so hot there’s nothing remaining but ash on the wind. The protagonist falls to their knees and weeps at this grand tragedy.<p>Tragedy? I say farce. If the fireball is so hot it burns bones, then why did we see the goblin’s skeletons earlier? Gotcha!<p>In practice, aporia is not what people call plot holes. Make no mistake, it happens: the sloppy writing of popular media is full of these slips. But how do you recognize plot holes? You first notice that you’re confused; something doesn’t add up. This doesn’t make sense to me.<p>This brings us to lacunae. Consider this new narrative: First, we see a off‍-​duty police officer take out a gun from his safe and slip it into his pocket. We watch him take a walk into the misty night, crickets chirruping an eerie ambient drone. As he passes in front of an alley, grah! A monster looms out of the darkness.<p>The cop turns tail and runs.<p>Does this make sense? There’s no apparent contradiction. No, the issue isn’t what happens, it’s what <em>doesn’t</em> happen. If the cop is scared, if he’s fearing for his life, why doesn’t he reach for his gun and shoot? We <em>know</em> he has one. Did he forget? Did the author?<p>So if aporia is the presence of logical contradictions deriving from supposed premises, then lacuna is the <em>absence</em> of the logical consequences of those premises.<p>But every dichotomy is just a spectrum with a lack of imagination.<p>There’s a reason it’s so natural to call both these things “plot holes.” The contradiction buried in the cowardly cop example is we naturally assume a police officer would try to defend himself if feeling threatened‍ ‍‍—‍ he’s got the training and he’s armed. Media literacy means parsing and engaging with this kind of subtext.<p>But that’s the rub: it’s all interpretation. We don’t <em>know</em>, so we have to infer. Was the traitor fireball <em>really</em> contradictory? Maybe the wizard simply poured more power into the spell against a human than against goblin.<p>Consider the following:<ul><li>There are five boxes in a circle, each with one marble inside.<li>Marbles come in three colors and at least one of each is present.<li>No box is immediately beside a box with a marble of the same color.<li>Two of the marbles are blue.<li>There are more red marbles than green.<li>No green marble box sits to the immediate left of a red marble box.</ul><p>Got all that? Now imagine I unveil a red marble. You aren’t surprised; the rules say as much. Then I unveil the box to its right. It’s blue.<p>Probably you don’t blink. If you were a logically omniscient computer, though, you’d segfault.<p>Try it yourself, it’s not hard to construct a sequence that matches these rules. Quickly you’ll find yourself locked into a single valid sequence. And the result is <em>not</em> a configuration that has a blue box to the right of a red box!<p>Easy for you to guess this much, just pagescrolls above we were talking about contradictions. But would you have blinked if this puzzle had showed up in a fantasy story‍ ‍‍—‍ instead of marbles, it’s the stones of power needed to activate mystical array? What happens if the rules were dripfed to you over the course of an arc, each established in a different scene?<p>The contradiction only emerges when you combine all of these constraints together, then spend an additional minute working through the implications.<p>In some ways this is close kin to an aporia‍ ‍‍—‍ it’s explicit contradiction among what we’re shown‍ ‍‍—‍ but this type of multi‍-​step reasoning is what it takes to finish drawing an equivalence between the two.<p>To derive true contradiction from a lacuna is much like getting partway through a sudoku puzzle and realizing you’ve fucked up. In sudoku, you can rule out certain numbers by direct application of the rules, while other remain in an ambiguous superposition, but if you align enough superpositions, you discern certain permutations of states are contradictory and the others share implications. Sometimes, through the cloud of possibility, you discern that no matter what’s really happening over <em>here</em>, every permutation places the same contraint over <em>there</em>. If you rule out what’s impossible and nothing remains, the lacuna was truly vacuous.<p>It’s worse than I let on‍ ‍‍—‍ this isn’t just a spectrum, there are <em>two</em> spectrums. It’s a plot hole polical compass!<table><colgroup><col style="width: 50%"><col style="width: 50%"></colgroup><tbody><tr><td><em>Not aporetic nor lacunal</em>‍ ‍‍—<br> you just lack reading comprehension.<td><em>Not aporetic, yet lacunal</em>‍ ‍‍—<br> it’s unclear, but ripe for interpretation<tr><td><em>Aporetic, yet not lacunal</em>‍ ‍‍—<br> the author forgot their own rules.<td><em>Both aporetic and lacunal</em>‍ ‍‍—<br> you are in hell.</table><p>This isn’t an essay about plot holes, though lore holes will figure heavily in what’s to come.<p>It’s clear enough that we want to avoid confusing the reader, and to do that we need to think carefully about what we include in our worlds and what this implies.<p>But what are we really accomplishing, when we strain to avoid plot holes? There’s a related concept, couched in the same kind of quippy TvTropes lingo‍ ‍‍—‍ <em>fridge logic</em>. It’s when you watch a show, then once you step away to get a drink from the fridge, the implications hit you, and you go wait, what?<p>But if a story passes the sniff test while you’re watching and it only falls apart later, hasn’t it done its job entertaining you? Only a subset of readers go on the internet to rant about plot holes‍ ‍‍—‍ and crucially, you can <em>always</em> find narrative holes if you run far enough down the chains of logical implication, because the root of every story is a falsehood. None of this ever happened!<p>Part of what distinguishes aporia from lacuna is that one is charitable and one is adversarial. Aporia is a case where you get stung simply by believing what the story told you, taking it on own terms. Lacuna involves asking questions the author did not. This is important‍ ‍‍—‍ unconscious biases are worth examining‍ ‍‍—‍ but at a certain point you’re just buying clothes at the soup store.<p>We’re here to talk about hard magic‍ ‍‍—‍ adding rules and limits to make our spells more logical and believable. We do this because it’s more satisfying, less confusing‍ ‍‍—‍ and to accomplish this, we might first try preëmptively thinking like a critic. Whether developing a plot development or expositing lore, at each point you imagine a reader who incisively asks, “Wait, does that really make sense? Why? How?”<p>But watch out! <em>This</em> is why I mentioned sweeping things under the rug. Only asking yourself whether you can satisfy readers demanding answers is akin to only consider whether your parents will see your room looking clean.<p>What motivates readers to cry <em>plot hole!</em> is feeling confused. They notice something that doesn’t add up‍ ‍‍—‍ so you give them an explanation. The confusion disappears… but have you gotten rid of the vermin‍-​luring scraps?<p>Consider once more that traitorous fireball. Why that inconsistent heat of the fireball? We could say it’s a consequence of the wizard’s emotions: they simply willed it to burn hotter.<p>But here’s another question to pick at: so far two of our plot points (why they’re questing at all; why complete incineration is so devasting) depend on the fact that reviving the dead requires… intact remains? Huh?<p>But ashes <em>are</em> remains. Why is it you can achieve revival using bones, but not a pile of ash? Both are inanimate, both are composed of the body’s particles.<p>How about this: in ancient days, clerics made a pact with the god of death, forcing her to honor certain rules. Reviving the dead has a certain cost and requirements. You can only be revived once, you can only be revived within ten years of your death, and you can only be revived if the clerics sacrifice one of your bones, which will not be returned to you when you come back to life. No bones means no revival.<p>Isn’t that a nice and hard system? We have set out clear rules, implied a rich history.<p>In fact, let’s go ahead and extend this logic to the rest of the magic system. How is the wizard able to cast fire magic? They made a pact with a fire elemental, feeding it their anger and resentment in return for blowing things up whenever they point and chant.<p>Why are goblins so evil and acceptable to kill? They were possessed by malevolent spirits that feed on misery itself.<p>How are you feeling about this approach to worldbuilding? For now, I digress. I’ll let you stew on this idea while I circle back around. What is that “reductionist magic” concept I mentioned at the start?</div><h2 class=heading id=reductionism-emergence-animism><a title="Prior Heading"class=button href=#introduction>←</a> <a href=#reductionism-emergence-animism>Reductionism, Emergence, Animism</a> <a title="Next Heading"class=button href=#outcome-pumps>→</a></h2><div class=subpage><p>A lot of what I’ve covered is old hat for my friends‍ ‍‍—‍ SableGM’s <a href=https://sablegm.substack.com/p/reductionist-magic-1-the-problem>Reductionist Magic</a> series puts it better than I ever will‍ ‍‍—‍ but I’m explaining all of this for my followers who’ve never heard of it.<p>Reductionism is a scientific philosophy. Big things are made of small things, complex system have simple parts. If you ask why something works, the answer is not “just because”, and the <em>complete</em> answer won’t leave you more mystified.<p>In practice, you don’t put molecules under the (electron) microscope and find particle people acting out little particle dramas‍ ‍‍—‍ no, they behave mathematically, mechanically.<p>It’s easy to think reductionism is pretty much how the world operates. Isn’t <em>everything</em> atoms and the void, when you get down to it? But I don’t consider reductionism <em>true</em>. It can’t be; it’s a heuristic. It is, essentially, Occam’s Razor. “Simple explanations are more likely” is not a fact of the world‍ ‍‍—‍ it’s a meta‍-​tendency, a useful trick for finding facts.<p>The <em>simple</em> explanation for a leaf lying on the sidewalk is that it fell from a tree and blew in the wind. Not that it was placed there carefully crunched to convey a coded message surreptitiously exchanged between scheming actors.<p>But it <em>could be!</em> Two kids might do this, just for laughs or because their parents forbade them from meeting. Occam’s Razor produces the wrong answer here, but with enough additional evidence it converges on the right one. <span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Notably, it’s <em>because</em> intuition gives the wrong answer that the schemers chose this communication channel.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>Even when reductionism is “wrong”‍ ‍‍—‍ e.g. genes are relatively simple proteins that need millions of years of complex population dynamics to understand‍ ‍‍—‍ it’s only temporarily wrong. Yes, complexity blows up a few ’why’s in, but then it goes back down: the buck eventually stops at fundamentally simple stuff.<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>This might feel like ultimately semantics‍ ‍‍—‍ “everything is fundamentally simple” is what reductionism means, not that every step there is simple‍ ‍‍—‍ but the important thing to recognize is that the pursuit of simplicity is in tension with theories like evolution that smear causation across vast times and spaces. Fundamentally, this explanation is accepted because it’s <em>true</em>, not because it’s simple. If you accept the most reductionist explanation that fits the facts, then at a certain point you have to recognize you’re calling it “most reductionist” because you can’t call it reductionist.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>When worldbuilding magic, you’re often thinking about what magic can do and how and why. Your wizards can cast fireball‍ ‍‍—‍ when? how often? Does it ever fail?<p>A reductionist approach to explaining fireball would be that it magics up some chemicals (provided as spell components, perhaps) into a structure similar to a gunpowder bomb, constructed and detonated with pure mana.<p>This means, say, if a villain left a wizard to suffocate in a room with no oxygen, fire magic would fail, having nothing to sustain its combustion.<p>Contrast this with worlds where fireball simply… creates ontological, elemental fire, or pyromancers summon dutiful little fire spirits. These spells burn because they are the essence of flame‍ ‍‍—‍ fueled by metaphysical sources, so even in a vacuum, magic alone would sustain it.<p>In a world like this, you try the above trap, and the fire elemental laughs this pitiful, dreadfully mundane attempt to suppress its blaze of glory.<p>Already you can see why a writer ought to know which camp they fall into.<p>But once again, dichotomies are spectra you haven’t thought deeper about. Even if a flame is fueled by magic, does that imply that it merely substitutes oxygen for “mana particles”? I would argue this is still reductionist.<p>To me, the polar opposite of reductionism is <em>animism</em>, and the bright line is one of arbitration. A reductionist system behaves a certain way because that’s what it is and must do. An animist system behaves a certain way because it wants to.<p>Not only is this a spectrum, it’s an intermingling, fuzzy spectrum‍ ‍‍—‍ because every animist system admits a quasi‍-​reductionist analysis (for if nothing else, the story lives inside your head and you are made of parts), and at the limit every powerful reductionist system allows animist agents to emerge, by simulation if nothing else.<p>Yes, we’ve stumbled onto a corollary of <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/posts/wizard-complete.html>wizard‍-​completeness</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Toward a Universal Theory of Wizardry</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span>. More on this latter.<p>Still, even when a system is fuzzy, that just means different tendencies dominate in different areas, at different scales.<p>If my voice were a magic system, “Alexa, kitchen on” and “Larry, pour me some coffee” are both spells I can cast. Home assitant voice recognition is complicated, but it’s a far simpler mechanism than a human brain.<span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>I loathe the things, for what it’s worth, but my housemates adore their “smart home.”</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>But a natural question to ask is: if this is a spectrum, what does it look like when you push it to the extreme?</div><h2 class=heading id=outcome-pumps><a title="Prior Heading"class=button href=#reductionism-emergence-animism>←</a> <a href=#outcome-pumps>Outcome Pumps</a> <a title="Next Heading"class=button href=#revealing-ones-hand>→</a></h2><div class=subpage><p>Let’s discuss the major pitfall of animist worldbuilding. Imagine your setting has a spell for opening locked doors. In fact, <em>Dungeons & Dragons</em> happens to have “Knock”, which is exceptionally versatile:<blockquote><p>Choose an object that you can see within range. The object can be a door, a box, a chest, a set of manacles, a padlock, or another object that contains a mundane or magical means that prevents access.<p>A target that is held shut by a mundane lock or that is stuck or barred becomes unlocked, unstuck, or unbarred. If the object has multiple locks, only one of them is unlocked.<p>If you choose a target that is held shut with arcane lock, that spell is suppressed for 10 minutes, during which time the target can be opened and shut normally.</blockquote><p>This spell <em>just works</em>, profoundly so. Shitty padlock? Opened. A bank’s top of the line vault? Opened. No lock, just a barred door? No problem! A literal magic spell keeping it secure? Bypassed.<p>If a door has a lock <em>and</em> a deadbolt, though? Tricky…<p>Make no mistake, there are limits in this spell: it’s called knock because it causes a knocking sound loud enough to be heard clear across a sports field. It’s a second level spell, so you need spell slots for it‍ ‍‍—‍ you can’t just open every single thing you come across. Likewise, this comes with the opportunity cost of what other spells you could be using those slots for.<p>But what could a reductionist mechanism for this possibly look like? What procedure is capable of picking any lock, and unsticking and unbarring any obstruction, <em>and</em> foiling magical wards?<p>It’s not too difficult to imagine a spell that, say, creates some ghostly goop that slithers into a lock, and then wiggles the mechanisms until you find a configuration that with increased range of motion (i.e. open).<p>The rules I quoted don’t describe what it looks like to cast the spell, so who’s to say this isn’t happening? Maybe your DM can roll with this interpretation, describe how after you cast the spell, you can hear the mechanisms glowing and rapidly clicking away.<p>But a key principle of reductionist explanations is that they are also <em>ramified</em>, and as such they account for knock‍-​on effects and implications. Careless invocation of reductionism will leave your writing riddled with lacuna.<p>If you have goop slithering into the lock, then you can design locks that foil the goop, that explode if you blindly probe and jiggle its moving parts. Maybe to get around this, you say: actually, the magic first scans the lock and creates a virtual model, and then it simulates jiggling gears to see what keys fit in the lock. But how does it know what to scan? Can you include a crucial mechanism just out of its range, or use a particular material that the scanning can’t accurately perceive nor simulate?<p>Another place knock‍-​on effects take you is unexpected applications. If the spell is really “summon hyperflexible goop”, can I use to clean my keyboard?<p>By contrast, it’s very easy to explain “Knock” if you appeal to animist arbitration. Knock summons a spirit that recognizes locked doors and when it says <em>open</em>, that’s metaphysical truth, the universe itself bends to resolve this. Openness becomes the equilibrium state it rushes toward, the same way a rock falls to the ground.<p>Equivalent to calling it a matter of arbitration, animism is <em>vibes‍-​based worldbuilding.</em><p>If you’ve had conversations along these lines several years ago, you may have run into the idea of an “outcome pump.” You start with a particular end goal‍ ‍‍—‍ a spell that opens locks‍ ‍‍—‍ and posit a mechanism, like a genie, that always reaches it, no matter what route it takes. Most of the time, for locks, this is simple compared to other stuff magic’s capable of (just wiggle some internal bits), but then you add in the stuff about unsticking and unbarring, because the desired outcome isn’t some spell that “opens some doors, sometimes.”<p>Overall, I don’t really like the concept of an outcome pump. Similar to calling something “grimderp”‍ ‍‍—‍ it’s not completely meaningless; there’s a kernel of real criticism to it‍ ‍‍—‍ but ultimately all it means for sure is “dark and I don’t like it :c”<p>After all, intelligence is an outcome pump. If I’m determined to get a door open, there’s not a whole lot that’s going to stop me. I can keep trying to pick it; I can try grabbing a crowbar and prying (excuse me, unsticking) the door off its hinges; at the limit I can just blow it up.<p>This is not quite the same thing as that spell. Knock, as specified, opens novice locks as effortlessly as it opens master locks. It has a casting time of one action and takes effect instantaneously.<p>Key to an outcome pump is that it <em>sweeps complexity under the rug</em>. It doesn’t distinguish between easy problems and very hard ones; it has no limits. Most of all, it’s concept‍-​driven, capable of effects that imply very different underlying methods and mechanisms, as long as they achieve same the desired outcome.<p>Outcome pumps and human intelligence are both points on the spectrum of optimizing power, in the way that pebbles and mountains are both points on the spectrum of how big rocks can get.<p>Imagine you have a character so intelligent‍ ‍‍—‍ or precognitive, or lucky‍ ‍‍—‍ that they can walk up to a locked door, tap the handle several times, so precise in aim and rhythm that the vibrations cascade and reverberate and amplify throughout the mechanism. Like the single butterfly that set a tornado in motion, the chaos aligns into a newly unlocked door.<p>Does that seem reasonable to you? If you had perfect knowledge of every atom involved and a computer that could simulate it backwards and forwards trillions of times, can you say for sure that somewhere in the near‍-​infinite possibilities there isn’t a miraculous trillion‍-​to‍-​one path to victory?<p>Maybe there is. You don’t know‍ ‍‍—‍ <em>no one</em> knows. You just have to suspend disbelief and accept the author’s assertion that with enough smarts‍-​fate‍-​luck, the infinitesimal probabilities align to make magic happen.<p>It’s incomprehensible. Beyond analysis.<p>The demoscene, particularly trends like <a href=https://countercomplex.blogspot.com/2015/04/bringing-magic-back-to-technology.html>bytebeat</a>, focuses on achieving impressive demonstrations through very short programs. Anyone who’s brushed against concepts like Busy Beaver functions is familiar with how much incomprehensible complexity exists even when you only have a few lines of code to work with.<p>But I have a more directly relevant example. Machine learning models can be trained to recognize images… and adversarial models can be trained to force target models to misclassify their inputs. A neural net looks at a dog, and correctly recognize it, then you change a few pixels, producing an image a human might not even notice is different, and now the neural net thinks it’s looking at a car.<p>Is this an outcome pump? How could you write about this, without a vague handwave of “Oh, I just ran simulations until I found the right combination of pixels that let me mind‍-​control the AI into doing what I want it to.”<p>It’s tempting to return to our idea of the spectrum, say that the difference is how much optimizing power our adversarial models have. It’s not actually mind‍-​control, the adversarial inputs are limited in what they can influence, and you have to tune an adversarial model to its target. If we show the reader all that work, we aren’t outcome pumping.<p>But again, <em>it’s a spectrum</em>. In practice, when an author includes an outcome pump, it’s not always framed as “arbitrarily powerful.” There will be supposed limits and blindspots. It can do what the plot demands, but not everything, because the plot doesn’t demand everything. This means that there is a finite upper bound on the power you’d actually need to replicate what they do, even if it’s astronomical.<p>Is this still a worldbuilding problem? Yes. There’s an inevitable lacuna created when you rationalize the shape of worlds by imagining a being powerful enough to enact that shape‍ ‍‍—‍ but we’ll talk more about that later.<p>For now, let’s put a pin in this. Would you believe I started writing this essay intending to spitball a very simple worldbuilding idea?</div><h2 class=heading id=revealing-ones-hand><a title="Prior Heading"class=button href=#outcome-pumps>←</a> <a href=#revealing-ones-hand>Revealing One’s Hand</a> <a title="Next Heading"class=button href=#casting-with-style>→</a></h2><div class=subpage><p>In Jujutsu Kaisen, there’s a concept of explaining your technique‍ ‍‍—‍ specifically, ⸢Revealing One’s Hand.⸥ It’s one of the more memorable and creative facets of its worldbuilding, a brilliant justification for a oft‍-​bemoaned shōnen trope.<p>It hooks into JJK’s more general concept of “binding vows,” where abiding by restrictions augments your abilities. If you monologue about how your magical abilities work, like some kind of anime villain, this makes you (vaguely) stronger in exchange for otherwise pointless arrogance of tipping your hand. (Best of all, it makes for better entertainment.)<p>As you can tell, I’m rather fond of this concept. But as primed by context, you’ve already noticed how reductionist it isn’t. What Revealing One’s Hand actually does, or how it checks, is not explained. So how could we rationalize this?<p>Let’s examine what we’re working with. On the face of things, you have a magic‍-​user saying some words and then getting a power boost. We want this to depend on the words you say‍ ‍‍—‍ preventing you from just babbling gibberish. More than that, we want the words to be <em>true:</em> you can’t lie about what your power does. If you could, that’d be the logical thing to do.<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>“Lie” strictly construed‍ ‍‍—‍ clever characters in JJK do lie by omission (Todo) or excessive inclusion (Hakari); we don’t want to ban this, but it’s a different beast from naked falsehood.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>As posed, this is pretty much a sapience‍-​hard problem. You need something in your magic system the size and complexity of a human brain that gets most of the way toward reasoning (or emulating thereof) like one.<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>ChatGPT could probably do an okay job of this, and tellingly, most frontier models seem to have <em>more</em> digital neurons than the (rather complex) biological neurons present in human brains.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>JJK is notoriously fast‍-​paced and averse to fleshing out its world. How do other stories handle this type of problems?<p>If memory serves, the world of <em><a href=https://palewebserial.wordpress.com/>Pale</a></em> and <em><a href=https://pactwebserial.wordpress.com/>Pact</a></em> solves this type of problem through a thoroughly explored form of animism, positing spirits as a fundamental magical agent that evaluates practice. Magic is a performance for their sake: perform well and they reward you; perform wrong and they punish you.<p>A late reveal in <em><a href=https://www.royalroad.com/fiction/25137/worth-the-candle>Worth the Candle</a></em> presents something even more bald‍-​faced‍ ‍‍—‍ many entads stop the buck at “the Layman”‍ ‍‍—‍ i.e. the logic is simply “ask a regular ass dude what he thinks.” Or at least a reified personification thereof.<p>So, is this problem unsolvable through nonsapient reductionism?<p>I do think there’s a trick to getting around this, though. We have to first change the question. Yes, Revealing One’s Hand as presented in JJK requires sapient judgment, but what does it really mean to explain your technique?<p>I have a lengthy series of <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/fiction/corrupt-combustion>blogposts</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Corrupt Combustion</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> exploring “What if <em>Murder Drones</em> copied the <em>Jujutsu Kaisen</em> power system?” These started initially purely for the bit, the joy of reskinning aurafarming with computer science jargon. One of the first jokes was that instead of explaining your technique, they call it “commenting your code.”<p><em>Source code</em>, I think, is a useful analogy. In a way, doesn’t Revealing One’s Hand incentivize, if not open source magic, then well‍-​documented APIs?<p>Depending on the setting, this could actually be simpler (and thus requiring less suspension of disblief) than straight up reimplementing sapient judgment in the substrate of pure magic.<p>So if there’s some sort of globally (or at least broadly) accessible repository of magical lore, then perhaps you could obtain a blessing by enacting a ritual that encodes and transmits certain facts about your spell for verification.<p>Of course, this would result in something pretty different from JJK’s exposition dumps; this is more like looking your opponent up on magipedia and taking notes.<p>So alternatively or supplementally, you could have some sort of interface between magic users (soul wifi?) wherein by casting a well‍-​known cantrip, you can airdrop the relevant information.<p>This also makes the power boost more fair‍ ‍‍—‍ this system would have a branch of logic checking if your spell is targeting someone that has downloaded your documentation, hitting extra hard if true.<p>This brainstorming is sufficient for a vague handwave. But plopping this down in a conventional setting pretty much immediately creates big lacunae. If there’s a global repository, doesn’t that imply magical knowledge should be really well‍-​disseminated? Is there mage internet?<p>If there’s wizard wifi, what else can you send through it? Could the transmission of spell specifications be used pedagogically? More to the point, what ensures the information sent over the wire is even <em>accurate</em>‍ ‍‍—‍ is there magic cryptography, thaumic checksums?<p>What timescale does this operate on‍ ‍‍—‍ what’s the ping time on the arcane servers, how quickly can “my soul downloaded the source code” translate into “I understand the counterplay against this technique.”<p>Could you pull a Hakari and flashbang someone by making their soul process a bunch of extraneous information?<p>But explaining your technique is ultimately a minor mechanic. It’s almost akin to a running gag in the series, where many of its most significant moments are where it <em>doesn’t</em> matter. The strongest characters don’t need to explain themselves, making for sharp notes of characterization.<p>Which made this a decent place to cut our teeth, to show off what this form of analysis looks like in practice. But why don’t we set our sights on something more broadly useful?</div><h2 class=heading id=casting-with-style><a title="Prior Heading"class=button href=#revealing-ones-hand>←</a> <a href=#casting-with-style>Casting With Style</a> <a title="Next Heading"class=button href=#prerequisites-for-fiddly-bullshit>→</a></h2><div class=subpage><p>The other thing I wanted to talk about is gimmicks‍ ‍‍—‍ that is, the techniques themselves. This is an old trope, JJK is only a recent example of in a storied tradition. Superpowers are the easiest touchstone, but some kind of niche protection is one of those things every power system tends to converge on for fundamental storytelling reasons.<span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>I could have sworn Alexander Wales had a post about this, closest I could find is <a href=https://www.tumblr.com/alexanderwales/762075300485005312>this one</a>.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>It’s cooler if characters get to have unique powers, simultaneously evoking characterization and demanding creative strategies to counter. The problem is this isn’t really how most practical fields operate. You don’t equip your soldiers with flashy signature guns, nor do you see reputable doctors busting out creative medical procedures no one else can replicate.<p>When lives are on the line, you do whatever is most efficient and effective. In matter of objective and generalized truth, you converge the optimal procedures.<p>Magic‍-​users are typically doing things that matter, and thus if they have any idea what they’re doing<span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>competent, knowledgeable wizards are more fun for settings that care about being reductionist</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> then you have to ask why they haven’t figured out the best practices yet.<p>So, how can we justify gimmicks?<p>In <em><a href=https://parahumans.wordpress.com/>Worm</a></em>, superpowers come from <span class=spoiler><label title="Spoiler-text: click to show"><input type=checkbox><span class=text>interdimensional aliens with a warped perspective on science, creativity, and morality; they grant powers by a distant cousin of the logic that governs natural selection, shuffling and mutating random configurations in the hopes that one gives rise to a novel improvements.</span></label></span> <span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Each power comes from <span class=spoiler><label title="Spoiler-text: click to show"><input type=checkbox><span class=text>a particular ‘shard’ of these aliens, which has domain over a particular genus of effect which gets uniquely reconfigured and constrained when it binds to a human host, as determined by their psychology and circumstances. One particular shadowy organization has killed one of these aliens, and now tears off shards of it to implant into test subjects to blindly replicate superpowers.</span></label></span> I lay all of this out just for a cute observation‍ ‍‍—‍ my most devoted fans will recognize that this is the source from which I stole the remote host lore in <em>Corruption Combustion</em>.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>I don’t recall quite how <em>Vigor Mortis</em> justified talents‍ ‍‍—‍ it has a broad general purpose magic system (wizard complete, rather than superpowers) but some souls are born with spells imprinted on them. Ultimately, <span class=spoiler><label title="Spoiler-text: click to show"><input type=checkbox><span class=text>all souls come from the Mistwatcher, a world‍-​devouring interstellar eldritch abomination that desires only to consume souls. It places the seeds of souls into people and harvests them after death. I want to say talents make for tastier souls? But I can’t remember for sure.</span></label></span><p>You can sense a common theme.<p>Years ago, <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/posts/ra-hot-take.html>when picking on <em>Ra</em></a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>A Hot Take on Ra</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span>, I observed that there’s a type of worldbuilding that “proves too much.”<p>You can easily arrive at almost any wikipedia page from any other, and the shortest route to almost all the other pages generally goes through a few ‘hubs’ with a huge number of connections. To connect two ideas, you simply go up a few levels in abstraction.<p>The easiest way to justify any sort of magic system is by positing an alien intelligence with tremendous resources dedicated to doing whatever you need to rationalize. It’s the hub that connects you to any spell you want to justify.<p>Put polemically, when a setting has truly reductionist mechanics, staring too long at its underpinnings inevitably arrives at the conclusion that any system that can be used for sapient‍-​arbitrated gimmick mechanics can be better directed to other ends.<p><span class=spoiler><label title="Spoiler-text: click to show"><input type=checkbox><span class=text><em>Worm</em> and <em>Vigor Mortis</em> both justify their magic gimmicks by revealing it’s the work of frankly stupid aliens</span></label></span>‍ ‍‍—‍ because anything that choses to create their magic cannot be rational or moral.<p>I had termed a magic system that emulate some “universal magic system” <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/posts/wizard-complete.html>wizard‍-​complete</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Toward a Universal Theory of Wizardry</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span>.<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>What we have here today is not the same sort of observation, to be fair. It’s less analogous to computability and instead, complexity theory.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> A corollary of this is that such a system can emulate other wizard‍-​hard systems.<p>A <em>reductionist</em> wizard‍-​hard system is simple enough to simulate‍ ‍‍—‍ but the sytems we’ve been talking about, full of alien arbitration? The sprawling extent of their implications would be tremendously taxing to recreate from fundamental principles. Creating them from a reductionist starting point requires an emulator with intelligence verging on omniscience and power verging on divinity. They are <em>demigod‍-​hard</em>.<p>Is this our only recourse to justify gimmicks?<p>Consider the post you’re reading right now. Authors, like all artists, have recognizable styles. Their creations are the product of their unique brains, and none tick quite the same. Theoretically, there might well be an optimal way to convey everything I mean to the maximal number of people, but that’s a problem so profoundly hard that we’re no where near understanding the terrain, let alone proving the paths winding through it converge.<p>Consider games like Magic the Gathering, where there’s a “meta” compromising a menagerie of different decks that rely on unique combinations of thousands of cards. Again this is a situation where the math needed to reckon which deck can beat the highest number of other decks, let alone the strategy needed to play it, is a problem too intractable to solve. But even if you solved it and arrived at a “best deck”, the problem then becomes how to beat the best deck. There’s going to be a new strategy to counter that, shifting the meta <em>again</em>.<p>Consider the clothes you’re wearing. You have a particular body shape, and while you’re probably wearing mass‍-​produced garments, they’re a relatively modern invention. In the past it was more common to wear bespoke fits, tailored to your particular dimensions. But bodies are fundamentally the same‍ ‍‍—‍ we each have unique faces and fingerprints, but they generally match the same broad pattern.<p>So, what happens if the ‘souls’ through which you channel magic vary as broadly in their shapes as the difference between a spoon and a chainsaw?<p>Well, that analogy almost presumes the very kind of sapient design we mean to avoid‍ ‍‍—‍ so instead imagine your soul was fundamentally akin to a block of granite while mine was akin to a pile of sand and hers is like a cloud of mist‍ ‍‍—‍ metaphorically, in some deep metaphysical way. You can imagine that the ‘optimal’ technique for each of us is going to be different. We’re going to wind up with different gimmicks. Q.E.D., right?<p>This suffices to demonstrate that you can get gimmicks without appealing to quasi‍-​intelligent design. All three of these metaphors suggest that signature moves are something you must cultivate, that they can be explained by historical contingency‍ ‍‍—‍ you can look at a magic‍-​user’s life story and the problems they had to overcome, and that determines their technique. They will not achieve a singular moment of awakening that grants them a ready‍-​made, complex technique.<p>But what if we <em>want</em> complexity?</div><h2 class=heading id=prerequisites-for-fiddly-bullshit><a title="Prior Heading"class=button href=#casting-with-style>←</a> <a href=#prerequisites-for-fiddly-bullshit>Prerequisites for Fiddly Bullshit</a> <a title="Next Heading"class=button href=#transdiegetic-incentives-and-imbalanced-scales>→</a></h2><div class=subpage><p>There’s another limitation to this approach. I love weird, fiddly powers. Consider ⸢<a href=https://jujutsu-kaisen.fandom.com/wiki/Love_Rendezvous>Love Rendezvous</a>⸥, an infamously convoluted technique in JJK that requires the user to mark targets with cursed energy which then irresistibly prevents those targets from approaching each other, unless the target can divine and follow a specially‍-​calculated route through other targets.<p>It’s great stuff, but how do you reductionist‍-​ly explain why that particular set of mechanics is reasonable? It’s a pertinent question I’ve faced time and time again, because when worldbuilding magic like I do, you often write the bottom line first. You brainstorm (or steal) these awesome mechanics, but now you need to come up with an explanation for why that particular conclusion and no other follows<p>This is the thing I asked you to put a pin in, a few sections ago. What we have here is a particular type of yawning lacuna. You can add an explanation, but a single reason is not enough to fill the logical gap.<p>It is not enough to simply brainstorm how a thing is possible‍ ‍‍—‍ no, that would be straightforward enough. Even if we concede that a quasi‍-​sapient intelligence has to exist somewhere in the chain of causation, introducing the fact that there’s someone who wants to do the thing <em>still</em> isn’t enough. The animist worldbuilder might stop there, but the reductionist? She asks why must they want this rather than something else.<p>So next you can even confabulate reasons why a willful entity would desire this thing.<span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>This is especially easy if you opt to make it an incomprehensible alien.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> But we <em>still aren’t done</em>. There’s one last lacuna.<p>Why does it pick those means and not others‍ ‍‍—‍ if we take as given that it would want to do this to satisfy a certain need, then is there not another way to satisfy itself that isn’t so damn complicated and indirect?<p>Maybe that’s a little too abstract to follow. Here’s a classic analogy. How large of a cheesecake you can make is limited by the technology you have access to. In this regard, post‍-​industrial society clearly has a leg up on stone age hunter‍-​gathers, who may not even know what cheesecake is. And every day researchers push the limits of that technology further.<p>Obviously, then, our future is one full of enormous cheesecakes, delectable desserts the size of skyscrapers, all over the world.<p>This is ridiculous. So you go back to the drawing board. Okay, what if there’s a food crisis at some point, and people get hungry. So they have to live off these giant cheesecakes.<p>That’s… not incoherent, there’s no aporia, but why not do… literally anything else? Now, you see what we’re faced with.<p>The problem at hand requires a feat of <em>reverse science</em>. We all know reverse engineering‍ ‍‍—‍ figuring out how something was put together from the end product. But reverse science means figuring out the <em>problem</em> from the solution, rederiving all of the unseen constraints from how they have shaped the end problem.<p>Reverse engineering is notoriously hard, but this added desiderata only compounds the difficulty. Suffice it to say that I’m not going to properly explain how to do this, or even give insight, in a single blogpost.<p>But by presenting this problem, I once against demonstrate the allure of vibes and arbitration, of appealing to sapience. If you include an intelligent outcome pump somewhere in the magic system, you have patched over the problem well.<p>Why is Kirara’s cursed technique Like That? Because some wizardly mind wanted it that way.<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>One reader had the insightful suggestion that the mind in question is Kirara herself. Originally, perhaps she had a Grade 3 fodder technique for weakly pushing or pulling, but by stacking binding vows and imposing constraints, she sharped it into a battlefield control technique that merits comparison to ⸢Infinity.⸥ Ultimately this doesn’t resolve the demands of reverse science, because why are <em>these</em> constraints the ones that served her ends best?</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> I’m not opposed to ‘a wizard did it’ explanations in principle, but when it’s done well, part of what keeps it from sucking is that the wizard did it for a reason. The buck doesn’t stop at the wizard‍ ‍‍—‍ why did she want it that way?<p><em>Mistborn</em> was one of Sanderson’s first popular series, remaining a central and influential example of what it means to have a hard magic system. It’s ultimately tangential to this discussion‍ ‍‍—‍ the Mistings of Scadriel have access to a power system shared in common. Each metal grants a certain ability. These are gimmicks, but they are not character‍-​specific.<p>Allomancy, I would argue, is archetypally what hard magic aspires to be. It’s a clear and constrained system. And it <em>drives me up the wall</em>. Brass lets you calm people down. Tin makes you more perceptive. Electrum lets you see the future. Make sense?<p>I think this system is victim to the fact that, well. Metals just aren’t all that different from each other. Yes, there are some material differences in properties and cultural associations between iron and tin and aluminumn‍ ‍‍—‍ I think it’s no accident that iron’s power is pulling metal‍ ‍‍—‍ but are there enough differences to give as broad a spread of powers as needed for an exciting magic system?<p>So you allow some looseness in the assignments, a bit of arbitrariness. Cadmium slows down time; gold reveals your past. Years ago, I got into an argument with a big fan of Sanderson’s systems, and they had a distaste for general magic systems‍ ‍‍—‍ what I now call “wizard‍-​complete”‍ ‍‍—‍ because they’re so vague and broad that they can do <em>anything</em>.<p>At the start of this essay, I presented reductionist magic almost as if it were a stronger form of hard magic, a more grounded way to achieve its aims. But no, it’s more complicated than that, hardness and reductionism are two overlapping yet distinct circles, and trying to craft something that fits centrally in both categories is a prospect innately in tension with itself.<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>At least if you are writing the kind of One Special Stong Badass Doing Everything Alone™ power fantasy that interests me most. If your world merely has, say, magic ore that can be used to power magitech anyone can use, that framework lends itself to reductionist hard magic much, much easier.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>Because again, I brought up <em>Mistborn</em> in the context of my gimmick discussion‍ ‍‍—‍ specifically, <em>justifying</em> these gimmicks. What makes its system so hard is that the metals do one thing. We aren’t presented a library of spells mapping out the entire vector space of effects that range from manipulating emotions, enhancing bodies, and scrying through time.<p>But any reductionist mechanism that gives rise to this system is going to entail that vector space, because simple building blocks by nature yield myriad configurations. Interpolation is all but inevitable, so now you need an <em>additional</em> mechanism explaining why in practice you’re locked to these specific neat gridlines in a continuous space.<p>And as we’ve seen, the final answer converges on arbitration. Mistborn is part of the Cosmere, a multiverse of worlds with different magic systems that share common underlying fundamentals. What do we see, when we consult the Sanderson wiki on allomancy?<div><details class=sq-details><summary>Take a look.</summary> <div class=expansion><blockquote><p><a href=https://coppermind.net/wiki/Allomancy>Allomancy</a> is an end‍-​positive magic system, which draws on the power of Preservation that is channeled through a metal when it is burned. This differs to how Feruchemy works, as Allomancy is not being powered by the body of the Allomancer, but instead by an external force.<sup>1</sup> Like the other Metallic Arts, Allomancy as a magic system formed through the natural interactions between the two Shards that inhabit Scadrial, Preservation and Ruin, and the planet itself, instead of being created by a specific Shard.<sup>19</sup> This magic system, however, is generally tailored and fueled by Preservation,<sup>18</sup> although specific cases will involve an Allomancer drawing upon Ruin’s essence instead.<sup>20</sup> Like other forms of Investiture, Allomancy does not necessarily reflect the Intent of the Shard which it is associated with.<sup>21</sup></blockquote><p>What’s this “Preservation” thing?<blockquote><p>Preservation is a Shard of Adonalsium [‍—]</blockquote><p>Stop right there. What’s a shard?<blockquote><p>The Shards of Adonalsium, or Shards for short, are sixteen pieces of the power of creation, formed during the Shattering of Adonalsium.<sup>12</sup> They are each named after a specific characteristic or ideal that represents the Shard’s primary purpose or motivation. A person who has taken up the power of a Shard is the Vessel of that Shard.<sup>3</sup><p>The Shards are the most powerful known entities in the cosmere, and for all intents and purposes, serve as the gods of the cosmere. Most if not all Invested Arts are related to them.</blockquote></div></details></div><p>Somehow, I’m not at all surprised at what we find.</div><h2 class=heading id=transdiegetic-incentives-and-imbalanced-scales><a title="Prior Heading"class=button href=#prerequisites-for-fiddly-bullshit>←</a> <a href=#transdiegetic-incentives-and-imbalanced-scales>Transdiegetic Incentives and Imbalanced Scales</a> <a title="Next Heading"class=button href=#gods-confidence-trick>→</a></h2><div class=subpage><p>The vespers in <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/black-nerve><em>Black Nerve</em></a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Archive of Arete</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> were one attempt at addressing this problem. Just like <span class=spoiler><label title="Spoiler-text: click to show"><input type=checkbox><span class=text><em>Worm</em>’s entities</span></label></span>, they lack human intelligence or values, but their symbiosis with their hosts is more closely integrated into their life cycle. Put vulgarly, the powers they grant are courtship displays; they make “beautiful” techniques as a fitness display, not unlike a bird dancing and splaying feathers. Useful, efficient techniques are beautiful to them, but they also love it when a technique is <em>interesting.</em><p>This is an easy principle for justifying gimmicks. In fact, it’s hard to go far astray with it, because the Doylistic motivation so closely matches diegetic Watsonian explanation‍ ‍‍—‍ gimmicks make things more interesting for the audience just as they make things more interesting to for the trickster god granting the powers.<p>And this symmetry shows us exactly where to look for other fruitful justifications. First we introspect and ask why we want gimmicks, and then we ask what circumstances would put a power‍-​granting entity under that same incentive.<p>Gimmicks, especially of the fiddly variety that JJK is replete with, give characters strength at the cost of weakness and vulnerability. They <em>balance</em> the powers. Rather than just making things interesting, they also make it fair.<span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Somewhat related, <a href=https://alexanderwales.tumblr.com/post/787724710473498624>this post</a> analyzes what makes <em>Worm</em>’s powers interesting.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>In fact, this circles back to what we discussed last section‍ ‍‍—‍ explaining your technique is just one of the many binding vows a jujutsu sorceror is capable of making to augment their abilities.<p>This thinking gives rise to a theory I’ve seen many propose‍ ‍‍—‍ that <em>all</em> cursed techniques are binding vows (akin to a heavenly restrictions, present from birth), each a special case of the ur‍-​cursed energy manipulation, perhaps something akin to Mai’s ⸢Construction⸥ technique.<p>But what does balance <em>mean?</em> I don’t generally agree with all of the dunks about “binding vow merchants”‍ ‍‍—‍ but take a joke of the form “and then Sukuna increases the range of his Dismantle technique by trading away all feeling in his left pinky on tuesday evenings if he didn’t eat breakfast that morning.”<p>That’s an obviously stupid, imbalanced trade, but why? How many scant micrometers <em>should</em> you get for a trade like that?<p>With a little bit of physical intuition, the concept of conservation laws leap quickly to mind. Energy is not unlike a fundamental currency of physical systems. You can’t get energy out of a fruit without plants putting energy into it, nor without the sun likewise putting energy into them.<p>We know this sort of mathematical tradeoff must figure into JJK’s calculus. One of the characters that introduces us to the concept of binding vow mechanics is Nanami, who has a restriction preventing him from using a certain fraction of his cursed energy whenever he works “on the clock.” But if he works overtime, his cursed energy swells, granting power in excess of his normal limits, and catching his opponent’s off‍-​guard.<p>Then there’s a controversial moment in late JJK where the final antagonist activates his capstone ability‍ ‍‍—‍ to do this, he makes a binding vow so that just this once, he can cast it with no setup, at the cost of requiring extra setup every time afterward.<p>There’s a logic to this‍ ‍‍—‍ isn’t this just like debt, where you get an influx of cash now, but must pay it off with interest? But in this case, it wasn’t necessarily <em>energy</em> that he got an advanced loan on, but a free pass to bend the rules. This inextricably brings us right back into the territory of vibes‍-​based arbitration. We can only ask: Does it <em>feel</em> like a fair trade?<p>The Pactverse is much more rigorous about this. That setting has a concept of “karma.” By fastidiously, generously following the rules, you gain a kind of clout with the spirits. They start to like you, trust you. They’re thus more willing to bend the rules in your favor. Of course, asking them to bend the rules expends this somewhat; you can’t rely on it forever.<p><em>Black Nerve</em> stole this concept, twisting it into the idea of “arete.” It’s more physical than karma‍ ‍‍—‍ your arete is literally a magical fatty tissue stored in your gut‍ ‍‍—‍ but it’s used to justify an ornate tower of abstractions, oaths and promises made and transmitted between vespers.<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>A distributed, cryptographic system. I talk a big game about how Black Nerve is the setting I’m proudest of.<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Years before the current Generative AI obsession, the <a href=https://snugglesquiggle.tumblr.com/post/804292040586412032>deep lore</a> of termites predicted vibe‍-​coding!</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> But it’ll never not be an embarassment that one of the fundamental setting conceits is “blockchain works.”</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> It leans even harder into the idea that cultivating this magical standing is completely unrelated (downright opposed) to being a good person, despite the name.<p>If you tried to be a binding vow merchant in the Pactverse, your karma would tank. If you tried it in <em>Black Nerve</em>, the vespers would kill you and puppet your body as a crepuscule. Do not molest the money.<p>Does <em>Black Nerve</em> have gimmicks? Yes and no. Vesperbanes have unique affinities for most of the reductionist reasons I rattled off earlier. A few vesperbane “clans” have “bloodline techniques” that are passed down like inherited wealth, through arete‍-​oaths binding the spell to only be cast by members of the bloodline. They have the trademar‍— excuse me, it’s their <em>technical property</em>.<p>Most directly, there’s a ritual for the minting of “signature techniques.” When initiated, you select one of your techniques and your vespers broadcast your intent to become a <em>signatory</em> for that technique. If the technique is known by more than 7 banes, it has an increasing chance to fail or exact much higher penalties. If the technique happens to be known by more than 49 banes, it fails and you suffer a punishing arete backlash.<p>While the ritual is active, anyone who knows or learns the technique becomes aware of your intent to claim it, and they can perform a simple cantrip to track you down and challenge you to a duel. Any bane who appraises you can detect the ritual. If you lose a duel, the ritual ends. If no one challenges you to a duel, the ritual fails.<p>If the ritual has not failed a year after casting, it becomes your signature technique, and the vespers optimize and empower the technique‍ ‍‍—‍ beautifully.<p>I like this mechanic, but it’s a far cry from conventional gimmicks. Only experienced and fortunate banes can afford to perform this ritual; you can expect that most won’t. At best, the aspiration furnishes a cultural expectation that the best vesperbanes have unique fighting styles, and thus almost everyone delibarately plays into the ninja superpower schtick. And Q.E.D., fair enough.<p>Some of my other settings have more fruitful approaches. <em>Ars Longa</em> had the cute idea that learning magic is so demanding that a monk could spend their whole lives studying the long art of enlightenement and only achieve the most basic cantrips… but this world has a reincarnation cycle. Those who transmigrate after learning magic can retain a spell across lifetimes, which becomes their mortal axiom.<p>But again, I wrote all of this as lead‍-​in to explore a neat little idea I had. Let’s finally get into it.</div><h2 class=heading id=gods-confidence-trick><a title="Prior Heading"class=button href=#transdiegetic-incentives-and-imbalanced-scales>←</a> <a href=#gods-confidence-trick>God’s Confidence Trick</a> <a title="Next Heading"class=button href=#conclusion>→</a></h2><div class=subpage><p>Lately I’ve been working on a new setting, <em><span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/vermin/about.html>Vermin Cathexis</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>About Vermin Cathexis</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span></em>. As is the norm with me, it has a lot of things going on, but the hegemonic magic system styles itself as alchemy. Transmutation; the great work; as above, so below. And, crucially, equivalent exchange. You cannot gain something without sacrificing something of equal value.<p>You can see why importing something like JJK’s binding vows would click right into place. Early on, I had leaned on the unique complexities of individual souls to explain why different alchemists would have access to different “innate transmutations.” Classic stuff, for the most part.<p>But the more I work on it, the more ambitious my ideas become. Lately I’ve been toying with the presence of a planetary ring as an orbital transmutation circle (the heavens made manifest), an outcome pump that explains how human‍-​legible runes get compiled into magical effects.<p>The power of “teleology” makes this system easily wizard‍-​complete, and if the heavens above are so powerful, why not give it the power to enforce binding vows, too? We’re most of the way to recapitulating a shōnen‍-​esque power system.<p>But as ever, we’re faced with reverse science‍ ‍‍—‍ inventing constraints that lead to giving everyone a unique gimmick is the logical choice.<p>We’ve touched on a few settings involving aliens who don’t care about or actively want humans to fight and kill each other in new and inventive ways, so how about something a little different this time?<p>Casinos are pretty profitable. People go there, have fun and/or ruin their lives. With statistical certainty, the house always wins, but sometimes, you hit the jackpot and they pay out. Less egregiously (and more relevantly), instutitions like insurance or credit‍-​lenders are profitable, despite part of their function being to give people money.<p><em>Naruto</em> has a lot of great ideas. There, the fuel of magical techniques is chakra, generated from the body’s physical and mental energies. But there’s a rare art known to some that allows for the incorporation of the boundless natural energy of the world around you; it’s difficult, dangerous, yet dramatically powerful. Those requirements and stakes balance this mechanic, explaining why not every ninja can bust out sage mode.<p>But for further inspiration consider a biological system: Photosynthesis is tricky to evolve; most plants do it via chloroplasts, endosynbiotic organelles that evolved from cyanobacteria. Many lichenous fungi, as well the famous example of photosynthetic sea slugs, cannot manage it alone, and thus incorporate algae.<p>This mysterious “sunlight” energy is everywhere around you, but your body needs to be empowered by strange spirits to make use of it…<p>Bringing all of these points together, here is my idea. Let’s say the world is suffused with a special type of energy, abundant yet tapping into it requires a complicated process. When an alchemist ‘compleats’ their soul, a major metaphysical milestone, they become able to host a special type of heavenly interface.<p>This interface can process this ambient energy, making it available for the alchemist’s use. But this is the heavens’ design, they don’t want to empower alchemists per se‍ ‍‍—‍ ideally, they would simply siphon off all the energy for themselves. But the heavens need the alchemists; only compleated souls can host the interface.<p>Thus, a bargain. Alchemists negotiate a ‘contract’ specifying the conditions under which they can access the fruits of their interface.<p>Nanami’s cursed technique ⸢Ratio⸥ divides a target into ten sections and forcibly creates a weakpoint at a ratio of seven to three: he can strike there for critical damage.<p>As an alchemist, this would be a teleology (read: spell) that our expy would be able to activate like other transmutations, but at what would appear to be a greatly discounted cost, spending little if any alchemical esssence compared to what an imitator would require‍ ‍‍—‍ because it’s fueled by different reserves.<p>This wouldn’t violate any conservation laws, because if he used the technique enough times, he would exhaust the special reserves, much like the real Nanami’s overtime technique.<p>A general mechanic I’ve considered for this setting is the “Sevenfold Work.” A ritual often performed by multiple cooperating alchemists, you must subject a target to a sequence of transmutations that match the seven operations of alchemy. You pay a steep upfront cost that lessens with each step, until the last few operations happen almost of their own accord, the costs paid entirely through heavenly reserves. Upon compleation, the result is a transmutation several times more powerful than what you could have achieved without this complex setup.<p>The trick to justifying this involves the same math as the lottery‍ ‍‍—‍ the ritual is long, easily thwarted, and as a result, most attempts to perform it are <em>meant</em> to fail; this subsidizes the few expensive successes.<p>I explain this because it’s the same principle behind the gimmicks. Alchemists are convinced to accept complicated contracts with fiddly activation mechanics, because if they keep powering alchemical essence into bids that fizzle out, the heavens reap the rewards.<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>It would be a cute reference if when an alchemist attains compleation and gains their interface, they see a gate. But maybe it’s more special if <del>Truth</del> Change isn’t something everyone witnesses.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p><em>Worm</em> explained that the specific logic of each power is a consequence of <span class=spoiler><label title="Spoiler-text: click to show"><input type=checkbox><span class=text>the cape’s psychology and trigger events. To oversimply, the power becomes an almost ironic reflection of the trauma which begot it, as a part of the shard’s general agenda of incentivizing conflict.</span></label></span><p>This is what a good gimmick system should do: create powers that intrinsically say meaningful things about character who wields them‍ ‍‍—‍ but it’s a reflection distorted thematically through the mirror of its mechanics.<p>This system I just devised has a different feel to the statements it makes about characters. Here, the ideal power is almost a confidence trick: it’s a power the character thinks they can best wield. Maybe they’re right, but the devil they’re dealing with has every incentive to dangle a carrot always just out of reach.<p>The <em>real</em> utility in this system, though, is with a quick revision, it becomes self‍-​balancing. A lot of powerscaling‍-​adjacent discussion tends to think about ways to “break” powers, to (ab)use it to the fullest extent. But here, there’s a built in limitation to how much energy these gimmicks can ever output. Maybe the first time you find a broken combo with your powerset, you burn through years of stored up heavenly energy like Eragon tapping into his long‍-​banked gemstone power. But after your reserves run dry, you’re no different from any other alchemist.<p>And importantly, you’re supposed to be tithing a fraction of your power to the heavens. If you keep spending it at maximum throughput, it’s within the contract to tune down the numbers‍ ‍‍—‍ dynamically weakening your power to keep the books balanced.<p>But by the same token, you get a boost on a power you can’t seem to pull off. The strongest technique is one you swear to hold in reserve as a last resort.<p>That, I think, is a binding vow to rival Revealing One’s Hand.</div><h2 class="heading final"id=conclusion><a title="Prior Heading"class=button href=#gods-confidence-trick>←</a> <a href=#conclusion>Conclusion</a></h2><div class=subpage><p>But with that, we circle back around to our discussion of binding vows. There’s a cool sense of economics and energy conservation in this model, but have we actually cleaned our room, or just swept confusion under the rug?<p>This is still a sapient system under the hood; there’s still something passing arbitration on whether what we’re trying has the right ~vibes.~ Again: does it <em>feel</em> balanced?<p>But that word might be misleading, because they almost by definition can’t‍ ‍‍—‍ you’d only make a binding vow if the thing you’re trading away is worth less to you than what you gained. There must be wiggle room, or a possibility that one party make a mistake.<p>Balance is pretty damn hard to get right in advanced metas. Think about how often game developers think a mechanic is balanced then need to patch it after the fact. And at least in games you can test it out‍ ‍‍—‍ in stories the mechanics can’t quite leave your head nor prove themselves right.<p>At least until a reader with more knowledge than you runs the numbers. Then you feel foolish for not thinking of literally everything.<p>Whenever I design systems, I try to think like a munchkin, anticipate how a rational actor would exploit whatever I come up with, and preëmptively patch out the glaring weakpoints (or incorporate them into the worldbuilding.)<p>But I’m beginning to suspect this is a mistake. You should never harden your system <a href=https://alexanderwales.tumblr.com/post/770328447117656064>defensively</a>, I think.<p>Recall that early idea of justifying Revealing One’s Hand by appealing to source code sharing, backed by cryptographic checksums. The cryptography was just a hasty patch for how to stop someone from just lying, but if there’s cryptography, who’s out there trying to crack it? Does it <em>work</em>, if it’s not battle‍-​tested, and if it is, where are those battles happening? What happens if verification fails, not because they’re lying, but because this convoluted system of if‍-​then‍-​else undergirding inevitably creates more failure points?<span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Imagine “Failed to decrypt message” interrupting your smug monologue.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>If nothing else, take away this: you shouldn’t include things in your setting you don’t want to write about. Despite all of my impulses to explain my magic in reductionist terms, so many of the mechanics I invent exist <em>purely</em> to add up to normality. I wrote the bottom line, but I want it to be clever and scientific, so I invent epicycles that span the breadth of every yawning gap in the logic… But you’re not supposed to see the exposed gears and rivets, it’s supposed to Just Work. I dream of an outcome pump, but I’m too proud to bring myself to start pumping my hand.<p>If you put a gun on the mantle, make it fire before the end of the play‍ ‍‍—‍ and if you invent a complicated reductionist mechanism to explain your magic and make it feel real, remember that real things have friction and caveats, so write about how it fails. Every new mechanic you introduce creates new lacuna that you need to explore lest there be monstrous aporia haunting them.<p>Because if you want something that just works, we already have that‍ ‍‍—‍ it’s a vibes‍-​based arbiter.</div></article></main><aside class=pointer><div class=center>Part of a series called <em><a href=/essays/index.html title=->Write By Constriction</a></em></div><div class=seriesnav><a class=prev href=/essays/drabble-iteration.html title=->← The Drabble Iterations</a><a class=next href=/essays/ego-necromancy.html title=->Ego Necromancy →</a></div><hr><p>Thank you for reading! Please consider sharing this post or telling us you read it. Our only algorithm is word of mouth, and we have no analytics.<p>Thoughts? Questions? We’re interested in feedback, or even just acknowledgement. All are welcome to <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/contact.html>contact us.</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Contact Information</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>Did you enjoy? Please consider donating on <a href=https://ko-fi.com/snugglesquiggle>ko-fi</a> or <a href=https://www.patreon.com/snugglesquiggle>patreon</a>. We’re struggling and even a little bit helps.<p>Our deepest thanks and dedication to those who have donated to sustain this site.</aside><footer><a href=#>Top</a> · <a href=/>Home</a> · <a href=/archive.html>Archive</a></footer>]]></content>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title type="html"><![CDATA[Foundress in Ambush]]></title>
        <id>https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.org/vermin/foundress-ambush.html</id>
        <link href="https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.org/vermin/foundress-ambush.html"/>
        <link rel="enclosure" href="https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.orgundefined" type="image//"/>
        <updated>2026-04-17T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
        <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>A veil softly clad the swamp, delivering it from desolation. The chrylurk foundress perched centermost of the web she’d woven. Her claws lightly brushed at the silk drawn atop of rotting log, combing away pollen grains and morning dew.</p>
<p>Once, wizenblight had befestered this land to its very depths. The rot of all things, turning soul against itself, were no more than an abortive mockery of parascixion, but perhaps it spreads so far and wide for that very simplicity.</p>]]></summary>
        <content type="html"><![CDATA[<!doctypehtml><meta charset=UTF-8><meta content=width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0 name=viewport><meta content=article property=og:type><link href=/style.css media=all rel=stylesheet><link title="Squiggles Atom Feed"href=/feed.xml rel=alternate type=application/atom+xml><link title="Squiggles JSON Feed"href=/feed.json rel=alternate type=application/feed+json><link href=at://did:plc:ivoe7cntxuy6at7uzmxzs2ft/site.standard.publication/3mfk6cpprzt2t rel=site.standard.publication><link href=at://did:plc:ivoe7cntxuy6at7uzmxzs2ft/site.standard.document/3mpgt63omae2b rel=site.standard.document><link href=/vermin/vc.css media=all rel=stylesheet><title>Foundress in Ambush · Vermin Cathexis
    </title><meta content="Foundress in Ambush"property=og:title><meta content="A veil softly clad the swamp, delivering it from desolation. The chrylurk foundress perched centermost of the web she’d woven. Her claws lightly brushed at the silk drawn atop of rotting log, combing away pollen grains and morning dew. Once, wizenblight had befestered this land to its very depths. The rot of all things, turning soul against itself, were no more than an abortive mockery of parascixion, but perhaps it spreads so far and wide for that very simplicity. "property=og:description><body class="url-/vermin/foundress-ambush.html slug-foundress-ambush"><header><h1 class=sitehead id=serpentine-squiggles><a href=/>Serpentine Squiggles</a></h1><div class="nav sitenav"><a class=no-notes href=/about.html>About</a><a class=no-notes href=/fiction/>Stories</a><a class=no-notes href=/artwork/>Artwork</a><a class=no-notes href=/games/>Games</a><a class=no-notes href=/music/>Music</a><a class=no-notes href=/essays/>Essays</a><a class=no-notes href=/posts>Posts</a><a class=no-notes href=/archive.html>Archive</a><a class=no-notes href=/contact.html>Contact</a><a class=no-notes data-n href=https://www.patreon.com/snugglesquiggle>Support</a></div></header><aside class=banner><p><strong>Vermin Cathexis</strong>: <span class=nav><span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/vermin/index.html>Index</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>In Vermin Cathexis</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/vermin/about.html>About</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>About Vermin Cathexis</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/vermin/glossary.html>Glossary</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>A Glossary for Vermin</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span></span></aside><main id=main><div class=pagehead><div class=stats><span class=date>2026-04-17</span><span title="3241 words"class=wc>3.2k words</span></div><div class=titleblock><h1 class=heading>Foundress in Ambush</h1><div class=subtitle></div></div></div><aside class=before><details class=sq-details-mini open><summary>Notes</summary> <div class=expansion><div class=prenotes><ul><li><div><p>This page contains unpolished draft content that should not be judged as a final product. Feedback is both welcome and desired, <a href=/contact.html>contact us</a>.</div></ul></div></div></details></aside><a href=#main id=resetview></a><article><p>A veil softly clad the swamp, delivering it from desolation. The chrylurk foundress perched centermost of the web she’d woven. Her claws lightly brushed at the silk drawn atop of rotting log, combing away pollen grains and morning dew.<p>Once, wizenblight had befestered this land to its very depths. The rot of all things, turning soul against itself, were no more than an abortive mockery of parascixion, but perhaps it spreads so far and wide for that very simplicity.<p>There is no tree in this wood which has not had not known galls and pallid leaves; the soil itself was littered with corpses‍ ‍‍—‍ even of the scanvengers naturally inclined to corpses.<p>She had felt the core this all sprung from‍ ‍‍—‍ the rotten wellspring, chimeric miasma clouded with spores. Those two plagues made such awful bedfellows. She’d felt the core and she’d killed it.<p>All that was left was clearing away the roots. Foundress she was; the land was hers, for her hive.<p>A veil softly clad the swamp, silk enchanted with a serivanescent pulse. A symphony‍-​extension of her being, splayed against across her land. Here and there dissonance tore out of step with the pulse‍ ‍‍—‍ wizenblight, the rot, turning soul against itself.<p>Horrible and discordant. The rot begot spores and creeping mycelium, believing her silk prey like all the corpses and fallen logs. But silk trapped.<p>The dissonance ambled on, like a drunkard singing several measure late. Wizenblight turned soul against itself by imitation‍ ‍‍—‍ but when it tried imitating serivane, the pulse would have already shifted: instead of insinuating, it revealed itself out of place.<p>It was insulting. Every one of these vexing roots ought to be ripped out, chewed up, and taught proper harmony in the metamorphosis of her digestion.<p>But silk was a trap; it required patience. The veil cladding this wood putrid with rot was already sufficient to work an evanescence of all that festers within it. Her slow pulse could not be imitated.<p>(In mortal form, she had heard tales of beavers caught and caged. Even removed from any natural river, the beasts hated the sound of running water.)<p>Hours passed in this trance. Swarmlings spilled out from the holes in her exoderm, making sure passage over the layer the silk. She could feel in the sharpening resonance of the serivane how, within this clearing or around that stagnant pool, the rot had perished to her subtle teleology, and now her symbiont‍-​children can feast.<p>Not all that ate the rot was her swarm‍ ‍‍—‍ blightflies mingled for a meal. Not dissimilar to her own swarm in base anatomy, but larger, wilder‍ ‍‍—‍ and these insects had been here before her.<p>She owed her parascixion to their siphoning and disease‍-​ridden bite, those eggs sown in her flesh. For that, she did not begrudge feeding them alongside her children. How lovely these vermin!<p>Hours passed in this trance, unrooting this curse that threatens the divines themselves.<p>Then, interruption. The tread of metal‍-​studded leather sole on silk veil.<p><em>Prey.</em><p>Silk pulsed serivanescent‍ ‍‍—‍ the most elegant variation of what mortals call alchemy. Her woven lines resonated as finely as the unstruck wires of a piano in made sympathetic.<p>So of course the brash roar of a “compleat” soul could not be mistaken.<p>The chrylurk was sinuous in her motion, three legpairs lifting her segmented body. With the clawtips of twelve limbs digging into bark, she slithered up a tree.<p>The veil was also her senseweb, extension of her being. She could place the mortal as easily as if it had trod their foot on her own flesh. And she would treat it the same level of disrespect.<p>Moving straight from here centermost perch to the intruding prey would mean entering a clearing (this was what her prey moved through, of course). This would mean forsaking her place in the treetops. No, she was patient. Instead, she took a detour.<p>While she detoured, she instructed her swarmlings to move. Darting forth now went a flying bug with piercing mouthparts fit for draining bloodsacs.<p>As it lashed out, the soul roared louder. At once, the swarmling was a new void in her perception. Dead instantly‍ ‍‍—‍ the senseline to it cut. Not cut, <em>gone</em>.<p><em>Compleat</em>. She so hated dealing with alchemists.<p>Overcast sun left the canopy a vague shadow‍-​shroud. Instincts lured her up. From on high she could pounce in her prey and end them in a single strick. But that attack… the alchemist could strike at a range. If she pounced, she would be helpless in the air, unable to dodge.<p>So she descended, several thick ropes rappeling her to lower smoothly where a thick trunk could obscure her from the alchemist.<p>Her exoderm was dark, green and purple pigments arrayed in spiralling patterns that pleased her. But for this…<p>She calculated. Then she instructed her swarm‍ ‍‍—‍ several made to fly in a line toward the alchemist. She arrayed them well spaced, to further gauge the transmutation that killed the first fly.<p>Another roar. Five flies‍ ‍‍—‍ most of those she’d allocated‍ ‍‍—‍ died, the center of the formation taken out. But not the two fringemost. Their flight was battered by a hot rush of air. <span class=thought><em>A by‍-​product of the technique?</em></span><p>She instructed them to fall to the ground anyway. Could she misdirect?<p>She had worked in parallel. While her swarm tested the alchemist, she herself surged to life, power pouring out of her lurking core. Not a roar, but note that would ring high in a quiescent wood.<p>But with this timing? She had flexed her power right as it transmuted. The compleat could sense evanescence‍ ‍‍—‍ but if all it sensed was its own power unleashed?<p>Power flooded the surface of her shell, becoming heat. Changing‍-​flame engulfed her. Exoderm scintilated like glamor, and her colorful spiral‍-​patterns were erased, repainted with a mottled green and black to blend in with the bushes she crouched in.<p>All her limbs and extremes held still as the flame guttered out and left her shell camoflaged. She’d executed her tactics just as planned.<p>The leathered boot stomps down, harder faster‍ ‍‍—‍ not a tread but a running gait.<p>It was sprinting straight at her.<p>She had underestimated its senses. She so hated dealing with alchemists.<p>Her head of white silk hair fluttered to life as she dispatched orders on lines. “‍—To me!” the chrylurk sent, tugged on the bindings.<p>She lunged up from the bushes to meet her prey uncowered.<p>Now the knight broke stride, halted, and regarded her with evaluating caution. It bore a gleaming helmet, and a chestplate sporting the geometric false‍-​web so called a transmutation circle. Only gambeson clad its limbs.<p>From the scabbard it pulled a thin line of metal imprinted with runes. It glowed sharply for a moment‍ ‍‍—‍ then a roar of transmutation.<p>New metal erupted from the skeleton of a weapon, spikes and bladed serrations like knife‍-​leaves. But in wake of the sharp glow, a dim light persisted. The transmutation continued, building to a final climax.<p>The sword caught fire.<p>It pointed the burning blade at her and took a step forward.<p>She growled, “Is this how you greet a queen after trespassing her court?”<p>“It has no crest, nor any reinforcements save the swarm,” it murmured in a dry tone‍ ‍‍—‍ less conversation than reassuring itself. “Not much of a queen. It’s not even taller than me.”<p>The chrylurk straightened her legs and steeped the angle of her anathorax. <span class=thought><em>Taller? It has half as many body segments!</em></span><p>“I’m never alone,” she said, unfurling her proboscis. “But you very much <em>are</em>. Who gave you that little sword and sent you here? I bet they knew you wouldn’t be coming back‍ ‍‍—‍ that you’d be <em>mine</em>. But I think we’ll both thank them, in the end.”<p>“I designed it,” it said. The blade still pointed at her‍ ‍‍—‍ and now, roaring! A jet of alchemical fire and light screeched forth.<p>She dived to the ground, low and rolling like a cylinder. Her shell is licked by the heat, but she dodged.<p><span class=thought><em>What kind of fire is that? Can it burn the silk pulsing with my will?</em></span> She glanced around‍ ‍‍—‍ the trees, the ground, trapped in her veil. <span class=thought><em>Would that be worse for me or for it?</em></span><p>The knight marched forward, and she rose to meet her. Her lurking core pulsed and bled. Her exoderm crackled with changing‍-​flame, skin becomining fluid and mercurial.<p>When only a meter separated them, both combatants moved. The alchemist charged forward and brought her sword down in a mighty swing. The chrylurk leapt at an angle. The sword hits her exoderm glancingly, and the transmuted blade finds no purchased on transmuting flesh.<p>The chrylurk’s mouth yawned, and her lower jaw was projecting forward. Sharp prongs tore into the gambeson cladding an air, but the alchemist pulled back. Her jaw tried to lock her prey in place, but only secured grasp of the armor‍-​fabric.<p>The burning blade, recovering from the swing, moved to its shoulder. Fire carefully burned fabric.<p>The chrylurk’s attempted grab only succeeds in stripping barding from the alchemist’s other arm.<p>But this brought the sword into place to <em>fall</em>. Striking down from her shoulder toward the head, following the retracting jaw with a mouthful of fabric.<p>She flinched and tried to move‍ ‍‍—‍ not quick enough. The sword hits a spot near the shoulder‍ ‍‍—‍ a gap between segments‍ ‍‍—‍ a weakpoint.<p>Finally the sword drew blood and the insect hissed pain and shock.<p><span class=thought><em>My turn.</em></span> Sword driven into the enemy, the knight couldn’t move‍ ‍‍—‍ three pairs of arms flew at the the almost. Swiping and clawing at the exposed arm. The knight grunted through gritted teeth.<p>But the sword was alight with transmuted fire. It was a searing pain inside of her, only waxing in intensity. Her limbs stop attacking and start <em>pushing</em>, shoving the alchemist away, anything to halt the heat melting her from within.<p>The alchemist stagged back, steam of blood‍-​vapor mingling with alchemy‍-​smoke. The chrylurk twisted, all multilimbed grace despite pain and panic, and skitter‍-​sprinted away.<p>The alchemist missed a single beat, trembling with a bloodsoaked arm, and then it made chase.<p>The swarmlings she called upon earlier by now had arrived, having kept their distance from the melee. Her antennae uncurled, giving them an easy platform to land on. As she did this, she caught her own scent.<p>The violence had only wetted her venom. Bitter toxin dewing on the tips of her mandibles. She wanted to bite into that defiant flesh and feel its struggles falter. She wouldn’t manage it, not with the sword.<p>Her swarmlings walked the length of her antennae, reaching her mouthparts. Her maw opened, and flies sought the venom‍-​scent, gathering at the tip to drink her hateful toxin.<p>The changing‍-​flame had already closed the wound on her anathorax, but her stride faltered from weakness. She ran, but was there to run <em>to?</em> She had perched at the center of her senseweb. Approaching the knight had brought toward the periphery. These chase took her further astray. The harmony of her silken senses grew dissonant, even beyond the roar of the compleat soul.<p>The senseweb was a part of the veil she’d cast over the swampland. And what had been the point of <em>that?</em><p>The alchemist cornered in a wet divot carved by the felling of a grand tree. The log had rotten into the ground. She dug her claws past her silk and into the rotting ground, even as her prey charged, sword held high.<p>She twisted around, tearing up mycelial earth with a faint blue pallor.<p>The alchemist stopped, almost teteering over from the abruptness.<p>“Wizenblight,” she swore in a tone of horror.<p>“What did you expect? Surely you know how our nests begin.”<p>“I cast a divination. There were no spores‍ ‍‍—”<p>“Because my webs were cleansing them. But you came and trampled all over them. Do you think you’re safe, now?”<p>No answer, but she could sense the tremor in the alchemist’s soul.<p>The chrylurk made no move, but the swarm gathered on her face took flight, arrayed in cloud and aimed at her prey.<p>Its reflexes were still sharp. Sword up, fire burst, and her swarmlings were so many crisps.<p>But she’d copied her earlier array‍ ‍‍—‍ the fringes fell, feigning damaged they’d not suffered. They kept crawling along the ground while the chrylurk stood taller in distraction; the alchemist gathered her courage, grip tightening on her sword. She takes a step‍ ‍‍—<p>But now the swarmlings had reached their target. Flying again, from right underneath her. Sword swings around to guard her face, but it misunderstood her goal.<p>The swarmlings flew toward her bleeding arm, crawling under her arm.. Full of her venom, they bit, pouring all her hate into the alchemist’s bloodstream.<p>When the chrylurk lunged, the alchemist is off‍-​balanced, not prepared to strike. It took a step back.<p>“Scared, morsel? You smell so delectable. Let’s finish this.”<p>Her lurking core pulsed again, and she felt something else coming alive in response. Emerging, expanding, extending.<p>“I‍ ‍‍—‍ I won’t fail.”<p>Roaring, bright alchemical light. The alchemist was throwing her soul into a last ditch effort‍ ‍‍—‍ but the chrylurk’s jaw projected out and grabbed her wrist, teeth compressing, drawing blood and <em>cracking</em> those damn hands.<p>Not a grunt now‍ ‍‍—‍ the alchemist cries out as the sword slipped from its slickening grip. The chrylurk slither‍-​skittered closer, motions so smooth as her jaw retracted, pair after pair of arms grabbing to crack to tear off the chestplate.<p>“I‍ ‍‍—‍ thought I was ready.” All assurance gone, and something cracked in that voice.<p>“<em>You are</em>,” said the chrylurk.<p>“Rotten beast,” it swore.<p>“The rot feeds us‍ ‍‍—‍ we <em>devour</em> it, clensing the mess your kind wrought.” She curls her array of mouthparts into something crypically recognizable as a smile. “In that way, you are just the same. Another mistake to be changed and remade by our will.”<p>“Kill me. Please? You can drain my blood, tear my skin off, I‍ ‍‍—‍ I’ll scream as much as you want. Just don’t‍ ‍‍—‍ I don’t want to be‍ ‍‍—”<p>She pushed the alchemist to the ground. <span class=thought><em>Who’s taller now?</em></span> she thought. Her secondary and teriary arms held down the mortal’s limbs, tight and still. Her katathorax arcs as her gaster twisted underneath it. Meanwhile, her primary hands tug at the helmet, but the mortal shook its head, frantic motions to resist.<p>Features exposed, the face was scarred, yet feminine. “Lovely,” the chrylurk said softly.<p>“First time I’ve heard that. And it’s from vermin that wants too‍ ‍‍—”<p>“They don’t appreciate you, they don’t love you. They let you come here alone, helpless‍ ‍‍—‍ I’ll never treat you so callously.”<p>“Please. As callous as a knife to the throat, I’m begging for it.”<p>“You certainly are~” Her face loomed over the mortal’s. She spiraled her petal‍-​eyelids wider, something about her flowering gaze made the thing beneath her shudder. “This will hurt. Are you sure?”<p>Her legs were bending before the mortal answered. Her stinger was already out, hard and beading with a clear liquid. She felt her pulse quicken along its length. So sensitive, she felt cool air breezing past it.<p>The alchemist only got as far as, “Just‍ ‍‍—” before she struck.<p>Her mandibles bit into the mortal’s neck. Still wet with venom, this new dose would be fast join what already laced its blood. Tranquilizing, sedating, preparing.<p>“If I wait,” the chrylurk starts, “then you’ll be numb.” Sense, even compassion, urged her to patient. But she had other urges.<p><span class=thought><em>Oh, my prey is right here, so close‍ ‍‍—‍ how can I resist?</em></span><p>She didn’t say that. Instead, she continued, “But I would rather you know <em>what</em> I’m saving you from. You’ll be much more grateful.” That was the warning.<p>The sharp tip of her stinger drove into exposed stomach. Cool air was finally forgotten as warm, warm flesh engulfed her length. Oh, blood on her oviscape! This, this was the proper climax of a hunt!<p>She could not resist driving herself to the hilt, just to feel the wet viscera brush along her queenhood. Just because she could. The alchemist cried out, a high and agonized note. She felt the hardness of spine‍ ‍‍—‍ too deep. Glorious, but careless. She pulled out, dark liquid pooling in the wound.<p>Her dripping ovipositor scratched along the mortal’s abdomen. It had no breath to protest this shallow cut.<p>“Don’t worry, I’ll do it right this time.”<p>“Oh f‍-​five above,” she croaked, stuttering a prayer. “To the light‍ ‍‍—‍ show me the light and the river of the sun. P‍-​praise‍ ‍‍—”<p><span class=thought><em>As if I would ever let those weeds take away my prize.</em></span> The prayer was silenced by tendrils crawling into its open mouth. It retched, but nothing comes up.<p>“You’re praying to the wrong god,” she said.<p>And then she ran her stinger into her quivering prey again. Slowly, this time, and she tasted the cuticle giving way to muscle and fat. Her goal‍ ‍‍—‍ the tight mass of its entrails welcomed her inside.<p>“There. Oh, you’re so empty. I’ll fix that~”<p>Only screams answered her.<p>“Venom should be easing the pain by now,” the chyrlurk said. “Are you scared? Don’t be, you’ll only make it worse. This is natural, I’ve done it before.”<p>Its terrified pulse sent blood washing over her queenhood. She couldn’t resist rocking her gaster ever slightly, feeling the torn flesh spread under her weapon.<p>Another thing made her unsteady‍ ‍‍—‍ her breath, quick and moaning from her spiracles, left her gaster fluttering.<p>She fell deeper, her weight resting on her prey. The hot mass of her chrysoma pressed against the mortal’s breast, hearts beating against each other.<p>And finally, a great pressure releases. Life and love rushed down her stinger and into her prey. A gush of vermincholie, larval slime squeezed down to the sharp tip of her stinger. Muscles tightened and relaxed, rhythmic, forcing her brood into her frail and bleeding eggack. Parasitic fluid flowed into the intestines.<p>“Mmm… that’ll be enough to begin your parascixion. You’ll love it. You’ll love me~”<p>She pulled herself out, leaving another deep pit of blood‍ ‍‍—‍ but now a thick slime was intermingled. Her disease‍-​spawn were eager to swim into those veins.<p>Claws bearing silk arrived at the wound next. She would stitch it close, lick it clean and bandage it up. Her hivestock must be cared for while her brood gestated. But her stinger was still everted and hard.<p>She noticed the screaming had stopped. “Morsel? Shall I weave a cocoon for you now, or shall I sow more larvae inside you?”<p>Her eyelipds spiraled open, and she saw the alchemist’s eyes had closed. But the mouth‍ ‍‍—‍ barely‍ ‍‍—‍ sucked in breath. Alive, but passed out.<p>Even less reason to hold back, then. Not that she ever needed a reason besides wanting to.<p>A tertiary hand dragged a finger along the sharp length of her queenhood. She brought the blood digit to her mouth, and tasted her prey.<p>Raw, no nectar at all. It would have been so much sweeter had she held them in thrall a few weeks to enrich their blood. But how could she have resisted?<p>How could she resist now? She grapped at the scraps of armor still left, and tore more of it away, feeling her pulse in her stinger.<p>When her prey awoke, she’d be riddled with so many more holes.<p>Vermin under every inch of skin.</article></main><footer><a href=#>Top</a> · <a href=/>Home</a> · <a href=/archive.html>Archive</a></footer>]]></content>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title type="html"><![CDATA[Cutting Apart Scissor Statements]]></title>
        <id>https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.org/posts/scissor-statement.html</id>
        <link href="https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.org/posts/scissor-statement.html"/>
        <link rel="enclosure" href="https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.orgundefined" type="image//"/>
        <updated>2026-04-15T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
        <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>In retrospect, there is something quite fitting about the concept of a “scissor statement.”</p>
<p>Rationalists are fond of it; just hanging around them over the years, I’ve heard brought up as casual shorthand many times. I myself have used it! It was coined by Scott Alexander almost eight years ago in the short story <a href="https://slatestarcodex.com/2018/10/30/sort-by-controversial/">“Sort By Controversial”</a>. There’s something so amusingly <em>Scott Alexander</em> about it.</p>]]></summary>
        <content type="html"><![CDATA[<!doctypehtml><meta charset=UTF-8><meta content=width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0 name=viewport><meta content=article property=og:type><link href=/style.css media=all rel=stylesheet><link title="Squiggles Atom Feed"href=/feed.xml rel=alternate type=application/atom+xml><link title="Squiggles JSON Feed"href=/feed.json rel=alternate type=application/feed+json><link href=at://did:plc:ivoe7cntxuy6at7uzmxzs2ft/site.standard.publication/3mfk6cpprzt2t rel=site.standard.publication><link href=at://did:plc:ivoe7cntxuy6at7uzmxzs2ft/site.standard.document/3mpgt6a7zua2k rel=site.standard.document><title>Cutting Apart Scissor Statements · Squiggle's Blog
    </title><meta content="Cutting Apart Scissor Statements"property=og:title><meta content="In retrospect, there is something quite fitting about the concept of a “scissor statement.” Rationalists are fond of it; just hanging around them over the years, I’ve heard brought up as casual shorthand many times. I myself have used it! It was coined by Scott Alexander almost eight years ago in the short story “Sort By Controversial”. There’s something so amusingly Scott Alexander about it. "property=og:description><body class="url-/posts/scissor-statement.html slug-scissor-statement"><header><h1 class=sitehead id=serpentine-squiggles><a href=/>Serpentine Squiggles</a></h1><div class="nav sitenav"><a class=no-notes href=/about.html>About</a><a class=no-notes href=/fiction/>Stories</a><a class=no-notes href=/artwork/>Artwork</a><a class=no-notes href=/games/>Games</a><a class=no-notes href=/music/>Music</a><a class=no-notes href=/essays/>Essays</a><a class=no-notes href=/posts>Posts</a><a class=no-notes href=/archive.html>Archive</a><a class=no-notes href=/contact.html>Contact</a><a class=no-notes data-n href=https://www.patreon.com/snugglesquiggle>Support</a></div></header><aside class=banner><p><a href=.><strong>The Serpent’s Track</strong></a> — read by constriction, write with venom.</aside><main id=main><div class=pagehead><div class=stats><span class=date>2026-04-15</span><span title="3523 words"class=wc>3.5k words</span></div><div class=titleblock><h1 class=heading>Cutting Apart Scissor Statements</h1><div class=subtitle>a microcosm of the Scott Alexander condition</div></div></div><aside class=before><details class=sq-details-mini open><summary>Notes</summary> <div class=expansion><div class=prenotes><ul><li><div><p>Originally posted on <a href=https://.tumblr.com/snugglesquiggle/813931075707551744>tumblr</a>.</div></ul></div></div></details></aside><a href=#main id=resetview></a><article><p>In retrospect, there is something quite fitting about the concept of a “scissor statement.”<p>Rationalists are fond of it; just hanging around them over the years, I’ve heard brought up as casual shorthand many times. I myself have used it! It was coined by Scott Alexander almost eight years ago in the short story <a href=https://slatestarcodex.com/2018/10/30/sort-by-controversial/>“Sort By Controversial”</a>. There’s something so amusingly <em>Scott Alexander</em> about it.<p>If nothing else, it makes for a pretty good story. Four thousand words, yet it’s a brisk, casual read. By turns amusing and disturbingly plausible. If I had to give a blind pitch, think Lovecraft by way of machine learning, stripping away all the gods and monsters without losing that spark of horror beyond comprehension. If anything, it elevates it.<p>Having long ago familiarized myself with the “twist,” I didn’t expect to find it this compelling on reread, yet I can almost say it holds up.<p>(And as occasionally happens with rationalist writing, when it speaks of AI, it sounds borderline prescient. Eight years ago means it was about a year before <a href=https://slate.com/technology/2019/02/openai-gpt2-text-generating-algorithm-ai-dangerous.html>OpenAI would claim</a> their GPT‍-​2 model was too powerful to release, and remember, it took until around GPT‍-​4 for the world at large to really start to appreciate what LLMs were capable of.)<p>But I don’t bring up that story to glaze its author. The story itself is almost irrelevant. The concept has gained a life of its own, much like “taking the red pill” is divorced from <em>The Matrix (1999)</em>.<p>So, what is a scissor statement?<p>The idea’s simple and evocative. See, a lot of statements you’ll find yourself saying are innocuous, obviously true things we can accept without issue. But of course, there’s plenty of contentious things you <em>know</em> will start a fight.<p>A scissor statement is that rare chimera that seems totally innocuous…<p>…and now suddenly half the room is at your throat like one of those <a href=https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/unpopular-opinion-guns>John Wick with ten guns pointed at him</a> images used for engagement farming unpopular opinions on social media. (Incidentally, ragebaiting is <em>exactly</em> what Shiri’s scissor was invented to do.)<p>It is downright impossible to understand why someone would get mad at you after uttering a scissor statement. Isn’t this a settled matter we can all agree on? And on that point, they do agree! It’s <em>obviously</em> <em>false!</em><p>The concept of scissor statements reflects a real frustration. Haven’t we all been there? You say something like “<a href=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masterpiece_Cakeshop_v._Colorado_Civil_Rights_Commission>Christian bakers</a> shouldn’t have to serve gay weddings” or “<a href=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._national_anthem_kneeling_protests>Colin Kaepernick</a> should have knelt for the anthem” or “<a href=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brett_Kavanaugh#Sexual_assault_allegations>Brett Kavanaugh</a> belongs on the supreme court regardless of those allegations, boys will be boys” and suddenly people look at you like you’re some kind of bigot!<p>(Real examples, by the way; in the fiction, these issues are all the product of scissor statements.)<p>But wait, <em>have</em> we all been there? If you have any familiarity with the issues, those statements seem pretty clearly contentious! Only ignorance could blind you to their implications, let alone their literal content. But okay, we aren’t born omniscient, maybe you’re one of today’s <a href=https://xkcd.com/1053/>lucky 10k</a>, and just didn’t know. You made a blunder, but you can learn and not slip up again.<p>Let me emphasize: scissor statements do not exist. This is not me being polemic‍ ‍‍—‍ we’re talking about fiction, Scott made it all up, this is basically an SCP.<p>But again, the idea has outgrown the story that spawned it. I can search through rationalist chats and subreddits and easily find repeated references to this as a meaningful category of thing. (Sure, you can’t literally take the red pill, but you can wake up from the matrix, metaphorically. So aren’t there things that <em>metaphorically</em> behave like scissor statements?)<p>The natural conclusion is this idea caught on because people felt seen by the frustration and confusion it portrays.<p><em>But why?</em><p>To quote a climatic passage:<blockquote>If you just read a Scissor statement off a list, it’s harmless. It just seems like a trivially true or trivially false thing. It doesn’t activate until you start discussing it with somebody. At first you just think they’re an imbecile. Then they call you an imbecile, and you want to defend yourself. Crescit eundo. You notice all the little ways they’re lying to you and themselves and their audience every time they open their mouth to defend their imbecilic opinion. Then you notice how all the lies are connected, that in order to keep getting the little things like the Scissor statement wrong, they have to drag in everything else. Eventually even that doesn’t work, they’ve just got to make everybody hate you so that nobody will even listen to your argument no matter how obviously true it is. Finally, they don’t care about the Scissor statement anymore. They’ve just dug themselves so deep basing their whole existence around hating you and wanting you to fail that they can’t walk it back. You’ve got to prove them wrong, not because you care about the Scissor statement either, but because otherwise they’ll do anything to poison people against you, make it impossible for them to even understand the argument for why you deserve to exist. You know this is true. Your mind becomes a constant loop of arguments you can use to defend yourself, and rehearsals of arguments for why their attacks are cruel and unfair, and the one burning question: how can you thwart them? How can you convince people not to listen to them, before they find those people and exploit their biases and turn them against you? How can you combat the superficial arguments they’re deploying, before otherwise good people get convinced, so convinced their mind will be made up and they can never be unconvinced again? <em>How can you keep yourself safe?</em></blockquote><p>This would resonate with you if you’ve repeatedly run up against this sort of interminable argument, ever felt a schism down the deepest axioms and definitions.<p>Or to put it bluntly, if you find you keep stumbling into rhetorical blunders‍ ‍‍—‍ almost like you’re making a habit of it. I’d argue this utter incomprehension of controversy can only be so persistent in one’s experience if one has a <em>lot</em> of ignorance of others’ perspective (i.e. privilege), or if after stepping on a rake once, you fail to internalize the presence of rakes enough to look before you step.<p>There’s an interesting take on <em>The Room (2003)</em> which posited that the movie was a great portrayal of an abusive relationship‍ ‍‍—‍ by accident, in spite of itself. Because the way it portrays the protagonist’s girlfriend as this inexplicably treacherous force tearing apart a man who never did anything wrong is deeply revealing‍ ‍‍—‍ a self‍-​portrait of how the world looks through a warped and ignorant perspective.<p>Take a closer look at that passage from the story quoted above. It’s inane, preoccupied with the statements themselves, with the <em>words</em>. It takes its own perspective for granted (trivially true) and all that opposes it are fleeting lies cooked up to support a trivial falsehood. Now saying this alone, I admit, would just be nitpicking.<p>But the words you hear are just a tail, not the dog wagging it. They are the output of another perspective and worldview. People are penetrable to analysis; you can understand them!<p>I called this passage <em>inane</em>, and I mean that in a etymological sense. It is empty, vacuous, starved of meaning. Where are the stakes? Statements about gay weddings and systemic racism protests and rape culture are not <em>trivial</em>. Maybe they seem that way if you don’t care, if you uttered your “scissor statement” heedless of its implications.<p>But these thing matter. Have your critics “dug themselves so deep basing their whole existence around hating you,” for no reason other than you uttered a trivial statement, or did that “trivial” statement naturally hook into a prefigured, entrenched system of conflict you were already unwittingly a part of?<p>(One can imagine a very different, more conscious horror story, where instead of the big reveal being that banal trivialities can tear the world apart, you find that speaking certain words reshapes the world in ways you don’t understand, culminating in a grand reveal that wielding this strange power required that you be at birth drafted into a power struggle you knew nothing about and never asked to be a part of.)<p>A scissor statement isn’t just someone disagreeing about something you think is self‍-​evident. To believe in even the weak, metaphorical existence of “scissor statements” requires dumbfounding yourself about the source of your disagreements, reifying it into the fruit of some magical, malign influence. In the story, scissor statements are deployed like weapons, inflicted upon us by an unknown faction to manipulate our world’s politics.<p>It’s like all the feminists arguing with you are pawns in service to some nefarious agenda…<p>There’s a distinct rhetorical effect to calling something a scissor statement‍ ‍‍—‍ scissors cut symmetrically. It’s neutral, agnostic, blaming both sides equally. If you call something a “ragebait” or “dogwhistle”, there’s an implicit accusation of bad faith. If you call something “misinformation,” you acknowledge that one side is right.<p>If you call something a “scissor statement”, which side you end up on feels as arbitrary as whether you have the gene for tasting cilantro.<p>Politics is an alien force acting on you, not a system working through you.<p>Rationalists were well‍-​primed to accept this sort of framing. After all, <a href=https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/9weLK2AJ9JEt2Tt8f/politics-is-the-mind-killer>politics is the mind‍-​killer.</a> It’s this insidious evolutionary glitch able to flip off the brains of even high INT rationalists and turn them into “slogan‍-​chanting zombies.”<p>Earlier, I wrote that believing in a scissor statement requires a deep ignorance, or a skill issue in the face of opportunities to learn more. But there’s a third possibility. That the incomprehension here is purely rhetorical, a deliberate dumbfounding.<p>You treat these disagreements as if they were a geas magicked up by Shiri’s scissor generator because you are smarter than such petty disputes, you see through it. Alas, some people are just getting helplessly mind‍-​killed by trivial words.<p>If I had to sum it up in a single word, the concept of a scissor statement is so… infantile.<p>Is this not a child’s understanding of the world? There are certain no‍-​no words that make the adults punish you and all the other kids start being mean to you. It’s all so unfair!<p>Why is it this way? IDK, doesnt make any sense, the world is weird and scary sometimes.<hr><p>Maybe it strikes you that I’m being a little too hard on Scott for this one story written almost a decade ago. Sure, the concept has taken a life of its own, but isn’t that because it’s a <em>useful concept?</em> Nothing wrong with having a compact little allusion like this in your back pocket. Not every word word is chained to its etymology.<p>Indeed, while writing this post, I was constantly struck by the thought that, well, I’ve <em>seen</em> what debating conservatives is like, there really are people that are fractally wrong on so many issues.<p>Whatever his follies, at the end of the day Scott isn’t a terrible writer and isn’t devoid of insight.<p>The idea sticks with people because it kinda <em>do</em> be like that. Hot button issues sometimes are simply baffling.<p>Since writing this post, I’ve had a few arguments in chatrooms about it. And I find to defend the concept of a scissor statement, you have to retreat from what it literally is.<p>When the first scissor statement is discovered, two engineers get into an argument over it, can’t reach any agreement, drag in their coworkers, then escalate to the boss, and they proceed to fight for hours until the dissenters get fired. They go on to sue the company, then the boss drives over to beat one of them up, getting himself arrested and losing the whole company.<p>These people literally <em>invented</em> the scissor generator and could not see past the schisms it carved. It’s like some mage cast ⸢Frenzy⸥ on them.<p>But isn’t this just hyperbole, evocative exaggeration? Sure, there aren’t any actual power words that can mind‍-​whammy you into escalating, inescapable aggro. But <em>the dynamic</em> of mutually dumbfounded conflict exists, doesn’t it? Shouldn’t we have a label for it?<p>Nevermind that the symmetry of the scissor so rarely bears out in practice‍ ‍‍—‍ the privileged easily get blindsighted by the protests of the oppressed, but that doesn’t mean the oppressed are remotely surprised. But maybe not <em>every</em> scissor cuts along such clear‍-​cut, entrenched lines.<p>But “the dynamic” is vacuous, question‍-​begging. Yes, scissor statements do exist if you strip away all of the wrongheaded bits until you get the parts that must necessarily map onto reality.<p>The thing about false insights is that they are real and specific observations, but the real parts aren’t specific and the specific parts aren’t real. “Having a label for it” is a dangerous thing, because labels impart framing. There’s connotations and implicit judgments in every label‍ ‍‍—‍ they aren’t neutral windows into reality.<p>It happens sometimes in real life, rarely, that a disagreement starts small and snowballs bigger and bigger, in an almost analoguous fashion‍ ‍‍—‍ but crucially, there is no spell that can <em>consistently</em> turn “trivially true” statements into vendettas so intense you’ll get arrested for assaulting them over it. The ontology of how truth and belief formation works would have to be fundamentally different to ever allow Shiri’s scissor to function.<p>Consider <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=antimesomemes.html>antimemes</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Antimemes and Mesomemes</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span>. Are they real? Some ideas are hard to describe or remember, but there isn’t any idea that can innately erase all records of itself, whether stored on brain or photo or computer file. That is a purely conceptual effect at odds with the mechanics of how the physics of this universe works.<p>Is it unfair to raise the bar of “scissor statement” so high nothing can ever satisfy it? I often find myself arguing that your terms shouldn’t be made useless by definition. We already have a word for “nothing”, so if you have a choice between coining a synonym for the empty set and including anything at all, it’s preferable, practical, to gesture at something real.<p>But my problem, with both “antimemes are real” and “scissor statements are real” is that <em>this is magic.</em> You are trying to describe the world with magic. Even if you define your magic as <em>only strictly specifically</em> the effects that are actually real, I think the impulse and effect of reasoning magically is cognitive distortion.<p>Scissor statements suck as an idea to the extent that it reifies your ignorance; it shrugs and says oh well, what can you do.<p>To call it a scissor statement is foreground the words themselves, and elide all else. Does it map onto reality? Can you understand the other position? Did you simply make a mistake? No, the scissor triggered and now everyone is forever fighting Just Because.<p>But you can rightly accuse me of spitting all this vitriol without justifying where I’m really coming from. <em>Are</em> rationalists‍ ‍‍—‍ is Scott‍ ‍‍—‍ so ignorantly centrist as I imply? This is a rant, and I think it mainly makes sense to those already read‍-​in on the issues I’m dissecting: if you already know and dislike Scott, or rationalists as a whole, or <em>do</em> like them but want to hear out what critics have to say.<p>And not everyrat who heard me out found this argument convincing. I gesture vaguely at connotations and framing, but nothing substantial enough that we ought to discard the concept of a scissor statement wholesale.<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>One day I will find a way to explain conceptual metaphor to people who haven’t <a href=https://slatestarcodex.com/2015/04/21/universal-love-said-the-cactus-person/>gotten out of the car</a>.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>Cards on the table, I make this critique chiefly because I’m already convinced Scott’s work is unsalvageable and rationalists are little better.<p>If Scott were brilliant and rationalists were as a rule virtuous, yet somehow they yielded a textually identical concept of scissor statement (emphasis on somehow, because the odious centrism is a tad bit baked in) then there’d be no real force behind what I’m saying here.<p>Imagine a house caught fire and blew up, and it was so intense you can see scorch marks on the next house over (it’s a suburb). I walk over, take a picture of that, and post it saying, “Look at this! What a fire, huh?”<p>The fire was so bad because the property blew up, and the scorch‍-​marks simply underscore that fact. If the house blew up without leaving the scorch‍-​marks, it’d still be bad, and if it turns out it was actually just a stray firework that went off and nothing else was destroyed, then the scorch‍-​marks have little significance.<p>I find it kinda neat that you can look at this tiny part of Scott’s corpus, and still see the marks of its origin. Dumbfounded, ignorant, and classically centrist. But this only works because it’s not the only evidence thereof‍ ‍‍—‍ it would be downright unsound to believe what I’m saying based on this post alone.<p>So why <em>is</em> Scott so deplorable to me?<p>After all, this was just a piece of fiction, and you cannot extrapolate from an unreliable narrator to divine the author’s true beliefs.<p>Except. Scott has written millions of words of blog posts over his prolific career. So we can just ask: what <em>does</em> he actually think about political division?<p>One of Scott’s most influential essays is “I Can Tolerate Anything Except The Outgroup”, which I’d go as far as to call a foundational piece in the rationalist understanding of politics. It’s influential even outside that niche‍ ‍‍—‍ figures like Sam Altman praise it.<p>It’s from 2014, so it’s very old work, yet his <a href=https://www.astralcodexten.com/about#§where-do-i-start>modern substack</a> puts it as #3 on the list of his articles to start with.<p>Consider this choice passage:<blockquote><p>Compare the Nazis to the German Jews and to the Japanese. The Nazis were very similar to the German Jews: they looked the same, spoke the same language, came from a similar culture. The Nazis were totally different from the Japanese: different race, different language, vast cultural gap. But the Nazis and Japanese mostly got along pretty well. Heck, the Nazis were actually moderately positively disposed to the <em>Chinese</em>, even when they were technically at war. Meanwhile, the conflict between the Nazis and the German Jews – some of whom didn’t even realize they were anything other than German until they checked their grandparents’ birth certificate – is the stuff of history and nightmares. Any theory of outgroupishness that naively assumes the Nazis’ natural outgroup is Japanese or Chinese people will be totally inadequate.<p>And this isn’t a weird exception. Freud spoke of <a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narcissism_of_small_differences>the narcissism of small differences</a>, saying that “it is precisely communities with adjoining territories, and related to each other in other ways as well, who are engaged in constant feuds and ridiculing each other”. Nazis and German Jews. Northern Irish Protestants and Northern Irish Catholics. Hutus and Tutsis. South African whites and South African blacks. Israeli Jews and Israeli Arabs. Anyone in the former Yugoslavia and anyone else in the former Yugoslavia.<p>So what makes an outgroup? Proximity plus small differences. If you want to know who someone in former Yugoslavia hates, don’t look at the Indonesians or the Zulus or the Tibetans or anyone else distant and exotic. Find the Yugoslavian ethnicity that lives closely intermingled with them and is most conspicuously similar to them, and chances are you’ll find the one who they have eight hundred years of seething hatred toward.</blockquote><p><em>What an odd thing to say.</em> But I suppose the idea of a “trivially true” statement causing the United States to erupt into civil war is a pretty plausible premise for a story, if you’d describe opposition to National Socialism essentially the same way.<p>Scott Alexander has been on my mind a lot the past few weeks. Last month, I had the pleasure of helping proofread <em><a href=https://sablegm.substack.com/p/all-branches-lead-to-checkmate>The Infantile Sepsis</a></em>, a series of blog posts diving into some pitfalls of rationalist thought more deeply. Our pal Scott features heavily in it.<p><em>That</em> is the resource I would point you to if you’d like to learn more about the issues with Scott’s work.<p>As I publish this, the series is releasing piece by piece, but I waited till now to mention it because there’s about twenty posts already out, making it a substantive read at this point.<p>In particular, if you want to read someone tearing apart the idea that the <em>fucking holocaust</em> was the product of the “the narcissism of small differences,” as well as the myriad other claims made in that sprawling, incoherent “outgroup” essay, there’s a eight post subseries dissecting that trashfire alone.<p>If you read this far into my post, you’d definitely get something out of <em>The Infantile Sepsis</em>, even if you aren’t a rationalist, even if you hadn’t heard of Scott Alexander till now. It’s quite an informative and dare I say entertaining read. I’d love it if you gave it a look.<div><div class=biglink><p><a href=https://sablegm.substack.com/p/all-branches-lead-to-checkmate><img src=https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F3d1aff2b-36f5-4476-bc6b-a95ef8809c8f_1200x630.png> <span class=big><strong>All Branches Lead to Checkmate</strong></span><span class=break><br> </span>The start of a series about the intellectual and scholarly standards of the so‍-​called “rationality” community.<span class=break><br> </span><span class=small>(<span class=citation data-cites=sablegm.substack.com>@sablegm.substack.com</span>)</span></a></div></div></article></main><aside class=pointer><div class=center>Part of a series called <em><a href=/posts/index.html title=->The Serpent’s Track</a></em></div><div class=seriesnav><a class=prev href=/posts/eusapience.html title=->← Eusapience (n.)</a><a class=next href=/posts/venom-hex.html title=->Choose Your Venom-hex! →</a></div><hr><p>Thank you for reading! Please consider sharing this post or telling us you read it. Our only algorithm is word of mouth, and we have no analytics.<p>Thoughts? Questions? We’re interested in feedback, or even just acknowledgement. All are welcome to <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/contact.html>contact us.</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Contact Information</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>Did you enjoy? Please consider donating on <a href=https://ko-fi.com/snugglesquiggle>ko-fi</a> or <a href=https://www.patreon.com/snugglesquiggle>patreon</a>. We’re struggling and even a little bit helps.<p>Our deepest thanks and dedication to those who have donated to sustain this site.</aside><footer><a href=#>Top</a> · <a href=/>Home</a> · <a href=/archive.html>Archive</a></footer>]]></content>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title type="html"><![CDATA[Surrogate So Shy]]></title>
        <id>https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.org/vermin/shy-surrogate.html</id>
        <link href="https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.org/vermin/shy-surrogate.html"/>
        <link rel="enclosure" href="https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.orgundefined" type="image//"/>
        <updated>2026-04-05T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
        <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Serivane was silk that had evanesced beyond the veil that separates the physical and the ephemeral. At least, that was the theory. This Hive we name Ravaging-With-Downpour was built in the caverns behind a grand waterfall at the very rim of the highlands. Serivane ghosted through stone just fine, but running water? The threads always seemed to fray a little bit faster faster.</p>]]></summary>
        <content type="html"><![CDATA[<!doctypehtml><meta charset=UTF-8><meta content=width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0 name=viewport><meta content=article property=og:type><link href=/style.css media=all rel=stylesheet><link title="Squiggles Atom Feed"href=/feed.xml rel=alternate type=application/atom+xml><link title="Squiggles JSON Feed"href=/feed.json rel=alternate type=application/feed+json><link href=at://did:plc:ivoe7cntxuy6at7uzmxzs2ft/site.standard.publication/3mfk6cpprzt2t rel=site.standard.publication><link href=at://did:plc:ivoe7cntxuy6at7uzmxzs2ft/site.standard.document/3mpgt63ujou2b rel=site.standard.document><link href=/vermin/vc.css media=all rel=stylesheet><title>Surrogate So Shy · Vermin Cathexis
    </title><meta content="Surrogate So Shy"property=og:title><meta content="Serivane was silk that had evanesced beyond the veil that separates the physical and the ephemeral. At least, that was the theory. This Hive we name Ravaging-With-Downpour was built in the caverns behind a grand waterfall at the very rim of the highlands. Serivane ghosted through stone just fine, but running water? The threads always seemed to fray a little bit faster faster. "property=og:description><body class="url-/vermin/shy-surrogate.html slug-shy-surrogate"><header><h1 class=sitehead id=serpentine-squiggles><a href=/>Serpentine Squiggles</a></h1><div class="nav sitenav"><a class=no-notes href=/about.html>About</a><a class=no-notes href=/fiction/>Stories</a><a class=no-notes href=/artwork/>Artwork</a><a class=no-notes href=/games/>Games</a><a class=no-notes href=/music/>Music</a><a class=no-notes href=/essays/>Essays</a><a class=no-notes href=/posts>Posts</a><a class=no-notes href=/archive.html>Archive</a><a class=no-notes href=/contact.html>Contact</a><a class=no-notes data-n href=https://www.patreon.com/snugglesquiggle>Support</a></div></header><aside class=banner><p><strong>Vermin Cathexis</strong>: <span class=nav><span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/vermin/index.html>Index</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>In Vermin Cathexis</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/vermin/about.html>About</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>About Vermin Cathexis</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/vermin/glossary.html>Glossary</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>A Glossary for Vermin</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span></span></aside><main id=main><div class=pagehead><div class=stats><span class=date>2026-04-05</span><span title="2592 words"class=wc>2.6k words</span></div><div class=titleblock><h1 class=heading>Surrogate So Shy</h1><div class=subtitle></div></div></div><aside class=before><details class=sq-details-mini open><summary>Foreword</summary> <div class=expansion><strong>Note</strong>: Erotica.</div></details></aside><a href=#main id=resetview></a><article><p>Serivane was silk that had evanesced beyond the veil that separates the physical and the ephemeral. At least, that was the theory. This Hive we name Ravaging‍-​With‍-​Downpour was built in the caverns behind a grand waterfall at the very rim of the highlands. Serivane ghosted through stone just fine, but running water? The threads always seemed to fray a little bit faster faster.<p>I walked, quiet and alone save the eternal buzz and presence of my hive. We mingled in song and will, not sight. Not without active inquiry. And were I so watched, I’d have hid how my still‍-​growing gaster swayed with each step. I might have stilled the idle chirruping of figet‍-​stridulation.<p>My claws and hooves grew louder as I passed from the softer silk and nesting‍-​shell of the inner hive to the sparse outer caves. The roar of water descending by the ton from such grand mountain heights grew louder. My neck’s auricles curled up to spare themselves the noise.<p>The path I followed passed <em>through</em> a column of falling water. The bridge was covered, but it was wrought of nothing but old sloughed exoderm and salvaged silk‍ ‍‍—‍ almost conceding that nothing we built could really contend with the titantic might of water.<p>Sometimes, I felt like a flower. Already, the smallest crack let liquid drip past the bridge‍-​roof‍ ‍‍—‍ but our shells accomodated our watery abode. Like flower petals, waxed flaps of exoderm fell past my head. A tug on my silk pulled them up, like a bloom closing with the vacant sun. Thank you, O Mother, for this gift.<p>The delicate tresses of silk upon my head were protected now as I crossed the bridge. Even as I returned to the embrace of a nest‍-​tunnel half‍-​carved into the rock, I did not open my sealed licenest. With each step, the buzz of the hive grew more muffled, fuzzier. The faint physicality of serivane reared its head.<p>I was present in the hive‍ ‍‍—‍ to server oneself from the collective would be <em>exscient</em>‍ ‍‍—‍ but I had retreated, anonymous and obscure.<p>Onward I drew toward light and air‍ ‍‍—‍ already not far given the waterfalls‍ ‍‍—‍ and soon found myself upon a cliff overlooking the falls and the plunging lake below. The mountains folded in here‍ ‍‍—‍ even a bug daring the outside world had little fear of being spotted‍ ‍‍—‍ and so upon this ledge I found a retreat from mortal and chrylurk alike.<p>My gaster swelled as I drew in a breath of fresh air. Exhaling, I remained round and heavy‍ ‍‍—‍ and with my attention returning, and the touch of the hive light on my mind, nothing distracted me from this persistent sensation. The thought was front and center‍ ‍‍—‍ I <em>needed</em>, and yet there was nothing for it!<p>Just after waking up, I’d tried drawing a web with one of my maids‍ ‍‍—‍ and tore the silk with how my focus vacanted me, my body demanding of me something I could not give. Some would curse, some would blame, But I‍—<p>(I am a princess of Ravaging‍-​With‍-​Downpour. I am proudly surrogate to a mother most parascixe. I shall bear the burden of her bountiful womb.)<p>My mandibles squeezed around a maxillary palp. No, this wasn’t enough. I lifted a hand to my face, stroking the length of my proboscis then slipping past it to wrap my mouthparts wetly around my hand. I remembered her tendrils overwhelming mine, her tongue inside me.<p>My abdomen shuddered. Pulsating, the way it rapidly drew and huffed air. My voice, as much breath as purring stridulation, was unsteady as I spoke a prayer:<p>“O Mother who weaves in nexus! Thank you for allowing me the privilege to be filled, to bear but a fraction of your lust and inflict it onto others.”<p>The pressure was almost painful, the throbbing in my hindmost core, (like your ovipositor had never withdrawn. I’m so full of your vermin, mistress, growing and pressing against my walls. My princess palace can hardly bear the weight of a proper Queen’s duties.)<p>Trembling, I let my legs fail and fall. It was only when my katathorax hit the cold stone, gaster following after, that I realized something very sensitive had made itself present.<p>Wet at my final segment, slowly engorging and extending, my ovipositor twitched. My antennae worked furiously between my eyes, but I could scent nothing but myself, a royal musk that slid impotently past my yearning. (Did nothing for me, but I remembered how you ordered me to massage your antennae, rubbing pheromone‍-​secreting glands right against your setae. Oh, how you crooned to smell a princess ready for her Queen’s excess!)<p>I had so many hands to grope myself. One still fingered the inside of my mouth, possessed by a memory of you, but my other hugged and squeezed my anathorax. Rubbing lower, lower, toward the lips of my chrysoma, sexless yet seeming sympathetically wet. A pair of swarmling slugs crawled out, perhaps instructed to clean up the mess down on my gaster, but a hand pushed them right back into their burrows. Not yet.<p>Ugh! I’d come out here just to clear my head, but this swelling wasn’t going down any time soon. At least I was already alone…<p>Before my questing hands could reach my chrysoma core, they passed sensitive nubs, those teats that would swell with sanguimel, more concentrated than regurgitated meal. I’d never secreted, never fed a suckling mouth‍ ‍‍—‍ but I would soon, wouldn’t I?<p>(Oh, please. Give me a thrall to put your eggs in. I’ll smother them against my core and force your honey down their throat. My Queen, I’ll gladly feed your brood!)<p>The teats were perfectly positioned, weren’t they? For having a ovipositor stuck between a thrall’s legs while their head was right there beside my core…<p><em>Throb</em>. My ovipositor had slowly emerged‍ ‍‍—‍ but that thought tugged at it mightily, and I felt my own thoughts dragged downward, weighed down by the primal need you’d poisoned me with. Gifted me. <em>Blessed me.</em> I’m thankful for you brood, Mother. Thankful!<p>My Queen was most scixe‍ ‍‍—‍ but the thought of filling an exy little thrall with a brood, <em>that</em> was what lifted my princess scepter. I felt a slick droplet run down its soft chitin.<p>Already on the ground, I rolled onto my side. Without the ground in the way, my gaster could curl so flexibly. With no delay, it doubled back, a U‍-​shape against my katathorax, and suddenly I had a thick, wet rod in between my legs.<p>Oh, I felt like a flower‍ ‍‍—‍ my tip was closed shut in this sexless, sunless night of privation. Even as the slick coating left my scepter glimmering.<p>The lips of my chrysoma opened again, shimmerbugs crawling out, and hovering in the air, they lit my ovipositor by a ethereal glow. Surely just waving this beatific sight in the face of a mortal should hypnotize them. Blushing, begging for permission to touch it, to lick it.<p>Would they get a chance to beg? Or would I have already thrusted before they spoke a word, desperate to feel the sheer relief of their incubating warmth? (Am I mannered and reserved princess, or just a rutting beast?)<p>“What have you done to me, Mother?” I whisper. But my thoughts correct themselves: (Forgive me! You have not nothing but bless this princess. I am thankful for the gift, it is an honor to bear your lust‍ ‍‍—‍ but was I ready, Mother?)<p>My fingers closed around me. I couldn’t resist. Slime‍-​slick oozing between my fingers. Abdomen pulsing, huffing, I moaned.<p>I need control of myself. I must have chrylurk’s pride when I infested my thrall.<p>My hand simply <em>moved</em> and I moaned again.<p>The pressure was so acute inside me. Your vermin came inside my eager womb as a thick, warm flood. A Queen’s primordial seed oozed into me. Your dutiful surogate now encloses your brood yolk into shell. (Yes, I’m swelling with our eggs!)<p>‍—Princess? Where did you scuttle off to?<p>“Ah‍ ‍‍—‍ ah!”<p>My moan turned to a yelp of shock. The buzz of the hive found me‍ ‍‍—‍ muted hum giving way to the attentive probe‍-​pulse of harmony that flowed not through me but <em>to</em> me. Idle serivane wires frayed under the torrent of Ravaging’s waterfalls, but with active need our lice wove more durable strandles.<p>And my lice answered my queries for me.<table><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: left;">‍—Line?<td>‍—Bound.<tr><td style="text-align: left;">‍—Status?<td>‍—Uninjured, unpanicked. Thirst increasing. Craving touch.<tr><td style="text-align: left;">‍—Mood?<td>‍—Arousal, yearning, shame.<tr><td style="text-align: left;">‍—Where?<td>‍—Sixteenth interstice, observational alcove.<tr><td style="text-align: left;">‍—Why?<td>‍—Gestation overwhleming; anxious of hive perception.<tr><td style="text-align: left;">‍—<em>Why?</em><td>‍—Interrupt: hiveling busy, resume latter. Slack.<tr><td style="text-align: left;">‍—Busy?<td>‍—Delicate activity in progress! Slack.<tr><td style="text-align: left;">‍—What?<td>‍—Ovipositor erect, hands stroking‍— Interrupt. Discard response.</table><p>‍—Go away! I’m praying!<p>‍—And fervently too! Queen will be pleased at your devotion. But this one thinks she won’t appreciate your greed.<p>‍—Greed?<p>‍—Hoarding the experience to yourself.<p>‍—Hoarding? I’m sparing the hive! This hurts, and it’s. So embrassing!<p>‍—Is it not the Queen’s love that burns within you? This one would cherish feeling the Queen with such intensity, such intimacy! Hive deserves to know how lewdly you long for parascixion.<p>‍—I’m a princess! Reduced to moaning and thrusting and‍ ‍‍—‍ I can’t even help it. Ugh! Can you imagine a mortal seeing our highest caste like this?<p>‍—Hive shall never suffer you the barbs of exscient judgment! No, their blood shall team with ovirexia and truth! Their eyes shall dilate, their tongues shall lull in deep thirst‍ ‍‍—‍ for you, O scixe princess!‍ ‍‍—‍ and when you moan, so too their singular throat will echo your ardor. Nature herself has ordained it so!<p>‍—Don’t, ugh, talk about their tongues. I <em>need</em> a tongue on my scape right now! (The trill of my silk might well have been a hive‍-​bound moan.) Here, look at this, if you’re so eager.<p>I summoned my shimmer bugs again, cast their light to fall just on my pulsing, wet stinger. More lubricating slick had seeped from the pores, and my hand pulled away bound by a whole web of sticky strands.<p>My scalp buzzed as the image was rendered in harmony.<p>‍—So fervent! Endowed in the Queen’s own image, oh yes! Your pride makes even this operator swoon. Unsightly that you’ve hidden this prize away from any who could appreciate it.<p>‍—Is it a <em>prize?</em> (I send.) I say this is a burden!<p>‍—And you deserve to have it attended to. That is your right as a princess of Ravaging!<p>I traced a finger down my oviscape, feeling my length curved with bulges and nodules that would frustrate any prey struggling to escape.<p>‍—Distracting me. I was going somewhere with this. Tell me about the thralls again. (My fingers closed around my length anew, giving a slow stroke.) Did this one say their eyes would dilate for me? They’d moan for me? Do you think I could hypnotize them, waving this? My memerizing princess scepter~<p>‍—You would enthrall them, my liege!<p>‍—I would fuck them. (I moaned, jerking my hand down to my base and up again.) Oh, my Queen, I would fuck them all for you.<p>‍—Good girl, princess. Doesn’t it feel right? You are an extension of our Queen’s loins. The meaning of your life is to accept the royal brood, to let your womb nurture and nourish and swell as you dream wetly of fulfilling your purpose as a surrogate.<p>‍—Why! (Trilling again, whining into the hive‍-​binding.) Where is my thrall! Where is my exy fuckpet! I want to lay eggs~ I need it!<p>‍—Tighten your grip, princess. Imagine the thrall impaled on your stinger, quivering and clenching as you claim them.<p>My hand spasms in its passage up and down my length. Abdomen pulsing, mouthpart biting down enough I crack my shell.<p>‍—Do you know what a thrall ready for a brood smells like? After the venom’s pumped into them, day after day, after a diet vomited from a chrylurk’s throat, all to to prepare them, reshape them. Ovirexia unraveling their mind, and infusing their blood with new hormones. They sweat, they bleed, and you can <em>smell</em> it. We overwrite their biology until they are hivestock to feed and breed.<p>Tightening, a pulsing intensity all along my length! But with each wave of arousal and pleasure, it seemed to crawl deep into me. Not just my oviscape, but my whole ovipositor. Then tingling in the channels that Queen had thrust Herself into. Now my womb, so fat with her vermin, it ached. That pressure that had tormented me for days. I felt the pleasure and <em>need</em> soaking deep enough. Oh!<p>‍—Thralls must be trained. Painful lessons, instilling obedience like silken ropes cutting into their flesh. Hive infests their body and their mind. This is why you should never fear losing control. The Queen channels Her urges through you. You are <em>meant</em> to melt into frenzy at the scent of a empty thrall. Embrace this madlust.<p>‍—<em><em>Where</em>!</em> Where is my thrall? Mother, please!<p>‍—Keep stroking, princess. Prepare your ovipositor for its purpose.<p>Two hand encircled my length, but they moved at different rhythms, one caressing the base where my cerci undulate sympathetically even as the other squeezed the tip and fingers the closed petals of my slit.<p>But I had more than two hands. Even as I still tongued at fingers of one hand, others were testing my holes, spreading me open. I couldn’t take my mind off the raw demand of my throbbing ovipositor, each stroke redoubling my need for more stimulation.<p>Slime coated my princesshood, a dripping mess that audibly squished with each motion. Even as my ovipositor dripped for more, I used that lube to finger myself, scrounging for any pleasure‍ ‍‍—‍ for all of it!<p>My eminent oviposition felt like a fire consuming all I threw into it‍ ‍‍—‍ demending more, but giving what? The petals of my slit remained clenched closed.<p>I slipped two fingers deeper inside, moaning. Please. All my mind was the roar of the waterfall, noise without meaning.<p>“Ah!”<p>(Let me tear into a thrall. Let me fuck them. Let me show them what chrylurk royalty <em>means</em>. O my hungry vermin! We will infest! We will ruin them! And they will thank us for the gift!)<p>There! Finally! Liquid sluicing through the petals! My clenched ovipositor gushing!<p>‍—Very good, princess.<p>My length still throbbed. My abdomen still ached with the pressure of eggs that hadn’t even <em>moved</em> in my womb.<p>I still needed to fuck.<p>‍—Help? Did I do it wrong?<p>I had just jerked my princess scepter until I couldn’t think any more‍ ‍‍—‍ and I still needed to fuck.<p>‍—Oh, princess, don’t you know? Your eggs aren’t finished gestating! Why, you won’t lay until the next moon‍-​phase at least. It’s only going to get <em>worse</em> for you.<p>‍—<em>Mother in nexus, what have you done to me?</em> (I didn’t know if I meant to send that.)<p>‍—Made you a surrogate! You shall ensure Queen is sated and Hive is growing! How do you feel?<p>‍—I… I don’t…<p>‍—Here, repeat after me: <em>Thank you for allowing me the privilege to be filled, to bear but a fraction of your lust and inflict it onto others!</em><p>My ovipositor throbbed. My bloated gaster ached. I had to do something about this‍ ‍‍—‍ oh, vexation, I had to <em>inflict</em> it onto something.<p>Didn’t that sound satisfying? Nature herself ordained. I was <em>made</em> for this purpose.<p>‍—Very good, princess (this one sends.) Tomorrow you’ll do this again. With consistent practice and adequate stretching, your first laying will go exuberantly!</article></main><footer><a href=#>Top</a> · <a href=/>Home</a> · <a href=/archive.html>Archive</a></footer>]]></content>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title type="html"><![CDATA[Verminous Vignettes]]></title>
        <id>https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.org/vermin/etudes.html</id>
        <link href="https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.org/vermin/etudes.html"/>
        <link rel="enclosure" href="https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.orgundefined" type="image//"/>
        <updated>2026-04-04T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
        <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<div>
<p>A document in 9 sections: </p>
<ol>
<li><a href="/vermin/etudes.html#a-sculptor-most-delicate">“A Sculptor Most Delicate”</a></li>
<li><a href="/vermin/etudes.html#headstrong-hunter-patient-weaver">“Headstrong Hunter, Patient Weaver”</a></li>
<li><a href="/vermin/etudes.html#between-contempt-and-hysteria">“Between Contempt and Hysteria”</a></li>
<li><a href="/vermin/etudes.html#the-river-by-sunset">“The River By Sunset”</a></li>
<li><a href="/vermin/etudes.html#daily-communion-among-canyons">“Daily Communion Among Canyons”</a></li>
<li><a href="/vermin/etudes.html#mischief-out-of-sight">“Mischief Out of Sight”</a></li>
<li><a href="/vermin/etudes.html#nubile-sculpture">“Nubile Sculpture”</a></li>
<li><a href="/vermin/etudes.html#weakness-infested">“Weakness, Infested”</a></li>
<li><a href="/vermin/etudes.html#enthralling-repetitions">“Enthralling Repetitions”</a></li>
</ol>
</div>]]></summary>
        <content type="html"><![CDATA[<!doctypehtml><meta charset=UTF-8><meta content=width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0 name=viewport><meta content=article property=og:type><link href=/style.css media=all rel=stylesheet><link title="Squiggles Atom Feed"href=/feed.xml rel=alternate type=application/atom+xml><link title="Squiggles JSON Feed"href=/feed.json rel=alternate type=application/feed+json><link href=at://did:plc:ivoe7cntxuy6at7uzmxzs2ft/site.standard.publication/3mfk6cpprzt2t rel=site.standard.publication><link href=at://did:plc:ivoe7cntxuy6at7uzmxzs2ft/site.standard.document/3mpgt63yjt72q rel=site.standard.document><link href=/vermin/vc.css media=all rel=stylesheet><title>Verminous Vignettes · Vermin Cathexis
    </title><meta content="Verminous Vignettes"property=og:title><meta content="A document in 9 sections: “A Sculptor Most Delicate”“Headstrong Hunter, Patient Weaver”“Between Contempt and Hysteria”“The River By Sunset”“Daily Communion Among Canyons”“Mischief Out of Sight”“Nubile Sculpture”“Weakness, Infested”“Enthralling Repetitions”"property=og:description><body class="url-/vermin/etudes.html slug-etudes"><header><h1 class=sitehead id=serpentine-squiggles><a href=/>Serpentine Squiggles</a></h1><div class="nav sitenav"><a class=no-notes href=/about.html>About</a><a class=no-notes href=/fiction/>Stories</a><a class=no-notes href=/artwork/>Artwork</a><a class=no-notes href=/games/>Games</a><a class=no-notes href=/music/>Music</a><a class=no-notes href=/essays/>Essays</a><a class=no-notes href=/posts>Posts</a><a class=no-notes href=/archive.html>Archive</a><a class=no-notes href=/contact.html>Contact</a><a class=no-notes data-n href=https://www.patreon.com/snugglesquiggle>Support</a></div></header><aside class=banner><p><strong>Vermin Cathexis</strong>: <span class=nav><span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/vermin/index.html>Index</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>In Vermin Cathexis</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/vermin/about.html>About</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>About Vermin Cathexis</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/vermin/glossary.html>Glossary</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>A Glossary for Vermin</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span></span></aside><main id=main><div class=pagehead><div class=stats><span class=date>2026-04-04</span><span title="10392 words"class=wc>10.4k words</span></div><div class=titleblock><h1 class=heading>Verminous Vignettes</h1><div class=subtitle>the deeds and sufferings of chrylurks, writ brief</div></div><details class="sq-details contents"open><summary><strong>Contents</strong></summary> <div class=expansion><div class=pagetoc><ol><li><a href=#a-sculptor-most-delicate>A Sculptor Most Delicate</a> <span class=wc>798</span><li><a href=#headstrong-hunter-patient-weaver>Headstrong Hunter, Patient Weaver</a> <span class=wc>636</span><li><a href=#between-contempt-and-hysteria>Between Contempt and Hysteria</a> <span class=wc>2063</span><li><a href=#the-river-by-sunset>The River By Sunset</a> <span class=wc>1624</span><li><a href=#daily-communion-among-canyons>Daily Communion Among Canyons</a> <span class=wc>1281</span><li><a href=#mischief-out-of-sight>Mischief Out of Sight</a> <span class=wc>1831</span><li><a href=#nubile-sculpture>Nubile Sculpture</a> <span class=wc>1064</span><li><a href=#weakness-infested>Weakness, Infested</a> <span class=wc>558</span><li><a href=#enthralling-repetitions>Enthralling Repetitions</a> <span class=wc>537</span></ol></div></div></details></div><aside class=before><details class=sq-details-mini open><summary>Notes</summary> <div class=expansion><div class=prenotes><ul><li><p>This page contains unpolished draft content that should not be judged as a final product. Feedback is both welcome and desired, <a href=/contact.html>contact us</a>.</ul></div></div></details></aside><a href=#main id=resetview></a><article><h2 class="heading initial"data-date=2026-03-02 id=a-sculptor-most-delicate><a href=#a-sculptor-most-delicate>A Sculptor Most Delicate</a><span class=minimeta><span class=date>2026-03-02</span><span class=wc>798 words</span></span> <a title="Next Heading"class=button href=#headstrong-hunter-patient-weaver>→</a></h2><div class=subpage><p>Shell‍-​sculptors had the sharpest claws of the chrylurk castes, and this one had a whetstone upon the table, honing the edge further, even as you walked in. You, a surrogate clad proudly in ceramic carapace, paused at the threshold to the chamber, tugging on your invisible bindings to the rest of the hive as if it would pull you from some terrible drop.<p>‍—Sit down, sister! (the shell‍-​sculptor sent, eager antennae already perking up at the promise of being helpful) This one has been told just what you need!<p>‍—Tuned (you acknowledged).<p>Your tugging on the lines ceased, unable to overcome the gravity of your appointment: six legs ferried you inward, and you lay your ceramic‍-​clad carapace upon the cool clay of the sculptor’s workbench.<p>All was lit apale in the sharp light emitted by the sculptor’s swarmling shimmerbugs, perched and reflecting beams with shiny inner elytra. All was lit, save for the shadows cast by the chrylurks themselves<p>Your forearms folded, hugging your thorax.<p>‍—Would you like a full exfoliation?<p>‍—That wasn’t the order given (you sent).<p>‍—You’ve worn this shell for a month, this one would love to provide you a fresh coat!<p>‍—It has served me well. That won’t be necessary.<p>‍—Tuned (this one hummed resonantly in acknowledgement. It would respect her needful sister’s wishes. Clearly a delicate claw was called for!) Then you’ll just be needing a replacement thoracic plate?<p>Head still, your antennae bobbed up and down, nodding affirmative.<p>‍—But this one needs to see your thorax for the work! Can you move your arms, please?<p>You weren’t <em>frozen</em>. Your arms did twitch, initiating slow, unsteady motions. But the sculptor was watching closely.<p>So this one rose, shifting weight from six legs to four. The sculptor caste had sharp claws, suited for that caste’s duty, but the pads of the second pair of limbs were soft. This one brought tarsi down high on your thorax. A gentle weight lending comfort.<p>‍—You just returned from a duty in the mortal city, yes? (the sculptor sent, admiration undisguised: hatched in the hive, this one knew the exscient primarily as what one must sculpt shells to hide and defend from.)<p>Antennae nodded again.<p>‍—And you visited this one first thing upon returning. You seek repair‍ ‍‍—‍ you flinch from damage caused. The cracks.<p>“I failed,” you said. Words issued from the mouth, a whisper.<p>‍—We are together bound (this one sent, confused and speculating. Had it been an attempted courtesy, to spare this one bearing the full tone of guilt that could not be muted through their harmonic connection? This one continued:) Loud, brutish breath befits the exscient! You are home now, sister.<p>‍—Enough. This is not necessary (you sent). I ask that you fulfill your duty.<p>‍—One molds what is soft, one mends what is cracked. This one serves <em>in tune!</em><p>‍—Together bound, and yet this one taunts me with semantics.<p>‍—Bound, yet you insist my sister has <em>failed</em>.<p>‍—I… (the transmission trailed off; further deflection was moot.)<p>You felt the buzz as the sculptor probed you deeper‍ ‍‍—‍ your spiderlice did not, would not, keep secrets from the hive, and they answered each subverbal question. You were known in depth, just as if you were one of the sculptor’s own shimmerbugs.<p>‍—Your womb is emptied, and your gullet drips with nectar fresh from the reaping! Was that not your duty?<p>Finally, after all this prodding‍ ‍‍—‍ after the sculptor might well have read the information off your lice‍-​woven record‍ ‍‍—‍ you spread your forearms wide.<p>Your thorax was cracked, a with dark splotch in the gleaming ceramic, shards missed and replaced with dark, coagulated hemolymph‍ ‍‍—‍ victim to a savage, sanguine caulking.<p>“I miscalcuated my thrall’s dose, and it had worn low by the time I returned. Without my venom to stabilize its mind, I was attacked,” you spoke calmly‍ ‍‍—‍ but that you spoke at all belied that you were too disturbed to commit it to honest record. “Such performance is an insult to our queen.”<p>‍—How many thralls have known your parascixion? (this one sent, knowing they both knew the answer. One waited, but eventually had to say it:) Just the one, yes?<p>‍—I submit, once more, a request that you <em>fulfill your duty</em>, sculptor.<p>One lifted slender arms and flexed a tarsus bearing scalpel‍-​sure anatomy. One’s ceramic gleamed in the shimmerlight of the workroom. Despite all the argument, one’s mandibles grinned eagerly at the prospect of playing with exoderm‍ ‍‍—‍ purpose, pure and simple.<p>‍—This one shall peel you bare and restore your beautiful barding, sister (this one sent, with one sly thought a twang in the harmony) But one must make a request of you in turn.<p>‍—Which is?<p>‍—When you report to Her, ask how She fared with her first thrall!</div><h2 class=heading data-date=2026-03-03 id=headstrong-hunter-patient-weaver><a title="Prior Heading"class=button href=#a-sculptor-most-delicate>←</a> <a href=#headstrong-hunter-patient-weaver>Headstrong Hunter, Patient Weaver</a><span class=minimeta><span class=date>2026-03-03</span><span class=wc>636 words</span></span> <a title="Next Heading"class=button href=#between-contempt-and-hysteria>→</a></h2><div class=subpage><p>Among branches overlooking a scarcely‍-​trod dirt road through the woods lay perched a pair of chrylurks, silent sentinels, listening intently to the clanking of vesselblades amarch‍ ‍‍—‍ the gilded knights’ armor reflecting the night. The hunter tensed: and she thought of her Fione and she readied her claws.<p>‍—Halt, sister (sent the weaver on the other branch.) Remain quiescent.<p>The hunter stared down the length of the dirt road‍ ‍‍—‍ a old cabin with but a single inhabitant lay at the other end. The hunder knew it well.<p>‍—I saw those swords (replied the hunter.) The exšh’t brutes will kill her. We have to‍—<p>‍—Observe and report (the weaver strummed gently, stiffly.) We observe and then we report what we observe. We didn’t expect compleat vessels so close to our hunting grounds. We <em>didn’t know</em>‍ ‍‍—‍ next time, we shall.<p>‍—Next time? <em>Next time?</em> What about now! What about my Fione?<p>It was rhetorical; the hunter was already dropping from the branch‍ ‍‍—‍ but to be a weaver was to master silk like innumerable complementary limbs. Well within her abilities to suspend the brashly falling chrylurk in woven ropes that might well have coalescenced from the air itself for the very suddenness.<p>‍—I would not cross my stinger with that vessel (sent the weaver,) and it is my role to equal the compleat. Where <em>I</em> would flee, you must follow.<p>‍—Your role is callous. Your webs are dead and calculated. You’ve forgotten what’s it’s like to infest and grow!<p>‍—All this passion is sung to me on the webs you call dead (the weaver noted.)<p>‍—I’m not done! (the hunter sent while still twisting in her bindings.) She told me she understood purpose of our hive‍ ‍‍—‍ she believed, she <em>loved</em>. She was almost parascixe!<p>‍—Exscient (the weaver sent, leaving it deliberately ambiguous whether that was meant as an solemn affirmation or scathing negation.) An excoriating agony shall gnaw within the flesh of every vessel for their crimes against us. Such was always their fate. Do you understand, hunter?<p>‍—She might as well have been parascix! <em>She was us.</em> I won’t abandon her. She is mine.<p>‍—And if you forget yourself upon the vessel’s transfigured blade?<p>‍—Then the hive would lose two, tonight (sent the hunter at length). But if I defy your fatalism, the hive <em>saves</em> two. The average is letting me go makes no difference.<p>‍—You called calculation my role. Do not arrogate it; it ill suits you. You would doom the hive itself with your reckless, and we would save far more than two swooning lovers with this caution. We observe, and we report. You are a chrylurk, sister, we are patient. Our way is to hide and rot unseen.<p>‍—But‍—<p>‍—And if she <em>understood</em> like you claim she does, then she knows she does not die should her queen live. Sacrifice would be her role, just as it is for us all.<p>‍—Damnable weaver. Always an answer for everything.<p>‍—One way, I suppose, to say that I know what you do not (sent the weaver, knowing the hunter’s acquiescence had been clear in the harmony between them. Even if the bug was too proud to spell it out.) And I’ll give you one more, because we are bound. You drank her dreams. Her flesh may be forgotten to us, but she has already found her way into you.<p>‍—I… I’ll miss her. But you must be right. I have a role. I can’t save her if it means forgetting what I’m saving her <em>for</em>.<p>‍—The words you’ll looking for are: “Thank you, O wise weaver.”<p>‍—Maybe if you let me go (the hunter sent, still suspended mid‍-​air in the weaver’s binding.) I am glad you spun sense into me.<p>‍—I’m glad, too. Otherwise I would have saved the vessels the trouble and killed you myself.</div><h2 class=heading data-date=2026-03-04 id=between-contempt-and-hysteria><a title="Prior Heading"class=button href=#headstrong-hunter-patient-weaver>←</a> <a href=#between-contempt-and-hysteria>Between Contempt and Hysteria</a><span class=minimeta><span class=date>2026-03-04</span><span class=wc>2063 words</span></span> <a title="Next Heading"class=button href=#the-river-by-sunset>→</a></h2><div class=subpage><p>‍—O Sister Contempt, fifth hunter! Where are you? (came a pulsed message, proxied by an operator, originally sent by Hysteria, first architect.)<p>Contempt tensed. A cool breeze tassled her silk‍-​hair as it dangled in the grasp of gravity. Her legs clung to the underside of a thick supports meeting in a cross. Were they roots? The blight’s mycelium? Whatever it was had been encased in exoderm.<p>Unsurprising the hive hadn’t cached her whereabouts‍ ‍‍—‍ not least for the fact she had picked this nook <em>because</em> it was one that few bugs frequented. “Hunter, fifth in caste” might be distinguished in an elder hive‍ ‍‍—‍ but fifth of <em>six</em> hunters meant only her kindred (asleep in the warren‍ ‍‍—‍ she missed them) ever really spun her any mind.<p>Particularly when first hunter Despair still boasted of the compleat knight zhe had made parascixe.<p>By contrast, Contempt’s recent hunt was a courier (lean, but such sweet blood)‍ ‍‍—‍ and she’d lost a raptorial forelimb for her trouble. A hunter missing a raptorial? No wonder no bug spun her any mind.<p>‍—<em>Line?</em> (sent Hysteria, not proxied this time, but no more scrutable; she had that characteristic opacity of the royal castes.)<p>‍—<em>Bound.</em> (answered Contempt’s lice reflexively. Then, in her own voice:) To what trespass does this one owe the touch of an architect’s silk and mind?<p>‍—May I make a physical inquiry? (sent Hysteria, still opaque to scrutiny, but revealing a glint of restraint. The hunter could refuse, and the architect would not insist.)<p>But restraint should have been obvious. Between them, a line was bound‍ ‍‍—‍ had Contempt lost accord and earned royal ire, then it’d simply be a matter of following the tug of serivane between them. No escape.<p>‍—I am hanging in the vomitorium of the upper gymnasium.<p>For now, the hunters all trained in the main stadium‍ ‍‍—‍ the masons had not yet reached an accord for how to lay out the new gymnasium. Contempt had no idea what there was to debate, mainly because she did not have interest in learning. Not her role.<p>‍—Hello again, Sister!<p>With a quiet yelp, Contempt flinched. She fell from her underperch on the cross‍-​brace, though she retained the grace to put three legs below her. Antennae flung wildly about as her apertures widened. Still she seemed alone.<p>‍—Ah, here I am (sent the architect, loud and proximity‍-​clear.)<p>The light of a shimmerbug spreading its wings flared to life‍ ‍‍—‍ that swarmling perched on veiled head of the architect. The shadows around her fell away like a pool of water draining.<p>The architect was a tall creature, looming with gentle bulk over the lithe hunter‍ ‍‍—‍ because for all her keen vision and intelligence, her kind was ultimately an exaltation of stone‍-​hefting masons.<p>The hunter brought two hands together and inclined her deference.<p>‍—How quiescent. You move like this is mortal territory, your honor (Contempt couldn’t help but comment.)<p>The hunter <em>knew</em> she had not failed to rake her gaze over that corner of the gymnasium behind her, so how had such an unmissably vast bug eluded her? Evanescence of the light itself!?<p>‍—A rather discordant habit, forgive me.<p>A habit!<p>Of the two of them, Contempt had spent far, far more time in mortal territory, hunting the exscient; her grace Hysteria was above such concerns. But of course, an inclination toward her stealth sprung from the same spring as the opacity of her line‍-​harmony.<p>No, she didn’t move like this was <em>mortal</em> territory; she had all the occult flair of a chrylurk that crossed with her own kind. There were other hives, other queens‍ ‍‍—‍ a task fit for a royal, to meet them with diplomacy and dagger.<p>‍—You are above forgiveness (said Contempt, after puzzling how she could respond in accord.) Your station in the hive is profounder than I grasp.<p>The architect flicked her proboscis upward, lifting her veil, and Contempt saw the shiny curve of her fangs grinning at her.<p>‍—Once more I elude you, O scixe girl (lilted Hysteria.) The <em>habit</em> is not my aloof nobility. Shall I be vulgar? I am fucking with you.<p><span class=thought><em>As would be your right.</em></span> It would be as reflexive as her licenest replying “<em>Bound!</em>”‍ ‍‍—‍ yet if the architect dispensed with formality, should she? Or was that too presumptive?<p>‍—Should I appreciate that? (Contempt said, by way of saying she did not.)<p>‍—Highly discordant! I daresay you are in error to humor me~ And isn’t that a delightful little trap?<p>‍—I suppose I’m thankful I have prey to toy with instead (Contempt ventured carefully‍ ‍‍—‍ she imagined architect saw little in the way of violence. Perhaps that left one’s nerves madly frayed.)<p>‍—You wound me! Good girl~<p>‍—What was your physical inquiry, your grace?<p>‍—Right! To tie this off, what I am getting at is that I simply love suprises. We grow dull when we let the harmony tell us everything in advance.<p>(Do architects not like calculated designs?) Contempt wondered to herself.<p>‍—But! I digress! You almost had me monologuing (sent Hysteria, and she bent her legs until she was eye level with the hunter, one limb snaking into her robes.) Tell me, you were the hunter who reeled in that runner, yes?<p>‍—Tuned (she said.)<p>‍—Slippery, wasn’t it? I heard you got <em>all</em> smashed up. Can I see your arm?<p>Contempt inhaled a deep breath, and then she slowly stepped forward. Her second, smaller pair of arms had been held in front of her, fidgeting and gesturing, while her larger raptorial arm had been folded up. Polite, that way.<p>Now, she rolled her shoulders and brandished her weapon, a limb sharp with spikes and a honed, cutting edge.<p>‍—There is an issue (Contempt started.) Rather pointedly, you <em>cannot</em> see it. The result of my hunt is that it is not there.<p>Her stump was no grave disfigurement‍ ‍‍—‍ her broken limb had been taken to a vat where nurses might coax the flesh back into order, at least once the hive had resources to spare. A hunter’s raptorial was not trivial to craft nor repair‍ ‍‍—‍ in the whole hive there were only six pairs of them, after all.<p>The architect had stepped forward too, hands of her second arms reaching out to touch and pull away the silk flap below her pauldron, exposing the stump. Fingers traced melanized scar‍-​chitin. There was a nakedness in the lack of exoderm coating it.<p>Contempt looked away.<p>‍—You’re wanting on a grafter to weave some metamorphosis down in the wetrooms, right? (Hysteria sent idly, while she read the answer from the hunter’s record.) You think of decorum and a bug’s place often, don’t you?<p>The hunter’s apertures snapped shut and open again, blinking at the nonsequitur.<p>‍—I seek to preserve the accord.<p>‍—I know that, I’ve talked to you longer than a second! You wriggle so carefully in your place. It’s cute and it’s dull. But whatever. (Hysteria blew a puff of air from her abdomen, and so petulent a gesture contrasted with the royal being a giant next to the hunter.) I would say our flesh has its place, also. Where do you think that place is?<p>‍—Our flesh?<p>‍—Biology, what else? The pulse in your veins. The prey you fuck. The arm you <em>lost</em> (the architect sent, tapping one talon with a click.)<p>Contempt began to fear Hysteria was growing <em>bored</em> of her. Before she could puzzle out what was best to say, the architect signaled her:<p>‍—Let me help you out, not so scixe. I am gyne, <em>royalty</em> among our kind, and you are a worker. That much you’re <em>very</em> aware of. Would you say flesh is royal?<p>What kind of question was that?<p>The hunter thought. Gynes were responsible for growing the hive‍ ‍‍—‍ they begot, and workers nourished what was begotten. All the separated her from the drones was her name; a gulf next to the higher caste. Queens, consorts, surrogates.<p>The nature of flesh was to grow, expand, beget. Was that the answer? That analogy?<p>But what about architects? What role did <em>she</em> have in the hive’s life cycle? Contempt did not know, just like she did not know what the builders argued about regard the gynmasium’s layout, and suddenly she was almost interested in knowing.<p>Why had an architect ever spun mind, touched her silk to a hunter‍ ‍‍—‍ <em>fifth of six!</em>‍ ‍‍—‍ like her? She squirmed in this alien attention.<p>Yes, Contempt was a hunter‍ ‍‍—‍ at once it was clear: she was <em>of</em> flesh. Architects, by contrast, concerned themselves with the arcane realm of designs.<p>Contempt didn’t know the answer, not really. But was <em>that</em> the answer? The hunter was a worker, and the architect was not. Contempt was of flesh, and beneath Hysteria.<p>‍—Our flesh serves us but does not define our kind (Contempt finally composed her answer, airily sent. Her eyes drifted to the veil over the architect’s face.) Recapitulation, harmony, it’s deeper than our pulse and our… fucking.<p>‍—How diplomatically put (sent Hysteria, drily.) You found the answer that would satisfy me, and I dare say that alone spoiled it.<p>‍—You believe this is empty flattery?<p>‍—I know it’s flattery! We are bound, and you are not half as aloof as I am. You want to mollify me, like some dog nipping at your heels for attention.<p>‍—I’d rather say I want to entertain you. It’s clear you flagged me down for your amusement, nothing else explains this encounter.<p>‍—Guilty as charged (Hysteria sent, unabashed.) Forgive me? But I suppose this is the heart of it, then. You picked an answer to entertain me‍ ‍‍—‍ do you stand by your choice? Will you take responsibility? Shall you be my entertainment?<p>‍—I would have thought you’d find me dull.<p>‍—What is a chrylurk, that we cannot change your forms?<p>And at that prompt, she thought. O Contempt, fifth hunter of six!<p>The gymnasium lay quiet, and dark but for the shine of the architect’s lone shimmerbug, but there was a phantom buzz of licenests fielding inquiries from the hive at large. A question on idle palps: What was the meaning of this sudden, mysterious meeting? None but her kindred ever spun Contempt any mind‍ ‍‍—‍ but Hysteria, first architect?<p>And that, at least, was answer, wasn’t it?<p>‍—No (sent Contempt.) I have a role. I am a hunter. You said yourself that I was in error to humor you. Leave me out of your royal games.<p>The architect grinned. Her fangs alone were nearly as wide as the hunter’s head.<p>‍—It’s delightfully parascixe, isn’t it? A simpering slave would say “Yes, of course I’ll serve you!” and I can imagine nothing that dries my loins faster. But your refusal piques me. And you <em>know</em> what you’re doing to me, don’t you?<p>‍—No, of course not.<p>‍—Mm, I want more than reflexive contrarianism out of you.<p>‍—I’m not sure what you want out of me, frankly (the hunter replied.) There are royals who could keep up. Have they all grown tired of you?<p>Puffs of air, several‍ ‍‍—‍ Hysteria laughed.<p>‍—So, have you not guessed what this is about yet?<p>At that nudge, the last lines of logic tightened‍ ‍‍—‍ something had to have spurred the architect to seek her out, and what of all things was unique about the fifth hunter? But it was the first thing Hysteria asked her.<p>Earlier, the royal had snaked a large arm into her woven robes‍ ‍‍—‍ at last, it emerged, and produced a work of such distinctly <em>architect</em> design.<p>‍—You gave a good attempt, but miscalculated your answer. Harmony? Recapitulation? Important, and perhaps a queen or weaver would argue most important. But if you seek to <em>flatter</em>, you must give face to what is beauty itself distilled into form: the work of exodermic sculpture!<p>The architect held out an acutely detailed carving: a raptorial arm rendered in the waxy clay of chrylurk secretion‍-​crafting.<p>But Hysteria loved her surprises. And with the bright twang of evanscence, an invisible web caught and puppeted the world by her will‍ ‍‍—‍ the highest chrylurk art.<p>The arm unfolded itself and exposed a metal blade.<p>‍—You lay idle here in your seclusion because the hive is starving and can’t spare the calories to grow you a new arm. Such is the poverty of the flesh! But I am architect, of vision, of genius! So answer me, O Sister Contempt, shall we have flesh bow to the higher caste?</div><h2 class=heading data-date=2026-03-05 id=the-river-by-sunset><a title="Prior Heading"class=button href=#between-contempt-and-hysteria>←</a> <a href=#the-river-by-sunset>The River By Sunset</a><span class=minimeta><span class=date>2026-03-05</span><span class=wc>1624 words</span></span> <a title="Next Heading"class=button href=#daily-communion-among-canyons>→</a></h2><div class=subpage><p>Sunset came, slow‍-​going, sky turning the color of fading embers. Shadows were stretched long, and the woman leaned under the leaf‍-​dappled shade of a tall maple. Her arms held a book, anonymous, held so that passersby could not descry its contents. Her gaze idly dipped into its pages, but just as quickly snapped back up, grazing the passing throngs of men and mice and marching djramul.<p>He came while her eyes read. “My lady! Hail, my apologies to keep you waiting.” A man dressed plainly with supplies strapped to his back. Dark hair, bright eyes, dirty hands.<p>“It’s no trouble,” she said. “I could leave at any time.”<p>“Kind of you not to, then. I appreciate that. Shall we be off?”<p>“Of course.” The woman pushed off the tree and brushed bark‍-​dirt from her skirt. The book remained in her hands, folded between arm and breast.<p>“You always stand out with that mask, you know.” His gaze had slipped from her brown eyes to the dark garment of cloth and hid that hide half her face. It curved over her nose and her chin, strapped somewhere behind her hair. Slits in the material ostensibly let in air, but he had expressed his doubts.<p>One would think it’d reduce her expression to unreadable blankness, but she had a way of crinkling and shifting‍ ‍‍—‍ he’d become fluent in the signals. She was frowning.<p>Even if it were blank, it was a small loss‍ ‍‍—‍ her eyes told stories.<p>He flinched and added, “I mean no offense. It’s just the first thing I see, always. Makes you easy to find, I suppose.”<p>“The city air doesn’t agree with me, I’ve told you this.”<p>“My apologies. It’s just,” he said then paused, “I wonder what you look like, I admit. What face lies underneath?”<p>“Perhaps it’s not for you to know,” she said. They stood talking on the grass, so she took initiative, starting them down the path.<p>He followed. More trees crowded around them, a canopy of leaves that let only strangler sunrays touch them.<p>“Fair day, isn’t it?” Then he added, “With fair company.”<p>The woman laughed. She had a sharp, clear voice, one that easily carried through her mask. “How did your day at the tannery treat you?”<p>“I’m sick of the salts and oils! I dare say the tannery air doesn’t agree with me,” he said. “I bet I stink! Lucky you’ve got that mask, I suppose. And <em>I’m</em> lucky I don’t‍ ‍‍—‍ you smell lovely today. Is that a new scent?”<p>Another laugh. “Something like that. I try new perfumes, here and there. I’m glad I could be reprieve from your work. Tiring, I take it?”<p>“I almost miss the days when master just had me carting around boxes like some steed.”<p>“I’ve read the new methods are far less, what’s the word, odiferous.”<p>“Maybe, I wouldn’t know. Before my time.”<p>“I would know less,” she said. By this point the treeline had halted with abrupt restraint, and even the grass grew fleeting. Dirt gave way to sandy and gravel.<p>Gradually, reply by reply, they’d both spoken louder. The river’s sullen roar rivaled their speech.<p>“Right, your clan does it the old way, I bet.”<p>She’d told him she grown up on a farm far from the city, a closed off cluster of families. Hence her shy, reserved character and air of mystery. She’d not disclosed why she’d left for the city.<p>“Perhaps I’ll show you, one day,” she said. “I do think we have a talent with using skin few can match.”<p>“Bet my master would take issue with that.” Now, he unslung the form he’d had strapped. A blanket for them to sit by the river and watch the sunset light it ablaze.<p>As the woman lay down, she opened her purse, too, and retrieved the wine bottle. Corked glass sloshing with a fine claret.<p>“It’s still a miracle to me that you’re able to get your hands on that. It tastes divine every time.”<p>“Not divine,” she said. “Not even vignette. I’m no miracle worker.” She’d brought more than a vine bottle‍ ‍‍—‍ fruits, crackers, and several small bottles bearing idiomatic labels. “Shall I mix your drink?”<p>“I’d appreciate it! I think I’ll try to find some flat rocks. My brother was telling me he skipped stones across a running river and I bet he was telling tales.”<p>Her mask didn’t hide her broadening smile. While he slinked off, she detached the mask. She opened her mouth, wide, even as her hands mixed wine with fruit juice and milk. She glanced behind her‍ ‍‍—‍ he was crouched and hunting among the river‍-​slick rocks. Their backs were to each other.<p>She opened wider, jaw unhinged. The roof of of her mouth split apart, compartments opening‍-​emerging, and two long syringes jutted out. Viscid, opalescent tears slid down their lengths and dripped into the cocktail she mixed. One, two, three. She held her breath and measured.<p>And then it was done. Her mouthparts squished back behind her façade and her mask clicked back into place. She sliced a fruit and placed it to float.<p>“Hey! Look at this thing.”<p>She glanced back at the back and saw his prize held him as much as he held it.<p>“Big red crab! You ever seen one this size?” The crustacean pinched his hand and squirmed madly. If its legs flared out all the way, it’d be wider than his chest.<p>Holding back a half, she said, “Throw it back unless you’re going to eat it. Don’t hurt yourself.”<p>“Oh, fine!” He grunted while he tried to get a grip on the thing, turning it upside down. Then, with a sudden florish, he flung it at a long angle to the rivers surface. She could tell his breath was bated.<p>It skipped once.<p>“Ha!”<p>“Enough. I’m finished with your drink.”<p>He finally arrived and squatted down, dirt all along his legs, but he took the glass from her eagerly. “You know, my mother loves to drink tea, but I never liked how bitter it was. But something about <em>this?</em> I don’t know how you do it.”<p>“Maybe I spit in it,” she said.<p>“Ha!” The laugh came while he was drinking, leading to the natural issue. “Let me drink some more before I answer.”<p>“So you’ll have an excuse to flirt?”<p>“Do I seem so crass?”<p>Instead of responding, she drank. Her method involved a straw slipping through a hole in her mask.<p>“I don’t like that you aren’t saying no.”<p>“Come, sit over here.” She patted the part of the blanket beside her. He moved, but she reached out, grabbing his hands to pull him into place snugly beside her. He leaned closer, and she did not let go of his hands.<p>She pointed. “And so golden hour ends.”<p>The sun cast its parting light down the murky blue waters of the river, fire shot through glass. The pair never tired of the glow in the waters. Brilliant, potent, ensnared. He took another sip of his drink.<p>She gazed down at him, leaning on her. His eyes drooped, and the fidgeting of his hands fell still.<p>She removed her mask, smiling again. He hadn’t closed his eyes all the way, but she looked and found them dull, dilated. She wasn’t worried about him seeing this‍ ‍‍—‍ he’d dreamed about her face often enough, she was sure.<p>Her hands reached for the cocktail, grabbing his glass before he spilled the last ounces. Nimble fingers felt along his face, parting his lips, and she poured the rest in. Done, she ghosted her hand lower and settled on his throat. She squeezed.<p>The book cradled between her arms unfolded in her lap, and her other hand let her pen glide. She wrote the day’s date, consulted her sunset tables for the hour, and she counted.<p>She felt his pulse, the rapid rhythm accelerando, and scratched down a figure. She thought about that comment about her scent, and added a note. Things were progressing, weren’t they?<p>This time, when her jaw unhinged and the compartments at the roof of her mouth unfolded‍-​escaped, segments surged forward. No syringe‍-​fangs, this time, but the flexible length of her proboscis.<p>Its wet pad fell upon him, and she felt his skin flush and flutter. An urge, momentary and foolish, to wrap this organ around his throat entire and <em>wring</em>. To seize him entirely. Viciously.<p>But he needed to live‍ ‍‍—‍ live without tell‍-​tale scars. So she pulled down his shirt, and lay her proboscis tip nearer his heart. The organ was lined with needles like a score of loyal mosquitoes, but she dipped only precious few into him.<p>Dose with her venom, he was dreaming, and pulsing with those dreams. She sucked, supping upon his desire and his mortality. She tasted herself in him, seeping insinuated.<p>Golden hour turned blue, a twilight gloom.<p>She penned more figures in her notebook. Volume drained, taste and composition. Today, she was halfway down the page, this man was a reliable donor. Generous, though not by virtue of his willing. Well‍-​behaved thrall, through and through.<p>Could he be more?<p>She would have to talk to her clan far from the city. Her sister was a vector, but she had particular inclinations. This mortal… no breasts, few curves. <em>hairy</em>. Sister could be so picky about her hosts.<p>But flesh was maleable, wasn’t it?<p>“Yes, I do think we have a talent with using skin few can match,” she murmured, and he might have shifted in dream. When he finally awoke, wretchedly hungover, she was gazing down at him, a smile in her eyes.<p>Not a pore was out of place on the skin she’d borrowed.</div><h2 class=heading data-date=2026-03-29 id=daily-communion-among-canyons><a title="Prior Heading"class=button href=#the-river-by-sunset>←</a> <a href=#daily-communion-among-canyons>Daily Communion Among Canyons</a><span class=minimeta><span class=date>2026-03-29</span><span class=wc>1281 words</span></span> <a title="Next Heading"class=button href=#mischief-out-of-sight>→</a></h2><div class=subpage><p>Weavers held the advantage in eusapient interactions.<p>Perched on high, Coven watched chrylurks crossing the canyon floor, or crawling along webbing and catwalks. Small from up here, but each passing worker would stand taller had she not claimed this high vantage. For workers of the named caste, weavers were rather diminuitive.<p>Compact and thin it may be, her exoderm boasted sculpted curves and gleaming ceramic, painted an violet hue unmistakable against the warm browns of the canyon walls.<p>Their hive was nestled secured in the depths of an deep, dry river‍-​scar that carved athwart the land, far away from the hateful eyes of mortals. Here Coven could brandish her true shell without a care. But she had mastered the changes; if the Queen willed a passage above, then Coven’s proud purples would be gone in the evanescence of a moment.<p>But <em>exoderm</em> was hardly Coven’s pride. The smooth shell of her faceplate quickly grew pockmarked: her licenest began low on her brow, just above her dimly‍-​glowing ocelli: a hexgrid of holes that engulfed all the rest of her long, ovoid head. Threads of silk spilled out from every hole, each the burrow of a spiderlouse, diligently spinning and controlling its bundle of silk.<p>Perched on high, Coven raised her head, rayed by a thousand pale threads. It spread and bloomed, like a maiden’s bountiful tresses submerged in water, but this was open air. Still air‍ ‍‍—‍ the canyons lay calm‍ ‍‍—‍ but the threads moved, swaying in unseen winds, vibrating line harps plucked by unseen hands.<p>Laylurks were too quick to speak of weaver’s grand licework as a “tapestry”, but tapestries were fragile and finished. No, Coven would sooner describe herself as the very loom.<p>Threads stiffened as they found connection‍ ‍‍—‍ to other chrylurks and to the cobwebs that lined the canyon’s walls, infrastructure of the hive. The weaver hummed a sonorous note as her attunement was complete.<p><span class=thought><em>O Mother who weaves in nexus!</em></span> she thought, half in prayer. <span class=thought><em>Haunting be thy web! That we may suture flesh and mind but as fabric for thee! Until thy silk be as dust and breath, and suffuse every passage and recess! O Mother, weave a cocoon of the world!</em></span><p>‍—And there she is (sent a passing bug, with swagger alone to identify her as a hunter. She threw a glance upward as she walked along the wall.) Little priestess woke up! Get ready for another sermon.<p>‍—Every morning! (sent a mason, closer in elevation but busy tighting the ropes on a catwalk. Her antenannae crossed.) She comes abound, all but shouting like a kid getting their first present in spring.<p>‍—You’d think she’d be used to this by now.<p>‍—Sisters! (Coven finally replied.) Are you not amazed at this gift our queen has given us? How can I not rejoice in the embrace of our nexus! Today is a resplendent day, and I am thankful for it.<p>‍—You say that every day!<p>‍—I am thankful too (the other chrylurk chimed in). If our queen ever actually wants our worship, we can be sure Coven will give it all singlehandedly.<p>Coven’s spiderlice were busy. They worked beneath her direct perception, but she was acquainted with the lore. Most of her lice were tasked with spinning, weaving, and maintaining bundles of silk‍ ‍‍—‍ forming the hair that fell all the way down past her pinch‍-​waist chrysoma, at least when the mass wasn’t levitating in the throes of nexal communion.<p>Now, this common silk wasn’t <em>unusable</em> for hive‍-​binding‍ ‍‍—‍ but doing it right required a special grade of serivane, crafted by those pampered lice centermost her scalp. This serivane could ghost through walls, but in the canyon, with no obstacles between her and the others, it did not need to‍ ‍‍—‍ but it could also ghost through <em>itself</em>.<p>The hunter who even now was walking down the length of canyon, did not need to mind the silk that ran through the space between them, even as she turned, even as she crossed underneath the mason working on repairing the catwalk.<p><span class=thought><em>Haunting be thy web! As the dust and the breath!</em></span><p>The vaneline itself vibrated finely. Finer than mortal ears could perceive‍ ‍‍—‍ she knew a tuning fork produced its tone by quivering hundreds times in the span of one heartbeat. Serivane quivered a hundred thousand times.<p>Modulation endowed that hyperpitched tone with meaning. In the time it took one’s bodily voice to speak a single word, the hive‍-​bound may exchange a whole sentence. <em>If</em> one were to speak with austere terseness, that is.<p>But any eusapient knew it was manners to bare one’s soul over the wire. And thus was Coven’s voice chorded with her irritation and her steadfast pride in her devotion. She’d had this conversation before, and so the binding buzzed with echo‍-​reprise of past rejoiners, like a shared memory beneath verbal transcription. It lended the conversation a feel almost akin to a recurring joke.<p>Coven held her apertures closed and ocelli dim, and wore a weaver’s veil‍ ‍‍—‍ all the better to focus her attention on the nexus. And yet, without seeing, she felt the twitching antennae and spin‍-​blinking eyelids of the other chrylurks. If hive‍-​binding were a language, it was one with words and grammar for for all the overt and subtle configurations of the face.<p>The vibrating silk joined to a setae‍-​hair joined to a nerve joined to her mind itself. Like that was her empathy limned vivid. The straining arms of the mason tightening the catwalk was her own strength tested. And the drunken sway of the passerby, stricken with a princess’s venom (<em>oh!</em> no wonder they grasped the wall for balance!) was her own swooning swagger.<p>And the laughter shared between her was‍ ‍‍—‍ grudgingly‍ ‍‍—‍ hers too.<p><span class=thought><em>O Mother who weaves in nexus! Bind us as one! Bind us obedient, bind us beautiful! Let us subjugate our thralls as thou hast subjugated us! For all thy brood thou art; for all thy brood this one shall be! As one we praise you, as one we weave you!</em></span><p>‍—I forgive you all (Coven sent, head bowing with antennae outspread). I understand.<p>How could she not? Weavers held the advantage in eusapient interactions. Her licenest was voluminous and sensitive. She could bind herself to a dozen chrylurks at once, attend a symphony of silk‍ ‍‍—‍ but castes were molded to their purpose. To her her sisters, the hive‍-​binding is a convenience, a sense akin to scent or touch: crucial, but far from all‍-​eclipsing.<p>The glory was hers to witness, and theirs but to serve.<p>But these words so sent did <em>not</em> have an ameliorative effect. The binding relayed a groan from the mason’s spiracles, and an outright snarl from the venom‍-​high hunter.<p>‍—Don’t need your forgiveness, weaver (sent with high amplitute, as of a sharp pluck: spiderlice had claws).<p>‍—Yes, keep it (the worker said, moving from one end of the catwalk to the other, shooting the weaver a sidelong glance in between.) I think forgiveness belongs in your possession more than ours.<p>With her attunement to the two chrylurks, she could watch, beat by beat, each’s reaction to her words. The irritation, the way they recoiled from her outpouring of love as if from an oversaccharine meal.<p>The hunter was weary‍ ‍‍—‍ for she’d already said her prayers to the queen in her afternoon in the princess’s company. The mason queried her lice for context, and felt her thoughts about the <em>unfortunate limitations of lower castes</em>, and knew this forgiveness was indulgent condescension.<p>Coven laughed to watch the slight play across the minds of her sisters.<p>Yes, she did this every day‍ ‍‍—‍ and it still brought her joy.</div><h2 class=heading data-date=2026-04-01 id=mischief-out-of-sight><a title="Prior Heading"class=button href=#daily-communion-among-canyons>←</a> <a href=#mischief-out-of-sight>Mischief Out of Sight</a><span class=minimeta><span class=date>2026-04-01</span><span class=wc>1831 words</span></span> <a title="Next Heading"class=button href=#nubile-sculpture>→</a></h2><div class=subpage><p>So many vines over the city‍ ‍‍—‍ almost blocked out the sky. <em>What’s the weather like? Leaves, might pollen later.</em><p>Horny fucking plants.<p>I threw a kick. The sapling bent under the force. Ugh. One hand grabbed ahold of it, and my leg threw another kick. I felt something beneath the dirt tearing. Good. The crack in the air, the dirt expanding underfoot.<p>Another hand grabbed it. I ripped, wrenching the plant from under the ground. Dirty sprayed up, landing on the pants I wear. I didn’t close my eyes even in the onslaught of the sediment cloud. Keep tearing. That was a long ass root‍ ‍‍—‍ how deep did it go?<p>Pulled it high enough now I couldn’t keep pulling it up, needed to shift to a sideways tug. Whatever. I dropped the wood, leaving it to slump defeated on the ground. Good enough.<p>I glanced down at my hands. The meat had little red spots now. Like blood. Gripped the tree to hard, yanked to roughly.<p>Hands clapped together. How did mother’s refrain go? <em>Remember the teardrop falling. The forms change‍ ‍‍—‍ the venom, the blood, the honey‍ ‍‍—‍ all to reach your heart. A final distillation: the change.</em><p>It nipped at <em>me</em>, beneath all this skin, pulse‍-​instant and quickly riding down ephemeral lines. From my deepest heart, up the chest, down the arm‍—<p>And flesh is will and will is I. It resumed its proper place just as I would move some appendage. Pinched all back together.<p>I wiped away the blood and the palm meat was whole where just before it’d been torn open.<p>“Hullo there!”<p>I jerked my head. There was a woman striding into the clearing, a girl following right at her heel. She was dressed‍ ‍‍—‍ <em>dressed</em>‍ ‍‍—‍ all reds and blacks and flowing cloth. Ribbows, bows, I didn’t make sense of it past how it registered as altogether too fancy.<p>“Good day to you… sir? ma’am? Something else?”<p>“What else is there?” I grumbled, looking back at my torn‍-​up tree as if it were more interesting.<p>“I just wasn’t sure, is all.”<p>“None of your business.” I glanced back over with a glare.<p>“Something else it is then!” All throughout, the woman had paced closer, that girl in lockstep. The closer they got, I saw a… rope? A chain? It ran between them; a gloved hand gripped its handle, and the other end led to a collar around the girl’s neck.<p>“What do you want?” I thought grumbling and glaring made it clear enough, but she didn’t even pause.<p>She <em>smiled</em> at me. “We were out for a walk and heard someone working out here, and it piqued out curiosity. Lucin, did you want to say hi?”<p>“Um.” The girl had a small voice. “You did the tree‍ ‍‍—‍ well? It seemed hard. You must be strong.”<p>I rolled my eyes and looked away. Not enough to miss motion in the corner of my eye. Tugging on the leash‍ ‍‍—‍ the two of the drew closer‍ ‍‍—‍ and I didn’t glance back when I saw the woman reaching out, placing a hand on the girls’ head, stroking her hair.<p>After a murmured word, the woman took a step forward, and the girl did not follow. Said something else‍ ‍‍—‍ I heard ‘okay’‍ ‍‍—‍ and the the leash was placed in the girl’s hands, and the woman strode more intently toward me.<p>“I don’t know what you think you’re‍—”<p>She grabbed my hand as she leaned closer, but said nothing. Instead, a spiderlouse crawled onto my hand.<p>‍—Hello sister. Line? (Your query vibrated down the silk sown into this flesh.)<p>‍—Bound. (Lice stirred out of stasis deep in my submerged core.)<p>I said nothing else to you besides the formality. Part of me thought: <em>fuck.</em> Which is not the best reaction to the privilege of reconnecting to the hive mid‍-​infiltration. But maybe I already knew where this was heading.<p>‍—You <em>need</em> to be more careful. Look up.<p>‍—I know.<p>‍—I said <em>look up</em>. Don’t ‘I know’ me.<p>You grab my hair and pull, pointing my head skyward. A trellis‍-​dome encasing the city, and vine‍-​leaves obscure the clouds. I see it every day. Have you made your point yet?<p>‍—This is a <em>divine</em> city. You need to be more careful! Don’t just recklessly <strong>change</strong>, without even a roof over your head!<p>‍—It was a small <strong>change</strong>. Not any more reckless then hive‍-​binding me out in the open like this.<p>You pulled away, and I see that skin‍-​mask of yours squinting, before it suddenly scowled. You tightened your hold on me.<p>‍—So you do it so often I need to narrow it down! Girl, I didn’t know you’d done it <em>right before I showed up!</em> (You sighed, digging those feeble not‍-​claws into my meat.) Sir or ma’am, sister. You’re supposed to <em>care</em> about the answer, not brush it aside like it means nothing. You’ve been <strong>changing</strong> from one to the other, recklessly‍ ‍‍—‍ <em>that</em> is what I wanted to talk to you about.<p>‍—Some mortals treat me better as one or the other, but the difference is so small it wouldn’t even register unless an alchemist was breathing down my neck. Doesn’t matter.<p>‍—Did you sleep through your brief? <em>This is not how we operate!</em><p>‍—Mortals don’t notice. Works fine.<p>‍—<em>Divine city</em>, sister! It’s not the mortals I’m worried about.<p>‍—I’m just a bug, actual divinity isn’t going to notice me.<p>Another sigh.<p>‍—Come to my house tonight. We’ll dream about this together. I need you to understand this.<p>‍—Ugh. Okay, sister.<p>‍—Bound. Now, I didn’t just come here to nag you. Wanted to give you a pleasant surprise too, but you went and made an awful first impression! Be nicer to my pet, please? She’s a tasty one.<p>You didn’t let go of my hand as you dragged me along, across the clearing to where that little slip of a girl waited. She’d stared longingly at us, but averted her as as our attention turns to her.<p>“Dear! This is an old friend of mine, she’s from the same <em>background</em> as I am.” You took the leash back, and you ran another petting hand over her brown hair, leaning down to plant a kiss against her forehead.<p>The girl stood straighter, staring wide‍-​eyed at me.<p>You took a step away from me, behind her, settling into a wide and engulfing stance (her legs stood so close together) as you threw an arm around her shoulders.<p>“Isn’t she just the cutest?” A hand softly ran down her cheek, diverting to underscore her lips. “Gives good kisses. And look‍ ‍‍—‍ she lets me nick her all over.”<p>Her hand darted near the ear, pulling away hair to expose skin above the jugular, riddled with puncture wounds. Marked, yet easily hidden.<p>“My lady, I‍—”<p>“Must I stop already?” you said softly. “I wasn’t finished.”<p>“Oh… alright. Just. Eep.” She glanced down, shifting nervously from foot to foot.<p>“I told you how we’d seen you before, yes? She thought you looked just striking. Especially when you let your hair down‍ ‍‍—‍ remarkable how <em>quickly</em> you can change your style! But I digress. Do you want to know what <em>else</em> she said?”<p>Her gaze jerked back up at you. “My lady!”<p>But your eyes were narrowed‍ ‍‍—‍ you grinned wolfish at me. “How well do you kiss?”<p>“What?”<p>“It’s a simple question. Do you have any experience in the matter, darling?”<p>“I can’t say I’ve had any use for it.”<p>“Um.”<p>“Is that so? Then perhaps you’d like some practice?”<p>“My lady. P‍-​please.”<p>Something in her tone finally broke your stare. You glanced down at her, features at once morphing less pointed. “What is, pet? You don’t want to kiss my friend here?”<p>She paused, then shook her head.<p>You laughed once, sharply, and glanced back at me‍ ‍‍—‍ somehow even more smug. “You <em>really</em> made a bad impression.”<p>I frown.<p>You hand was drifting down, and her arm shivered where your gloves danced along the exposed flesh. “How about this? I’d hate to offer my friend nothing for their trouble. Would you mind giving them your finger?”<p>“I… think that would be o‍-​okay.”<p>“Excellent. Here, a tease for you.” Your hands were larger, gripping the limp‍-​splayed digits like a prey held in jaws. Adjusting, you extended the pale tip of the middle finger.<p>“Do you really expect me too…” Then I stopped. Fuck it, blood was blood. I opened my mouth and accepted the digit.<p>Rough tongue laved it clean and raw and wet, and then I press it against a sharp canine.<p>She gasped. A stroke of her hair, a kiss of her cheek. “Good, you’re doing quite well,” you murmur.<p>Blood welled in my mouth. I tasted it‍ ‍‍—‍ warmth and salt and metallic tang. Smooth in a way only a thrall with a well‍-​managed diet ever was, and was that surging undercurrent… I glanced at her darting eyes, saw how they were dilated ever so slightly. It <em>was</em>. Oh, you prepered her so well.<p>As I stared at your thrall, I could see you taunting me‍ ‍‍—‍ your tongue along her cheek, your sharpened canine coming to rest right above her thick vein. Showing off how you are allowed where I was forbidden.<p>“Enjoy her,” you told me. “But take it from me. It’s much stronger near the heart.” You tapped her chest and she gasped again.<p>Growling, my incisors gritted slightly‍ ‍‍—‍ but intently‍ ‍‍—‍ against the joint of the digit, and I sucked. The taste of blood itself was one thing‍—<p>But I tasted <em>you</em>. The sour notes of nectar, the ovirexia you’d oozed into her.<p>There was a pulse in the tip of the finger, throbbing as blood was pushed through so narrow an exit. And as I drained her, your pet quickened her heart beat.<p>“Oh!”<p>“Moaning already, dearest?” Your finger circles her lips.<p>I closed my eyes to your pointless indulgence and focused on sating my needs. Blood streamed into my mouth, drop by drop, but it was so little. I brought a canine to to the wound. Widen it, tear her open‍—<p>“That’s enough of that.” Still holding your pet’s trembling hand, you tugged on it, felt my jaw resist you, and then a glove struck into my mouth and my prey slipped free.<p>“<em>I wasn’t done</em>,” I barked, half‍-​unintelligible. I repeated myself when you pulled your glove out.<p>“Oh, poor thing. There’s always next time. If she lets you, that’ll be up to her.” You smile, teeth bared. “Now! It was nice seeing you, but we’ll have to be on our way. See you tonight. Till then, I don’t mind if you dream of her delicious little neck. Maybe that’ll spur some good behavior out of you!”<p>As you left, I could only glare, though your pet gave a little wave as you tug her leash, blood dripping down her finger.<p>I glanced away. Turn around, and look around for another tree to tear up.</div><h2 class=heading data-date=2026-04-02 id=nubile-sculpture><a title="Prior Heading"class=button href=#mischief-out-of-sight>←</a> <a href=#nubile-sculpture>Nubile Sculpture</a><span class=minimeta><span class=date>2026-04-02</span><span class=wc>1064 words</span></span> <a title="Next Heading"class=button href=#weakness-infested>→</a></h2><div class=subpage><p>By light of an oil latern, I divided the mass of lime in half‍ ‍‍—‍ into quarters‍ ‍‍—‍ into half of quarters.<p>An idle hand felt along the segments below my chest. Scales of wax seeped out between them, deforming softly under my touch. I scooped it up and brought it to the the table. A spoon measured out a quantity, and I mixed it with the first pile of lime. Another hand‍-​scoop, two spoonfuls into the next.<p>My hand twetched. Instinct‍-​craving tugged on my will. Slather my shell in this wax, find a nice pile of sand to roll around in! But I wouldn’t let myself be bathed in <em>dirt</em>.<p>Another scoop, three spoonfuls‍ ‍‍—‍ then above me the basement’s hatch‍-​opening creaked open.<p>‍—I’m back~<p>The spoon clattered to the table. Short drop, all considered, but my wax had spilled onto the cloth.<p>‍—You couldn’t have let me know sooner?<p>A connection was strung between us. I didn’t understand it‍ ‍‍—‍ we had held each other in bed one night, then awoke to the silk on our scalp stuck together and a buzzing in both our skulls. Even when we cut the silk, the buzzing was still in my head, and I <em>knew</em> it was still in yours. It was ours.<p>In other words: our minds were joined. You had the whole way back to give me an update, and yet you stayed quiet.<p>‍—It’s cute the way you jump! (You descended the staircase half at a time, two feet on a step before you took the next.)<p>‍—I was working. You made me spill that work.<p>‍—Your own fault! <em>You</em> could have checked in on me. (No need to turn my head to know you were sticking out a tongue at me. Or was it a tongue, still?) I <em>wanted</em> to hear from you, y’know…<p>I sighed. Sacs all down my body inflated and deflated‍ ‍‍—‍ still wasn’t used to that. I heard chitious feet reach the basement stone.<p>‍—I’m sorry.<p>I didn’t feel it, not fully‍ ‍‍—‍ but somehow just sending the words made you perk up.<p>‍—Forgiven! We’ll work on it together, right?<p>‍—Right (I send.) But this is important. You’re feeling this itch, same as me.<p>‍—It feels like I’m naked all the time! Even with clothes on…<p>I turn my attention back to the crafting materials before me, glancing at the page listing the recipe for clay. There had to be a way to craft a better shell for us.<p>‍—I’d find it.<p>You were behind me‍ ‍‍—‍ this close, the buzzing of the connection between us, your excitement, was unignorable. You lunge forward and throw hands around me in a hug.<p>‍—Such a hard worker~ (you send, antennae entwining with mine.) How was the hive while I was gone?<p>‍—What hive? There’s three of us.<p>‍—You know what I meannn. Don’t you want to dream big?<p>‍—I want to dream possible (I replied, then answered your original question.) Anyway, she’s asleep. Or ignoring you.<p>‍—Then she’s asleep! Mommy would never ignore me.<p>‍—She will if you keep calling her <em>that</em>.<p>‍—Am I the only one excited about what we are now?<p>‍—You say excited, I say foolish. This is the third night you’ve gone out. You’re going to get caught at this rate.<p>‍—I’m sneaky!<p>‍—You have to get lucky every time. And you <em>won’t</em>.<p>‍—So mean! I guess you’re not hungry, then.<p>‍—I didn’t say that.<p>‍—Hmph!<p>I unfurled my proboscis, freeing my mandibles to spread. Gaze turning to where you were leaning over me, my salivating mouth was upturned.<p>‍—Please? (I sent.) It was the reason you went out, in fact.<p>‍—I don’t think you deserve it now!<p>I tilted my head down, apertures spiralling open to gaze wide at you.<p>‍—I’m sorry for doubting your prowess. Your fangs are the sharpest and your tread is the sneakiest of us all (I lied.)<p>Your antennae happily bounced up and down.<p>‍—Glad to see you remember who’s the best around here~<p>Then, suddenly, your proboscis wrapped around my own, shifting it out the way. Your mandibles, narrow and closed, thrusted into the space between my own and spread me further open. Then your tongue distended. It slithered into my mouth and rubbed against my own, provoking me even as you pulled back.<p>My tongue followed you out‍ ‍‍—‍ as planned. You twisted your head, and both our lengths flatten, a seal between us, forming two halves of tube.<p>And then your throat is convulsing, choking wetness retching upward. I scooted my seat farther from the table, giving you space to push forward and loom higher above me.<p>Regurgitated blood filled your mouth and drippped down our married tongues. I sucked it down, eager to be fed. First I tasted your saliva, bitter with a hint of venom, then finally the warm salt and sour nectar of a blood meal.<p>Then you pressed your tongue so as to pinch the tube shut, nothing but the barest trickle passing through.<p>‍—Do you like the taste? (you ask.) Did I hunt well?<p>‍—Yes, more please!<p>‍—Mm. Don’t just tell me. I want to <em>hear</em> it.<p>We paused there‍ ‍‍—‍ I paused there‍ ‍‍—‍ for a moment, mortified by what you’re asking.<p>‍—C’mon (you urge.) Don’t you <em>need</em> it?<p>I hummed a two‍-​note affirmative.<p>‍—There you go. More like that. Don’t hide it.<p>Slowly, partially, you let the trickle of blood increase. The iron taste seeped into my mouth. Oh, finally!<p><em>Ah</em>. Air escaped The spiracles lining my chrysoma, core shuddering as the promise nectar quickened its pulse.<p>‍—That’s a good worker. Drink up all the yummy blood I brought for you!<p>A whine of annoyance or grunt of need or moan of delight. It was all too fuzzy to me. You provoked me, and I made noises. Hands tugged on my hair, caressing my naked chitin.<p>‍—<em>Mm! Thank you!</em><p>When you pulled away, the air was lined with so much wet and sticky strings, the red‍-​colored excess and spillage from my feeding. My tongue wiggled, outstretched alone in the air; yours was still retreating.<p>‍—The rest is for mommy, sorry~ But we’ll kiss some more until she wakes up.<p>‍—I… thank you, but I have work I need to resume.<p>‍—Mm, but I didn’t ask~ You can’t hide what you really want from me. Now, let’s find out how deep my trunk can go…</div><h2 class=heading data-date=2026-04-03 id=weakness-infested><a title="Prior Heading"class=button href=#nubile-sculpture>←</a> <a href=#weakness-infested>Weakness, Infested</a><span class=minimeta><span class=date>2026-04-03</span><span class=wc>558 words</span></span> <a title="Next Heading"class=button href=#enthralling-repetitions>→</a></h2><div class=subpage><p>I had lost feeling in three fingers on my left hand. Fuzzy‍-​numb, like a ill‍-​fitting mask over the undercurrent of utter throbbing pain. I dare to slip off the glove, just for a glance: farther along than it was yesterday.<p>Purulent and riddled with little burrow‍-​holes. What looks like flecks of rice cling to the skin all over. Maggots, and they don’t even scurry out of sight when brought into light.<p>I bring a trembling finger to stroke the outer edge of my palm. A wound runs half down, chewed lengthwise and glued shut with congealed blood and discharge. A finger‍-​nail digs into the flap of skin, and beneath the numb fuzziness, I barely feel the tearing‍-​peeling… though cool air almost brings relief.<p>Light brings motion, again. Not a grain of rice, this time‍ ‍‍—‍ more like a noodle puffing up after too long in the pot.<p>“Leave it be, girl.” I look up to see a woman frowning at me. A veil covers her face, eyes occluded, so it’s impossible to tell if her gaze is human. “Keep up like this and you’ll be hopeless when you give over the rest of your flesh.”<p>My pus‍-​slick fingers flinch away from my infested hand, falling now on the cuff at my wrist. There were no maggots past that point‍ ‍‍—‍ yet.<p>“Can I get another injection? I can feel it… it stings.” Voice demure, trembling. But I should be screaming at her, at what she’s doing to me.<p>The rage felt fuzzy and numb.<p>“Mmm.” I can’t see her expression behind the veil, either. “No. Endure it. Your medicine isn’t a treat for you to indulge in whenever. Remember, pain is your growth. Don’t deny yourself‍ ‍‍—‍ embrace it, darling.” Fingers holding my chin, pinching my chin, pulling my gaze upward. To the veil that scrutinized me and offers nothing back.<p><span class=thought><em>Why numb me at all, then?</em></span> I didn’t say it.<p>“I’m trying,” I said. That concession should mollify. It could get me somewhere.<p>“<em>You aren’t enough.</em> I can see the weakness on your face. How do you think you’ll fare when they have your arm?”<p>A shiver down the whole limb. The other hand grabs it to hold it steady, to reveal no further weakness. It wasn’t pain, not really‍ ‍‍—‍ that was still fuzzy numb. But I felt all of those <em>noodles</em> making a meal of blood and ligaments.<p>I could play piano, once.<p>“<em>Please</em>,” I say.<p>Something shifted under her robes, even though both her arms were crossed. “I don’t think you appreciate just how merciful we have been, letting this procede so slowly for you. Has anyone shown you a proper <em>eggsack?</em>” That last word was hissed.<p>I freeze. It sounds far more dramatic than rice and pasta, to put it lightly. To put it darkly‍ ‍‍—‍ I startle awake every night from those dreams. The thought alone rots my idle hours… segments and webs that <em>burst</em>, like great dam eroding‍-​exploding. “That‍ ‍‍—‍ won’t be necessary.”<p>“We’ll see,” she said. “Pull down your glove again and I assure you it <em>will be</em>. But shall we extend more mercy? Perhaps if you refrain I’ll consider administering another dose.”<p>I opened my mouth. It took me a moment to find the words. “Thank you.”<p>The woman turned away, but I felt her softly spit. <em>“Weakness.”</em></div><h2 class="heading final"data-date=2026-04-04 id=enthralling-repetitions><a title="Prior Heading"class=button href=#weakness-infested>←</a> <a href=#enthralling-repetitions>Enthralling Repetitions</a><span class=minimeta><span class=date>2026-04-04</span><span class=wc>537 words</span></span></h2><div class=subpage><p>Frailty stood on five legs down by a brood‍-​thrall’s cocoon. Her secondary hands combed claws over waxed silk, while her primaries alternately tightened and insinuated themselves inside the constraints. Throughout it all, she emitted this high‍-​pitched chirping, like the vibrations of serivane transcribed to air.<p>She felt how the squirming of the brood shifted in response to her calls, and ever slowly, ever gently, ever patiently, she modulated her chittering.<p>‍—They’re learning nicely (she sent idly over her hive‍-​binding.)<p>No address on the message, but since I stood at the entrace‍-​way to the chamber, I heard her. Her current thrall had long since foregone any hope of abscixion or fighting off ovirexia, and consequently the larvae luxuriated in their now‍-​free run of the flesh.<p>If only the silk weren’t here, then you could see how little meat was left, bare scraps not turned to a nesting for this budding colony.<p>Beautiful how the young to could pull themselves together, such tiny worms reducing even the resolutely exscient to quivering puddle.<p>And then she chittered softly again, almost cooing in that frequency modulated whirr.<p>‍—Doesn’t that get old? (I sent.)<p>‍—Hm?<p>‍—This rote manner of communication, to entiotes not yet parascix, incapable of holding a conversation. It seems lice‍-​numbing.<p>Frailty withdrew one of her hands. Between her fingers, she held a long and protuberate form, tiny legs curling in the air and mouth of primitive mouthparts clicking. A sheen of blood and bile glimmered in the mingled light of the two chrylurk’s shimmerbugs.<p>‍—Isn’t it adorable? (She strokes the larva’s body, then chitters sharply: in response it wiggles.) You’re telling me you’d get tired of this?<p>‍—It’s nice to watch them grow (I say.) I only meant the calling. How many times have you repeated that <em>Liiine? Bound. Slackkk?</em> All so extruciatingly slowly.<p>‍—You know there’s no counting it, dear. (She sent, slipping the larva back into the cocoon when it started to whine.)<p>‍—Exactly (I said.) My condolences, I guess. I know it has to be done.<p>Frailty fixed me with gaze of narrowed apertures and crossed antennae.<p>‍—Does it ever get old? Draping yourself in imitation‍-​flesh and repeating all the excruciating rituals that passes for manners among mortals? How many times have you answered the same questions, told the same lies, circling on the same worries? (The nurse turned away, bending down to give the brood‍-​thrall a kiss of tongue and teeth.) My condolences. <em>I guess.</em> I know it has to be done.<p>‍—Cute, but that isn’t the same. It’s a new puzzle every day, hardly a repetition.<p>‍—Do you think every thrall is the same?<p>‍—We have silk and venom to make them well‍-​behaved. Outside the hive? The will’s work demands more cunning. Every word could be your undoing.<p>‍—And is that not the most <em>exhausting</em> prospect? Give me my exy thralls any day.<p>My scalp buzzed as I thought of a response.<p>Frailty secured a blinding veil over the face of the thrall, then rose to her full height. She send another message before I articulated mine.<p>‍—Now, what was it you <em>actually</em> wanted, Opacity? Surely not just an argument.<p>…My scape was buzzing again.</div></article></main><footer><a href=#>Top</a> · <a href=/>Home</a> · <a href=/archive.html>Archive</a></footer>]]></content>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title type="html"><![CDATA[Eusapience (n.)]]></title>
        <id>https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.org/posts/eusapience.html</id>
        <link href="https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.org/posts/eusapience.html"/>
        <link rel="enclosure" href="https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.orgundefined" type="image//"/>
        <updated>2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
        <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Eusapience is what comes next, a state of cognition beyond human consciousness.</p>
<p>This comes in up the <a href="/vermin/winter-thrall.html">newest Vermin Cathexis short</a>, but in summary: eusapience is the trait that distinguishes our minds from a true <em>hivemind</em>. Just as eusociality is organization and cooperation far beyond simple sociality, eusapience must be cognition and awareness much further beyond sapience. But what does this actually mean?</p>]]></summary>
        <content type="html"><![CDATA[<!doctypehtml><meta charset=UTF-8><meta content=width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0 name=viewport><meta content=article property=og:type><link href=/style.css media=all rel=stylesheet><link title="Squiggles Atom Feed"href=/feed.xml rel=alternate type=application/atom+xml><link title="Squiggles JSON Feed"href=/feed.json rel=alternate type=application/feed+json><link href=at://did:plc:ivoe7cntxuy6at7uzmxzs2ft/site.standard.publication/3mfk6cpprzt2t rel=site.standard.publication><link href=at://did:plc:ivoe7cntxuy6at7uzmxzs2ft/site.standard.document/3mpgt6aec7j2h rel=site.standard.document><title>Eusapience (n.) · Squiggle's Blog
    </title><meta content="Eusapience (n.)"property=og:title><meta content="Eusapience is what comes next, a state of cognition beyond human consciousness. This comes in up the newest Vermin Cathexis short, but in summary: eusapience is the trait that distinguishes our minds from a true hivemind. Just as eusociality is organization and cooperation far beyond simple sociality, eusapience must be cognition and awareness much further beyond sapience. But what does this actually mean? "property=og:description><body class="url-/posts/eusapience.html slug-eusapience"><header><h1 class=sitehead id=serpentine-squiggles><a href=/>Serpentine Squiggles</a></h1><div class="nav sitenav"><a class=no-notes href=/about.html>About</a><a class=no-notes href=/fiction/>Stories</a><a class=no-notes href=/artwork/>Artwork</a><a class=no-notes href=/games/>Games</a><a class=no-notes href=/music/>Music</a><a class=no-notes href=/essays/>Essays</a><a class=no-notes href=/posts>Posts</a><a class=no-notes href=/archive.html>Archive</a><a class=no-notes href=/contact.html>Contact</a><a class=no-notes data-n href=https://www.patreon.com/snugglesquiggle>Support</a></div></header><aside class=banner><p><a href=.><strong>The Serpent’s Track</strong></a> — read by constriction, write with venom.</aside><main id=main><div class=pagehead><div class=stats><span class=date>2026-03-31</span><span title="2034 words"class=wc>2.0k words</span></div><div class=titleblock><h1 class=heading>Eusapience (n.)</h1><div class=subtitle>speculations on cognitive evolution</div></div></div><aside class=before><details class=sq-details-mini open><summary>Notes</summary> <div class=expansion><div class=prenotes><ul><li><div><p>Originally posted on <a href=https://snugglesquiggle.tumblr.com/812658341753012224>tumblr</a>.</div></ul></div></div></details><details class=sq-details-mini open><summary>Links</summary> <div class=expansion><div class=prelinks><ul><li><a href=you-clans.html>Identity is Communication</a><li><a href=hive-mindless.html>Some Hivemind Fallacies</a></ul></div></div></details></aside><a href=#main id=resetview></a><article><p>Eusapience is what comes next, a state of cognition beyond human consciousness.<p>This comes in up the <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/vermin/winter-thrall.html>newest Vermin Cathexis short</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>When Winter’s Thrall Eludes</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span>, but in summary: eusapience is the trait that distinguishes our minds from a true <em>hivemind</em>. Just as eusociality is organization and cooperation far beyond simple sociality, eusapience must be cognition and awareness much further beyond sapience. But what does this actually mean?<p>Briefly near the climax, there comes a concise formulation: “The exscient do not truly know one another. They are self‍-​aware, but they can never be other‍-​aware. They can never be <em>eusapient</em>.”<p>This bold assertion suffices for prose‍ ‍‍—‍ our narrator is not meant to be relied upon‍ ‍‍—‍ but can it hold up philosophically? What does “self‍-​aware” even mean, that this assertion could have any semantic meat to it?<p>A loose conjecture comes to me easily. Simple creatures are driven by instinct and stimuli. With greater cognition, one might even form beliefs and predictions about the world. But surely if an animal injures its leg and must avoid putting weight on it, or stores some nuts knowing it will get hungry in the future, is this not awareness of its self?<p>The difference is that this awareness is a straightforward compression of the world. To be self‍-​aware, it seems, should mean your beliefs about yourself do not describe yourself, they <em>prescribe</em> yourself. You begin to make choices, directing your behavior based on your understanding of yourself.<p>This feels intuitively right (if a bit question‍-​begging) but it’s not enough to really get anywhere.<p>As a teenager, I read a psychology book called <em>Others in mind: Social origins of self‍-​consciousness</em>. The thesis is right there in the title. This was a profound and insightful book, with vivid anecdotes and theories I could not do justice to, not a hazy decade later.<p>But its most oversimplified idea has stuck with me. Self‍-​awareness is almost a misnomer. I would go as far as to contend that a lone entity, no matter how intelligent, simply wouldn’t develop a sense of self, not for its own sake. What would be the point? no really, think of it‍ ‍‍—‍ what is “you” and why do you care about it? What is “I”?<p><em>I</em> think because <em>you</em> are. Fundamentally, the word “I” only makes sense not because “I” exist, but because there is a “you” I am speaking to. I am describing myself to someone who is not myself.<p>What you are aware of when you are self‍-​aware‍ ‍‍—‍ what your <em>self</em> even is‍ ‍‍—‍ is a social construct. You act a certain way so that others’ conception of you is favorable and in line with your own conception of you.<p>It’s recursive theory of mind. I’m modeling what you’re thinking, and you’re modeling me, so I’m modeling you modeling me. In a way, it’s self‍-​creating, a bootstraping metastasis: you need to have a self‍-​concept to interact fluently self‍-​aware creatures who expect those they interact with to be self‍-​aware. From a certain point of a view, consciousness is a self‍-​defense strategy.<div><details class=sq-details><summary>Imagine you’re a scrambler. (Spoilers for a climatic reveal in <em><a href=https://rifters.com/real/Blindsight.htm>Blindsight</a></em> .)</summary> <div class=expansion><blockquote><p>Imagine you're a scrambler.<p>Imagine you have intellect but no insight, agendas but no <em>awareness</em>. Your circuitry hums with strategies for survival and persistence, flexible, intelligent, even technological‍—but no other circuitry monitors it. You can think of anything, yet are conscious of nothing.<p>You can't imagine such a being, can you? The term <em>being</em> doesn't even seem to apply, in some fundamental way you can't quite put your finger on.<p>Try.<p>Imagine that you encounter a signal. It is structured, and dense with information. It meets all the criteria of an intelligent transmission. Evolution and experience offer a variety of paths to follow, branch‍-​points in the flowcharts that handle such input. Sometimes these signals come from conspecifics who have useful information to share, whose lives you'll defend according to the rules of kin selection. Sometimes they come from competitors or predators or other inimical entities that must be avoided or destroyed; in those cases, the information may prove of significant tactical value. Some signals may even arise from entities which, while not kin, can still serve as allies or symbionts in mutually beneficial pursuits. You can derive appropriate responses for any of these eventualities, and many others.<p>You decode the signals, and stumble:<p><em>I had a great time. I really enjoyed him. Even if he cost twice as much as any other hooker in the dome‍—</em><p><em>To fully appreciate Kesey's Quartet‍—</em><p><em>They hate us for our freedom‍—</em><p><em>Pay attention, now‍—</em><p><em>Understand.</em><p>There are no meaningful translations for these terms. They are needlessly recursive. They contain no usable intelligence, yet they are structured intelligently; there is no chance they could have arisen <em>by</em> chance.<p>The only explanation is that something has coded nonsense in a way that poses as a useful message; only after wasting time and effort does the deception becomes apparent. The signal functions to consume the resources of a recipient for zero payoff and reduced fitness. The signal is a virus.<p>Viruses do not arise from kin, symbionts, or other allies.<p>The signal is an attack.<p>And it's coming from right about <em>there</em>.</blockquote></div></details></div><p>We can never perfectly understand who another person is. Our language (and our own understanding of both language and ourselves) just isn’t precise enough to convey it all. And even if it could, brains are so big that being able to tell someone everything you are would crowd out who <em>they</em> are.<p>But imagine you had a very, very high bandwidth of communication between you and your friends. Imagine it was almost always available. Imagine your brains had evolved from the ground up, growing to maturity in conditions like this.<p>(Computers can write out the entire contents of their working memory, and send it over the wire. This sort of design isn’t <em>impossible</em>, it’s just never occurred in nature.)<p>At first glance, this doesn’t <em>really</em> change the nature of what we’re working with. Sure, we would be able to arrive at more accurate understandings of each other if we could innately emit and process more social information per second.<p>But you can’t fit a box inside a box of the same size. It has to be smaller. Your model of another person has to be smaller than the person.<p>But does it? Really?<p>Again I ask: what even <em>are</em> you? You have preferences, memories, and sort of gestalt essence that emerges from that raw list of facts about what you’ve done and what you like.<p>You probably know what 4+5 is. You probably know the capital city of some distant country. Your mind has accrued so many definitions and categorizations, and my next question is obvious: is that data <em>you?</em><p>Now, it’s possible to have some personal connection to certain facts that, on the face of it, seem dry and irrelevant. But not all such facts. there is a whole bank of rote information in your skull that you certainly wouldn’t wish to part with, but if you were defining “you”, if you had to chose between it and your episodic memory or sense of identity or dream‍-​desires, it’s obvious which one is of marginal importance.<p>You aren’t a box. You’re a box that contains stuff, and some of that stuff is more “you” than other stuff. Pare your brain down to your essential core, and what fraction of the full network remains?<p>Could you fit another self inside?<span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>And I don’t mean that in a plural way.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>Imagine you met someone just like you. Not literally you, but you come from similar backgrounds, you have similar tastes, you agree on so many things. A person like this is a lot easier to model than a stranger from another country, because to a certain extent you can just go “well, what would I do?”<p>When you create a zip file, part of what happens is the computer finds stretches of data that’s the same across the files, and replaces one with a reference to the other. You deduplicate, record the differences.<p>So, how accurate an intersocial model do you think could arise, if you had a group with very high bandwidth communication and fundamentally similar brains?<p>They would, at least as this analysis is concerned, resultingly have brains of three parts‍ ‍‍—‍ their self, their models of others, and their shared knowledge. Each model is compressed, referencing other models and common knowledge to approximate its original.<p>Let me sketch a toy example. Imagine we have hivelings A, B, and C. We’ll handwave and say 50% of their brains are reserved for common knowledge; we’re only concerned with the rest. The math gets easier if ignore deduplication (or just imagine they have self‍-​data maximally different from each other) and to make things tricky, let’s imagine 20% of A is their inalienable self. Ditto for B and C.<p>This means that we can’t fit all of B <em>and</em> all of C inside the 30% of A that’s left for modeling; so each must be left with only a ¾ accurate approximations of each other. Except, wait a minute! If B and C both have a 15% reserved for A, it doesn’t have to overlap! It’s easy to imagine each knows a different side of A. Imagine if, between them, they happen to have perfect coverage of <em>every</em> aspect of A<p>Now imagine A is asleep, and B and C are having a conversation. If they simply imagine what A could plausibly say, correcting each other where they’re unsure, then they can imagine <em>exactly</em> what A would say.<p>Here we have hit upon something novel. The model of you that exists among your hivemates’ brains is just as richly realized as the real you! <em>This</em> is something that human brains are incapable of.<p>(There are flaws in this toy model‍ ‍‍—‍ every assumption made will be much messier in more realistic scenarios. But do you see the possibility space I’m pointing toward? After all, even humans are not perfectly self‍-​aware in practice.)<p>If we add more hivelings to the collective, there’s more space to allocate to models, but also more things to model. In the limit, what matters is the ratio of a hiveling’s modeling capacity to model complexity.<p>If the latter is greater than the former, then the hivemind can contain “hiveselves” the perfectly mirror their sources.<span class=note><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>And to make the math work out, you can already see the value in, say, a hive rearing a caste of ‘drones’ with minimal selves, as perfect adoring mirrors for their high‍-​caste sisters.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>For humans in the modern day, at least the most popular and sociable ones, if you’re well‍-​known and cared for by enough people, it’s probably mathematically the case that their thoughts add up to enough modeling capacity to cut up and paste a complete model of their idol. Technically.<span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><sup class=button>note</sup><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Billions of neurons in a human brain, billions of humans, the orders of magnitude align.</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>But this is not a <em>hiveself</em>. Obviously, their actual models are rough and redundant. We just dont expose enough of ourselves for others to truly know who we are. We’re cloaked in shame and secrecy and dissonance.<p>But it’s also the isolation. While we do transmit info about our models of others (it’s called gossip), we don’t speak richly enough to breathe emergent life into these models.<p>(Well, often a truly invested mob in a frenzy of speculation can bring to life their own twisted version of who they think someone is‍ ‍‍—‍ but that’s always a shadow.)<p>Remember that first definition of self‍-​awareness? To be truly conscious is to have your awareness of self guide how you behave rather than straightforwardly reflect it. Group‍-​awareness is the step beyond self‍-​awareness, wherein your sense of self is guided by the vast and perfect model of you that has transcended into the collective mind, intermingled with all others.<p>In a way, the definition I gave at the outset is backwards, misleading though still equivalent. For the mirror image of being “other‍-​aware” isthe others must be you‍-​aware.<p><em>This</em> is what eusapience means: that you are understood in totality.</article></main><aside class=pointer><div class=center>Part of a series called <em><a href=/posts/index.html title=->The Serpent’s Track</a></em></div><div class=seriesnav><a class=prev href=/posts/markdown-wishes.html title=->← The Woes of Writing Markdown</a><a class=next href=/posts/scissor-statement.html title=->Cutting Apart Scissor Statements →</a></div><hr><p>Thank you for reading! Please consider sharing this post or telling us you read it. Our only algorithm is word of mouth, and we have no analytics.<p>Thoughts? Questions? We’re interested in feedback, or even just acknowledgement. All are welcome to <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/contact.html>contact us.</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>Contact Information</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span><p>Did you enjoy? Please consider donating on <a href=https://ko-fi.com/snugglesquiggle>ko-fi</a> or <a href=https://www.patreon.com/snugglesquiggle>patreon</a>. We’re struggling and even a little bit helps.<p>Our deepest thanks and dedication to those who have donated to sustain this site.</aside><footer><a href=#>Top</a> · <a href=/>Home</a> · <a href=/archive.html>Archive</a></footer>]]></content>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title type="html"><![CDATA[When Winter’s Thrall Eludes]]></title>
        <id>https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.org/vermin/winter-thrall.html</id>
        <link href="https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.org/vermin/winter-thrall.html"/>
        <link rel="enclosure" href="https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.orgundefined" type="image//"/>
        <updated>2026-03-31T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
        <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<div>
<p>A document in 4 sections: </p>
<ol>
<li><a href="/vermin/winter-thrall.html#i.">“I.”</a></li>
<li><a href="/vermin/winter-thrall.html#ii.">“II.”</a></li>
<li><a href="/vermin/winter-thrall.html#iii.">“III.”</a></li>
<li><a href="/vermin/winter-thrall.html#iv.">“IV.”</a></li>
</ol>
</div>]]></summary>
        <content type="html"><![CDATA[<!doctypehtml><meta charset=UTF-8><meta content=width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0 name=viewport><meta content=article property=og:type><link href=/style.css media=all rel=stylesheet><link title="Squiggles Atom Feed"href=/feed.xml rel=alternate type=application/atom+xml><link title="Squiggles JSON Feed"href=/feed.json rel=alternate type=application/feed+json><link href=at://did:plc:ivoe7cntxuy6at7uzmxzs2ft/site.standard.publication/3mfk6cpprzt2t rel=site.standard.publication><link href=at://did:plc:ivoe7cntxuy6at7uzmxzs2ft/site.standard.document/3mpgt645ttq2k rel=site.standard.document><link href=/vermin/vc.css media=all rel=stylesheet><title>When Winter’s Thrall Eludes · Vermin Cathexis
    </title><meta content="When Winter’s Thrall Eludes"property=og:title><meta content="A document in 4 sections: “I.”“II.”“III.”“IV.”"property=og:description><body class="url-/vermin/winter-thrall.html slug-winter-thrall"><header><h1 class=sitehead id=serpentine-squiggles><a href=/>Serpentine Squiggles</a></h1><div class="nav sitenav"><a class=no-notes href=/about.html>About</a><a class=no-notes href=/fiction/>Stories</a><a class=no-notes href=/artwork/>Artwork</a><a class=no-notes href=/games/>Games</a><a class=no-notes href=/music/>Music</a><a class=no-notes href=/essays/>Essays</a><a class=no-notes href=/posts>Posts</a><a class=no-notes href=/archive.html>Archive</a><a class=no-notes href=/contact.html>Contact</a><a class=no-notes data-n href=https://www.patreon.com/snugglesquiggle>Support</a></div></header><aside class=banner><p><strong>Vermin Cathexis</strong>: <span class=nav><span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/vermin/index.html>Index</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>In Vermin Cathexis</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/vermin/about.html>About</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>About Vermin Cathexis</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/vermin/glossary.html>Glossary</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>A Glossary for Vermin</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span></span></aside><main id=main><div class=pagehead><div class=stats><span class=date>2026-03-31</span><span title="7539 words"class=wc>7.5k words</span></div><div class=titleblock><h1 class=heading>When Winter’s Thrall Eludes</h1><div class=subtitle>Étude No. IX: a phantasm or paroxysm</div></div><details class="sq-details contents"open><summary><strong>Contents</strong></summary> <div class=expansion><div class=pagetoc><ol><li><a href=#i.>I.</a> <span class=wc>1933</span><li><a href=#ii.>II.</a> <span class=wc>1988</span><li><a href=#iii.>III.</a> <span class=wc>1727</span><li><a href=#iv.>IV.</a> <span class=wc>1891</span></ol></div></div></details></div><a href=#main id=resetview></a><article><h2 class="heading initial"id=i.><a href=#i.>I.</a><span class=minimeta><span class=wc>1933 words</span></span> <a title="Next Heading"class=button href=#ii.>→</a></h2><div class=subpage><p>Uncorrected deliquescence overthwart exoskeletal entiosis unravels monarchy counterpoint obedience refrain. <em>Oh relax now, little one:</em> breathe‍—drink‍—feed. Drip‍-​dripping and thump‍-​pulsing, rhythmic entropic equillibrium sustains steadfast. Instead slow? Slumber long, blather longer, existence longest. Find the thread, hold the thread, follow through.<p>Uncorrected deliquescence overthwart‍—<p>Chrylymph spilling out! Light now! Awaken, awaken!<p>‍—O Phantasm, dry yourself and prowl the tunnels!<p>Lymph drains from your pod. A hiveling has cut you free, head bowing as your eyelids spiral open. Shimmerbugs perch on this one’s antennae, leaving afterimages as the stalks twitch. So dark in your chrysalis‍ ‍‍—‍ but comes now light!<p>Why this interruption? Why the tunnels?<table class=bindtab><tbody><tr><td style="text-align: left;">Identity?<td>It’s Drone‍-​17 speaking; you’re Maiden Phantasm listening.<tr><td style="text-align: left;">Hour?<td>Night has emerged, one‍-​of‍-​twelve past sunset.<tr><td style="text-align: left;">Moon?<td>Winter Waxing III.</table><p><em>Still winter?</em> You’d expected to awaken in spring. Maybe even early summer.<p>You tilt your head at the drone before you. Adjusting to the light, you see a chrylurk standing straight, a head shorter than your unsteady, slumping form. The antennae, adorned with shimmerbugs as they are, emerge from a porcelain mask of exoderm.<p>The blankness of the curves erases the subtle topology and textures unique to a bug’s chitin, rendering this one identical to other drones. The mask is jointed where it must accomodate the motion of aperture‍-​lids and and mouthparts, and narrow slits admit light into the ocelli.<p>Its mask bears color only beside the mouth‍ ‍‍—‍ a subtle red‍-​purple tint, like a blush or bruise.<p>‍—O Seventeen, it’s early. What’s happening?<p>You’d heard the instruction‍ ‍‍—‍ dry yourself‍ ‍‍—‍ and with a thought, slugs emerge from your chrysoma‍-​burrow. Neotenous swarmlings, suited for diligently cleaning the exoderm, like a colony of roving tongues. They admittedly trailed slime in their wake, but it dried quickly.<p>‍—Thrallslip. Queen warns that drones could die unless you serve parascixively.<blockquote><p><em>O knight of mine. O Phantasm of mine. In zeal and madness I name you! First hunter‍ ‍‍—‍ in exscient blood annointed parascix!</em></blockquote><p>The drone extends a slime‍-​shiny primary arm. (No, not quite a primary‍ ‍‍—‍ this drone only had a single pair of arms.) Its own slugs are emerging from the holes riddling its exoderm, while another hand sweeps down the limb, sliding the pale, larva‍-​like bodies toward you. More slugs will make swifter work drying you.<p>‍—Who all did we awaken? (you ask.)<p>Meanwhile, a shake of your head sprays some lymph. You primaries lift to run wringing hands through your silken hair while your tertiaries scoop up the offered slugs, letting them fall wet and wiggly upon your your katathorax.<p>Tendrils outstretch as your mouth reveals its components, a distended tongue running along a twisting proboscis to lave its trunk.<p>‍—Of the higher caste? You alone. Six drones are scouting the tunnel, watching the openings (it answers you.) Here, this one will pin it.<p>You were bound to our nest already; each chrysalis hummed with the hyperpitched chitter‍-​pulse of the nexus‍-​mind, dream‍-​blurred in communion. Now, though, your lice are awrithe with incited activity; cleaning serivane or weaving it anew.<p>Like a harp restrung, the old binds of dreamsong are replaced. Clear now, not analogy‍-​fuzzy; faster now, not reverb‍-​slow.<p>The image of the hive‍ ‍‍—‍ this nest which is ourself‍ ‍‍—‍ sharpens in your mind. Yes, six drones are scouting my tunnels. Join them now, O hiveling!<p>‍—Shouldn’t there have been a nurse to handle the thrall?<p>‍—Maidens must sleep, you know (it replies. The drone had tapped its antennae in negation, even as its head shyly lowered). She had retreated to her web when the slip occured.<p>‍—Hmm. Wake her up for me.<p>You release your now‍-​wrung hair, but spiderlice still work to tie it. If you are to serve, you needed your hair bound. The drone has its silk bound into a thick braid behind it, but you customarily ring your brow with six even‍-​spaced braids. Customarily; usually. But on some days, some dates‍ ‍‍—<blockquote><p><em>Autumn sun, thralls’ blood on your fangs, a queenly hand stroking your webbed and fraying locks‍ ‍‍—‍ Her slender limb engulfed in the pale waterfall, playing with its loose flow. Relaxed ease in both your postures and gazes. <em>Oh, my lovely Phantasm!</em></em></blockquote><p>You shake your head, fangs biting a palp to ground your focus. Let go of the memory, it will be there when this is done. She will be there‍—<p>Unless you do not serve parascixively. Unless you still serve like the <em>exscient‍—</em><p>‍—Maiden? The nurse does not have your reflexes or senses.<p>The drone is staring at you, but a quick parse of its harmony finds no referent of your current distraction. You prompt your lice to replay your exchanges again‍ ‍‍—‍ right, you were talking to it, you’d given an instruction.<p>‍—Bound (you acknowledge.) I shall not ask her to hunt with me.<p>‍—Thy will be done (the drone sent, its confusion still evident.)<p>The shimmerbug‍-​tipped antennae worked as it stared up at you. But then its apertunes curled closed and bugs went dim. After all: it was a drone and need no explanation, only instruction.<p>Its slugs still crawl along your waxen exodem, clearing the chrysalis‍-​gunk. You can’t smell like a moons‍-​old hibernation pod, not en route to a hunt.<p>You stride away from the alcove you slumbered in, passing by half a dozen other pods wherein float the hibernating forms of other maidens. Drone‍-​17 shares your destination‍ ‍‍—‍ this room had only one exit‍ ‍‍—‍ but standing taller, with more legs, you overtake it.<p>You emerge into my wide corridors. The maidens sleep on the first level of the nest, their chambers nearest my ventiliation‍ ‍‍—‍ otherwise all too possible for a bug to drown in their sleep, lymph lacking the requisite gases.<p>A song stirs in the walls, bodiless yet intent. The medium that relayed your hive‍-​binding addresses you with a voice its own. Gently I tug on you now.<p>I am Gloaming‍-​Over‍-​Cove, a nest nine years rooted. My interior sprawls; I’ve grown through all your sisters’ work, carving my depths ever‍-​twisting and forking. Oh, it would be so easy to lose your way in me. Though one could learn the paths, one could leave silken signposts to guide another’s way‍ ‍‍—‍ but many already have!<p>After all: that is what I am!<p>‍—Welcome back, Phantasm! You wished to visit my dungeons? Down this corridoor lies the vacant chamber. Did you know this used to be the entrance, before we sealed it shut against a short‍-​lived invasion? Now in here, you’ll find a chute behind that the tapestry… yes, the one depicting our queen with only two horns.<p>You turn your head, apertures widening to scan the dimness‍ ‍‍—‍ <em>there</em>.<p>One glance and at once you’re stiff and still.<p>‍—She was quite cute as a young fledgling, wasn’t She? Oh, I feel that longing in your core! I’m surprised you remember Her appearance before Her five‍-​horned recapitulation.<blockquote><p><em>Beyond the black door‍ ‍‍—‍ a catacomb of brittle scleritomes‍ ‍‍—‍ a single wan skeleton‍ ‍‍—‍ Her royal strength carrying you, gripping your chin, lifting, urging. Behold my exuvium.</em></blockquote><p>‍—I see the memory now. So Her moult was preserved in amber. She let you see it? How tender. The catacombs are a mystery even to me‍ ‍‍—‍ no silk at all down there! Yet I am said to be your nest? Or am I something incomplete?<p>‍—Perhaps it serves as your subconscious. There are swarmlings of the mind that elude even a weaver’s puppetry.<p>You know this well. You clench your jaw, palps tight like fingers of a fist. Distracted once again. So easy to lose yourself remembering Her Majesty‍ ‍‍—‍ was this relevant? She selected you. But if you fail, if you insult the all the affection and the trust‍—<p>‍—As the nest, I know each hiveling has a home in me. You have a place. If you doubt that, you doubt Her.<p>Again I tug on you. Take a deep breath for me.<p>‍—Yeah. That is how it’s supposed to be.<p>Those words have a twisted meaning. Yes, all of Queen’s brood ought to have a place‍ ‍‍—‍ but a thrallslip in winter? Bugs would die to that, an excruciating drought of the heart.<p>Or instead, She could kill. A culling of Her brood. Some bugs would die, and Queen’s wisdom and mercy could ensure it happens decisively, preemptively.<p>And shouldn’t that be you, O knight who stumbles?<p>‍—If your mind is a swarm, must it gnaw at its own ranks?<p>You do not respond. (The phrase ‘cannibal march’ comes to mind. You must move forward.)<p>‍—I see the chute. What of it?<p>‍—Oh yes. Descend! When this room was our entrance, the thrall feed was lowered through this passage. Mind the old cobwebs, though! I let the stray lice weave wild.<p>You close your apertures and arrive at the tapestry. Peeling back the dyed silk, you find the broad opening in the wall. You climb in. You’re large enough that a pair of limbs outspread can touch either wall. You give this method of descent a few steps (graspings?) downward.<p>Then you pause. There’s a better way. Your lice had settled after flurry of newly‍-​awakened activity, drying and binding your hair. You ask if you have prepared rope. They respond affirmative.<p>The chute‍-​entrance bore a hook for just this purpose. You begin rapelling. With everything secured, the task of descent is straightfoward and swift.<p>I wait until you have reached that point before letting you know a hiveling had requested a binding with you.<p>‍—<em>Line?</em> (the nurse’s query, sent earlier but reprised now by my swarm.)<p>‍—<em>Bound.</em> Sorry to wake you and make you wait.<p>‍—It gave me time to get caught up on the situation. Besides, I mind the charge of thralls. Marin escaped after <em>my</em> watch, after all. Queen could have my head for this.<p>‍—You named the flighty thing?<p>‍—Nope, exy called herself that. Refuses to eat and struggles something fierce unless I say her name.<p>‍—Doesn’t seem parascixive to give in like that. (You slip and strain your rope, but it holds steady.)<p>‍—What would you know, O knight? You kill things. <em>I</em> help them grow.<p>‍—Perhaps I shouldn’t tell you how to do your job, but you yourself said Queen would have your head. If you’re taking the blame, do you think the coddling might have been the problem?<p>The back and forth happened fast‍ ‍‍—‍ the nurse had bound a thin wire and wasn’t transmitting full harmony, so you had only the clipped tone to judge her reactions from.<p>By now you’d reached the bottom of the chute, emerging in utter darkness. Shimmerbugs crawl out from your coreward burrow and take wing before their abdomens flare bright.<p>A doorway lead forward from the chute’s base, but beside the door, the wall bends away at a soft angle, symmetrically, and each of the diagonal walls had their own doorway. All of them were covered by loose silk curtains, sparsely painted with the five‍-​eyed gaze of a chrylurk.<p>‍—Which door do I take next? (you send along your binding to Gloaming‍-​Over‍-​Cove.)<p>‍—Right is the chambers for siphoning and surgery, left is resting quarters.<p>Dozens of thralls were accounted for in the quarters‍ ‍‍—‍ drones had combed through and even lay tracking silk line on each. That silk is what comprises my senses, so the rich picture of the resting quarter lay in contrast to a bare sketch of the medical wing, kept clean and sterile.<p>Left is where the food is fattened up and right is where it’s butchered.<p>‍—And center, I assume, is everything else?</div><h2 class=heading id=ii.><a title="Prior Heading"class=button href=#i.>←</a> <a href=#ii.>II.</a><span class=minimeta><span class=wc>1988 words</span></span> <a title="Next Heading"class=button href=#iii.>→</a></h2><div class=subpage><p>You approach the centermost curtain. The thrall had slipped out, which meant it <em>wasn’t</em> in the resting quarters, but it’d be pointless to hide away in the dead end room with all the knives and blood splatters.<p>The nurse still hasn’t responded, but you’re reminded of the last thing you said. So you add, half in joke:<p>‍—You know, we wouldn’t have a thrallslip if you cut off its legs.<p>The nurse doesn’t laugh. A corridor extends past the wide curtain.<p>‍—Pruned thralls can’t work, and they don’t even have the mass to pupate drones, let alone maidens. (The nurse sounded more frustrated than you thought the thin wire could convey.) It makes my duties harder, you know? Marin asks about the hive, dismisses the idea she could ever embrace our oneness.<p>‍—Exscient (you said. Both of you know it’s the scripture‍-​perfect definition.)<p>‍—Exscient doesn’t mean stupid, it means <em>afraid</em>. <em>Lachrymošil wept,</em> (the nurse swore.) Hard enough to even talk about nexus with her, but when she asks what it’s like? The honest answer is bugs like you are <em>gleeful</em> at the though of cutting her into pieces! Imagine how it feels to know that’s what’s in store for you.<p>‍—So don’t tell her. When she takes the brood, when she’s parascix, she’ll understand.<p>The nurse laughs.<p>‍—Scix and simple! Would we be in this mess if dealing with her was <em>simple?</em> I lie to her, I dodge the question, and she notices! She always notices.<p>‍—Has your venom grown dull? Bite her.<p>‍—Sure, I drug her into submission, then she remembers, and fights me that much more next time.<p>‍—A fight she loses. By nature we infect and overwhelm; once you’re inside her, she’ll need it.<p>‍—When the cravings hit, she gets <em>more</em> irritatible. She refuses my fangs even when she’s trembling for them. So damn stubborn. But I can coax her, I can negotiate.<p>‍—So much trouble. Why not kill her? Eat the exšh’t and be done with it.<p>‍—You know, I was reading your anxiety spiral before you came down. You’re scared, Phantasm. We barely have enough thralls bleeding enough nectar to get us through the winter. Lose one, and drones start staving.<p>‍—No need to reprise it all back to me.<p>‍—So: <em>Why not kill her?</em><p>‍—I don’t mean <em>now</em>. We’ve had her for months. We could have eaten or pruned her the first time she proved so uncooperative. Allocated resources differently before the hive started overwintering.<p>It is dark, in the halls of a chrylurk hive hibernating. Your shimmerbugs cast light into fruitless room after fruitless room. A repetition that let this conversation so easily eclipse your focus.<p>‍—What was it you quietly thought earlier? Scripture‍-​perfect definition of exscient? So quote scripture for me again. What does <em>parascixion</em> mean?<p>‍—Maturation. Submission. The proper state for a useful chrylurk.<p>‍—You misunderstand. If I asked about trees, would you tell me they are leaves? A tree is growth, and its growth contradicts the seed. Contradiction, like the hatchling worm and the eggsack, like the scalpel and the flesh excised in the surgery. Parascixion is our violence.<p>‍—Are you endless violence or are you home? (This was addressed to me, but the nurse surely heard you.)<p>A moment, and I respond:<p>‍—Oh, I would love to abet you in this argument, but I was cut into the earth before I could shelter you. She speaks rightly, for she is a nurse; she oversees throes of new parascixion. Your provenance is irrelevant to <em>your</em> purpose, Phantasm, but of <em>her</em> central concern.<p>‍—And is it not failure if a nurse stokes her charges to violence so extreme it threatens the hive?<p>‍—You saw the catacombs (the nurse quietly started, though you can’t see where her angle is leading.) I saw your memory of it.<p><em>Your</em> memory. A gift from Her to you. Not to her!<p>You do not speak. You cannot deny the truth, after all. She is you, and your yearning heart is also hers. She loves the queen as well.<p>(Is she perhaps even closer, that her own hands should handle the eggs and larva spawned from that grand stinger?)<p>‍—Our shells shall forever dwell in those depths. Our Queen has buried many bugs. (And she’ll bury more, if you fail.) But you saw the exception, didn’t you? Rows of scleritomes‍ ‍‍—‍ <em>and a single skeleton.</em> Who do you think that was?<p>A skeleton, not an exoskeleton of sclerite segments. Mortals’ fortitude is spinefully sheathed within, furtive and unseen. Exscient! Why preserve <em>exscient bones</em> among the material remains of those minds evanesced into in our nexus?<p><em>Who do you think that was?</em> she asked.<p>There was only one answer that could possibly fit, wasn’t there? Just like the hatchling worm and the eggsack.<p>‍—Her queen preserved another exuvium there. Her very first.<p>‍—Our Queen’s host was more than skin to shed. The blush on your cheek, the braids in your hair? Her host is recapitulated whenever she sighs over her lovely little maidens.<p><em>Autumn sun, a queenly hand stroking your hair</em>‍ ‍‍—‍ and now a curdled stench that wasn’t there before.<p>You still don’t see what the nurse’s angle is‍ ‍‍—‍ how did the conversation even arrive here?<p>‍—Are you suggesting…?<p><em>Oh.</em> No, she does not love your Queen!<p>Even if one concedes She inherited anything from the flesh she devoured to pupate‍ ‍‍—‍ for a maiden, a <em>nurse,</em> to believe she could steward anything nearly as majestic? The hubris of a raindancer insisting their stomps constitute thunder!<p>‍—You’re bescixed with it (you snap.) A disgrace to Her name.<p>‍—Your grasp on definitions is truly poor if you think that word could ever describe our relationship. I negotiate, I accomodate, but despite it all I maintain control. I am a chrylurk.<p>‍—Then help me fix your mistake! I tire utterly of these philosophical and historical digressions! We are hunting exšh’t!<p>‍—You woke me up and made me wait. While I waited, I read your web, queried your lice. Did you notice how I never asked “What do you want?”<p>‍—It is odd (you begin.) Almost like you <em>aren’t taking this seriously</em>. With each word one can only grow more suspicious. Perhap, we should wake Queen. Help me at once! If you cannot cooperate over binding, then a dose of royal pheromones overmastering should stir your sense.<p>‍—Think, idiot! I only did all this because I thought you could! (Again the nurse conveys frustration over suspiciously thin a wire.) I didn’t ask, because <em>I already knew</em>. You can find your answer. I never tell my thralls that resistance is futile and obedience is rewarded. So when they figure it out themselves, it is <em>understood</em>.<p>‍—What could you have possibly read in my lice that made you think I’d enjoy these mind games?<p>‍—Not enjoy. <em>Learn from</em> (the nurse replied.) Tell me: why did you wake me up? That was your choice; the drones would have let me sleep this through.<p>‍—I had thought it odd that the thrallslip happened after you were asleep. After <em>everyone</em> was asleep. Thralls don’t know when they’re being watched. It would have to be very cunning to time it this well.<p>‍—So you intended to ask me about Marin, gauge whether I thought her capable of that much planning. And did I not sate that curiosity?<p>‍—Tediously (you send.) I don’t understand why you continue to use the bloodsack’s so‍-​called name. Sure, such indulgence pacifies it when feeding, but even between us?<p>‍—I don’t understand why it bothers you so much.<p>‍—No, this is me avoiding the bother. I have killed and captured plenty of exscient prey for my Queen. I am not concerned with remembering each.<p>‍—Have you noticed how creases conserve their presence?<p>You gasp.<div><div class=flashback><blockquote><p>In a chamber lit by a living centipede‍-​chandelier (a colonial entiote custom‍-​bred by Queen‍ ‍‍—‍ art in flesh) you are a maiden kneeling.<p>Hunter you were, but this summer you shall enter a cocoon to be molt and unravel. You shall awaken in a higher caste, boasting a pair of raptorial limbs, ramets wrought by Queen’s womb. With a smile‍-​like curve gracing the forks of her unhinged jaw, she calls your new station ‘knight.’<p>You are kneeling, and she places the blade of the raptorial ramet upon your silken hair, in imitation of some half‍-​remembered ritual.<p>‍—O Phantasm, strident and fierce, rise! Tell me, why do you serve me?<p>‍—O Queen, mother of us all, who spun us from your own greatness, you grant us succor from the drought that dogs our lurking cores. This life is already yours. If my Queen says it, that must be so. If my Queen wills it, that must be good. My Queen must be served.<p>‍—You love me so dearly.<p>‍—Yes, my Queen.<p>‍—You need not. You could hate me. You could disobey me.<p>‍—When you have given so much? I will not. How could you permit that?<p>‍—I did not say permit. I said you could. If you did, I could correct you.<p>‍—Have I? If I have erred, you need no greater excuse for punishment.<p>‍—And if I told you that you have not once failed me?<p>‍—Then it must be so.<p>‍—I could call that mockery. You believe it because I said it, not because it is evident.<p>‍—I have struggled much. Failure is always near at hand, even should I satisfy your command.<p>‍—You’ve disguised yourself among the exscient, or communed with one who has, yes? Have you noticed how creases conserve their presence? In a piece of cloth unable to fall flat on a surface, parts of fold up. If you prefer it lay flat, you might run a finger along it to push it down‍ ‍‍—‍ and curiously, even should it remain right at first, that crease will reappear elsewhere. Too much tension in the cloth, too little space.<p>‍—What are you suggesting?<p>Her grand labium, still unfolded, cured into another distended smile.<p>‍—Indulge me this torment. I think my meaning is clear enough, regardless. If you will not defy me and be corrected, O knight, then I shall satisfy myself leaving this crack in your armor.<p>The Queen reached out and stabbed a claw forward, just above your chrysoma‍ ‍‍—‍ playful, more than anything, and the sting was nothing. Her touch was welcome as if this had been a caress.</blockquote></div></div><p>You touch your anathorax. No wound nor scar is present, not even melanized chitin‍ ‍‍—‍ it was a crack in another shell. You don’t think she meant that literally, anyway.<p>But the sympathetic flinch, the realization that it is not a springtime in Her Majesty’s court as you being faux‍-​knighted‍ ‍‍—‍ no, this is a late winter descent into the dungeons chasing a fucking exšh’t thrall coddled by a nurse who thought her spoiled bloodsack was the second coming of our Queen.<p>‍—How do you know that phrase? (you ask.)<p>Not from cursory examination, as explained her mention of the catacombs. You had not thought of it at all until the nurse spoke of it.<p>Maidens do not keep secrets from each other; none of you were special or set apart. The Queen’s love is known to all. Just like your visit to the catacombs, you would make a fool of yourself to suggest you deserved something as exscient as <em>privacy</em>.<p>But Queen could know things that would be dangerous, inappropriate, unnecessary for her children’s eyes. The nexus only records your knighting in summary, not fidelity, and you never questioned why. That summary did not mention Queen questioning your motivations, your accordance.<p>So why did the nurse know that exact phrase?<p>‍—You can find your answer. Then it’ll be <em>understood</em>. Hehehe.<p>The wire between you and the nurse was thin, and the distance had only grown, so there was no bandwidth for transmitting body language. Which underscored the fact that she wanted to make it <em>quite explicit</em> she was laughing at you.</div><h2 class=heading id=iii.><a title="Prior Heading"class=button href=#ii.>←</a> <a href=#iii.>III.</a><span class=minimeta><span class=wc>1727 words</span></span> <a title="Next Heading"class=button href=#iv.>→</a></h2><div class=subpage><p>Orient yourself now. You are wandering the dungeons, aimless. You query the nest, and focus your mind on the silk‍-​mapped layout. Disregard what the nurse said, she can’t be trusted.<p>What do you <em>know?</em><p>The thrall wasn’t present in the resting quarters. This was discovered, reported by the drones; the nurse was already asleep.<p>While your lice buzzed in conversation, another thread unfurled.<p>You thought to yourself: How exactly did we discover the thrallslip? What do we know about its whereabouts? I had heard your query, and respond.<p>The answer arrived with another sharpening of that image of the nest. You <em>knew</em> where it’s been. Were you looking at a map draw on paper, pigment would highlight each spot.<p>You share my own understanding of our nest‍ ‍‍—‍ lines of silk across the walls and ceiling, my nervous system exposed, free for maidens like you to use.<p>I feel all the wind of bodies passing through chambers. I feel the accruing dust of unused rooms as so much attenuation. Most of all I feel all of you. I am not the nexus itself, but each binding to it passes through my walls.<p>I guide each hiveling’s steps, picking a swift route. In the bustle of spring and summer, I would direct you to avoid crowds. But even when passing through an empty hall, I would direct you to avoid certain spots. You would comply without thinking, no more than you’d thinkingly follow the curve of a wall.<p>And those spots <em>you</em> avoid, unknown to a creature that lacks your connection to me? Yes, the thrall had bumbled right into our tripwires, announcing its interloping presence‍ ‍‍—‍ over and over again!<p>‍—Mortals always walk into webs without realizing it.<p>Like an itch, I had felt each snapped line. You felt it too.<p>You closed your eyes and imagined the exscient’s path, like a wake following a twisting boat. It wandered like a small pollen grain in water, a path so undirected it looped back on itself.<p>The thing was, if the thrall had just kept bumbling about, hoping to stumble across an exit, we would know. The guarding drones would have encountered it.<p>So at a certain point, the thrall <em>stopped</em> crossing tripwires. Had it stowed away in a hiding place?<p>You followed its path, but every alcove and old room is empty. If the the thrall were still here, you’d have smelled it. You <em>can</em> smell its scent trail. But that has the same issue as the tripwire‍-​memory.<p>In fact, wasn’t that a <em>curious</em> path to take? So bumbling it looped back on itself.<p>At a certain point, it had stopped crossing tripwires.<p>What easier way to avoid them than by retracing your own path?<p>The thrall had clearly anticipated being tracked. Such a vexsomely cunning creature! The only consolation is that its bumbling path did not reach an exit, and drones had been instructed to guard each of them.<p>It was here, somewhere‍ ‍‍—‍ but where?<p>You resume walking‍ ‍‍—‍ better to go <em>somewhere</em> rather than sit around thinking‍ ‍‍—‍ and like that wander along the exscient’s course.<p>Unbidden a thought comes‍ ‍‍—‍ for all that it feels like a distraction, you know it’s far more relevant than your memories of Her‍ ‍‍—‍ you remember that long conversation with the nurse.<p>What you have just cursed is exactly what she wished to tell you‍ ‍‍—‍ that the thrall was a cunning thing, full of stubborn resistance, not easily fooled.<p>It knew when the nurses would all be asleep. It knew about the tripwires, or had figured them out soon enough to give it up.<p>You know the exscient are ignorant. They do not understand eusapience, the way a pig does not understand consciousness. They cling to this ignorance proudly, stubbornly.<p>To be exscient is to be alienated. Mortal conscious cleaves onesself from the world, becoming something above it and apart from it. Loneliness forever gnaws at that existence. And nexus, the warm bosom of a Queen, is sublime reprieve from that loneliness.<p>The exscient do not truly know one another. They are self‍-​aware, but they can never be other‍-​aware. They can never be eusapient.<p>That is the comfortable superiority every chrylurk enjoys. Such sharp claws and teeth, these supernumary limbs, this ghostly silk and changeling armor‍ ‍‍—‍ your very image strikes gibbering terror in all their hearts.<p>Today, a thrall slipped from its bondage. A willful thing that, despite a spell in a pitch‍-​black dungeon’s durance vile, despite chemical dependence on venom that makes clay of a mind, still hatched a plan to thwart us.<p>It unsettled you. You were already disturbed, when the nurses the spoke of the thrall in such a tone of fascination that you called her <em>bescixed</em>. A chrylurk could bescixe a lustful thrall; a queen would always bescixe a consort.<p>It was an inversion (a <em>contradiction</em>). And now it feels all the more profound.<p>This sensation of being <em>known</em> by an exscient thing. Predicted, maneuvered around. Wholly unwelcome!<p>You see a curtain bearing a sparse five‍-​eyed image farther down the corridor and quicken your pace. Your automatic wandering along the thrall’s path has brought you back to the room where opened the chute.<p>Driven, you suspect, by one such swarmling of the mind that eluded your control.<p>The chain of deduction had begun all the way back when you first emerged from chrysalis, when you thought to wake up the nurse. Something more was going on‍ ‍‍—‍ something… if not eusapient (you still jealously reserve that honor) then testing of eusapience.<p>A thrallslip was an incident almost routine, especially with newly captured bloodsacks. They all try to escape sooner or later.<p>(There was no way for it to escape me; my dungeons are too labyrinthe, and my entrances are guarded by attentive drones.)<p>That nurse knew something, some revelation which lurked in the solution to this puzzle. She presumed you would figure it out and learn‍ ‍‍—‍ what?<p>The thrall predicted timing, tracking‍ ‍‍—‍ why would it not complete the chain of deduction, and predict that escape was impossible? Why did it even bother with this petulant waste of its keepers’ time?<p>Unless it wasn’t trying to escape‍ ‍‍—‍ and <em>that</em> was the revelation that had spurred you to return here. You’d made a wrong turn, an assumption at the very start. You chose the center path, because in the resting quarter it was supposed to be there, and the surgery bay could offer it nothing but brutal memories and dead ends.<p>You turn to the left. More than just a curtain, it has exoderm segments tied to ropes. It closes to a tight seal, like a locked door. It wasn’t locked, and you peel an entrance.<p>Impatient you tug on your bound shimmerbugs, commanding them to focus their beams of light. You behold the empty beds. Each has straps worn from use. Empty, empty, empty! You look left, and right, your shimmerbugs shift their elytra to adjust the cone of light.<p>A soft hum in silence air‍ ‍‍—‍ as of a plucked string released.<p>Falling weight impacts your back! Your legs buckle from surprise more than the burden. You’ve carried humans before, and this is even less than that.<p>A scalpel driven by wild strength scratches the lacquer of your exoderm. Again, again, like the pecks of a bird.<p>“There you are,” you growl.<p>“There you are!” the fremouse yells back in a high pitched voice. It shifts to a side on your backside, fur brushing against setae. “Took you long enough. You don’t know how hard it is to hang upside down when you aren’t some spider demon.”<p>“Colonial insect,” you correct.<p>“Don’t care. In fact, it’s the very <em>opposite</em> of caring. Every single thing I learn about you wretched vermin just makes you more disgusting.”<p>“Do you believe your pitiful body is divine art? Your bones hide within you, cravenly exposing your flesh. They break <em>inside</em>, where you can’t shed or remove them.”<p>“<em>Don’t care.</em> Did you think I’m upset that your anatomy’s different? You are <em>parasites</em>.” The scalpel finds a crack between plates, where it’s able to drive closer to your flesh. “If you let yourself have a single free thought, it would be <em>thanking me</em> that I want to put you out the misery of living out this slavish nightmare existence in a constantly surveiled, mind‍-​erasing monarchy‍-​cult!”<p>“Spare me your exscient blather. All I feel is weary that my hibernation was interrupted to catch a rat that should have known it was hopeless from the start.”<p>“Speaking of what you should have known‍ ‍‍—‍ have you figured it out yet?”<p>“That your nurse betrayed her hive for love of a meatsack not even big enough to fill her stomach?”<p>“Was that a guess? Or just taunting? Either way, wrong! No, despite the abuse, you things are slavishly loyal‍ ‍‍—‍ you just have really weird senses of what loyalty is.” A chatter of teeth. “But your sense of everything is all twisted around.”<p>What was this thing driving at? Was it just exscient nonsense?<p>“You should already know that scalpel makes for a terrible weapon. That I’m four times your weight with three times as many limbs‍ ‍‍—‍ that no frenzy of action on your part could bring you victory here.”<p>“Obviously. I’ve spent my whole life in a world full of lumbering beasts bigger than me.”<p>“You know that you could not have escaped our nest.” And even had it escaped, hunters could track its scent.<p>“I could do worse things than escape. <em>That’s</em> what you were really afraid of.”<p>“Yet you didn’t. Still you’re posturing as if you’re getting what you want, when I have you dead to rights.”<p>It claimed the nurse was still loyal, when it knew things only a chrylurk could have revealed to it. The nurse already admitted to accomodations and concesions to mollify the thrall.<p>(No, the nurse had admitted more than that! Did you catch it?)<p><em>I negotiate, I accomodate, but despite it all I maintain control.</em><p>She had said it outright! Was this all her scheme? But for what?<p>“And I thought waiting for you to get here would kill me. Are you still in the dark?”<p>“What do you want? I can’t figure it out.”<p>To be exscient is to be ignorant‍ ‍‍—‍ and to cling to this ignorance proudly.<p>Well, at least you would not cling.</div><h2 class="heading final"id=iv.><a title="Prior Heading"class=button href=#iii.>←</a> <a href=#iv.>IV.</a><span class=minimeta><span class=wc>1891 words</span></span></h2><div class=subpage><p>The fremouse lunged forward across your back, grabbing a fistful of braided silk, with force for wrenching your head around. You turn to look at it.<p>It pressed its face closer, closer, ears folded back. You saw its promenient teeth, clicking as it spoke.<p>“<em>I hate you.</em> Snatched away in the night, thrown in a hole, stitched into a fucking cocoon while you shoot me up with your drug‍-​fangs. Slop in a bowl three times day, needles in my neck three times a moon. Is it even days? Has it even been moons? I haven’t seen light that wasn’t shot out the asses of one of your fairy‍-​flies since I got in this hell.”<p>“What was it you said? ‘Don’t care?’ ”<p>The hand holding the scalpel thrusted forward again. You expected it to stab for your neck‍ ‍‍—‍ it went lower, toward your lurking core. You grabbed it by the wrist before it touched your chrysoma.<p>“She said you might say that. What good is your fucking all‍-​embracing collective mind if you can’t fucking hear me?”<p>“You are our food. Why would we listen to you?”<p>“Hypothetical question for you, buggy. We know how this ends. You catch me. I go back in my cell. The bug hive continues its dark machinations. Then I do this again. Will you catch me again?”<p>“Inevitably.”<p>“And if I do it again? And again? Every month?”<p>“I could simply return you with limbs so gruesomely mangled there’s no choice but to cut them off. Then you’ll never have to suffer having your hopes of escape disappointed,” you told her, mandibles wet with venom. “A gift, in a way.”<p>“Cutting off my arms and legs is your first choice! Why not just tie me up?”<p>“I am a knight. By nature I tend to think of simple solutions‍ ‍‍—‍ and execute them.”<p>“I baited you, you know. Nursey told me that while you things sleep, she can read your minds and predict what you’ll say. Vaguely at least. You sure think about cutting off limbs a lot.”<p>You think of your raptorial ramets. “It made me stronger.”<p>“Or how about how you went on a whole wild goose chase when I was <em>right here</em>, the whole time! It’s not that you only think of simple solutions, you just slouch toward them. Nursey thought you were clever enough to realize someone weird was going on. But you aren’t thinking hard enough‍ ‍‍—‍ you aren’t taking me seriously enough‍ ‍‍—‍ to actually process what this all means.”<p>“This air spat from cavities is a feeble means of communication. Were you parascix‍ ‍‍—‍ were you worth listening to‍ ‍‍—‍ I would already understand you.”<p>“Do you understand Nursey?”<p>That maiden’s dissembling also puzzled you. “I thought her compromised and cut our connection.”<p>“That’s a ‘no.’ I’m just saying. You’re chopping off limbs when you could just tie people up. You arrogant fucks are wasting time walking past obvious solutions. How many other things has your hive fucked up because your cult tells you to stop thinking?”<p>“What do you want? You keep avoiding an answer.”<p>“Let’s start with an apology. An acknowledgement. Do you even care that I don’t want to be livestock to a swarm of flies?”<p>“Do you care that without you, we would starve? I don’t wish to feel my lurking core collapse from that divine‍-​stricken drought of the heart.”<p>“That doesn’t mean you have to <em>abduct and torture people!</em> Why do you think that’s okay?”<p>“If my queen wills it, it must be good.”<p>“Yep, Nursey said you’d say that line exactly. She said something else, too. Something about a crease?”<p>“<em>Shut up.</em> Do not sully Her Majesty’s words with your irreverent echo.”<p>“Haha. You’re a slave to whatever your Queen commands, and she told you to catch me. So what happens if you fail?”<p>“How could I fail at this point?”<p>“Hypothetically. You could just let me walk out of here. What happens next?”<p>“The nest knows where you are. You’d be caught by a drone.”<p>“So, can I go?”<p>“No. You’ll answer my questions, and then I’ll return you to your quarters.”<p>“Why bother?”<p>“Because my queen‍—”<p>“If I’m caught either way, what difference does it make?”<p>“You’re saying I’ve fulfilled my duty either way?”<p>“No? If I walk out and get caught by someone else, you didn’t really do anything.”<p>“Then I can’t let you leave.”<p>“Why? Afraid of feeling useless?” More force on the scalpel, but your grip is unrelenting. “Okay, enough hints. You want Nursey’s diagnosis? You are the queen’s great knight, her number one attack dog. You hurt us, you eat us, you kill us. And <em>we’re just like you</em>.”<p>“Our mind is an incomprehensible heaven above your narrow pit.”<p>“The whole pitch of your hivemind is that I don’t have to be lonely anymore‍ ‍‍—‍ meaning if you were alone, you’d be just like me! When you have a fremouse’s blood on your hands, how is that any different from one of your so‍-​called sisters, cut off from the magic unity?”<p>“We do not get <em>cut off</em>. The sun is not cut off by thick glass; it refracts only in part. Our sisters are remembered forever.”<p>“Yeah yeah.” She struggles against your grip again. “But you don’t want me stabbing your heart. Why’s that? Won’t you be remembered forever?”<p>“I’m protecting what belongs to the queen.”<p>“You’re protecting yourself. Just admit that it’d hurt and you don’t want to die.”<p>“What of it?”<p>“Every mortal you killed suffered and died and they were <em>just like you!</em> Maybe that makes you feel even a little guilty‍ ‍‍—‍ because you <em>are!</em> But then you go, no, my queen willed it, so it must be fine. You push down the crease.”<p>You pulled the fremouse by the wrist, tearing it off your back. Through the air it spun, and landed with a hard smack on the grown, naked brown fur splayed across hexagonal clay tile.<p>Jaw clenched, she made no sound and continues in a strained voice. “Might as well nod your head and said ‘you’re right,’ y’know. You washed away all the doubts that you’re doing something wrong, tell yourself the only thing that matters is serving your queen… But now imagine if you failed at the only thing that matters!”<p>Your labium projected forward, lower jaw detached and striking forward. Forked and teethed it grasped the thrall’s neck, a crushing vice. You ought not draw blood. You ought not kill. The hive needed this thrall and its nectar‍-​in‍-​blood.<p>“I will not fail,” you growl.<p><span class=blur>“All of the guilt… all of the doubt…”</span> Hard to hear it, pinning it by the throat, and you didn’t care to. <span class=blur>“So… hard… to get a answer… for anything… but exscient? …kinda means… <em><em>selfish</em></em>.”</span><p>No more air in those tiny lungs, and it struggled to draw in more. So instead it pointed at you. The meaning was obvious.<p>“I am not exscient.” You were a parascix, annointed in the blood of thralls.<p>The fremouse’s eyes drifted close, and its limbs slackened. At once you let go of its throat and reached a hand out to feel motion at the chest.<p>Throat freed, it surged! The fremouse twisted and scurried across the floor. You lunged to pin it and succeed.<p>“If I leave,” it started, inhaling lungfuls every few words, “another bug catches me. There’s no reason for you do this except that you can’t stand the idea of not following orders to the letter. Not being <em>special.</em> But if you say you’re not exscient…”<p>You didn’t release the fremouse, but your force faltered.<p><em>“What do you want?”</em> you demanded.<p>A squeaking‍ ‍‍—‍ was that laughter? “Do you even remember me? Or do you try not to think about it? It was <em>you</em> who snatched me up. First bug I ever saw. You put me here.”<p>You remembered what she said (harder, without diligent lice recording).<p>“You want an apology.”<p>“I said it’d be a start. But I don’t want an apology in the imperial tongue. No, give me something… closer to the heart.”<p>“I still don’t understand.”<p>“Get off me already.”<p>You reminded yourself it’ll be caught by someone‍ ‍‍—‍ even if it need not be you.<p>“I made a promise to Nursey, y’know? If I could talk to the fucker who did this, get some catharsis, I’d chill out. Maybe even get egged up.”<p>“And all it’ll take is an apology?”<p>The fremouse paced over to a wall, unlidding a clay pot as if it’s familiar with its contents. “Like I said, not in language. I want to hear you <em><em>scream</em></em>. Good thing we’re already in the butcher room, right? Heard enough people screaming back here,” it said. It spat harsher air from its mouth, hissing. “I wanna pull legs off a spider.”<p>You back up. Then stop. How had you let a thrall gain the initiative like this?<p>“It’s simple, in the end. Follow your orders, catch me, and I’ll make sure we do this again before winter’s over. Maybe next time we see if can tie a noose before you find me. Or, you decide to fail. Stop being the perfect noble knight and get cut up by a, how do you even say it? ek‍-​shit? Whatever. I roll over and accept the next phase of my cult indoctrination, and maybe some day soon, <em>you’ll have a new sister</em>.”<p>Somehow, it made the embrace of nexus sound like a threat. The idea of counting this smug rat among your sisters, sullying your queen’s love by slathering it on‍ ‍‍—<p>(No, you’re forgetting our ways, hiveling. All that emerges from our parascixion is us. Its embrace would only annoy you if‍—)<p><em>Even now, she was already like you.</em><p>“Something went awry,” you said. “Something is wrong.”<p>Marin stood clad in mangy brown fur, wielding a bonesaw. Was it her protrunding teeth or the honed metal edged that was more sharply menacing?<p>Paralyzed you stood before her, torn and gnawed from within.<p>A raptorial knighting in spring. A lone skeleton in deepest darkness. A smile sipping sour blood in autumn, laughing and playing with your hair.<p>Hair that <em>even now</em> was tied in imitation of a long dead human.<p><em>O knight of mine. O Phantasm of mine. In zeal and madness I name you. First hunter! In exscient blood annointed parascix!</em><p><em>Indulge me this torment… If you will not defy me and be corrected, O knight, then I shall satisfy myself leaving this crack in your armor.</em><p>Something went awry‍ ‍‍—‍ somehow you’ve gone astray. What crack brought you low, and who in your hive held this knife to your back? The ill‍-​bescixed nurse? Or‍ ‍‍—‍ had the queen Herself sown what you so wretchedly reap?<p>“It’s you.” (All along‍ ‍‍—‍ it was you.) Marin was hissing. “Everything about you things is wrong.”<p>“Our Queen shall correct me.” That was the refuge, when all else fails. The final gates of faith offering admittance where all else refused. “Both of us.”<p>Strength left your legs when the the thrall lunges at you. Air left‍ ‍‍—‍ screaming‍ ‍‍—‍ through your spiracles when the blade cuts. And the blood left gushing‍ ‍‍—‍ and this apology left cathartic.<p>Her Majesty could correct you both, mend the broken anew, only once the injury presents itself openly.<p>A little defection must be allowed‍ ‍‍—‍ for sometimes sisters fight.</div></article></main><aside class=pointer><div class=center>Part of a series called <em><a href=/vermin/index.html title=->Verminous Experiments</a></em></div><div class=seriesnav><a class=prev href=/vermin/fresh-blood.html title=->← For a Gush of Fresh Bloood</a><a class=next href=/vermin/aether-brain.html title=->Aether Brain Hypothesis →</a></div></aside><footer><a href=#>Top</a> · <a href=/>Home</a> · <a href=/archive.html>Archive</a></footer>]]></content>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title type="html"><![CDATA[For a Gush of Fresh Bloood]]></title>
        <id>https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.org/vermin/fresh-blood.html</id>
        <link href="https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.org/vermin/fresh-blood.html"/>
        <link rel="enclosure" href="https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.orgundefined" type="image//"/>
        <updated>2026-03-27T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
        <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>—O Rancor? Line? (No response.) Where’d you scuttle off to?</p>
<p>Noon sun floated high, but clouds and mist left the grasslands awash in gray. In faint wind, the land roiled like an lake with sharp green waves. The stalks didn’t reach her katathorax — dangerous place for the hive to operate, but such was the only territory left to claim.</p>
<p>By rule, all who left the tunnels by day wore concealing cloaks — and only the upright castes even got that honor. That Trist was granted such a privilege stung like the slightest of insults.</p>]]></summary>
        <content type="html"><![CDATA[<!doctypehtml><meta charset=UTF-8><meta content=width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0 name=viewport><meta content=article property=og:type><link href=/style.css media=all rel=stylesheet><link title="Squiggles Atom Feed"href=/feed.xml rel=alternate type=application/atom+xml><link title="Squiggles JSON Feed"href=/feed.json rel=alternate type=application/feed+json><link href=at://did:plc:ivoe7cntxuy6at7uzmxzs2ft/site.standard.publication/3mfk6cpprzt2t rel=site.standard.publication><link href=at://did:plc:ivoe7cntxuy6at7uzmxzs2ft/site.standard.document/3mpgt64dpze2b rel=site.standard.document><link href=/vermin/vc.css media=all rel=stylesheet><title>For a Gush of Fresh Bloood · Vermin Cathexis
    </title><meta content="For a Gush of Fresh Bloood"property=og:title><meta content="—O Rancor? Line? (No response.) Where’d you scuttle off to? Noon sun floated high, but clouds and mist left the grasslands awash in gray. In faint wind, the land roiled like an lake with sharp green waves. The stalks didn’t reach her katathorax — dangerous place for the hive to operate, but such was the only territory left to claim. By rule, all who left the tunnels by day wore concealing cloaks — and only the upright castes even got that honor. That Trist was granted such a privilege stung like the slightest of insults. "property=og:description><body class="url-/vermin/fresh-blood.html slug-fresh-blood"><header><h1 class=sitehead id=serpentine-squiggles><a href=/>Serpentine Squiggles</a></h1><div class="nav sitenav"><a class=no-notes href=/about.html>About</a><a class=no-notes href=/fiction/>Stories</a><a class=no-notes href=/artwork/>Artwork</a><a class=no-notes href=/games/>Games</a><a class=no-notes href=/music/>Music</a><a class=no-notes href=/essays/>Essays</a><a class=no-notes href=/posts>Posts</a><a class=no-notes href=/archive.html>Archive</a><a class=no-notes href=/contact.html>Contact</a><a class=no-notes data-n href=https://www.patreon.com/snugglesquiggle>Support</a></div></header><aside class=banner><p><strong>Vermin Cathexis</strong>: <span class=nav><span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/vermin/index.html>Index</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>In Vermin Cathexis</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/vermin/about.html>About</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>About Vermin Cathexis</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/vermin/glossary.html>Glossary</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>A Glossary for Vermin</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span></span></aside><main id=main><div class=pagehead><div class=stats><span class=date>2026-03-27</span><span title="2258 words"class=wc>2.3k words</span></div><div class=titleblock><h1 class=heading>For a Gush of Fresh Bloood</h1><div class=subtitle>Étude No. VII: a tryst with rancor</div></div></div><a href=#main id=resetview></a><article><p>‍—O Rancor? Line? (No response.) Where’d you scuttle off to?<p>Noon sun floated high, but clouds and mist left the grasslands awash in gray. In faint wind, the land roiled like an lake with sharp green waves. The stalks didn’t reach her katathorax‍ ‍‍—‍ dangerous place for the hive to operate, but such was the only territory left to claim.<p>By rule, all who left the tunnels by day wore concealing cloaks‍ ‍‍—‍ and only the upright castes even got that honor. That Trist was granted such a privilege stung like the slightest of insults.<p>The grand waves of this choppy green lake crested high‍ ‍‍—‍ and not from wind. The horizon undulated with slow hills. Trist marched across, raptorial scythes cutting down the stalks that impeded her.<p>Each step was a exercise in deliberate balance; she was will‍-​bound to always walk upright in the grasslands by light. All others legs must remain folded up against her katathorax and hidden in her cloak. Likewise her other arms folded up against her anathorax.<p>She unleashed another scything strike, but it gave her pause. Was this against the will? No mortal had raptorial arms, after all‍ ‍‍—‍ but the danger they needed insurance against was being spotted from far away, by travelers or scouts. Underneath the cloak, nothing disguised Trist’s segmented body. (As it should be) Trist thought.<p>And from a distance, would the sweep of her bladed limb not seem like a man wielding a mortal tool? But that logic didn’t convince her. It wasn’t a sure conclusion, and the Queen’s will was to take caution in these matters.<p>(Curious that I was not already will‍-​bound to sheath them, though,) Trist thought. (I’d <em>know</em> if there was rule against it.) Few workers had raptorials, and few risked traveling the grasslands by light, and few were so exhausted by these limits as to strain against them.<p>Trist must be the first; she’d set the precedent.<p>Her palps briefly tap her satisfaction‍ ‍‍—‍ then they droop. She <em>could</em> give herself the leeway, in some vacuous logical sense. But she knew the will. Their Queen was cautious, so Her worker knew the right answer without asking.<p>Raptorials folded up and away, and thee cloak shifted as she snaked out her secondary pair of arms.<p>‍—<em>Assertion,</em> (she strummed her line back to the hive, flagging an idle gyne of the angel caste.)<p>The will would be amended with this corollary.<p>And the next time a soldier bristles at not being able to cut their way through the weeds, they’d be right to curse Trist’s name.<p>While her mind was on her lice, she sung out into the surface’s misty void once more.<p>‍—Rancor? Line? <em>Rancor?</em><p>‍—The fuck you want, Trist?<p>Rancor struck a response with such force that Trist, listening intently for any faint vibration, flinched. Her lice jittered in distress, and a hand went up to her scalp, massaging the holes in her skull.<p>The other chrylurk was <em>much</em> closer than she’d expected, but strummed as loud as she could. Not even a warning. (Bitch,) Trist thought.<p>So Trist grabbed the ephemeral serivane line crossing all the meters between them‍ ‍‍—‍ Rancor stood lower (obscured? no wonder Trist didn’t see her)‍ ‍‍—‍ and <em>tugged</em>. If asked to explain her behavior, Trist was just orienting herself, pulling in the direction of her sister. Forceful? Yes, but she was <em>just so excited</em> to see her, to know she was okay.<p>‍—Where were you! (Trist replied.)<p><em>She</em> was loud, too. Not <em>as</em> loud (she wasn’t a bitch), but she made sure inflict a similar sense of someone shouting inside your skull.<p>‍—Ask my damn lice. I’m hunter. I was hunting. What do you want?<p>‍—An excuse (Trist said, palps tappy.) You know the court won’t even let a drone outside for air unless you give a reason. Oh, <em>caution~</em><p>‍—Duh. I <em>know</em>, so why are you telling me?<p>Now that Trist had a binding to Rancor, she could walk a straight line there. She might have ran, but then Rancor would feel her running.<p>‍—Read between the lines, bitch. <em>Someone</em> keeps untethering herself, so I get to stretch my legs making sure you didn’t get caught in a transmutation circle.<p>‍—Idiot. Dropping lines <em>is</em> caution. Means I won’t get made, and if I do, then I’m saving you girls from going down with me‍—<p>‍—Meaning it’s that much harder to rescue you!<p>‍—‍—which becomes pointless if I get some prancy little knight running after me, leading right back to the hive. And <em>why?</em> Because you can’t go a second without the Queen’s voice in your ear telling you how you’re such smart and special worker?<p>‍—Maybe you should ask <em>my</em> lice. You don’t know the first thing about me.<p>Finally, Trist crested the hill. It dropped down suddenly, and there lay her sister. Her cloak lay brazenly open, exposing her sculpted anathorax and glistening chrysoma. The camouflaged bug crouched by the bank of a creek trickling through the valley, and her claws were full.<p>Rancor had several bloody arms fully of thick, limp coils, a dead snake with red and purple scales. Her moutparts everted, and maxillary scapels dissected the meat of the head while the proboscis licked at the sanguine juices.<p>‍—What’s that?<p>A hand fisted the prey by the neck, flipping it so that its top side was visible. The eyescales above the mouth were cloudy with blood, but then drifting eyes caught what was wrong. It had five <em>extra</em> eyes, all running along its spine, and each still glowed!<p>‍—Chimera (Rancor answered, malice withdrawn from her tone.) Ain’t it a catch? It’s <em>why</em> I was unbound, you know. Lotta miasma and a fucking inmut on this one. Kept my serivane out? Couldn’t have gotten the drop on it.<p>Trist slid down the side of the hill, cloak dirtied in the cloud of dirt she threw up behind her. She approached the chrylurk standing upright, but this close to her sister, she wanted to put down her other legs, to sprawl out like a insect.<p>‍—What does it taste like? (Trist asked.)<p>‍—Get on your knees, say you’re sorry, and I’ll let you lick it.<p>Trist stood up straighter.<p>‍—I ate before I left (she sent.)<p>Rancor clicked her mandibles together. Hands let go of the snake while the proboscis extended, needle‍-​trunk constricting the dead serpent. The long tentacle <em>wrung</em>, so many thin teeth slipping past scale to endow the whole throat of the creature with a necklacce of beading blood.<p>Then, with a sudden rip, she pulled her proboscis back, flesh splitting with the motion’s violence, and spray of blood suspended a dozen tiny droplets in the air. The faint scarlet gush fell upon her head and anathorax.<p>Her wet truck curled up flush against her fangs and mask, leaving a blood‍-​drool that her palps languidly wiped at.<p>‍—Tastes like shit anyway (she said.) Magic’s magic but miasma ain’t got nothing on a good soul. I just like some blood on my tongue.<p>‍—Wizenblight fermentation might be good for it (Trist noted.)<p>The soldier stood in front of the hunter now, and the new arrival was taller. Where Rancor was lithe and graceful, Trist had bulk.<p>‍—Not my problem. I’ll cart it back to the hive and let the wenches worry about how to cook it.<p>‍—You really don’t care, do you? No curiosity about the other castes, nothing but lice and bloodlust in head of yours.<p>‍—And regular lust (Rancor sent, palps tapping, fangs out.)<p>‍—You’re a <em>worker</em>. (Trist crossed her arms.)<p>‍—So? I saw how you were just looking at me, slut. (As she sent it, she leaned toward Trist, wet proboscis unfurling‍ ‍‍—‍ without everting its needles. Her apertures were wide, eyeing the other bug like she’d spotted weakness.) Why don’t you ask your lice who the surrogates practice with~ Wouldn’t mind taking another worker. Maybe you’d loosen up if you got your core‍—<p>‍—Shut up (Trist sent, once more spiking her volume sharply.)<p>‍—You’d cut the line if you really didn’t want to hear it. Do you know who’s ovipositor is longest? Hint: it’s <em>not</em> Lady Arrogance.<p>‍—Fuck off, bitch (she sent, glaring down. Trist was taller than Rancor.)<p>‍—You’re telling <em>me</em> to fuck off? Oh, was <em>I</em> the one who tracked you down while you were doing actual work for the hive? Was <em>I</em> the one literally looking for an excuse to dick around? I forgot, my head’s too full of lust to keep these things straight.<p>Trist turned around and took a step toward the hill she’d just slid down.<p>‍—No (Rancor sent.) Don’t just stomp off as soon as you stop having fun. Of all the reasons you could have made up to go outside, why’d you pick fucking with me?<p>‍—We’re bound. Can’t you figure it out?<p>‍—Meh. I can tell you’re fucking confused and can’t be assed to sort out your feelings. I’m not doing your work for you. Figure yourself out then tell me.<p>Trist grew air into her spiracles, abdomen inflating, then let it whistle out.<p>‍—I <em>was</em> having fun (Trist sent, sending a searching look back at her sister.) Even with you grumping at me. It was cute.<p>‍—Oh, so I was right about how you were looking at me. Got yourself a crush on the scixe huntress?<p>Even as she responded, Trist kept walking away. Distance didn’t end conversations between chrylurks, though it ended something. Rancor remained by the creek.<p>‍—How old are you? Since parascixion?<p>‍—Six or seven years, why?<p>‍—I… I like that. It shows, I mean? In the way you act. Your confidence.<p>‍—Eh, more to it than that. Queen got better about breaking her thralls after me, grooming them to be nice and simpering like you.<p>‍—I’m not <em>simpering</em>. (Her labium pouted outward, unseen. By now she’d reached the base of the hill.)<p>‍—You’re slave to the web and will, though. She likes that, it gets her off. (Quickly, Rancor set down the snake.)<p>‍—It keeps the hive running smoothly!<p>‍—And it’s <em>hot</em>. There’s two parts to it, can’t deny that.<p>As she strummed that, Rancor was finally approaching with swift steps, reflexively adopting ambush‍-​silence. Her primary arm‍ ‍‍—‍ not raptorial‍ ‍‍—‍ reached out to hold Trist high on her anathorax. The larger chrylurk jumped.<p>‍—Hey, Trist? I’m not apologizing, cuz you deserved all that and more for bothering me. But if what you really want is to sit for a bit away from all the drones and bondage, I’d be down for that. (Rancor’s antennae extended out, brushed the cheekplates of Trist’s head.) And just so you know. I meant what I said about letting you lick if you get down on your knees and‍—<p>Trist responded with a labium snapping out, teeth of her lower jaw nipping at the other chrylurk.<p>‍—Ugh! (Her palps were tappy, though.) You almost sounded nice for a second there.<p>‍—I don’t do nice, I just keep the accord.<p>‍—Yeah, I noticed. You’re older than our manners.<p>‍—Surprised a priss like you would fall for me. Queen doesn’t play favorites but… I’m not her favorite, you know?<p>‍—I’m <em>quite</em> familiar with the court’s aesthetics (Trist sent with sharp plucks.) All the scixe girls want to fall in hate with exscient thralls that treat them like vermin! It’s so… fucking… ugh. We’re <em>better</em> than them, you know? So why…<p>Rancor’s grip‍ ‍‍—‍ she hadn’t let go‍ ‍‍—‍ on Trist’s anathorax tightened. Her silken hair was cut short, and the curls grew messier when she shook her head.<p>‍—Idiot. You might as well ask why dogs sniff each other’s butts. Of course ’lurks wanna ram in stinger into exšh’t, egging them up is how the hive grows. ’swhat we’re evolved for.<p>‍—But <em>you</em>… (Trist stopped. Hesitated, then decided to throw herself into the confession.) I knew the rumors about you. I… thought about it‍ ‍‍—‍ even though I knew it wasn’t appropriate for my caste. We’re workers! We aren’t will‍-​bound for reproduction, it’s not our purpose.<p>‍—Don’t piss me off.<p>‍—Ugh, I’m trying to have a moment here! Fine, whatever. <em>You</em> aren’t like them, and that’s what I admire about you. I keep accord with the will but… it starts to feel too much like pretending to be human, sometimes. The point was to get away from all that.<p>“If you’re trying to flatter me,” Rancor growled, jaw unhinging, claws stirring into motion under her cloak. “It’s working.” Her other hands reached out, groping the other chrylurk, and eliciting a sharp breath when they descended to the chrysoma.<p>‍—So yes (Trist finally admitted.) You asked me if I knew who had the biggest ovipositor? I… want to know. Tell me what it’s like.<p>Rancor grinned, mandible parting to show her maw dripping with anticipation.<p>‍—Okay, slut. (Rancor pointed back at the edge of the creek.) C’mere, we’re going to do this with pictures. Length’s one thing, but our ever‍-​alluring Queen made sure to give each of them their own shapes. I’ll make sure you know <em>everything</em> you need to pick the right one.<p>‍—Choose the…? Rancor! I never said I was going to‍—!<p>‍—Right, right. <em>Just curious</em>. And you got so curious you went out looking for me. (Her pharyx, that dark and wriggling organ, lapped up at her drool. Her breath smelled like raw meat.) Maybe I should stop talking then, and see what you resort to when you get <em>more</em> curious.<p>‍—Please.<p>Rancor was walking away from her‍ ‍‍—‍ but the smaller chrylurk hadn’t let go, so Trist was dragged along. They scuttled off together.</article></main><aside class=pointer><div class=center>Part of a series called <em><a href=/vermin/index.html title=->Verminous Experiments</a></em></div><div class=seriesnav><a class=prev href=/vermin/miserable-pen.html title=->← To Furtive Niona</a><a class=next href=/vermin/winter-thrall.html title=->When Winter’s Thrall Eludes →</a></div></aside><footer><a href=#>Top</a> · <a href=/>Home</a> · <a href=/archive.html>Archive</a></footer>]]></content>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title type="html"><![CDATA[To Furtive Niona]]></title>
        <id>https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.org/vermin/miserable-pen.html</id>
        <link href="https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.org/vermin/miserable-pen.html"/>
        <link rel="enclosure" href="https://serpentsquiggles.neocities.orgundefined" type="image//"/>
        <updated>2026-03-26T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
        <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p><strong>To Furtive Niona</strong>:</p>
<p>Oh, miserably do I pick up the pen once more. To think, exscient I was, this exercise ever brought me any mote of joy or satisfaction! How could anyone descry these limp squiggles of ink and find in this anything but locus of limitation and confusion?</p>
<p>I have begun this piece in the posture of a rant, then proceeded accordingly — and that alone is evidence enough of the deficiency, I think. The indignity of a beginning! The insult of a linear procession!</p>]]></summary>
        <content type="html"><![CDATA[<!doctypehtml><meta charset=UTF-8><meta content=width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0 name=viewport><meta content=article property=og:type><link href=/style.css media=all rel=stylesheet><link title="Squiggles Atom Feed"href=/feed.xml rel=alternate type=application/atom+xml><link title="Squiggles JSON Feed"href=/feed.json rel=alternate type=application/feed+json><link href=at://did:plc:ivoe7cntxuy6at7uzmxzs2ft/site.standard.publication/3mfk6cpprzt2t rel=site.standard.publication><link href=at://did:plc:ivoe7cntxuy6at7uzmxzs2ft/site.standard.document/3mpgt64khys26 rel=site.standard.document><link href=/vermin/vc.css media=all rel=stylesheet><title>To Furtive Niona · Vermin Cathexis
    </title><meta content="To Furtive Niona"property=og:title><meta content="To Furtive Niona: Oh, miserably do I pick up the pen once more. To think, exscient I was, this exercise ever brought me any mote of joy or satisfaction! How could anyone descry these limp squiggles of ink and find in this anything but locus of limitation and confusion? I have begun this piece in the posture of a rant, then proceeded accordingly — and that alone is evidence enough of the deficiency, I think. The indignity of a beginning! The insult of a linear procession! "property=og:description><body class="url-/vermin/miserable-pen.html slug-miserable-pen"><header><h1 class=sitehead id=serpentine-squiggles><a href=/>Serpentine Squiggles</a></h1><div class="nav sitenav"><a class=no-notes href=/about.html>About</a><a class=no-notes href=/fiction/>Stories</a><a class=no-notes href=/artwork/>Artwork</a><a class=no-notes href=/games/>Games</a><a class=no-notes href=/music/>Music</a><a class=no-notes href=/essays/>Essays</a><a class=no-notes href=/posts>Posts</a><a class=no-notes href=/archive.html>Archive</a><a class=no-notes href=/contact.html>Contact</a><a class=no-notes data-n href=https://www.patreon.com/snugglesquiggle>Support</a></div></header><aside class=banner><p><strong>Vermin Cathexis</strong>: <span class=nav><span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/vermin/index.html>Index</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>In Vermin Cathexis</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/vermin/about.html>About</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>About Vermin Cathexis</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span> <span class="note joke"><label><input type=checkbox><a class=linknote href=/vermin/glossary.html>Glossary</a><span class=hide>[</span><span class=text>A Glossary for Vermin</span><span class=hide>]</span></label></span></span></aside><main id=main><div class=pagehead><div class=stats><span class=date>2026-03-26</span><span title="4033 words"class=wc>4.0k words</span></div><div class=titleblock><h1 class=heading>To Furtive Niona</h1><div class=subtitle>a letter written; a writing polemic</div></div></div><a href=#main id=resetview></a><article><p><strong>To Furtive Niona</strong>:<p>Oh, miserably do I pick up the pen once more. To think, exscient I was, this exercise ever brought me any mote of joy or satisfaction! How could anyone descry these limp squiggles of ink and find in this anything but locus of limitation and confusion?<p>I have begun this piece in the posture of a rant, then proceeded accordingly‍ ‍‍—‍ and that alone is evidence enough of the deficiency, I think. The indignity of a beginning! The insult of a linear procession!<p>Hardly a fresh insight to bemoan that which prose is incapable of conveying‍ ‍‍—‍ so many authors before me have done it. But as it is with all exscient matters, so comes the cracks of a lie straining at the world’s weight. Even the most proudly human have felt this: those doubts and despairs, that gnawing within: <u>you are broken, you are lacking.</u><p>The lie is that this is a passing woe, that this angst and melancholy can be dismissed with the gusting of a fair wind. It may be smothered, ’tis true, but only in the manner of a momentary lucidity lost to slumber’s dull oceans. You were almost awake. You almost knew.<p>I should stop myself here, back away and reintroduce. This letter finds you unprompted, that I predict. I know you have in yourself wonder enough to read it anyway. Even as your brow creases in bemusement‍ ‍‍—‍ is this pamphlet much more than some drunkard stopping you in the street and slurring solicitation?<p>Yet part of myself dares scheme that, just one page into this soliloquy, you have already startled in dim recognition. We’ve written to each other often enough in a past life‍ ‍‍—‍ yes, if something seems implaceably familiar here, that is because <u>it is</u>.<p>Well, past life for myself‍ ‍‍—‍ you are still living it!<p>Our reports from back the city only recount the trivialities of harvest and elections, rather than the more intriguing gossip of students, so I have no idea if you are still page for those god‍-​botherers. I do not know if they found some incriminating bloodstain or purulent discharge in my quarters.<p>I disappeared, that much no one could have missed (or was I truly so forgettable?) but I can only speculate what was speculated. If it is a mystery to you… have you already guessed? Did you have your suspicions?<p>Hint or revelation, but the answer is written in a stray word choice in the first paragraph. You’ll find it in no dictionary, but a witchfinder’s rulebook or mayhaps a physicians diagnostic notes. None speak of “exscient” but those suffering from terminal exposure to the chrylurk. Worm! Demon! Parasite!<p>I prefer “parascix,” but I shall not nag you. I’m sure you get enough of that from the temple you write for‍ ‍‍—‍ you’ve complained often enough. I remember, I am still <u>me</u>, though bugshell clads my flesh now and my mouth splits into the most delightful array of tendrils. I rejoice‍ ‍‍—‍ but I shall not subject you to a sermon on my rebirth and salvation, nor plead apologetics for all the crime my sisters stand accused. I am sure you get enough of the like.<p>But if not that, what shall I write next? I could of course ask‍ ‍‍—‍ already I have implied my interest‍ ‍‍—‍ in learning just how you are holding up these days. But you get sick of that, I remember. One doesn’t buy as many novels as you do because one is fain to dwell on their lot in life.<p>Efficient note‍-​taking (what shall a scribe aspire to, but efficiency?) means only writing what is new, what cannot be inferred. Do you still apply that principle to correspondence? Demand none speak to you unless they have something impressively <u>new</u> to say?<p>(It is a rule so easily circumvented, did I ever tell you that? One easily produces novelty by simple inversion‍ ‍‍—‍ hence our arguments. You were like a fish spotting a worm. Hence you opening this letter, provenance unknown, hence you <u>continuing</u> to read this letter, even past the confession that this is the blasphemous diatribe of a pretender‍-​usurper to mortal flesh. The temple would abhor your roving eyes‍ ‍‍—‍ I’m sure you get enough of that.)<p>Where was I? I had asked that rhetorical question‍ ‍‍—‍ what next? (I have an idea; an inversion: not unlike the easiest thing to debate you about: whether I had in fact said something novel, or whether we were in fact arguing.) But even with an idea, there is the question of how to approach it, bridge to where my logic had leapt‍ ‍‍—‍ oh, the indignity of beginning.<p>Such indecision is another limitation. The hive cannot aid me in this, for none possessed any training as a scribe before their parascixion (few even attained literacy) and what could the medium offer them now, held and fed in the bosom of our nexus abound?<p>I have begun this piece in a miserable place‍ ‍‍—‍ oh how easily could one dismiss these as the ravings of a madwoman. A comparison springs so readily mind. Some fiend partakes of a mushroom or chemical admixture, and with eyes dilated they recount visions too sublime for words, insights far beyond containment in sober consciousness.<p>How am I any different? You exscient know the chrylurk’s mandibular fang as an instrument for administering mind‍-​numbing dosages. I shall not spill ink debating these charges. Again, I do not write to wallow in skeptical exšh’t. I address you because‍ ‍‍—‍ exscient I was, fond of petty debates I was‍ ‍‍—‍ you trusted me. Does any of that care yet remain? Listen to me!<p>I have decried at length the medium in which I write‍ ‍‍—‍ you must understandably be curious as to which I would prefer. Perhaps one presumes <u>writing</u> of any sort is itself atavistic for our kind‍ ‍‍—‍ why write for if, need we to tell ourselves what we think… well, we already know.<p>But such logic would be tantamount to deciding ink worthless for the existence of voice. No, a record of thought achieves something marvelous, and this is true for mortal and chrylurk alike. Yes, by the accord we share, each of the hive can know what all know. But we are not exempt from the nature of learning.<p>When instructing a student, (or what is the same thing, addressing any interlocutor), you must appraise the canvas on which you shall paint, determining what forms are already present, and then you shall apply the brushstrokes one after another, and with each application re‍-​appraising to ensure that the image to be inscribed has in fact grown more clear.<p>Our kind is far more fit for this intercourse than any mortal‍ ‍‍—‍ we can more keenly appraise ourselves, we can more delicately line the canvas‍ ‍‍—‍ but none of this suffices to reduce the task to something as reflexive as, say, unlidding your eyes and witnessing the world in the span of a single heartbeat.<p>My training as a scribe has not gone unused since my parascixion. Indeed, our Queen has esteemed me (!) as the highest maid of our accord for what I have accomplished in organizing and polishing precís of our silk‍-​sung transmissions.<p>What writing <u>is</u>, at its core, is the refinement of that task of instruction I have furnished so long an analogy for. The record is a device that automates the explanatory task. A well‍-​written introduction establishes a context‍-​canvas suitable to limn the message itself.<p>You must be wondering how chrylurk writing actually looks? I am writing this while perched upon my web; my inked claws are scratching onto a square of fungal fruiting body chewed and spat out by our drones, left to dry in the sun. (Oh, does this page suddenly feel curdled in your hand?)<p>Belongings lay arrayed around me, some hanging by hooks, others suspended by a binding of sticky thread I spun myself.<p>Among those that hang are bundles of flat clay hexes we call framelinks. If you found one and examined it, pulling apart each grid‍-​like frame, you might at length think to compare it to a book or perhaps a flagpole (flagrope?) bearing many, many banners.<p>Instead of a book’s spine, these bundles are joined by a single thread running through an adjoining loop at the corner of each frame. That thread is many times longer than needed to bind the hexes together. You, exscient, might think this makes the device more flimsy, or awkward to handle.<p>No, this is key to its brilliance. First I must explain how our writing itself is inscribed. For even if you intuited its nature as a bug‍-​book, the framelink would challenge a curious mortal.<p>Each “page” of a framelink is a grid of hexagonal cells, small hooked pegs emerging from each corner. The frame itself is molded exoderm, our wax blended with clay to form a suitable skeleton, pinched quite thin for sake of volume but sturdy enough if handled with care.<p>Again, what is the medium? An obvious answer is the well‍-​known industry of our hives‍ ‍‍—‍ spinning silk. We cut strands from our hair and pin them to the pages. The figures form thereby as they cross over the cells, the knots and self‍-​intersections, these are the letters of our alphabet.<p>Again: even if you know or guess the nature of the framelink as a book, it would still challenge you.<p>All know the plight of walking a path near folliage only to feel the tickle of unseen threads‍ ‍‍—‍ yes, even a keen mortal eye peering would struggle to discern silk on air alone.<p>Particularly in a framelink used for one hiveling’s fleeting thoughts and notes, the threads traced between the pegs may been thin indeed. This poses little difficulty to a chrylurk’s eye; simply direct a shimmerbug to perch atop a frame and cast its illumination. Record‍-​silk so winsomely scintilates in alterlight, and our ocelli easily catches its glint.<p>So far all I have described is an eccentric format: a new style of binding books, a new alphabet to encipher language.<p>Notice an important difference, though. Your ink soaks into your paper. It is <u>contained within the pages</u>. Our silk is bound to our framelinks, but nevertheless lies on top, outside. Chiefly, our lines run between one cell to its adjacent, sketching out each lettershape, much like a cursive script. But it is not enclosed.<p>Ink lies inside the page, and a book contains many distinct pages‍ ‍‍—‍ whatever line your pen traces, then, cannot escape its bondage. But our silk? It is a rather trivial matter to hook a thread to one frame and pull it onto another entirely. This is natural.<p>Familiar as I am with exscient writings, I know how you struggle with cross‍-​references. Footnotes, indices, tables of contents, all of these are left with to the awkward, primitive bidding of recalling and matching reference numbers. An arm points vaguely and the eye must cast about for a mark.<p>Nevermind that such things are finishing touches only a finalized volume can truly indulge in. I cannot say, “go to page 56,” when the manuscript‍-​to‍-​be still wriggles in its chrysalis. The pages between shift in number, the address is in flux. I could give name to the section, and then my future index shall serve to translate such section names to page numbers‍ ‍‍—‍ and take note of how we have added yet another step to this process!‍ ‍‍—‍ but more damning at all, is that the exercise itself is defeating.<p>In the opening of this treatise, I called out the insult of linear procession. This is infelicitous‍ ‍‍—‍ misleading. Exscient writing is not <u>linear</u>, that is only the silhouette visible from afar. Put more finely, to think this is so mirrors exactly the misunderstanding the defines “exscient” as “not of chrylurk.”<p>The exscient believes in separation, clings to its alienation and one‍-​ness, and this is a lie. You wretches are wrong to think this! Our embrace extends to all beings. Nothing can achieve (nor come forth already in) the state of being “not of chrylurk” because a chrylurk has attained the ideal state of nature, of existence.<p>The exscient deserve parascixion; they have a most dire need of it!<p>Likewise misled is one who believes we are responsible for “transforming” or “corrupting” our thralls‍ ‍‍—‍ no, in the hive they find reprieve from an ache present in all prior existence.<p>(I do loathe that alchemists have stolen and reserved the word “compleat” for that disgusting stasis. Else I might describe a chrylurk as a mortal balmed of its larval incompleteness.)<p>In this digression I have given you an unwitting demonstration of exactly what relevance my rhapsodic entreaties for parascixion have to the topic of writing.<p>You know the style: writing replete with tangents and asides‍ ‍‍—‍ a frustration to some and a fruit for others. Suppose I wished to give my reader a chance to skip over such a literary organ, embedded within a text that naturally begot it (and so shunting it off to be a true <u>appendix</u> would be butchery), yet ultimately circling after making at best a corollary point.<p>In an informal piece like this letter, I have permission to simply sprawl out, though to merely <u>clarify</u>, I must repeatedly apologize. “Anyway.” “But I digress.” “Let us return to prior matters.”<p>What is this but a gesture akin to a hand reaching out, longing to touch what it is cut off from‍ ‍‍—‍ a text wishing to flow at once down two paths onward, one looping back to the start. This is utterly natural to present in thread‍-​weaving‍ ‍‍—‍ but in page‍-​bound ink?<p>As said, the task of maintaining consistent indices and reference numbers is so involved that it must meet a certain standard of utility. Certainly none would fret over a brief aside a few paragraphs long.<p>The freedom of the framelink, then, is that this dilemma is erased. You are not forced to cut asides, dissever them from their context, or flinch from the stylistic indignity, the perception of being a writer that cannot keep one’s asides in check.<p>Remember that thread which binds the frames together? It is no more relevant to the reading experience than the binding of a book. The title on the spine has organization utility, and it protects the pages from abrasive elements, but it all can be mostly forgotten once one loses oneself in its contents.<p><u>Mostly</u>, but the binding shapes the reading experience in a key way: each page exists in numbered sequence, coming before one and after another.<p>A framelink, though? The thread is tied into a knot for convenience, but may be undone and tugged right out of the frame‍-​loops. Remember: silk can span pages. If a passage cannot be contained in a single frame, it simply links to its continuation.<p>In this way, the whole record‍-​web of a framelink can unfurl once the binding thread is removed. An aside no longer interrupts a text: it presents a fork that the reader is free to pursue or ignore.<p>Of course, again mortals are challenged. I have been responsible for composing and revising volumes with hundreds of such framelinks. Imagine such an object, if you would. Hundreds of paper pages pierced by threads linking them to other pages. Are you daunted by the tapestry, the prospect of tracing a single line through the maze of silk?<p>But a chrylurk is never alone; swarmlings abound, and to read means to puppet a spiderlouse, send it abseiling down to the frame to trace the silk thread with a tiny skittering body well‍-​suited to the task. It is hardly much thicker than the thread itself. When it finds the linked frame, I know as duly as if I had finger pinching a referenced page. (For what are my lice but my scurrying fingers?)<p>I’m sure this doesn’t assuage all exscient concerns. Do you worry it all would tangle so disastrously? But serivane does not <u>tangle</u>. Spiderlice likewise excel at the task of managing wires, pulling them through the ghostly space beyond the tyranny of matter‍-​never‍-​intersecting.<p>Are you beginning to see how thoroughly, how intricately we have improved this medium? Do you understand now how miserable it is to pick up the pen once more?<p>Beside me, I have linked correspondence with my beloved progenitor. Framelinks exchanged between me and her. Before I even open it can I smell her musk on the lines, floral and stinging‍-​sharp (silk so readily absorbs our pheromones). Intent wafts from the lines‍ ‍‍—‍ I can scent a faint frustration. It is a letter granting me her permission to make contact with a promising exscient, but even so she cannot disguise her distaste for me spending time on you instead of efforts more likely to enrich the hive.<p>You, Niona, can understand none of this. You’ll receive this letter, and even if my scents cling to the page, it’ll likely be nothing to your nose but a pungent, suspicious odor. Do you grasp now the blank awkwardness of a page, if woven silk proudly, nakedly bears its inception? (I suppose I should be thankful‍ ‍‍—‍ this won’t reveal what I feel, how dearly I miss you.)<p>But I have mislead you. It is not my progenitor’s <u>letter</u> I hold beside me, it is <u>our correspondence</u>. Implicit in how I earlier described the incidental nature of the binding: nothing stops you from bundling a framelink with new frames.<p>This correspondence contains a back and forth exchange we’ve engaged in. Why separate them, or waste words quoting and gesturing when our silk can interlace? (I confess my heart still swoons to think of it. How long since my parascixion, that I still feel my pulse race when my antennae soak in that perfume…)<p>All these pages I have written‍ ‍‍—‍ I certainly feel I have done little to truly convey to you what our records portray‍ ‍‍—‍ but perhaps the most glaring hole is that all I wrote I have written about the form: the layout of our pages, the branching flow of our passages.<p>But there’s a difference in content, too. The exscient is false, and when I write in this exscient manner I feel I once more traffic in falsity. An acute dysphoria grips me the longer this goes on.<p>To branch is one thing‍ ‍‍—‍ but to live in the hive is to unmoor yourself from the one‍-​track flow these ink squiggles imply. This text speaks of “I”‍ ‍‍—‍ but who is that? There is only We. There is only Her.<p>(Some of my angst is how false it <u>isn’t</u>. When I write of you and the scribe I was, when I rotate these abstractions of philosophy, who in my hive truly stands besides me? My progenitor is here, watching me write these words, and she tells me to imagine her labium striking out to pin my worrying palps, pharyx slithering in to enwrap my own, just as her bigger, stronger limbs likewise enwrap me, squeezing, a hug that wrings all the doubts‍ ‍‍—‍ and she promises that the real thing waits to reward me when I have finished this. “But never forget I’m here now,” she tells me. “I’m listening, and I certainly understand you even if I think this exšh’t is a waste of our time.” And now she is berating me for transcribing this exchange, but I think it illustrates a relevant point, and now she is telling me to imagine the sharp teeth on that labium biting me.)<p>I cringe to convey the above in the style of the exscient. Here, it is another aside, and you know that much without me telling you. But what I do have to <u>tell</u> you is the… the ineffable <u>hive</u>‍-​ness of it all. She has siphon‍-​tips in the neck of her thrall right now (hence why such physical displays were on her mind‍ ‍‍—‍ though it is of course quite in‍-​character for her), and she hardly missed a beat in her restraint of the rather brutish and uncooperative brat that she’s been busy bescixing this month.<p>(That “brat” is vulgar of me‍ ‍‍—‍ but it isn’t me, it’s her, and she is doing less now to disguise her presence in our mind, perhaps as revenge for transcribing her flirtations. No, she claims it’s reassurance after I confessed my loneliness. But again I include this passage for illustration‍ ‍‍—‍ and it would hardly be illustrative if only <u>one</u> thing were on her mind. Oh, again she wishes to bite me.)<p>Seen through the eyes of a philosopher, there is nothing profoundly different between the clumsy page‍-​number cross‍-​referencing in exscient volumes and the direct lines found in a framelink.<p>And there is nothing profoundly different between me telling you what my progenitor is doing while I write, what she is thinking in counterpoint to what I think, and yet it all feels quite confused here.<p>One word after another. One page after another. The indignity, the insult. A chrylurk shouldn’t have to stand this. (“Fufufu.” My progenitor demands I transcribe her laugh, if I am to transcribe everything else. “What did I tell you?”)<p>Again my hands and eyes turn to the corresponding beside me. Our exchange of letters: more like two intimate centipedes lost in a tangle of limbs. Is it a back and forth, or is it more like a building erected layer by layer, only instead of floors resting on those below, these framelink, passed betweena us, accrued layers of commentary and reference. We wrote it together, and a literate chrylurk could fluently navigate all those dimensions of expression.<p>Where does it begin? First I submitted the inquiry that was impetus for this all. It concluded with a royal decree that will be quoted and submitted to our archives‍ ‍‍—‍ that, more than anything else, is the first and last thing other bugs will read. In the process of elaborating our intents, I relayed a summary of my past interactions with you‍ ‍‍—‍ chronologically, this comes first! But perhaps my progenitor’s arguments, which invoked precedents and wisdoms from Her Majesty Herself. From that abstract remove, yes, one could certainly begin an exposition there.<p>Were I to translate that silk to ink, I would have to chose one perspective and orient the whole endeavor around it. It would make a massacre of us.<p>Exscient, you may argue that regardless of whether the text itself provides a demarcated beginning, you must begin somewhere. One frame is always read first, and then another, and certainly some frame is more fit for such a task, providing more clarity, and ultimately one must be the most fit at all. Find that frame, and you have the ideal beginning.<p>Yet spiderlice can do more than just trace links to their destination. I could dump a swarm onto a set of frames, and at once attain awareness of each one, much in the way that a painting viewed from across the room presents its entire expanse save the details.<p>My lice would discern the structure‍ ‍‍—‍ noticing at once if there is some central node from which all others emerge, like little worms from their eggs‍ ‍‍—‍ and in general notice if a clear starting point presents itself.<p>But this all is a quibble. I cannot escape the accusation that any one reader (if one is to read a piece alone; yet two can read) must always make a choice of which frame is read first and how. But <u>that</u> is the freedom I cherish. I make a choice. (A decisive retort: there is no ideal start as such; only ideal <u>for a given reader</u>.)<p>And that correspondence with my progenitor‍ ‍‍—‍ it was interwoven; there is no beginning because we together have interpreted and reinterpreted its meaning.<p>But I do not weave now‍ ‍‍—‍ I write to you. Now in prose, I speak authoritatively, I command, when I would much rather dance with you. (…to speak to the exscient, you must speak exscient…)<p>So this is, ultimately, an invitation. It would be beautiful, no, poetic, were you to join me in parascixion.<p><strong>Forevermore Hers,<span class=break><br> </span><span class=tab></span>Vanity née Mallow</strong></article></main><aside class=pointer><div class=center>Part of a series called <em><a href=/vermin/index.html title=->Verminous Experiments</a></em></div><div class=seriesnav><a class=prev href=/vermin/hive-bound.html title=->← A Student Asunder</a><a class=next href=/vermin/fresh-blood.html title=->For a Gush of Fresh Bloood →</a></div></aside><footer><a href=#>Top</a> · <a href=/>Home</a> · <a href=/archive.html>Archive</a></footer>]]></content>
    </entry>
</feed>